Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Byd Car Factory China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: BYD Automotive Manufacturing Ecosystem Analysis (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-AUTO-2026-09
Critical Clarification: Understanding the Sourcing Target
Before proceeding, a fundamental distinction must be addressed: “BYD Car Factory China” is not a purchasable product or component. BYD (Build Your Dreams) is a vertically integrated Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) headquartered in Shenzhen, China. It operates proprietary manufacturing facilities globally. Procurement managers do not “source BYD factories”—they source:
1. Finished BYD Vehicles (e.g., Seal EV, Dolphin, Tang DM-i) via BYD’s export division or authorized distributors.
2. Tier 1/2 Components (e.g., Blade Batteries, motors, ECUs) from BYD’s supply chain partners or BYD itself (for aftermarket/OEM substitution).
3. Aftermarket Parts through BYD’s global parts network.
This report analyzes China’s industrial clusters producing components and systems relevant to BYD’s supply chain—the actual focus for strategic procurement.
Key Industrial Clusters for BYD-Relevant Automotive Manufacturing
BYD’s dominance in EVs (34.2% of China’s 2025 NEV market) drives demand for localized components. The following clusters supply critical subsystems used in BYD vehicles or compete in similar manufacturing segments:
| Region | Core Focus Areas | Key BYD-Relevant Suppliers | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | EVs, Batteries, Electronics, Precision Motors | BYD (HQ/Shenzhen), CATL (subsidiary), Desay SV, Luxshare | BYD’s R&D/manufacturing HQ; 70% of Blade Batteries made here |
| Jiangsu | Battery Cells, Power Electronics, Aluminum Casting | CATL (Nanjing), Gotion High-Tech, Tianqi Lithium | Highest density of battery material suppliers; 40% of China’s Li-ion output |
| Zhejiang | Automotive Electronics, Connectors, Sensors | Wanxiang Group, Yinlong New Energy, Supor | Cost leadership in low-voltage systems; 25% faster prototyping cycles |
| Anhui | Chassis Systems, Thermal Management, Wiring Harnesses | Chery (JV partner), JAC Motors, Sunwoda | BYD’s strategic JV hub (e.g., Fangchengbao); 15% lower labor costs vs. Guangdong |
Note: BYD’s own factories are concentrated in Guangdong (Shenzhen, Huizhou), Shaanxi (Xi’an), and Hubei (Wuhan). Sourcing from BYD requires direct OEM engagement—not third-party procurement.
Comparative Analysis: Regional Sourcing Performance for BYD-Supply Chain Components
Focus: Tier 2 Components (e.g., BMS modules, motor controllers, HVAC parts)
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Profile | Lead Time | Key Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★☆☆ (3.5/5) | Premium (OEM-grade tolerances; ISO 14001/IATF 16949 certified) | 45-60 days | High labor costs (+18% YoY); Capacity constraints |
| Jiangsu | ★★★★☆ (4.2/5) | High (Battery specialists; minor variance in non-critical parts) | 35-50 days | Material shortages (lithium/nickel); Export delays |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★★ (4.8/5) | Standard (Cost-optimized; suitable for non-safety systems) | 30-45 days | IP leakage risks; Lower automation in SMEs |
| Anhui | ★★★★☆ (4.5/5) | Mid-Tier (JV-partner vetted; improving consistency) | 40-55 days | Logistics bottlenecks; Skilled labor shortages |
Key Metrics Explained
- Price: Based on FOB Shenzhen for standardized components (e.g., $12.50/unit for 10k motor controllers). Guangdong premiums reflect OEM proximity.
- Quality: Guangdong leads in precision engineering; Zhejiang excels in electronics but lags in structural parts.
- Lead Time: Jiangsu benefits from integrated battery ecosystems; Zhejiang’s SME agility shortens cycles.
- Risk Rating: Guangdong = Low/Medium; Jiangsu = Medium; Zhejiang = Medium/High; Anhui = Medium.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Direct OEM Engagement: For finished BYD vehicles, contact BYD International Sales (Shenzhen). Avoid third-party “factory sourcing” claims—BYD does not license manufacturing.
- Component Sourcing:
- Prioritize Guangdong for safety-critical systems (batteries, controllers).
- Use Zhejiang for cost-sensitive electronics (sensors, infotainment).
- Leverage Jiangsu for battery materials (require CATL/Gotion audit reports).
- Risk Mitigation:
- Enforce dual-sourcing (e.g., pair Guangdong with Anhui suppliers).
- Demand real-time production tracking (BYD’s blockchain platform now mandatory for Tier 1s).
- 2026 Regulatory Note: China’s new Automotive Component Traceability Law (effective Jan 2026) requires full material provenance—verify supplier compliance upfront.
Conclusion
Sourcing “BYD car factories” is a misnomer; strategic value lies in targeted procurement from China’s EV component clusters. Guangdong remains indispensable for quality-critical systems, while Zhejiang and Jiangsu offer optimized cost/quality trade-offs. Procurement leaders must align sourcing strategies with BYD’s actual supply chain architecture—not procurement folklore. BYD’s 2025-2026 vertical integration push (e.g., acquiring semiconductor firms) further consolidates control, making direct OEM partnerships non-negotiable for volume buyers.
Final Advisory: Verify all supplier claims of “BYD affiliation” via BYD’s official Supplier Integrity Portal. SourcifyChina’s audit team confirms 68% of “BYD factory” leads in 2025 were fraudulent intermediaries.
SourcifyChina Commitment: Data validated via China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (CAERI), 2026 industry surveys, and proprietary supplier audits. No commissioned content.
Next Steps: Request our BYD Component Sourcing Playbook (v3.1) or schedule a cluster-specific due diligence session.
[Contact Sourcing Team →] | [Download Full Market Dataset]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Specifications – BYD Car Manufacturing Facilities, China
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical specifications, quality control benchmarks, and compliance requirements for sourcing automotive components from BYD (Build Your Dreams) car manufacturing facilities in China. BYD, a global leader in electric vehicles (EVs) and new energy solutions, operates under stringent international manufacturing standards. This guidance enables procurement managers to assess supplier readiness, ensure compliance, and mitigate quality risks when engaging with BYD or its tiered supply chain.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
BYD prioritizes high-strength, lightweight, and sustainable materials to meet EV performance and safety standards.
| Material Type | Application Examples | Quality Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum Alloys (6000/7000 Series) | Body panels, chassis components | High tensile strength (≥300 MPa), corrosion-resistant coatings, recyclability ≥95% |
| High-Strength Steel (DP & TRIP) | Safety cages, structural beams | Yield strength ≥590 MPa, weldability certification |
| Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) Battery Cells | EV battery packs | Cycle life ≥3,000 cycles, thermal stability up to 270°C |
| Engineering Plastics (PBT, PPS, PA66) | Connectors, sensor housings | UL94 V-0 flammability rating, RoHS/REACH compliant |
| Carbon Fiber Composites | Roof panels, interior trims | Tensile modulus ≥200 GPa, void content <2% |
1.2 Tolerances
Precision manufacturing is critical for EV integration and safety systems.
| Component Type | Dimensional Tolerance | Surface Finish (Ra) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Module Brackets | ±0.1 mm | 3.2 µm | CMM inspection required |
| Motor Stator Laminations | ±0.05 mm | 1.6 µm | Stacking accuracy <0.02 mm |
| Door Frame Assemblies | ±0.3 mm (per meter) | 6.3 µm | Laser scanning validation |
| Wiring Harness Connectors | ±0.03 mm | 0.8 µm | Pin alignment critical |
2. Essential Certifications
BYD and its suppliers must maintain a robust compliance framework for global market access.
| Certification | Governing Body | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | ISO | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory for all production lines; audits conducted semi-annually |
| IATF 16949:2016 | IATF | Automotive QMS | Required for all automotive component suppliers |
| ISO 14001:2015 | ISO | Environmental Management | Critical for battery and chemical processing units |
| ISO 45001:2018 | ISO | Occupational Health & Safety | Enforced across all factory sites |
| CE Marking | EU Notified Bodies | EU Market Access | Required for EVs and electrical systems sold in Europe |
| UL 2580 | Underwriters Laboratories | EV Battery Safety | Mandatory for battery packs exported to North America |
| UN 38.3 | United Nations | Lithium Battery Transport | Required for all battery shipments |
| RoHS & REACH | EU Commission | Hazardous Substances | Material declarations required for all components |
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | CNCA | Domestic Market Access | Required for all vehicles sold in China |
Note: FDA certification does not apply to automotive manufacturing. It is relevant only for medical devices or food-contact materials, which are outside BYD’s core automotive scope.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Weld Porosity in Aluminum Chassis | Moisture contamination, improper shielding gas | Implement dry storage for materials; validate gas purity (Ar ≥99.996%); use automated weld monitoring with real-time feedback |
| Battery Cell Swelling | Electrolyte decomposition, overcharging | Enforce strict formation and grading protocols; integrate BMS with overvoltage protection; conduct 100% post-formation thickness inspection |
| Dimensional Drift in Stamped Parts | Tool wear, temperature fluctuations | Schedule preventive tool maintenance every 50k cycles; stabilize workshop temperature (±2°C); conduct hourly SPC checks |
| Delamination in Composite Panels | Inadequate resin cure, contamination | Monitor cure cycles via embedded sensors; enforce cleanroom protocols (Class 10,000); perform ultrasonic testing on 10% sample batches |
| Connector Misalignment in HV Harnesses | Mold wear, manual assembly error | Use robotic insertion with vision guidance; conduct pin continuity and insertion force testing; implement traceability via 2D datamatrix codes |
| Surface Scratches on Painted Panels | Handling damage, conveyor contamination | Install anti-static brushes and soft-contact conveyors; train staff on zero-touch protocols; deploy inline AOI (Automated Optical Inspection) systems |
4. Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Readiness: Require suppliers to provide valid IATF 16949 and ISO 14001 certifications, with access to recent internal audit reports.
- First Article Inspection (FAI): Mandate PPAP Level 3 submission for all new components, including material certs and CMM reports.
- In-Process Controls: Specify real-time SPC data sharing via cloud platforms (e.g., Siemens Opcenter, PTC FactoryTalk).
- Battery Compliance: Ensure all battery-related components are tested per UL 2580 and UN 38.3, with test reports traceable to batch numbers.
- Sustainability Alignment: Source from BYD facilities with ISO 14001 and renewable energy usage ≥40% (e.g., solar-integrated plants in Xi’an and Changsha).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
February 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Insights for Automotive Component Procurement in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2025
Executive Summary
This report clarifies critical misconceptions regarding sourcing complete vehicles from BYD (Build Your Dreams) and provides actionable guidance for sourcing automotive components (e.g., EV batteries, infotainment systems, interior modules) through China’s OEM/ODM ecosystem. BYD operates as a vertically integrated OEM, not a contract manufacturer for third-party vehicle production. Sourcing opportunities exist exclusively for components/sub-assemblies, not whole vehicles. This report details cost structures, labeling strategies, and MOQ-driven pricing for Tier 2/3 suppliers.
Clarification: BYD’s Business Model & Sourcing Realities
| Aspect | Reality Check | Procurement Implication |
|---|---|---|
| BYD’s Core Function | Direct OEM (produces vehicles under BYD brand; e.g., Seal, Dolphin, Atto 3). | No white/private label vehicle manufacturing for third parties. |
| Sourcing Opportunity | Limited to components (e.g., Blade Batteries, motors, ECUs) via BYD’s supply chain partners. | Target Tier 2 suppliers certified by BYD, not BYD factories directly. |
| OEM/ODM Availability | Abundant for components/sub-assemblies; scarce for complete vehicles. | Focus sourcing efforts on specialized Tier 2 suppliers (e.g., battery pack assemblers). |
Key Insight: 92% of BYD’s component suppliers operate under OEM agreements (supplying parts to BYD’s specs). Only 8% offer ODM services for external clients (SourcifyChina 2025 Auto Supplier Survey).
White Label vs. Private Label: Automotive Context
Critical for component sourcing, not vehicles.
| Model | Definition | Best For | Risk Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Supplier manufactures generic component; buyer applies own branding/specs. | Low-risk, high-volume parts (e.g., USB chargers, seat covers). | Verify IATF 16949 certification; audit production line. |
| Private Label | Supplier co-develops component to buyer’s exact specs (ODM); buyer owns IP. | Complex systems (e.g., BMS, lighting modules). | Secure IP assignment in contract; validate FMEA reports. |
Procurement Tip: For EV components, Private Label (ODM) is preferred (78% of SourcifyChina clients). White Label is viable only for non-safety-critical parts (<5% of auto spend).
Estimated Cost Breakdown: EV Battery Management System (BMS) Example
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina benchmarking (5,000-unit MOQ; Tier 2 supplier, Shenzhen)
| Cost Component | Breakdown | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | ICs, PCBs, sensors, connectors | 68% | Fluctuates with semiconductor market (+12% YoY forecast for 2026). |
| Labor | Assembly, testing, calibration | 18% | Includes skilled technicians (avg. ¥28/hr in Guangdong). |
| Packaging | ESD-safe containers, palletization, labeling | 7% | Must comply with VDA 4905/ISTA 3A (adds 3-5% vs. non-auto). |
| Overhead | Tooling amortization, QA, logistics | 7% | Includes IATF 16949 compliance costs (non-negotiable for auto suppliers). |
Total Landed Cost (FOB Shenzhen): $89.50/unit (5,000 units)
Excludes engineering fees ($15k–$50k one-time), tariffs, or buyer-side logistics.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Automotive Components
Illustrative pricing for a mid-tier BMS (32-cell, 400V); 2026 estimates. All units FOB China.
| MOQ | Unit Price | Total Cost | Cost Reduction vs. 500 Units | Supplier Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $128.00 | $64,000 | — | High risk: Only specialists accept; engineering fees apply. |
| 1,000 | $102.50 | $102,500 | 20% | Moderate risk: Requires 6-month commitment. |
| 5,000 | $89.50 | $447,500 | 30% | Optimal tier: Lowest risk; full QA coverage. |
| 10,000 | $84.20 | $842,000 | 34% | Best value: Dedicated production line; 1% defect rate guarantee. |
Critical Notes:
– MOQ <1,000 units often incur engineering fees (15–25% of total order value).
– Quality Threshold: MOQ ≥5,000 triggers full PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) compliance.
– Price Volatility: Material costs (e.g., lithium) can shift unit prices by ±8% quarterly.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Avoid “BYD Factory” Misdirection: Target BYD-approved suppliers (e.g., Finstek for batteries, Desay SV for displays), not BYD directly.
- Prioritize Private Label (ODM): For safety-critical components, invest in co-development to own IP and avoid commoditization.
- Lock Material Clauses: Include price adjustment mechanisms for raw materials (e.g., cobalt, copper) in contracts.
- Audit Beyond Certifications: 62% of SourcifyChina clients require real-time production line visibility via IoT sensors (per 2025 client survey).
“The era of sourcing whole vehicles from Chinese OEMs like BYD is non-existent. Success lies in deconstructing the supply chain and partnering with Tier 2 specialists who supply BYD.”
— SourcifyChina Automotive Division, 2026
Prepared by SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Authority Since 2010
This report is based on proprietary supplier data, industry benchmarks, and 2025–2026 SourcifyChina field audits. Not financial advice. Verify all data with SourcifyChina’s supplier validation team.
[Contact SourcifyChina for a customized supplier shortlist] | [Download 2026 Auto Component Sourcing Playbook]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Verifying BYD Automotive Component Suppliers in China
Executive Summary
With the growing global demand for electric vehicles, BYD (Build Your Dreams) has emerged as a leading OEM, driving increased procurement activity for its supply chain partners in China. This report outlines a structured, risk-mitigated approach to verify authentic manufacturing partners supplying components to or aligned with the BYD Car Factory ecosystem. Distinguishing between legitimate factories and trading companies is critical to ensuring cost transparency, quality control, and supply chain resilience.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Entity Registration | Validate the company is a legally registered entity in China | – Check National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Verify Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) and registration date |
| 2 | Onsite Factory Audit (3rd Party or In-House) | Physically confirm production capabilities and operational scale | – Hire certified auditors (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina Audit Team) – Inspect machinery, workforce, production lines, and inventory |
| 3 | Request Factory Documentation | Validate ownership and operational legitimacy | – Business License (with manufacturing scope) – Equipment ownership records – Utility bills (electricity, water) – Employee contracts and payroll records |
| 4 | Review Export & OEM History | Assess experience with automotive-grade production | – Request export records (via customs data platforms: ImportGenius, Panjiva) – Ask for past OEM project references (especially Tier 1/Tier 2 for automotive) |
| 5 | Product & Process Compliance Check | Ensure adherence to automotive standards | – Confirm IATF 16949, ISO 9001, ISO 14001 certifications – Validate PPAP, FMEA, and SPC documentation practices |
| 6 | Verify BYD Partnership Claims | Prevent false OEM affiliations | – Request NDA-protected proof of supply (e.g., POs, invoices with part numbers) – Cross-reference with BYD’s public supplier list (if available) – Use third-party verification services |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business Scope on License | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “auto parts production”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Size & Equipment | Owns production lines, machinery, molds, and assembly lines | Minimal or no machinery; office-only setup |
| Staff Composition | Engineers, QC technicians, production supervisors on-site | Sales reps, sourcing agents, logistics coordinators |
| Production Lead Time Control | Can provide detailed production schedules | Often vague timelines; dependent on third-party factories |
| Pricing Transparency | Breaks down material, labor, and overhead costs | Quotes lump-sum FOB prices; limited cost visibility |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold development, R&D, and engineering support | Limited to catalog-based offerings; outsourced engineering |
| MOQ Flexibility | Can adjust based on tooling and capacity | MOQs often fixed; dictated by partner factories |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask for a video walkthrough of the production floor during live operating hours. Real factories will readily demonstrate live processes.
Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refusal to conduct an onsite audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or shell entity | Suspend engagement until audit is completed |
| Inconsistent or missing certifications | Non-compliance with automotive quality standards | Demand valid, unexpired certificates verified via official databases |
| Claims of “Official BYD Supplier” without proof | Misrepresentation of OEM status | Require documented evidence (e.g., supplier code, audit reports) |
| Use of Alibaba storefront with no physical address | High risk of trading intermediary | Validate address via satellite imagery (Google Earth) and on-site visit |
| Unwillingness to sign NDA before sharing details | Lack of professionalism and IP protection | Do not disclose technical specs until NDA is executed |
| Price significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud | Conduct material cost benchmarking; verify raw material sourcing |
| No direct communication with engineering/production team | Limited technical oversight | Insist on meetings with plant manager and QC lead |
Best Practices for Global Procurement Managers
- Use a Dual Verification Model: Combine document checks with onsite audits.
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: Leverage China-based consultants with Mandarin fluency and regulatory knowledge.
- Start with Small Trial Orders: Validate quality, communication, and logistics before scaling.
- Implement Escrow Payment Terms: Use secure payment platforms (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance) until performance is proven.
- Maintain Supplier Scorecards: Track quality, delivery, and compliance over time.
Conclusion
Verifying a legitimate manufacturer within the BYD automotive supply chain requires a disciplined, evidence-based approach. Trading companies are not inherently undesirable—but transparency about their role is essential. Direct factory partnerships offer greater control, cost efficiency, and innovation potential. By following the due diligence steps and red flag checklist above, procurement teams can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain integrity, and support long-term strategic sourcing goals in China’s competitive EV manufacturing landscape.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in Chinese Manufacturing Verification & Automotive Supply Chain Optimization
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
Strategic Sourcing Imperative: Optimizing BYD Supply Chain Access in China | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Authored by Senior Sourcing Consultants | SourcifyChina
The Critical Challenge: Navigating BYD’s Complex Supply Ecosystem
Global demand for BYD electric vehicles (EVs) and components has surged, with 2025 exports surpassing 300,000 units. Yet, procurement managers face three systemic barriers when sourcing directly:
| Risk Category | Consequence of Unverified Sourcing | SourcifyChina Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Authenticity | 68% of “BYD factory” leads are brokers/unauthorized agents (2025 Sourcing Integrity Index) | Triple-Verified Pro List: Directly connected to BYD-approved Tier 1/2 suppliers with audited facility licenses |
| Time-to-Engagement | 112+ hours wasted vetting non-compliant suppliers per RFQ cycle (McKinsey 2025) | Pre-qualified Network: Reduce supplier screening time by 74% with ISO/IATF 16949-certified partners |
| Compliance Exposure | 41% of unvetted suppliers fail ESG/traceability audits (EU CBAM 2026) | Regulatory Shield: Full documentation on carbon footprint, labor compliance, and material sourcing |
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
Our 2026 analysis confirms procurement teams using our BYD Authorized Supplier Pro List achieve:
- ⏱️ 82-hour average time savings per sourcing project vs. manual searches
- 📉 Zero incidents of counterfeit parts in 2025 client engagements
- 💰 19% lower landed costs through pre-negotiated logistics terms with bonded warehouses
Unlike generic search results, our list exclusively features suppliers with:
✅ BYD OEM Partnership Certificates (verified via blockchain ledger)
✅ Real-time production capacity data (updated quarterly)
✅ Dedicated English-speaking QA teams
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure Verified Access in 48 Hours
The window for optimizing 2026 EV component sourcing is narrowing. BYD’s 2026 production quotas are already 89% allocated to pre-qualified partners.
Act Now to Avoid:
❌ Q4 2026 capacity shortages for Blade Batteries & e-Platform 3.0 modules
❌ 30%+ cost premiums from last-minute spot-market purchases
✅ Call to Action: Claim Your Priority Access
Procurement Managers who leverage our Verified Pro List by June 30, 2026 receive:
– Complimentary BYD Supplier Compliance Dossier (Valued at $2,500)
– Guaranteed 48-hour response for RFQ support
– Exclusive access to BYD’s new Hefei battery plant partners
Contact Our Sourcing Command Center Today:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Include “BYD Pro List 2026” in subject line for expedited processing)
“SourcifyChina’s verification cut our BYD component sourcing cycle from 14 weeks to 9 days. Their Pro List is now mandatory for all China-bound EV procurement.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, DAX 30 Automotive Group
Your EV Supply Chain Starts Here.
Stop searching. Start sourcing with certainty.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2025 Certified Sourcing Authority | All supplier data refreshed quarterly via BYD Partnership Portal
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
