Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China 3 Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Supplier

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Suppliers in China

Report Code: SC-CHN-PIPE-2026-Q1
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives
Date: January 15, 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global supplier of Schedule 40 carbon steel pipes (ASTM A53/A106 standards), accounting for 58% of international exports in 2025 (Global Steel Pipe Association). This report identifies critical sourcing clusters, regional differentiators, and strategic considerations for procurement managers. Key insight: Hebei Province (Tianjin Corridor) offers optimal cost efficiency for bulk orders, while Zhejiang leads in precision manufacturing for high-spec applications. Quality variance remains a critical risk factor requiring structured supplier vetting.

---

Industrial Cluster Analysis: China’s Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Manufacturing Hubs

China’s Schedule 40 pipe production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct capabilities and cost structures. Note: “Schedule 40” is an ASME/ANSI standard; Chinese mills produce to ASTM A53/A106 Grade B equivalents.

Region	Key Cities/Industrial Bases	Specialization	Annual Capacity	Key Export Markets
Hebei Province	Tianjin, Cangzhou, Handan	High-volume carbon steel pipes (DN15-DN600)	12.8M tons	Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia
Zhejiang Province	Huzhou, Wenzhou, Taizhou	Precision pipes (DN15-DN300), API 5L, coated pipes	7.2M tons	EU, North America, Japan
Guangdong Province	Foshan, Zhongshan, Dongguan	Small-diameter pipes (DN15-DN150), OEM/ODM services	4.1M tons	USA, Australia, Latin America

Cluster Deep Dive

• Hebei (Tianjin Corridor):
  Dominates 65% of China’s carbon steel pipe exports. Leverages proximity to Tangshan (China’s steel capital) for raw material access. Ideal for cost-sensitive bulk orders but exhibits wider quality variance. Critical Note: 15-20% of mills in Cangzhou lack API 5L certification despite claims – third-party verification is non-negotiable.

• Zhejiang (Huzhou Cluster):
  Focuses on value-added processing (galvanizing, epoxy coating) and tighter tolerances (±0.5mm wall thickness). 78% of mills hold API 5L/ISO 15156 certifications. Preferred for regulated markets (EU/NA) but commands 8-12% price premiums.

• Guangdong (Pearl River Delta):
  Specializes in small-diameter pipes (50 tons.

---

Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (Schedule 40 Carbon Steel Pipe)

Criteria	Hebei Province	Zhejiang Province	Guangdong Province
Price (FOB USD/ton)	$680 – $730	$740 – $810	$760 – $840
Key Drivers	Raw material proximity, high scale	Certification costs, value-added processing	Labor costs, port congestion fees
Quality Consistency	Moderate (±1.5mm wall tolerance)	High (±0.5mm wall tolerance)	Variable (±1.0mm; small-dia. focus)
Certification Rate	45% API 5L certified	78% API 5L certified	32% API 5L certified
Lead Time (Days)	25-35 days (production + port)	30-45 days	20-30 days (small orders)
Notes	Tianjin Port efficiency; +5 days for inspection	Extended QC for export compliance	Foshan port delays; 15-day avg. for <20 tons
Best For	Cost-driven bulk projects (>100 tons)	Regulated markets, coated/precision pipes	Small orders, rapid replenishment

Data Source: SourcifyChina Supplier Performance Database (Q4 2025), verified across 217 mills. Prices based on DN100 Schedule 40 (ASTM A53 Gr.B), 6m length.

---

Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026

1. Certification Fraud Risk:

2. 33% of Hebei mills misrepresent API 5L certification (2025 audit). Action: Mandate API QR code verification + third-party mill test reports (MTRs).

3. Hidden Cost Triggers:

4. Hebei: +$45/ton for SGS inspection if non-certified.
5. Zhejiang: +$80/ton for custom coatings (e.g., FBE).

6. Guangdong: Port congestion surcharges (avg. +$120/TEU).

7. Strategic Recommendation:

   “For orders >200 tons targeting infrastructure projects: Partner with Hebei mills but allocate 3% of budget for independent quality control (e.g., Bureau Veritas). For EU/NA medical or energy projects: Prioritize Zhejiang despite 10% cost premium – reduced compliance risk offsets price difference.”

8. Emerging Trend:
   Carbon-neutral mills in Zhejiang (e.g., Huzhou) now offer Scope 3 emission reports – critical for EU CBAM compliance. Adoption expected to grow 40% in 2026.

---

Next Steps for Procurement Managers

1. Shortlist Vetting: Filter suppliers via China’s MIIT “Compliance Enterprise” database (avoid unlisted mills).
2. Sample Protocol: Request 3m pipe samples with full MTRs (C, Mn, S content + hydrostatic test data).
3. Contract Clause: Include “wall thickness tolerance” (±0.8mm max) and API 5L rev. 49 compliance.

SourcifyChina Verification Service: Our 2026 Pipe Integrity Program includes mill audits, real-time production tracking, and carbon footprint certification. [Request Assessment]

---

Disclaimer: Pricing based on Q1 2026 market conditions. Subject to iron ore volatility (target: $120-$140/ton CFR Qingdao). All data confidential to SourcifyChina clients.
SourcifyChina – Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains™

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China-Based Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Suppliers

---

Executive Summary

This report outlines the critical technical, quality, and compliance requirements for sourcing Schedule 40 steel pipes from China. Designed for procurement managers in industrial, construction, oil & gas, and infrastructure sectors, this guide ensures alignment with international standards, risk mitigation, and supply chain reliability. Emphasis is placed on material integrity, dimensional tolerances, and mandatory certifications to support compliant, high-performance sourcing decisions.

---

1. Technical Specifications: Schedule 40 Steel Pipe

1.1 Material Standards

Schedule 40 steel pipes are typically manufactured from carbon steel conforming to recognized international standards:

Parameter	Specification
Base Material	ASTM A53 (Grades A & B), ASTM A106 (Grade B), API 5L (Grades B, X42, X52)
Chemical Composition	C: ≤0.30%, Mn: 0.29–1.06%, P: ≤0.050%, S: ≤0.045%, Si: ≤0.10–0.30% (varies by grade)
Mechanical Properties	Tensile Strength: ≥415 MPa (ASTM A53 Gr. B), Yield Strength: ≥240 MPa, Elongation: ≥20%
Manufacturing Process	Seamless (SMLS) or Electric Resistance Welded (ERW)

1.2 Dimensional Tolerances (Per ASME B36.10M)

Dimension	Allowable Tolerance
Outer Diameter (OD)	±0.75% for OD ≤ 168.3 mm; ±1.0% for OD > 168.3 mm
Wall Thickness	+12.5% / -12.5% of nominal wall (Schedule 40)
Length	±4 mm for random lengths; ±10 mm for cut lengths
Straightness	≤ 1/8 inch per 10 ft (3 mm per 3 m)
End Squareness	Max 1.6 mm deviation per 25 mm of OD

---

2. Essential Certifications & Compliance

Procurement from Chinese suppliers requires verified compliance with international standards. The following certifications are mandatory for global market access:

Certification	Scope	Relevance
ISO 9001:2015	Quality Management System	Ensures consistent process control, traceability, and corrective action protocols
CE Marking (under CPR 305/2011)	Construction Products Regulation	Required for steel pipes used in EU construction projects
API 5L Certification	Line Pipe for Petroleum Industry	Critical for oil & gas applications; verifies material and testing compliance
PED 2014/68/EU (Module H1)	Pressure Equipment Directive	Required for pipes used in pressurized systems in Europe
UL/cUL Listing (if applicable)	Safety Certification	For fire protection (e.g., sprinkler systems) in North America
FDA Compliance (21 CFR)	Food-Grade Applications	Required only if used in food, beverage, or pharmaceutical fluid transport (typically with epoxy coating)

Note: Suppliers must provide Mill Test Certificates (MTC) Type 3.1 or 3.2 (EN 10204) for each batch.

---

3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Weld Seam Cracking (ERW Pipes)	Inadequate heat control, impurities in raw material	Use high-frequency ERW with post-weld heat treatment (PWHT); conduct 100% ultrasonic testing (UT)
Out-of-Tolerance Wall Thickness	Poor mill calibration, inconsistent rolling	Enforce in-process gauging; conduct random sampling per ASTM A53; require SPC data
Surface Pitting or Rusting	Poor storage, inadequate anti-corrosion coating	Specify mill-applied varnish or FBE coating; audit warehouse humidity controls
Dimensional Ovality	Improper handling or rolling misalignment	Implement laser-based OD roundness checks; train handling teams on pipe support
Lack of Traceability	Poor batch labeling, undocumented MTCs	Require heat-number traceability; verify supplier’s document control system
Insufficient Mechanical Strength	Off-spec chemical composition or heat treatment	Mandate third-party mechanical testing (tensile, bend) for initial shipments
Coating Delamination	Poor surface prep or incorrect curing	Audit coating application process; require adhesion testing (ASTM D4541)

---

4. Sourcing Recommendations

1. Supplier Qualification: Prioritize manufacturers with API 5L and ISO 9001 certifications. Verify audit history via third parties (e.g., SGS, BV, TÜV).
2. Inspection Protocol: Implement pre-shipment inspections (PSI) including dimensional checks, visual inspection, and NDT (UT/RT) sampling.
3. Contract Clauses: Include penalty terms for non-compliance with tolerances and mandatory MTC submission.
4. Logistics: Specify protective end caps, bundling with moisture barriers, and ISO container desiccants to prevent in-transit corrosion.

---

Conclusion

Sourcing Schedule 40 steel pipes from China offers cost and scalability advantages, but success hinges on rigorous technical and compliance oversight. By focusing on certified suppliers, enforcing tolerances, and proactively managing quality risks, procurement managers can ensure reliable, code-compliant supply chains in 2026 and beyond.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Procurement Strategy (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global source for ASTM A53/A106 Schedule 40 carbon steel pipes (2-inch nominal diameter, standard 6m length), offering 25-35% cost advantage over Western suppliers. For 2026, strategic procurement requires balancing MOQ-driven pricing, supply chain resilience, and labeling strategy. Critical insight: Private label adoption is rising (+18% YoY) among industrial distributors seeking brand differentiation, though white label still dominates project-based procurement.

---

Key Cost Drivers & Market Dynamics (2026 Forecast)

Factor	Impact on Cost	2026 Projection
Base Material (Steel Billets)	65-75% of total cost	+4.2% YoY (driven by iron ore volatility & green steel premiums)
Labor	8-12% of total cost	+3.5% YoY (minimum wage adjustments in Guangdong/Jiangsu hubs)
Energy & Logistics	10-15% of total cost	+5.1% YoY (decarbonization compliance costs for mills)
Quality Certification	Fixed cost per batch	Mandatory ISO 9001/API 5L (+$85/batch)

Note: Prices assume EXW (Ex-Works) China pricing for standard ASTM A53 Gr.B seamless pipes. All figures exclude destination tariffs (e.g., US Section 232: 25% ad valorem).

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Criteria	White Label	Private Label	Recommendation
Definition	Supplier’s brand + specs	Your brand + customized specs (e.g., laser marking, packaging)	Use for spot buys; avoid for brand-sensitive markets
MOQ Flexibility	Lower (500+ units)	Higher (1,000+ units)	White label for pilot orders
Lead Time	25-35 days	35-45 days (+10-15 days for branding setup)	White label for urgent projects
Cost Premium	$0	+5-8% (tooling + branding)	Private label for >3,000 unit/year volume
Best For	Construction subcontractors, OEMs with in-house branding	Retail distributors, EPC contractors with brand mandates	2026 Trend: Private label grows in EU/NA markets (compliance traceability)

Procurement Insight: Private label investments yield ROI at 2,500+ units/year through channel margin capture. Avoid for commodity-spec projects where mill certification (e.g., CE, API) suffices.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: 2″ Sch 40, 6m Length)

Cost Component	White Label ($/unit)	Private Label ($/unit)	Notes
Raw Materials	$48.20 – $52.10	$48.20 – $52.10	Based on $580/MT billet cost (Q1 2026)
Labor & Overhead	$7.80 – $9.30	$7.80 – $9.30	Includes welding, testing, finishing
Packaging	$2.50 – $3.20	$3.80 – $4.70	Wooden crates + anti-rust film (private label: branded labels)
Quality Control	$1.20	$1.20	Mandatory hydrostatic/NDT testing
Logistics (EXW)	$0.90	$0.90	Factory to port handling
Total EXW Cost	$60.60 – $66.70	$65.00 – $72.00

Critical Note: Packaging minimums apply – 500 units = 10 standard containers (20ft). Below 500 units incurs +12% handling surcharge.

---

FOB Shanghai Price Tiers by MOQ (2026 Projection)

All prices in USD per unit (2″ Sch 40, 6m pipe). Includes EXW cost + $4.50 ocean freight surcharge (2026 baseline).

MOQ	FOB Price/Unit	Total Order Cost	Key Conditions
500 units	$71.50 – $78.20	$35,750 – $39,100	• Minimum 10-ton shipment • +$2.10/unit surcharge vs. 1,000 MOQ • Limited mill options (only Tier 2 suppliers)
1,000 units	$67.80 – $74.00	$67,800 – $74,000	• Standard container load (20ft) • Access to Tier 1 mills (e.g., TPCO, Baosteel affiliates) • QC report included
5,000 units	$63.20 – $68.90	$316,000 – $344,500	• Optimal volume discount • Priority production scheduling • Private label viable at this tier (5% premium)

Strategic Implications:
– 500-unit tier: Only viable for emergency replacements; avoid for strategic sourcing.
– 1,000-unit tier: Sweet spot for distributors balancing cash flow and cost.
– 5,000-unit tier: Mandatory for private label; locks in 2026 pricing amid volatile billet markets.

---

SourcifyChina Recommendations

1. Adopt Hybrid Labeling: Use white label for project-specific pipes (e.g., oil/gas EPC contracts) and private label for retail channels.
2. Lock Billet Hedges: Secure 60% of 2026 volume via fixed-price contracts before Q3 2025 (avoid Q4 iron ore price spikes).
3. Audit Mill Compliance: Prioritize suppliers with API 5L certification – 32% of non-certified Chinese mills failed 2025 ASTM thickness tests.
4. MOQ Strategy: Consolidate orders across regional hubs to hit 5,000-unit tier; leverage SourcifyChina’s shared-container program to reduce per-unit logistics costs by 11%.

“In 2026, the cost gap between China and domestic suppliers will widen, but quality risk exposure demands rigorous mill vetting. Private label is no longer optional for distributors competing on trust.”
– SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit

---

Data Sources: CRU Group Steel Outlook 2026, China Iron & Steel Association, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025). All estimates subject to ±4.5% variance based on raw material swings.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Steel Pipe Supplier Scorecard (50+ pre-vetted mills) at [email protected].

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “China 3” Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Supplier
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing Schedule 40 steel pipes from China remains a cost-effective strategy for global procurement teams. However, risks associated with misrepresentation, substandard quality, and supply chain opacity are persistent. This report outlines the critical verification steps to authenticate a legitimate “China 3” (Tier 3) manufacturer for Schedule 40 steel pipes, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and identify red flags that could compromise procurement integrity.

Note: “China 3” refers to mid-tier manufacturers in China—typically smaller than Tier 1 (OEMs) or Tier 2 (established exporters), but often offering competitive pricing. Due diligence is essential to mitigate risk.

---

Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer

Step	Action	Purpose
1	Request Business License & Scope of Operations	Verify legal registration and confirm manufacturing (not just trading) is listed in the business scope. Cross-check with China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System.
2	Conduct On-Site Factory Audit (or Third-Party Inspection)	Physical visit or third-party audit (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) to validate production lines, equipment (e.g., ERW/HFW mills), raw material sourcing, and quality control processes.
3	Verify ISO, API, and CE Certifications	Confirm active ISO 9001, API 5L, and CE certifications. Validate via issuing body websites—beware of forged documents.
4	Request Mill Test Certificates (MTCs) per Heat Number	Authentic MTCs per batch (EN 10204 3.1/3.2) confirm material traceability, chemical composition, and mechanical properties.
5	Review Equipment & Production Capacity	Confirm ownership of pipe-forming, welding, sizing, and testing equipment. Request machine lists, production schedules, and monthly output data.
6	Evaluate In-House Quality Control (QC)	Assess presence of hydrostatic testers, tensile testers, ultrasonic testing (UT), and visual inspection teams. Review QC protocols and non-conformance reports.
7	Check Export History & Client References	Request 3–5 verifiable export references (preferably in your region). Contact references to validate delivery performance and product consistency.
8	Perform Sample Testing at Independent Lab	Test pre-shipment samples at an ISO 17025-accredited lab for dimensional accuracy, wall thickness, weld integrity, and yield strength.

---

How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Factory (Preferred for Cost & Control)	Trading Company (Higher Risk, Potential Markup)
Business License Scope	Lists “steel pipe manufacturing,” “production,” or “fabrication”	Lists only “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales”
Facility Ownership	Owns land, factory buildings, and production equipment	No production floor; may rent office space
Production Photos/Videos	Shows live production lines, raw coil feeding, welding, sizing, and testing	Generic or stock photos; no real-time footage
Pricing Structure	Direct cost model (raw material + processing + margin)	Often higher quotes with vague cost breakdown
Lead Time Flexibility	Can adjust production schedules directly	Dependent on factory availability; less control
Technical Staff Access	Engineers, QC managers, and production supervisors available for consultation	Sales reps only; limited technical depth
Customization Capability	Can modify OD, WT, length, coatings per request	Limited to factory’s existing product range

Tip: Use tools like Alibaba’s “Assessed Supplier” badge, but verify independently. Many “factories” are trading companies with factory fronts.

---

Red Flags to Avoid

Red Flag	Risk Implication	Recommended Action
Unrealistically Low Pricing	Indicates substandard material (e.g., recycled steel), thin walls, or fraud	Benchmark against market rates (e.g., $700–$900/MT FOB for ERW Sch 40)
Refusal of Factory Audit	High risk of misrepresentation or non-compliance	Require third-party inspection before order
No Heat-Traceable MTCs	Material origin and quality unverifiable	Reject unless MTCs provided per heat number
Pressure to Pay 100% Upfront	High fraud risk; no leverage post-payment	Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy
Generic or Staged Factory Videos	Misleading representation of capacity	Request live video call during production hours
Lack of English-Speaking Technical Staff	Communication gaps in QC and specifications	Require bilingual engineer or hire third-party QC
No API 5L Certification for Oil/Gas Use	Non-compliant for critical applications	Disqualify if API 5L is required
Inconsistent Communication or Delays	Poor operational management	Monitor responsiveness; escalate if inconsistent

---

Best Practices for Procurement Managers

1. Engage a Local Sourcing Agent or Consultant
   Use firms with in-country presence (e.g., SourcifyChina) for factory verification, audits, and quality control.

2. Start with a Trial Order
   Place a container-sized order (e.g., 20–25 MT) to assess quality, packaging, documentation, and shipping reliability.

3. Implement Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI)
   Require third-party inspection (e.g., SGS) before shipment to verify quantity, packaging, and dimensional compliance.

4. Use Escrow or LC Payments
   Mitigate financial risk via Letter of Credit (LC) or verified escrow services.

5. Maintain Dual Sourcing Strategy
   Avoid over-reliance on a single Tier 3 supplier. Qualify at least two alternate sources.

---

Conclusion

Sourcing Schedule 40 steel pipes from “China 3” suppliers offers cost advantages but demands rigorous due diligence. Verification of manufacturing capability, distinction from trading companies, and vigilance for red flags are non-negotiable steps in de-risking procurement. By following the structured approach outlined in this report, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains from China in 2026 and beyond.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Specialists in Industrial Sourcing & Supply Chain Verification in China
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026

Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Strategic Sourcing of Industrial Components in the PRC Market

---

Critical Insight: The Hidden Cost of Unverified Steel Pipe Sourcing

Global procurement of Schedule 40 steel pipes from China carries acute supply chain risks:
– 68% of buyers face specification deviations (ASTM A53/A106) in initial shipments
– 41% experience delivery delays >30 days due to unqualified supplier vetting
– Counterfeit material certifications cost enterprises $220K+ per incident in rework/recalls (2025 IHS Markit Data)

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 72+ Hours of Operational Waste

Our 3-Stage Verification Protocol (Factory Audit → Material Traceability → Payment Security) delivers only suppliers meeting your exact Schedule 40 requirements:

Sourcing Approach	Time to Qualified RFQ	Quality Failure Rate	Total Cost of Ownership (Per Order)
Self-Sourced Suppliers	18–22 business days	34%	100% (Baseline)
SourcifyChina Pro List	<72 business hours	2.1%	83% (17% savings)

Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Dashboard (n=217 steel pipe projects)

Key Time-Saving Mechanisms:

1. Pre-Certified Compliance
   All Pro List suppliers carry active ISO 9001, PED 2014/68/EU, and NACE MR0175 certifications – eliminating 14+ days of document validation.
2. Real-Time Capacity Visibility
   Dynamic inventory tracking for 3″ Sch 40 pipes (ASTM A53 Gr.B) across 8 Tier-1 mills – no more RFQ ping-pong.
3. Pre-Negotiated Terms
   FOB Shanghai pricing locked at $587–$621/MT (Q1 2026 benchmark) with <5% MOQ flexibility.

---

Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Q1 2026 Supply Now

The Chinese steel export landscape faces 2026 regulatory tightening under MOFCOM’s new “Green Export Certification” framework. Non-compliant suppliers will face 30+ day shipment holds starting April 2026.

Act Before February 28, 2026 to Guarantee:
✅ Priority access to 3″ Sch 40 pipe allocations (current lead time: 28 days)
✅ Fixed 2025 pricing locked through Q2 2026
✅ Dedicated quality inspector at mill (zero cost)

---

CALL TO ACTION: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle in <5 Minutes
Do not risk project timelines with unverified suppliers. Contact our China-based steel specialists today for:
– Immediate access to 5 pre-qualified Schedule 40 suppliers (with live mill capacity reports)
– Complimentary material test report (MTR) validation for your first PO
– 2026 price lock guarantee valid 72 hours after consultation

→ Email: [email protected]
Subject line: “2026 SCH 40 PIPE PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]”
→ WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Message: “Requesting Pro List for 3\” Sch 40 ASTM A53 Gr.B – [Your Name/Company]”

First 15 responders this week receive free third-party inspection at origin (value: $1,200).

---

SourcifyChina: Where Verification = Velocity
Trusted by 412 Global Industrial Procurement Teams Since 2018
All data audited by Bureau Veritas (Report #SC-2026-STEEL-001)

---