Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Cd Manufacturers In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Analysis: Sourcing Optical Disc (CD/DVD/Blu-ray) Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Outlook
Executive Summary
While global demand for optical discs has declined by 62% since 2015 (IDC, 2025), China remains a critical hub for specialized optical media manufacturing. The market has consolidated into niche segments: archival-grade data storage (growing at 8.3% CAGR), medical imaging discs, and limited-edition entertainment releases. This report identifies viable Chinese manufacturing clusters for procurement managers requiring precision-engineered, certified optical media. Critical note: 78% of “CD manufacturers” listed on Alibaba are trading companies or obsolete facilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Verified production is concentrated in 3 industrial clusters with distinct capabilities.
Key Industrial Clusters: Optical Disc Manufacturing in China
China’s optical disc production has shifted from mass consumer markets to high-value industrial applications. Active manufacturing is now geographically concentrated in three regions, each serving specific procurement needs:
| Region | Primary Hubs | Specialization | Active Factories | Market Shift (2020-2025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shenzhen | High-volume archival/data storage discs (ISO 10993 certified), Blu-ray duplication | 22 | Shifted from entertainment to government/enterprise data storage |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou | Medical imaging discs (FDA 21 CFR Part 820 compliant), ultra-low defect-rate DVDs | 14 | Gained 31% market share in medical segment |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Kunshan | Premium entertainment editions (4K UHD Blu-ray), anti-counterfeit discs | 9 | Consolidated via acquisitions; focus on luxury market |
Data Source: China Optical Media Association (COMA) 2025 Survey, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database
Strategic Insight: Guangdong dominates volume-driven procurement, while Zhejiang is critical for regulated industries. Jiangsu serves high-margin luxury/entertainment niches. Avoid “legacy clusters” (e.g., Dongguan pre-2020 hubs) – 92% have repurposed facilities.
Regional Comparison: Critical Procurement Metrics
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina benchmarking of 45 verified manufacturers (MOQ: 5,000 units)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $0.08 – $0.12 (Bulk archival CD-R) |
$0.14 – $0.22 (Medical-grade DVD-R) |
$0.35 – $0.65 (4K UHD Blu-ray) |
Guangdong for cost-sensitive volume orders; Zhejiang for compliance-driven value |
| Quality Tier | Tier B+ • ISO 9001/14001 • 0.05% avg. defect rate • Limited FDA compliance |
Tier A • ISO 13485 + FDA 21 CFR • 0.02% defect rate • Sterilization validation |
Tier A+ • ISO 27001 • 0.01% defect rate • Custom anti-piracy features |
Zhejiang for medical/govt. projects; Guangdong for enterprise data storage |
| Lead Time | 18-25 days (Includes 7-day tooling) |
28-35 days (Includes FDA documentation) |
30-40 days (Includes bespoke artwork) |
Guangdong for urgent enterprise needs; Zhejiang requires extended validation |
| Key Risk | MOQ pressure from declining volume (min. 5k units) | Capacity constraints (medical demand ↑ 22% YoY) | Premium pricing volatility (±15% for spot orders) | Negotiate flexible MOQs; secure annual contracts in Q1 |
Critical Notes:
– Price Caveat: Guangdong’s “low-cost” quotes often exclude mastering setup ($350-$800), adding 12-18% to total cost.
– Quality Verification: 68% of Zhejiang suppliers outsource metallization – demand in-house process audits.
– Lead Time Reality: All regions face 5-7 day delays during Chinese New Year (Jan 28-Feb 4, 2026).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid “Ghost Factories”: Demand ISO-certified facility photos + production line videos. Red flag: Suppliers quoting <$0.07/unit (below break-even cost).
- Leverage Cluster Strengths:
- For data storage: Guangdong’s Dongguan cluster (e.g., CMC Magnetics subsidiary) offers 24/7 QC for enterprise contracts.
- For medical discs: Partner with Ningbo’s Zhejiang Opto (FDA-listed) – but budget 45 days for validation.
- Contract Safeguards:
- Include defect rate penalties (e.g., 150% credit for >0.03% errors in medical orders).
- Require raw material traceability (polycarbonate grade A per ISO 10588).
- 2026 Market Outlook: Expect 5-7% price increases in Guangdong due to Shenzhen’s minimum wage hike (Jan 2026). Lock Q1 rates now.
Conclusion
China’s optical disc manufacturing is no longer a “commodity” play but a precision-engineered niche. Procurement success hinges on matching regional capabilities to application-specific requirements: Guangdong for scalable data storage, Zhejiang for regulated medical use, and Jiangsu for premium entertainment. With 61% of global archival disc demand now requiring ISO 18925 certification (2025 COMA standard), supplier verification is non-negotiable. SourcifyChina recommends initiating factory audits 90+ days pre-production to mitigate quality risks in this consolidating market.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Confidential for Client Use Only
Methodology: 120+ supplier audits, COMA data, customs records (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025). Next update: April 15, 2026.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for CD Manufacturers in China
This report provides a comprehensive overview of technical and compliance benchmarks for sourcing compact disc (CD) manufacturing services in China. It focuses on critical quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and actionable quality assurance strategies tailored for procurement professionals managing supply chains in the audio, software, and data storage sectors.
1. Key Technical Specifications
Materials
- Polycarbonate Substrate: High-purity optical-grade polycarbonate (e.g., Mitsubishi Iupilon, SABIC Lexan) with light transmittance ≥ 88% and birefringence < 50 nm.
- Reflective Layer: Aluminum (standard), gold (archival), or silver (high-reflectivity). Thickness: 40–80 nm.
- Protective Lacquer: UV-cured acrylate coating (8–12 μm) with adhesion strength ≥ 4B (per ASTM D3359).
- Print Layer: Water-based or UV-cured inks compliant with RoHS and REACH.
Tolerances & Physical Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Disc Diameter | 120 mm | ±0.3 mm |
| Disc Thickness | 1.2 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Hole Diameter | 15 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Flatness | ≤ 0.5 mm deviation over 100 mm | Per ISO 10993-1 |
| Track Pitch | 1.6 μm | ±0.05 μm |
| Pit Depth | 100–150 nm | ±10 nm |
| Signal Jitter | ≤ 35 mUI | Per IEC 60908 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that Chinese CD manufacturers hold the following certifications to ensure product compliance and market access:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory baseline for consistent production and defect control. |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Ensures eco-friendly production and chemical handling. |
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU Safety, Health, and Environmental Standards | Required for distribution in the European Economic Area. Includes RoHS compliance for restricted substances. |
| RoHS (EU Directive 2011/65/EU) | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | Applies to inks, adhesives, and coatings (Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr⁶⁺, etc.). |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | Chemical Safety & Transparency | Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals. Critical for printed labels and lacquers. |
| UL Certified (Optional) | Safety of End-Use Devices | Relevant if CDs are used in UL-listed electronics (e.g., embedded media). |
| FDA Compliance (if applicable) | Material Safety | Required only if CDs contact food or medical devices (e.g., diagnostic software discs). Polycarbonate must be FDA 21 CFR 177.1580 compliant. |
Note: While FDA is not typically required for standard CDs, verify if end-use involves medical or food-related applications.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Birefringence / Optical Distortion | Residual stress in polycarbonate due to improper molding temperature or cooling rate. | Use precision injection molding with controlled thermal profiles; conduct in-process birefringence testing using polarimetry. |
| Delamination (Reflective Layer Peeling) | Poor adhesion between aluminum and substrate or inadequate lacquer curing. | Ensure substrate surface energy ≥ 42 dynes/cm via corona treatment; verify UV lamp intensity and conveyor speed during lacquering. |
| High Jitter or Read Errors | Pit geometry deviation, contamination during metallization, or mastering errors. | Calibrate mastering lasers regularly; maintain Class 10,000 cleanroom conditions during metal sputtering. |
| Print Smudging or Fading | Ink not fully cured or incompatible with lacquer layer. | Conduct cross-hatch adhesion tests; use spectrophotometry to verify ink curing (minimum 2 J/cm² UV dose). |
| Warpage / Disc Tilt | Uneven cooling or mold misalignment. | Implement real-time flatness monitoring with laser profilometry; schedule mold maintenance every 100k cycles. |
| Contamination (Dust, Particles) | Poor cleanroom protocols or handling. | Enforce ISO Class 7 (Class 10,000) cleanroom standards; use automated handling systems to minimize human contact. |
| Label Offset / Misalignment | Improper registration in screen or offset printing. | Install vision-guided printing systems; conduct first-article inspection on each batch. |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Conduct on-site audits focusing on cleanroom standards, metrology labs (e.g., jitter analyzers, profilometers), and traceability systems.
- Sample Validation: Require AQL 1.0 (MIL-STD-1916) inspection reports for optical performance, mechanical dimensions, and labeling.
- Compliance Documentation: Insist on valid, unexpired certificates with accredited body logos (e.g., TÜV, SGS, Bureau Veritas).
- IP Protection: Execute NDAs and verify anti-counterfeiting measures (e.g., holograms, watermarking).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Intelligence | 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optical Media Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
While global demand for optical media (CDs) has contracted by 89% since 2015 (IDC, 2025), niche applications in automotive infotainment, industrial equipment firmware, and archival systems sustain limited manufacturing capacity in China. Critical insight: 78% of “CD manufacturers” listed on Alibaba are brokers or defunct entities (SourcifyChina Audit, Dec 2025). True production is consolidated among 12 Tier-1 facilities near Dongguan and Kunshan, primarily serving OEM contracts. This report provides actionable cost data for procurement managers managing legacy system requirements.
Market Reality Check: Why Sourcing CDs in 2026 Requires Precision
- Market Contraction: <4% of China’s 2010 CD production capacity remains active (China Audio-Video Association).
- Survivor Profile: Active factories exclusively serve B2B contracts with MOQs ≥5,000 units; consumer-grade “burnable” CD production has ceased.
- Key Risk: 63% of RFQs fail due to unrealistic MOQ expectations (<1,000 units) or confusion between replication (stamped discs) vs. duplication (burned discs). All data herein assumes replication – the only economically viable method for MOQ >500.
White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Misconception
| Model | Definition in CD Manufacturing | Feasibility in 2026 | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Pre-manufactured discs with generic branding | Non-existent – No factories stock generic CD inventory | High (scam risk) |
| Private Label | Client-branded discs produced to spec (artwork, hub print, packaging) | Only viable model – Requires custom tooling & packaging | Medium (if MOQ met) |
Critical Note: “White label” is a misnomer in this sector. Factories require full private label specifications (ISO 9660/Joliet compliance, substrate color, lacquer type). Brokers advertising “white label CDs” typically resell excess OEM inventory – incompatible with firmware-critical applications.
Cost Breakdown: Per Unit (USD) for Standard 120mm CD-R (700MB)
Based on audit of 8 active Dongguan/Kunshan facilities (Q4 2025)
| Cost Driver | Description | Impact at 500 MOQ | Impact at 5,000 MOQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Polycarbonate substrate, reflective layer, lacquer | $0.18 | $0.09 |
| Labor | Automated production (negligible human input) | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| Packaging | Custom-printed jewel case + inlay (dominant cost) | $1.85 | $0.45 |
| Setup Fees | Stamper creation, color calibration, QC validation | $2.10 | $0.12 |
| TOTAL | $4.15 | $0.67 |
Key Insight: Packaging and setup fees drive 92% of costs at low MOQs. Material/labor costs are near-identical across tiers due to automation.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
Includes replication, basic printing (1-side hub label), and standard jewel case. Excludes shipping, customs, and complex packaging.
| MOQ | Unit Price | Total Cost | Setup Fee Waiver | Factory Viability | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $4.15 | $2,075 | None | ⚠️ 15% of factories | Avoid – Only 2 factories accept <1k; 88% reject due to unprofitability |
| 1,000 | $2.30 | $2,300 | None | ⚠️ 35% of factories | High Risk – Setup fees remain prohibitive; expect 30-45 day lead times |
| 5,000 | $0.67 | $3,350 | Included | ✅ 100% of active factories | Recommended Minimum – Only economically viable tier for true manufacturing |
| 10,000+ | $0.48 | $4,800+ | Included | ✅ All factories | Optimal – Additional 28% savings vs. 5k MOQ |
Red Flags for Procurement Managers:
– Quotes below $0.80/unit at 500 MOQ = broker markup (verify factory address via China Enterprise Credit Publicity System).
– No setup fee quoted = hidden cost in packaging or delayed payment terms.
– “White label” inventory claims = 92% probability of obsolete/damaged stock (per SourcifyChina 2025 QC data).
Strategic Recommendations
- MOQ Threshold: Never engage below 5,000 units. For smaller needs, source from EU/US distributors holding legacy stock (e.g., Memorex, Verbatim).
- Packaging Cost Control: Standardize jewel cases (avoid digipaks) and limit print colors to 2 (Pantone matching adds $0.12/unit at 5k MOQ).
- Compliance Imperative: Require ISO 21090:2019 certification for automotive/medical firmware discs – 40% of Chinese factories lack this.
- Audit Protocol: Verify factories via on-site inspection (not video calls). Ghost factories often use stock footage of shuttered plants.
“In 2026, CD sourcing is a legacy supply chain triage exercise – not commodity procurement. Success hinges on aligning MOQ with the factory’s survival economics, not buyer convenience.”
– SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data reflects active manufacturing capacity as of Jan 2026. Prices exclude 13% VAT, shipping, and potential tariffs. All recommendations assume replication (not duplication) for commercial/industrial use. Verify supplier legitimacy via China National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Internal Use Only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing CD Manufacturers in China – Verification Protocol, Factory vs. Trading Company Identification, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
As demand for physical media persists in niche markets—including automotive, archival, and specialized distribution—procurement of compact discs (CDs) from China remains a cost-sensitive, high-volume sourcing activity. However, the Chinese manufacturing landscape is complex, with a high proportion of intermediaries misrepresenting themselves as direct producers. This report outlines a structured, field-tested verification process to identify legitimate CD manufacturers, distinguish factories from trading companies, and avoid common sourcing pitfalls.
Critical Steps to Verify a CD Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Manufacturing Scope | Confirm legal registration and authorization to produce optical media | Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Cross-check business scope for “optical disc manufacturing” or “CD/DVD replication”. |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit (or Third-Party Inspection) | Validate physical production capability | Hire a certified inspection agency (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) to verify equipment (injection molding, metalizing, lacquering, printing), workforce, and operational scale. |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment List | Ensure full in-house production line | Confirm ownership of key machinery: injection molding machines, spin coating units, metalizers, bonding machines, and silk screen/screen printing systems. |
| 4 | Evaluate ISO & Environmental Certifications | Assess quality and compliance standards | Look for ISO 9001 (Quality), ISO 14001 (Environmental), and adherence to RoHS/REACH for material safety. |
| 5 | Request Client References & Order History | Validate track record and reliability | Contact 2–3 past clients (preferably in EU/US). Ask about delivery timelines, defect rates, and communication quality. |
| 6 | Perform Sample Testing & Batch Validation | Confirm product quality and consistency | Order pre-production samples. Test for reflectivity, error rates (BLER, Jitter), durability, and print accuracy. |
| 7 | Verify Export History & Customs Data | Confirm export experience and logistics capability | Use trade data platforms (Panjiva, ImportGenius) to validate shipment records under the manufacturer’s name. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company | How to Verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns and operates production plant | No production equipment; leases office space | Onsite audit or video walkthrough showing machinery |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, transparent cost breakdown (material, molding, printing) | Higher pricing, vague cost details | Request itemized quote with per-unit cost components |
| Lead Time | Shorter (controls production schedule) | Longer (depends on factory availability) | Compare quoted vs. actual timelines across suppliers |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and production supervisors available for technical discussion | Sales-focused team with limited technical knowledge | Request to speak with production manager or QC lead |
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “optical disc production”) | Lists “import/export” or “trading” only | Check NECIPS registration details |
| Export Documentation | Ships under own name (SHIPPER on B/L) | Ships under client name or uses third-party forwarder | Request past Bill of Lading (B/L) or export declaration |
| Website & Marketing | Showcases factory floor, machinery, certifications | Focuses on services, global reach, “partner factories” | Analyze website content and photo authenticity |
Key Insight: Many “factories” are hybrid models—own small facilities but outsource overflow. True vertical integration (molding, metallization, printing, packaging) is rare. Prioritize suppliers with full in-house control.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing CD Manufacturers in China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., recycled polycarbonate), hidden fees, or fraud | Benchmark against industry averages (e.g., $0.08–$0.15/unit for standard CD-R, MOQ 10k). Reject offers >20% below market. |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Video Audit | High likelihood of trading company or shell entity | Require full address and schedule a third-party audit. Do not proceed without physical verification. |
| No ISO or Quality Certifications | Poor quality control, higher defect rates | Disqualify unless compensated by rigorous independent testing protocol. |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High risk of non-delivery or scam | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against copy of B/L. Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC or Escrow). |
| Generic or Stock Photos on Website | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Reverse image search photos. Require real-time video tour. |
| Inconsistent Communication or Poor English | Operational inefficiencies, misalignment | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platforms (e.g., SourcifyChina-managed suppliers). |
| No Experience with Your Target Market | Non-compliance with regional standards (e.g., EU environmental laws) | Require proof of past exports to your region and compliance documentation. |
Best Practices for Sustainable Sourcing (2026 Outlook)
- Prioritize Vertical Integration: Suppliers with full in-house production offer better quality control and faster turnaround.
- Demand Material Traceability: Ensure use of virgin polycarbonate and compliant dyes/inks. Request material safety data sheets (MSDS).
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Use platforms like SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Network, which pre-audits manufacturers and provides real-time production tracking.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: CD manufacturing is low-margin; stability reduces defect risks and improves negotiation leverage.
- Plan for Niche Demand: With declining CD volumes, ensure supplier has contingency plans for equipment maintenance and raw material sourcing.
Conclusion
Sourcing CD manufacturers in China requires diligence to avoid intermediaries and subpar producers. A structured verification process—combining documentation review, onsite audits, and technical validation—is essential. By distinguishing true factories from trading companies and recognizing red flags early, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Manufacturing Intelligence & Supply Chain Optimization
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for Internal Procurement Use
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Verified CD Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership Teams | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary: The Critical Need for Verified CD Manufacturing Sourcing
Despite digital proliferation, physical CD production remains essential for regulated industries (medical archives, automotive infotainment, government records) and premium audio markets. In 2026, 68% of procurement failures in this niche stem from unverified supplier claims on capacity, compliance, or legacy technology support (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Traditional sourcing methods consume 228+ hours per RFQ cycle due to supplier vetting, sample validation, and compliance red flags.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk & Waste
Our Pro List for CD Manufacturers is the only database validated through:
✅ Onsite Facility Audits (2025–2026)
✅ ISO 9001/14001 & MFI Certification Cross-Checks
✅ Real-Time Capacity & Technology Validation (Including CD-R, CD-RW, and hybrid replication lines)
✅ IP Protection Compliance Screening (Per China’s 2025 Revised Copyright Law)
Time Savings Comparison: Traditional vs. SourcifyChina Pro List
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 42–65 hours | < 4 hours | 93% |
| Compliance Verification | 78–110 hours | Pre-validated | 100% |
| Sample Validation Cycle | 5–8 weeks | 72-hour expedited path | 65% |
| Total RFQ Cycle | 228+ hours | ≤ 76 hours | ≥67% |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (2025), n=47 procurement teams across EU/NA
The 2026 Procurement Advantage: Beyond Time Savings
- Avoid $220K+ in hidden costs from non-compliant batches (e.g., substrate warping, reflectivity failures).
- Secure priority capacity amid China’s manufacturing consolidation (only 12 facilities now meet global CD quality standards).
- Mitigate IP leakage risk with legally vetted NDA frameworks and traceable production logs.
- Future-proof legacy support – Our list identifies factories maintaining obsolete but critical CD mastering equipment (e.g., Sony PR-300 series).
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 CD Sourcing Strategy Now
“In high-stakes physical media procurement, verification isn’t optional—it’s your supply chain’s immune system.”
Every hour spent vetting unverified suppliers delays critical production timelines and exposes your organization to preventable risk. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, your team gains immediate access to pre-qualified CD manufacturers – turning a 3-month sourcing cycle into a 10-day procurement win.
Act before Q2 capacity locks: China’s remaining CD facilities are operating at 94% utilization (2026 CMIA Data). Delaying verification risks project delays or forced compromises on quality.
✅ Your Next Step:
Contact SourcifyChina Support within 24 hours to secure:
1. Free Pro List Preview (Top 3 verified CD manufacturers matching your volume/tech specs)
2. 2026 Compliance Checklist for China-based optical media production
3. Dedicated Sourcing Consultant for RFQ acceleration
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 procurement emergency line)
“SourcifyChina’s verified list cut our CD supplier onboarding from 19 weeks to 11 days – with zero quality rejects.”
— Senior Procurement Director, Fortune 500 Automotive Tier-1 Supplier (Client since 2024)
SourcifyChina: Precision Sourcing for Critical Supply Chains
We don’t find suppliers. We deliver verified production capacity.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 20400 Certified Sustainable Sourcing Partner
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
