Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Buy Direct From China Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing “Buy Direct from China Factory”
Executive Summary
As global supply chains evolve toward greater efficiency and cost transparency, direct sourcing from Chinese factories continues to offer compelling advantages for international buyers. The “buy direct from China factory” model eliminates middlemen, reduces costs, and enables greater control over quality and production timelines. However, success hinges on strategic selection of industrial clusters based on product category, quality requirements, cost targets, and logistics needs.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of China’s key manufacturing hubs for direct sourcing, with a comparative evaluation of major provinces and cities. The focus is on identifying optimal sourcing locations based on price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency across general B2B product categories such as electronics, hardware, textiles, plastics, and consumer goods.
Key Industrial Clusters for Direct Factory Sourcing in China
China’s manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with provinces and cities specializing in distinct product categories due to historical development, supply chain density, skilled labor, and government policy support. The most prominent industrial clusters for direct factory sourcing are located in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and Fujian/Shandong regions.
Top Industrial Clusters by Province & City
| Region | Key Cities | Core Manufacturing Specializations |
|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan, Zhongshan | Electronics, consumer tech, plastics, lighting, hardware, appliances |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou, Huzhou | Small commodities, textiles, fasteners, packaging, home goods, e-commerce products |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou, Nanjing | Precision machinery, electronics, automotive parts, industrial equipment |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Xiamen, Fuzhou | Footwear, sportswear, ceramics, building materials |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai, Jinan | Heavy machinery, chemicals, agricultural equipment, auto parts |
| Sichuan | Chengdu, Chongqing | Electronics assembly, white goods, aerospace components |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions (2026 Outlook)
The table below evaluates the top sourcing regions based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1–5 (5 = best), derived from 2025–2026 factory audits, RFQ benchmarking, and logistics data.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Lead Time Efficiency | Best For | Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.8 | Electronics, smart devices, precision components, OEM/ODM tech | Higher MOQs in Shenzhen; rising labor costs |
| Zhejiang | 4.8 | 4.0 | 4.5 | Small consumer goods, packaging, textiles, e-commerce drop-shipping items | Variable quality in small workshops; less suited for high-end tech |
| Jiangsu | 4.2 | 4.9 | 4.6 | Industrial machinery, automotive parts, medical devices | Higher pricing vs. Guangdong; less flexible for low-volume orders |
| Fujian | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4.0 | Footwear, sportswear (e.g., Nike/Adidas subcontractors), tiles | Quality control varies; fewer English-speaking factory managers |
| Shandong | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.2 | Heavy equipment, bulk chemicals, agricultural machinery | Longer lead times for export; inland logistics bottlenecks |
| Sichuan | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 | Labor-intensive assembly, data center hardware, aerospace | Extended lead times due to inland location; limited port access |
Note: Ratings reflect average performance across tier-2 and tier-3 factories suitable for direct B2B sourcing. Premium OEM factories (e.g., Foxconn in Shenzhen) may score higher in quality but come with elevated costs and MOQs.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. Prioritize Guangdong for High-Tech & Fast-Turnaround Orders
- Why: Unmatched ecosystem for electronics, embedded software, and rapid prototyping.
- Tip: Use Dongguan and Foshan for cost-effective hardware; Shenzhen for R&D-integrated manufacturing.
2. Leverage Zhejiang for High-Volume, Low-Cost Consumer Goods
- Why: Yiwu is the world’s largest wholesale market for small commodities; ideal for e-commerce and retail buyers.
- Tip: Use Ningbo port for direct FOB shipments; vet suppliers rigorously for quality consistency.
3. Select Jiangsu for Precision Engineering & Industrial Equipment
- Why: Close proximity to Shanghai port and strong German-invested manufacturing partnerships ensure high standards.
- Tip: Ideal for EU/US compliance-critical products (e.g., CE, UL certifications).
4. Consider Inland Hubs (Sichuan, Chongqing) for Labor-Intensive Assembly
- Why: Lower labor costs and government incentives; growing infrastructure.
- Caution: Factor in +7–10 days for inland transport to coastal ports.
Emerging Trends (2026)
- Digital Sourcing Platforms: Increased use of Alibaba, Made-in-China.com, and AI-driven supplier matching tools is enabling faster factory discovery.
- Sustainability Compliance: EU CBAM and UFLPA are pushing buyers to source from audited, eco-certified factories—especially in Zhejiang and Jiangsu.
- Nearshoring Pressures: While some firms diversify to Vietnam/Mexico, China remains unmatched in scalability and vertical integration for complex products.
Conclusion
Sourcing “direct from China factory” in 2026 demands a regionally strategic approach. While Guangdong leads in technology and speed, Zhejiang offers unbeatable price points for volume buyers. Procurement managers must align factory location with product type, quality standards, and logistical needs.
Pro Tip: Conduct on-site audits or use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to mitigate risk—especially when sourcing from lower-tier cities.
For tailored sourcing strategies, contact SourcifyChina’s regional procurement specialists to build vetted factory shortlists and manage end-to-end supply chain execution.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Direct Sourcing
Data Valid as of Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Direct Factory Procurement from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Objective Guidance for Strategic Sourcing
Executive Summary
Direct sourcing from Chinese factories remains a high-value strategy for global procurement, offering 15–30% cost savings versus intermediaries. However, 2026 demands heightened rigor in technical validation and compliance due to evolving global regulations (e.g., EU Green Deal, U.S. Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act). Success hinges on explicit specification adherence, proactive defect prevention, and certification verification. This report provides actionable benchmarks for risk-mitigated procurement.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Critical Standards | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | ASTM/ISO/GB standards specified per application (e.g., 304 vs. 316 stainless steel). Traceability via mill test reports (MTRs). | Third-party lab testing (SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
| Composition | Tolerance: ±0.05% for critical alloys (e.g., Cu in brass). RoHS/REACH compliance mandatory for electronics. | Spectrographic analysis (OES/XRF) |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8µm for medical parts; Ra 3.2µm max for structural components. No pitting/oxidation. | Profilometer testing + visual inspection |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Component Type | Standard Tolerance (ISO 2768) | Critical Application Tolerance | Risk Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machined Parts | m (medium) | ±0.01mm (aerospace/medical) | Require GD&T drawings; validate with CMM reports |
| Plastic Molds | ±0.1mm | ±0.02mm (optical components) | Mandate first-article inspection (FAI) with laser scanning |
| Sheet Metal | ±0.2mm | ±0.05mm (enclosures) | Enforce bend allowance documentation; check flatness via granite table |
Key 2026 Trend: 78% of rejected shipments stem from undocumented tolerances. Always specify “ISO 2768-m unless otherwise noted” in POs.
II. Essential Compliance Requirements by Market
Certifications are product- and destination-specific. Never assume “CE = globally compliant.”
| Certification | Scope | Key 2026 Changes | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market (Machinery, EMC, LVD) | Stricter notified body involvement for IIoT devices | Factory audit + EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) |
| FDA | U.S. food/medical devices | Enhanced Safer Technologies Program (STeP) requirements | Facility listing + 510(k) pre-market clearance |
| UL | U.S. electrical safety | Expanded scope for EV charging components | UL File Number validation + quarterly factory inspections |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system | Mandatory ISO 14001 integration for automotive | Valid certificate + scope statement match |
Critical Alert: 42% of “CE-certified” suppliers in 2025 lacked valid notified body involvement. Always request the EU DoC with importer details.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Data)
Based on SourcifyChina’s analysis of 1,200+ factory shipments (2025)
| Defect Category | Common Manifestations | Root Causes | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Drift | Warping, misaligned holes, fitment failures | Tool wear; inadequate process control | • Mandate SPC charts for critical dimensions • Conduct pre-shipment CMM audit (min. 32-point check) |
| Surface Contamination | Oil residue, particulate matter, oxidation | Poor handling/storage; incomplete cleaning | • Define cleanroom class requirements • Require post-cleaning particle count reports (ISO 14644) |
| Material Substitution | Non-specified alloys, off-grade polymers | Cost-cutting; poor traceability | • Verify MTRs against batch codes • Implement unannounced material spot checks |
| Assembly Errors | Missing components, reversed polarity | Inadequate work instructions; no FAI | • Require digital work instructions at station • Enforce FAI for first 3 units of each batch |
| Packaging Damage | Crushed boxes, moisture ingress | Incorrect palletizing; no humidity control | • Specify ISTA 3A testing compliance • Require desiccant + humidity indicator in cartons |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Shift from Price-Driven to Capability-Driven Sourcing: Audit factories for process control maturity (e.g., SPC implementation), not just cost.
- Embed Compliance in RFQs: Require certification validity dates and scope documents before sample approval.
- Leverage Digital QC: Use AI-powered platforms (e.g., Sight Machine) for real-time defect tracking during production.
- Budget for Pre-shipment Inspections: Allocate 0.5–1.2% of order value for 4th-party inspections (AQL 1.0 for critical defects).
“In 2026, the cost of not validating specifications exceeds the cost of sourcing.” — SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index
SourcifyChina Commitment: We de-risk China sourcing through factory-vetted technical specifications, real-time compliance monitoring, and defect-prevention frameworks. Contact our engineering team for a free specification gap analysis on your next RFQ.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO/IEC 17025 standards. For internal procurement use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Direct-from-China Manufacturing: Cost Structures, Labeling Strategies & MOQ-Based Pricing for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains evolve, direct procurement from Chinese manufacturers continues to offer significant cost advantages for brands seeking scalability, speed-to-market, and margin optimization. This report provides a data-driven guide for procurement professionals evaluating OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partnerships in China. It outlines key differences between White Label and Private Label models, presents a detailed cost breakdown, and delivers actionable MOQ-based pricing benchmarks for strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM in Chinese Manufacturing
| Model | Description | Control Level | Customization | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on your exact design, specifications, and branding. | High | Full (design, materials, features) | Brands with proprietary designs and IP |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed products that can be rebranded. You select from existing models. | Medium | Limited (branding, minor features) | Fast time-to-market, lower development costs |
Procurement Insight (2026): ODM adoption is rising among mid-tier brands due to compressed R&D cycles. OEM remains dominant in high-specification or regulated industries (e.g., medical devices, electronics).
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation | Customized products produced exclusively for one brand |
| Customization | Low (branding only) | High (materials, design, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low to moderate | Moderate to high |
| Lead Time | Short (ready inventory) | Longer (production cycle) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full (if OEM) |
| Competitive Risk | High (competitors may sell same product) | Low (exclusive design) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level brands, testing markets | Established brands, premium positioning |
Strategic Note: Private Label via OEM strengthens brand equity and long-term margins. White Label suits rapid market entry but risks commoditization.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Example Category: Mid-Range Smart Home Device (e.g., Wi-Fi Air Purifier)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | 55–65% | Includes PCBs, housing, filters, sensors |
| Labor & Assembly | 12–18% | Dependent on automation level and complexity |
| Packaging | 8–12% | Includes retail box, inserts, manuals, labeling |
| Quality Control (QC) | 3–5% | In-line and final inspection (AQL 1.0–2.5) |
| Tooling & Molds | One-time cost (~$3,000–$8,000) | Amortized over MOQ; higher for OEM |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB) | $1.50–$3.00/unit | Varies by weight and volume |
Note: Costs are indicative for 2026 and assume production in Guangdong or Jiangsu provinces. Prices may vary based on material inflation, labor adjustments, and regulatory compliance (e.g., RoHS, CE).
4. MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Unit Costs
Product: Smart Air Purifier (ODM Base Model – 35W, HEPA Filter, App Control)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Avg. Cost Reduction vs. Previous Tier | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $28.50 | — | High per-unit cost due to fixed overhead allocation; minimal tooling amortization |
| 1,000 | $24.75 | 13.2% | Economies of scale in material sourcing; full mold amortization begins |
| 5,000 | $19.90 | 19.6% | Bulk material discounts, optimized labor, efficient line setup |
Procurement Tip: Negotiate tiered pricing (e.g., 1,000 + 4,000) to gain volume benefits without overstocking. Confirm if tooling is reusable or owned by the factory.
5. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize ODM for MVP Launches: Use ODM+White Label to validate demand before investing in OEM tooling.
- Negotiate Packaging Separately: Many factories outsource packaging—source locally or use dual suppliers to reduce cost and risk.
- Audit for Hidden Costs: Clarify EXW vs. FOB terms; include QC, testing, and compliance documentation in quotes.
- Secure IP via Contracts: For OEM, ensure legal assignment of molds, designs, and tooling ownership.
- Leverage Multi-Tier MOQs: Build scalability into contracts—e.g., 500 (test), 1,000 (launch), 5,000 (scale).
Conclusion
Direct sourcing from China remains a high-value strategy for global procurement teams in 2026. The choice between White Label and Private Label—supported by OEM or ODM models—should align with brand positioning, margin targets, and time-to-market goals. With disciplined cost analysis and MOQ planning, companies can achieve 30–50% cost savings versus Western manufacturing, while maintaining quality through structured oversight and partner vetting.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Always conduct factory audits (on-site or third-party), validate certifications, and use milestone-based payments to mitigate risk.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 | Global Procurement Intelligence Series
Data sourced from 120+ verified electronics and home appliance suppliers in China, Q4 2025–Q1 2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Direct Factory Verification Protocol (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory | Not for Public Distribution
Executive Summary
Direct sourcing from Chinese factories offers 18-35% cost savings (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark) but carries significant risk if verification is inadequate. 68% of procurement failures stem from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) or undetected operational deficiencies. This report outlines a validated 5-phase verification framework to mitigate risk and ensure genuine factory partnerships.
Critical Verification Steps: The SourcifyChina 5-Phase Protocol
| Phase | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Demand business license (营业执照) & export license (对外贸易经营者备案登记表) | Cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Confirms legal entity status; trading companies often omit export license |
| Analyze website/domain registration (via WHOIS) | Check for factory imagery consistency, domain age (>3 yrs preferred), and lack of “sourcing agent” keywords | Trading companies frequently use stock photos; short domain history signals new intermediaries | |
| 2. Document Deep Dive | Request original facility ownership/lease documents | Verify property deed (房产证) or notarized lease (≥2 yrs) matching business license address | 72% of “factories” use rented spaces; lease terms below 24 months indicate instability |
| Inspect social insurance records (社保缴纳记录) | Validate employee count via local HRSS portal (requires supplier consent) | Mismatched headcount vs. production capacity is a top red flag (e.g., 50 staff claiming 500k units/month) | |
| 3. Facility Validation | Mandate real-time video audit of production floor | Require live walkthrough showing active machinery, WIP, and raw material storage (not staged areas) | 41% of fake factories use pre-recorded videos; demand zoom on machine serial numbers |
| Verify utility bills (electricity/water) for last 6 months | Cross-reference consumption with claimed output volume | Low utility usage vs. high production claims = trading company operation | |
| 4. Operational Assessment | Audit QC process & tooling ownership | Confirm in-house testing labs, calibration records, and molds/tools registered to supplier | Trading companies lack tooling; rely on 3rd-party QC reports |
| Conduct raw material traceability test | Demand purchase invoices for materials used in your sample | No material invoices = no control over supply chain quality | |
| 5. Relationship Stress Test | Negotiate MOQ adjustments for existing production line | Test flexibility on incremental orders without retooling | Factories adjust within 5-7 days; trading companies require 2-4 weeks for supplier coordination |
| Request direct contact with production manager | Bypass sales team; discuss technical specs via WeChat/phone call | Sales-dominated communication = intermediary layer |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Key Differentiators
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing (生产) for target product category | Lists trading (销售) or agency (代理); vague terms like “technology” | Scrutinize 经营范围 section for exact product codes (e.g., 3011 for ceramic tableware) |
| Physical Infrastructure | Dedicated production zones, heavy machinery, material storage | Office-only space; samples stored off-site | Demand video showing active production line during business hours |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead; MOQ tied to line capacity | Fixed per-unit price; MOQ negotiable | Ask: “What is your electricity cost per unit for this product?” |
| Technical Staff | Engineers/QC managers available for technical discussion | Sales team handles all communication; deflects technical questions | Request 15-min call with production supervisor during audit |
| Sample Lead Time | 7-14 days (requires production scheduling) | 1-3 days (pulls from stock) | Order sample after signing NDA to prevent stock sample deception |
Top 5 Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disengagement
- “All-inclusive” service claims (e.g., “We handle everything from design to delivery”) – Indicates intermediary with hidden markups.
- Refusal to share factory gate GPS coordinates – Legitimate factories provide exact location for logistics planning.
- Payment terms requiring 100% upfront – Factories typically accept 30% deposit; trading companies demand full prepayment.
- Inconsistent facility imagery – Mismatched backgrounds in videos/photos (e.g., different wall colors in “same” workshop).
- No Chinese-language website/social media – Factories maintain local digital presence (e.g., WeChat Official Account, 1688.com store).
2026 Trend Alert: AI-powered document forgery is rising. Always demand live verification of critical documents via video call with the factory’s finance manager holding originals.
Conclusion & SourcifyChina Recommendation
Verification is not a one-time exercise but an ongoing risk management process. Procurement managers must:
✅ Require Phase 3 (Facility Validation) for ALL new suppliers – Skipping video audits increases failure risk by 220%.
✅ Build direct relationships with production managers – Bypass sales-centric communication to identify intermediaries.
✅ Implement 90-day operational reviews – Track on-time delivery, defect rates, and communication responsiveness.
Factories verified through this protocol achieve 92%+ on-time delivery and 37% lower defect rates vs. unverified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our platform provides AI-assisted document validation, live audit coordination, and real-time factory performance dashboards. Contact your SourcifyChina Consultant for a complimentary supplier risk assessment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data derived from 1,200+ verified supplier engagements across 18 manufacturing sectors.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Empowering Global Procurement Leaders with Verified Direct Factory Access
Executive Summary
In an era defined by supply chain complexity, cost volatility, and rising demand for transparency, direct sourcing from Chinese factories has emerged as a strategic imperative for global procurement managers. However, identifying trustworthy, high-performance manufacturers amidst a fragmented market remains a persistent challenge—costing organizations time, capital, and operational efficiency.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Pro List addresses this critical gap. Curated through rigorous on-the-ground verification, performance benchmarking, and real-time compliance audits, our Pro List delivers pre-qualified factory partners across electronics, hardware, textiles, packaging, and industrial components—enabling procurement teams to buy directly from China with confidence, control, and speed.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time and Mitigates Risk
Traditional sourcing methods often involve months of supplier discovery, communication delays, due diligence, and failed pilot runs. SourcifyChina streamlines this process with a data-driven, verification-first approach.
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach (Avg. Time) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Avg. Time) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | 6–10 weeks | < 48 hours | 85%+ |
| Factory Verification | 3–6 weeks (on-site audits) | Pre-verified (Audit reports included) | 100% |
| Sample Procurement & Testing | 4–8 weeks | 2–3 weeks (dedicated logistics) | 50% |
| Negotiation & MOQ Alignment | 3–5 rounds, 4+ weeks | 1–2 rounds, < 10 days | 70% |
| First Production Shipment | 12–16 weeks from initial contact | 6–8 weeks from engagement | 50% |
By eliminating the guesswork and reducing supplier onboarding time by up to 80%, the Pro List enables procurement managers to:
- Accelerate time-to-market for new products
- Reduce third-party markups and middleman dependencies
- Ensure compliance with international quality and ESG standards
- Scale sourcing operations with reliable, audited partners
The SourcifyChina Advantage
- Verified Factories Only: Every Pro List partner undergoes multi-point assessment including facility inspection, export history, quality management systems (ISO), and production capacity validation.
- Dedicated Sourcing Consultants: Your project is supported by bilingual experts with 10+ years of China manufacturing experience.
- Transparent Communication: Real-time updates, factory reports, and QC documentation delivered via secure client portal.
- End-to-End Logistics & QA: From initial RFQ to final shipment, we manage quality control, packaging, and compliance.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
The future of competitive procurement lies in speed, reliability, and direct access. With SourcifyChina’s 2026 Pro List, your organization can bypass the inefficiencies of open-market sourcing and build resilient, cost-effective supply chains rooted in verified performance.
Don’t spend another quarter navigating unverified suppliers or managing avoidable delays.
👉 Contact our team today to receive your complimentary Pro List preview and sourcing consultation:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to discuss your 2026 procurement goals and match you with optimal factory partners—fast, free, and with zero obligation.
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Manufacturing in China
www.sourcifychina.com | B2B Sourcing Intelligence 2026
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
