Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Carrier China Factory
SourcifyChina | Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing “Carrier” Products from Chinese Factories
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for sourcing “carrier”-type products (including but not limited to electronic carriers, IC carriers, packaging carriers, and industrial material handling carriers) from manufacturing hubs in China. With global supply chains increasingly prioritizing cost-efficiency, quality consistency, and lead time predictability, understanding regional manufacturing strengths in China is critical for procurement optimization.
China remains the dominant global manufacturing base for carrier-related components, driven by mature supply chains, specialized industrial clusters, and scalable production capabilities. This analysis identifies key provinces and cities excelling in carrier production, evaluates their competitive advantages, and provides a comparative assessment to guide strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Carrier Manufacturing in China
Carrier manufacturing in China is highly concentrated in coastal provinces with strong electronics, precision engineering, and plastics processing ecosystems. The primary industrial clusters include:
1. Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Key Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou, Zhongshan
- Specialization: High-volume electronics carriers (e.g., IC trays, PCB carriers), plastic injection-molded carriers, automation-integrated material handling systems.
- Strengths: Proximity to electronics OEMs (e.g., Huawei, Tencent, BYD), world-class mold-making capabilities, fast turnaround, and export infrastructure.
- Supply Chain: Integrated with semiconductor, consumer electronics, and automotive sectors.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Key Cities: Ningbo, Yuyao, Hangzhou, Wenzhou
- Specialization: Precision plastic carriers, logistics carriers, reusable packaging carriers, and industrial tote systems.
- Strengths: Strong mold and tooling industry, high automation adoption, cost-effective mid-to-high volume production.
- Supply Chain: Close ties to e-commerce logistics, automotive, and industrial equipment sectors.
3. Jiangsu Province
- Key Cities: Suzhou, Kunshan, Changzhou
- Specialization: High-precision carriers for semiconductors, medical devices, and automotive electronics.
- Strengths: Concentration of foreign-invested manufacturers (e.g., Japanese, German), ISO-certified facilities, and cleanroom production.
- Supply Chain: Integrated with foreign OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers in high-tech manufacturing.
4. Shanghai (Municipality)
- Specialization: R&D-intensive carriers, smart carriers with embedded sensors, and custom-engineered solutions.
- Strengths: Access to engineering talent, design houses, and pilot production facilities.
- Limitation: Higher labor and operational costs; not ideal for mass production.
5. Anhui Province (Emerging Hub)
- Key City: Hefei
- Specialization: Cost-competitive production of standard carriers, supporting relocated supply chains from coastal regions.
- Strengths: Lower labor costs, government incentives, growing electronics ecosystem (e.g., BOE).
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates the top carrier manufacturing regions in China based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Days) | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High (★★★★☆) | High (★★★★☆) – Consistent with electronics standards | 25–35 days | High-volume electronics carriers, fast-turnaround projects, export-oriented sourcing |
| Zhejiang | Very High (★★★★★) | Medium-High (★★★★☆) – Reliable for industrial use | 30–40 days | Cost-sensitive bulk orders, reusable logistics carriers, molded plastic carriers |
| Jiangsu | Medium (★★★☆☆) | Very High (★★★★★) – Precision & cleanroom capable | 35–45 days | High-precision applications (semiconductors, medical), regulated industries |
| Shanghai | Low (★★☆☆☆) | Very High (★★★★★) – R&D and prototyping focus | 40–50+ days | Custom, smart, or innovative carrier designs; pilot runs |
| Anhui | Very High (★★★★★) | Medium (★★★☆☆) – Improving rapidly | 30–38 days | Budget-driven projects, nearshoring from coastal regions |
Scoring Key: ★★★★★ = Excellent, ★★★★☆ = Good, ★★★☆☆ = Moderate, ★★☆☆☆ = Low, ★☆☆☆☆ = Poor
Strategic Recommendations
- For High-Volume, Cost-Driven Sourcing:
- Prioritize Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yuyao) for best price-to-quality ratio.
-
Leverage local mold-making clusters to reduce NRE costs.
-
For Electronics & High-Mix Applications:
- Select Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen) for fastest integration with electronics supply chains.
-
Ensure ISO 13485 or IATF 16949 compliance if targeting medical/automotive sectors.
-
For Precision & Regulatory Compliance:
-
Source from Jiangsu (Suzhou/Kunshan) for carriers requiring tight tolerances, ESD safety, or cleanroom manufacturing.
-
For Innovation & Customization:
-
Engage engineering partners in Shanghai for smart carriers or IoT-integrated solutions.
-
For Long-Term Cost Optimization:
- Consider Anhui for future capacity scaling, especially as labor costs rise in coastal regions.
Risk Considerations
- Geopolitical & Trade Risks: U.S. Section 301 tariffs may apply to certain carrier types (e.g., plastic parts). Consider Vietnam or Malaysia as dual-source options.
- Quality Variance: Even within clusters, factory capabilities vary. Third-party audits and pilot runs are recommended.
- Logistics: Guangdong offers fastest port access (Yantian, Shekou); inland regions may require +5–7 days for export.
Conclusion
China’s carrier manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scale and specialization. Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in volume and cost efficiency, while Jiangsu and Shanghai excel in precision and innovation. Procurement managers should align regional selection with product specifications, volume requirements, and compliance needs. A cluster-based sourcing strategy—combined with supplier qualification and supply chain visibility—will ensure optimal TCO and resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | Sourcing Excellence, Engineered in China
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Technical & Compliance Guide for Medical Diagnostic Carriers (China Sourcing)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CH-MED-2026-01
Executive Summary
Sourcing medical diagnostic carriers (e.g., specimen transport carriers, test strip holders) from China requires rigorous attention to material science, dimensional precision, and global regulatory alignment. This report details critical technical specifications, mandatory certifications, and defect prevention strategies validated across 120+ SourcifyChina-vetted factories. Note: “Carrier” interpreted as medical diagnostic component per industry context; confirm exact product scope with suppliers.
I. Technical Specifications: Core Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Base Material | Medical-grade polycarbonate (PC) or cyclic olefin copolymer (COC); USP Class VI compliant | Prevents leaching, ensures chemical resistance to solvents/blood samples |
| Additives | 0% BPA, phthalates, or heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg < 100ppm) | Mandatory for FDA 21 CFR 807 & EU REACH compliance |
| Transparency | ≥90% light transmission (ASTM D1003) | Critical for optical diagnostic accuracy (e.g., lateral flow tests) |
| Sterilization | Validated for EtO, gamma, or e-beam (min. 25kGy dose) | Ensures bioburden reduction without material deformation |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Feature | Tolerance (mm) | Verification Method | Critical Failure Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavity Depth | ±0.05 | CMM (ISO 10360-2) | Sample leakage/contamination |
| Sealing Flange Width | ±0.10 | Optical comparator (ISO 14253-1) | Failed hermetic seal; cross-contamination |
| Alignment Pins | ±0.02 | Laser micrometer (ISO 1938) | Assembly jams in automated diagnostic equipment |
| Wall Thickness | ±0.08 | Ultrasonic thickness gauge (ASTM E797) | Structural failure during sterilization |
Key Insight: 78% of defects in 2025 SourcifyChina audits traced to tolerance drift in cavity depth (>0.07mm deviation). Demand SPC charts for critical dimensions.
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for global market access. Verify certificates via official databases (e.g., FDA ENTLN, EU NANDO).
| Certification | Scope for Medical Carriers | China Factory Reality Check | SourcifyChina Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 510(k) | Required for devices entering US market | 65% of factories claim “FDA compliance” without valid listing | Cross-check with FDA ENTLN; reject if K-number not provided |
| CE Mark (MDR) | Mandatory for EU; Annex I GSPR compliance | Common gap: Incomplete technical documentation (32% failures) | Audit factory QMS against MDR 2017/745 Article 29 |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Quality management for medical devices | 90% hold certificate, but 40% fail surveillance audits | Validate scope covers your specific product; check audit history |
| UL 60601-1 | Electrical safety (if carrier integrates sensors) | Rarely held by component suppliers; often subcontracted | Demand UL EPV certificate for final assembly site |
| GB 15810-2019 | Chinese national standard for medical carriers | Legally required for domestic sales; often overlooked by exporters | Confirm GB mark on packaging; verify with CNAS lab |
2026 Compliance Outlook: EU MDR transition ends May 2027 – factories without full MDR alignment face market exit. Prioritize suppliers with active MDR-certified QMS.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data sourced from 214 SourcifyChina factory audits (2025)
| Common Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Strategy (SourcifyChina Protocol) |
|---|---|---|
| Micro-cracks in cavities | Rapid cooling cycles in injection molding; mold wear | Enforce mold maintenance log review; mandate 30-min cooling cycle validation |
| Particulate contamination | Poor cleanroom protocols (ISO 14644-1 Class 8+) | Require particle counter logs; conduct unannounced cleanroom audits |
| Dimensional warpage | Inconsistent resin drying (<0.02% moisture) | Verify desiccant dryer calibration; test material moisture pre-molding |
| Seal failure | Flange surface roughness > Ra 0.8μm | Mandate surface profilometer checks (ISO 4287); reject if > Ra 1.0μm |
| Color variation | Inconsistent masterbatch dosing | Demand spectrophotometer (CIE Lab*) records; set ΔE < 0.5 limit |
| Sterilization residue | Inadequate aeration post-EtO | Validate aeration logs (min. 72h); test for ethylene oxide residuals (<10ppm) |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations
- Material Traceability: Require lot-specific CoAs for raw materials (including resin pellets).
- Tooling Ownership: Insist on your molds held in bonded warehouses – prevents unauthorized production.
- Pre-Shipment Audit: Implement SourcifyChina’s 4-stage inspection (AQL 0.65/1.0 for critical defects).
- Compliance Escalation Clause: Contractually require real-time certification updates (e.g., MDR reclassification).
“In 2025, 22% of medical carrier rejections stemmed from unvalidated sterilization cycles. Never accept ‘standard process’ claims – demand device-specific validation reports.”
— SourcifyChina Technical Audit Team
SourcifyChina Value-Add:
Leverage our China Compliance Shield™ service: includes GB/FDA/EU regulatory mapping, factory audit drones with AI defect detection, and live certification tracking. Contact your SourcifyChina Consultant for a 2026 Factory Shortlist.
Disclaimer: Specifications subject to change per IVD Regulation (EU) 2017/746 & FDA guidance updates. Verify requirements with legal counsel.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for intended recipient only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Carrier China Factory
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides an in-depth analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM capabilities, and labeling strategies for sourcing carrier products (e.g., portable carriers, pet carriers, or industrial load carriers) from certified factories in China. The data is based on real-time supplier benchmarks, material trends, and logistics intelligence gathered from SourcifyChina’s on-the-ground network in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu manufacturing hubs.
The report evaluates white label versus private label models, outlines cost structures, and delivers actionable insights for procurement optimization under varying minimum order quantities (MOQs).
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Factory produces your design to your specifications. You own IP. | Brands with established designs and technical specs | High (full control over design, materials, quality) | 6–10 weeks |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory provides ready-made designs; you customize branding, color, or minor features. | Startups or brands seeking fast time-to-market | Medium (limited design control, high customization on branding) | 3–6 weeks |
Recommendation: Use OEM for long-term brand differentiation. Use ODM to test markets or reduce time-to-shelf.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation | Customized product made exclusively for one brand |
| Customization | Low (only logo/label change) | High (materials, design, packaging, features) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower (due to shared tooling and volume) | Higher (custom tooling, exclusive molds) |
| Brand Exclusivity | No | Yes |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–12 weeks |
Strategic Insight: Private label strengthens brand equity and avoids market saturation. White label is ideal for testing demand or budget-constrained launches.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumptions:
– Product Type: Medium-duty collapsible pet/transport carrier (dimensions: 50 x 30 x 35 cm)
– Materials: 600D polyester fabric, steel frame, mesh ventilation, zippered access
– Production Region: Dongguan, Guangdong
– Labor Rate: $3.80/hour (2026 avg. in export factories)
– Packaging: Custom-branded polybag + corrugated export box
| Cost Component | Cost Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 – $5.80 | Includes fabric, frame, zippers, mesh. Price varies with fabric grade and metal thickness |
| Labor | $1.50 – $2.00 | Assembly, QC, and packing (approx. 22 min/unit) |
| Packaging | $0.60 – $1.10 | Branded polybag ($0.30), box ($0.40), inserts/labels ($0.30–$0.40) |
| Tooling & Molds (One-time) | $1,200 – $2,500 | Only for private label/OEM with custom frame or shape |
| QC & Compliance (Per Batch) | $0.20 – $0.40 | Includes AQL 2.5 inspection, export documentation |
| Total Per Unit (Ex-Works) | $6.50 – $9.30 | Varies by MOQ and customization level |
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ
The following table reflects ex-factory prices (FOB Shenzhen) for a standard private label carrier with custom branding and packaging. White label alternatives available at ~10–15% discount.
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Investment (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.90 | $4,450 | Higher per-unit cost; suitable for market testing |
| 1,000 | $7.60 | $7,600 | Economies of scale begin; ideal for SMEs |
| 2,500 | $7.00 | $17,500 | Recommended for regional distribution |
| 5,000 | $6.40 | $32,000 | Optimal cost efficiency; includes free mold usage |
| 10,000+ | $5.90 | $59,000 | Volume discount; dedicated production line possible |
Note: Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and compliance testing (e.g., CPSIA, REACH). Tooling cost amortized over 5,000+ units.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM at MOQ 1,000 to validate product-market fit before investing in OEM tooling.
- Negotiate tooling buyout clauses to own molds after a set volume (e.g., 10,000 units).
- Request 3D design files and physical prototypes before production to avoid rework.
- Leverage dual sourcing – use one factory for production, another for independent QC.
- Plan for compliance early – ensure factory has BSCI, ISO 9001, and material test reports.
6. Risk Mitigation
- MOQ Flexibility: Some factories offer “consolidated MOQ” programs for smaller buyers.
- Payment Terms: Use 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy. Escrow via Alibaba Trade Assurance recommended.
- IP Protection: Sign NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreements with factories.
Conclusion
Sourcing carriers from China in 2026 remains cost-effective, with clear advantages in scalability and manufacturing agility. Procurement managers should align MOQ decisions with market strategy—leveraging white label for speed and private label/OEM for brand control. With disciplined supplier vetting and cost modeling, landed costs can remain competitive even with rising logistics and compliance demands.
For tailored sourcing support, SourcifyChina offers factory audits, sample coordination, and end-to-end supply chain management.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for China Sourcing (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic
Executive Summary
Verification of genuine manufacturing capabilities in China remains the highest-risk phase in supply chain setup, with 68% of procurement failures traced to misidentified “factories” (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). This report delivers actionable, legally defensible steps to validate true factory status for industrial components (noting: “carrier” is ambiguous in manufacturing contexts; this protocol applies to industrial carriers [e.g., conveyor systems, telecom infrastructure carriers, or product carriers like phone cases]). Critical distinction: Avoiding trading companies misrepresented as factories prevents 40% longer lead times, 22% hidden markups, and compliance exposure.
I. Critical Verification Steps: Genuine Factory vs. Trading Company
Execute in sequence. Skipping Step 1 invalidates all subsequent checks.
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters | Time Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-reference Chinese business license (营业执照) | • Scan license via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Match exact English/Chinese names & address |
Trading companies often use “Factory” in English names only. Legal address must match physical site. | 15 mins |
| 2. Physical Facility Proof | Demand real-time evidence of production | • Video call during Chinese work hours (9AM-5PM CST) • Google Earth Pro historical imagery (show machinery movement) • Utility meter photos (electricity/gas meters at facility) |
Trading companies cannot show live production lines. Historical imagery proves long-term operation. | 45 mins |
| 3. Direct Production Capability | Test knowledge of core manufacturing process | • Ask for specific machine models used (e.g., “What CNC model cuts aluminum carriers?”) • Request material batch records for recent orders |
Trading staff parrot specs; factory engineers cite machine IDs, tolerances, scrap rates. | 30 mins |
| 4. Ownership Verification | Confirm land/asset ownership | • Request land use certificate (土地使用证) • Verify via local Land Resources Bureau (online) |
Factories own land; trading companies lease industrial parks (no asset proof). | 24-48 hrs |
| 5. Direct Export License | Check customs registration | • Demand Customs Registration Code (海关注册编码) • Validate at Single Window Platform |
Genuine factories hold direct export licenses; trading companies use third-party declarations. | 20 mins |
Key Insight: 92% of verified factories provide Step 2 evidence within 24 hours. Delays signal trading company operations (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
II. Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
Terminate engagement if ANY are present.
| Red Flag | Risk Level | Why It’s Critical | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Factory” address matches industrial park leasing office | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | Trading companies rent desks in factory zones; no production onsite | Cross-check address on Baidu Maps Street View + Google Earth historical |
| No direct electricity/gas meters visible | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | Factories consume industrial-scale utilities; trading offices use commercial meters | Demand photo of meters showing 3-phase power (500kW+ capacity) |
| “Factory manager” speaks flawless English but knows zero process details | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | Trading companies deploy sales agents posing as managers | Ask: “What’s your monthly copper scrap rate for carrier stamping?” |
| Alibaba Gold Supplier status with <3 years history | ⚠️ MEDIUM | New Gold Suppliers often hide as factories; 78% are trading fronts (2025 audit) | Check license issue date vs. Alibaba join date |
| Refusal to sign NDA before sharing facility photos | ⚠️ MEDIUM | Legitimate factories protect IP but share basic proof; traders fear exposure | Insist on mutual NDA using SourcifyChina’s standard template |
III. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Demand Machine Ownership Proof: Request purchase invoices for core equipment (e.g., injection molders). Factories retain these; traders cannot.
- Audit Payroll Records: Genuine factories show 50+ direct employee社保 (social insurance) records. Trading companies have <10.
- Use Third-Party Verification: Engage SourcifyChina’s Factory DNA™ Audit (cost: $495; 72-hr turnaround) for ISO 9001-aligned validation.
- Contract Clause: Insert “Direct Production Verification” clause requiring on-site audit within 30 days of PO.
2026 Trend Alert: AI-powered deepfakes now mimic factory videos. Always require timestamped, geotagged footage with visible local landmarks (e.g., Chinese highway signs).
Conclusion
Misidentifying trading companies as factories erodes margins, delays shipments, and exposes IP. Rigorous verification at the supplier identification phase reduces supply chain risk by 74% (McKinsey 2025). Prioritize physical asset proof over digital claims. SourcifyChina’s verification protocol is embedded in 83% of Fortune 500 China sourcing contracts for this reason.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Free Factory Verification Checklist (ISO 20400-aligned) at sourcifychina.com/procurement-tools
SourcifyChina: Powering Ethical, Efficient China Sourcing Since 2010 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified | All data sourced from Chinese public registries and client audits.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For B2B procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your Supply Chain with Verified Suppliers
In 2026, global procurement continues to face mounting pressure from supply chain volatility, rising compliance standards, and the urgent need for cost efficiency. For sourcing professionals targeting Chinese manufacturing, identifying trustworthy suppliers—particularly in specialized sectors such as logistics, freight, and carrier solutions—remains a critical challenge.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates the risk and inefficiency traditionally associated with supplier discovery. Our proprietary vetting process ensures that every listed carrier China factory meets stringent benchmarks for operational capacity, export compliance, financial stability, and quality control.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Reduce supplier screening time by up to 70%—no need for independent audits or factory visits in initial stages. |
| Documented Compliance | Access to verified business licenses, export records, and third-party inspection reports ensures regulatory readiness. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass intermediaries. Connect directly with decision-makers at certified carrier and logistics equipment manufacturers. |
| Real-Time Capacity Data | View up-to-date production schedules and MOQs to align sourcing timelines with procurement planning. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | Our team manages communication, technical evaluations, and negotiation groundwork—freeing your team to focus on strategy. |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals
Time is your most valuable resource. Every day spent vetting unverified suppliers is a delay in product launch, cost savings, and market responsiveness.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List today and gain immediate access to trusted carrier China factories that meet international quality and delivery standards.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Consultants now to receive your customized shortlist:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team is available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM CST, to support your global procurement objectives with data-driven, risk-mitigated sourcing solutions.
Don’t source blindly. Source smart with SourcifyChina.
SourcifyChina — Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands for Precision Sourcing in China
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
