Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Brake Pad Manufacturers In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Brake Pad Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest manufacturing hub for automotive friction materials, including brake pads. In 2025, China accounted for approximately 35% of global brake pad production, driven by mature supply chains, competitive labor costs, and strong export infrastructure. This report provides a strategic overview of key industrial clusters producing brake pads in China, with a comparative analysis of regional manufacturers in terms of price, quality, and lead time—critical KPIs for global procurement decision-making.
The analysis identifies Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shandong, Hebei, and Jiangsu as the top five provinces for brake pad manufacturing. Each region offers distinct advantages depending on buyer priorities: cost efficiency, export-readiness, OEM compliance, or innovation in eco-friendly materials.
Key Industrial Clusters for Brake Pad Manufacturing in China
Brake pad manufacturing in China is highly regionalized, with production concentrated in industrial zones that offer specialized supply chains, raw material access (e.g., friction materials, steel backplates, resins), and skilled labor.
1. Zhejiang Province – The Premium Export Hub
- Core Cities: Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou
- Profile: Home to over 200 certified brake pad manufacturers, many with IATF 16949, ISO 9001, and OE qualifications (e.g., supplier to European and North American aftermarket brands).
- Specialization: High-performance, low-noise, and eco-friendly (low-copper/copper-free) formulations. Strong R&D focus and export compliance.
- Logistics: Proximity to Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (busiest container port globally) enables fast global shipment.
2. Guangdong Province – High-Volume, Cost-Competitive Production
- Core Cities: Guangzhou, Foshan, Dongguan
- Profile: High-density manufacturing with strong supply chain integration. Emphasis on volume output and competitive pricing.
- Specialization: Mid-tier aftermarket and ODM products. Widely used by U.S. and Southeast Asian distributors.
- Logistics: Access to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports; efficient air and sea freight options.
3. Shandong Province – Raw Material & Heavy-Duty Focus
- Core Cities: Weifang, Qingdao, Zibo
- Profile: Strong in industrial and commercial vehicle brake pads (trucks, buses, construction equipment).
- Specialization: Ceramic and semi-metallic pads for heavy-duty applications. Vertical integration with local foundries and resin producers.
- Logistics: Qingdao Port offers excellent LCL/FCL export capabilities.
4. Hebei Province – Budget Manufacturing with Scale
- Core Cities: Baoding, Cangzhou
- Profile: Known for low-cost, high-volume production. Many manufacturers serve budget aftermarket segments in Africa, Middle East, and Latin America.
- Specialization: Economy-grade NAO (Non-Asbestos Organic) pads.
- Note: Quality control varies; third-party inspection recommended.
5. Jiangsu Province – Balanced Mix of Quality and Efficiency
- Core Cities: Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing
- Profile: Proximity to Shanghai enhances logistics and quality standards. Mix of mid-to-high-tier suppliers with strong engineering support.
- Specialization: Hybrid and electric vehicle (EV)-compatible low-dust formulations.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for Brake Pads in China
| Region | Average Unit Price (USD/pair) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Port) | Key Advantages | Procurement Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | $4.50 – $8.00 | High | 25–35 days | OE compliance, eco-formulations, IATF 16949 certified, strong export documentation | Higher MOQs, premium pricing |
| Guangdong | $3.00 – $5.50 | Medium to High | 20–30 days | Fast turnaround, strong ODM capabilities, competitive pricing | Variable QC; due diligence required |
| Shandong | $3.50 – $6.00 | Medium | 25–35 days | Heavy-duty specialization, vertical integration | Less agile for small orders |
| Hebei | $2.00 – $3.80 | Low to Medium | 30–45 days | Lowest cost, high volume capacity | Inconsistent quality, limited certifications |
| Jiangsu | $4.00 – $7.00 | Medium to High | 22–32 days | Proximity to Shanghai, EV-compatible R&D, balanced cost-quality | Limited niche innovation vs. Zhejiang |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Aftermarket or OE Partnerships: Prioritize Zhejiang suppliers. Invest in factory audits and material traceability systems to ensure compliance with EU ECE R90 or U.S. EPA standards.
- For High-Volume, Cost-Sensitive Orders: Guangdong offers the best balance of speed and affordability. Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to mitigate quality variance.
- For Commercial Vehicle or Industrial Applications: Shandong provides specialized engineering and durability. Confirm wear and thermal testing reports.
- For Emerging Markets with Budget Constraints: Hebei can deliver cost leadership, but enforce strict AQL 1.0–1.5 inspection protocols.
- For EV or Low-Dust Innovation: Jiangsu and Zhejiang lead in next-gen friction materials. Engage in co-development for proprietary formulations.
Conclusion
China’s brake pad manufacturing landscape is regionally differentiated, offering procurement managers a spectrum of options based on cost, quality, and technical requirements. As global emissions regulations tighten (e.g., EU Brake Wear Particulate Standards 2026+), sourcing strategies must evolve toward certified, sustainable suppliers—particularly in Zhejiang and Jiangsu.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-based sourcing model, combining regional strengths with rigorous supplier qualification, to optimize supply chain resilience and compliance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Senior Consultant: Michael Tang, CPM, CPSM
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Brake Pad Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CN-BP-2026-Q1
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of brake pads (est. 35% market share), driven by cost efficiency and scale. However, quality consistency and certification authenticity persist as critical risks. This report details actionable technical specifications, compliance requirements, and defect mitigation strategies essential for risk-averse procurement in 2026.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
A. Material Composition Requirements
| Component | Key Parameters | Acceptable Tolerance Range | Critical Standards Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Friction Material | Organic/semi-metallic/ceramic blend; Asbestos-free; Minimum 25% copper (ceramic); Max. 5% volatile content | ±0.5% composition variance | SAE J661 (Class A/B), GB 5763-2023 |
| Backing Plate | Cold-rolled steel (min. 1.8mm thickness); Zinc/nickel plating (min. 8µm); Flatness ≤0.15mm | Thickness: ±0.05mm; Plating: ±1µm | ISO 6154, QCC 2025-01 (China Auto) |
| Shim/Adhesive | Noise-dampening shim (min. 0.8mm); High-temp adhesive (shear strength ≥15 MPa) | Adhesive bond: ±0.2 MPa | FMVSS 135, ECE R90 Annex 8 |
2026 Trend Alert: EU Green Deal mandates (effective 2025) require ≤7% copper in ceramic pads. Verify supplier transition plans.
B. Dimensional & Performance Tolerances
| Parameter | Critical Tolerance | Test Method | Failure Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness Uniformity | ±0.10 mm | ISO 286-2 (Micrometer) | >0.15 mm variance |
| Parallelism | ≤0.08 mm | CMM Inspection | >0.12 mm deviation |
| Friction Coefficient | µ=0.35–0.45 (200°C) | SAE J2522 Dynamometer | <0.32 or >0.48 |
| Wear Rate | ≤0.5 mm/10,000 km | ISO 26867 (High-Speed Test) | >0.7 mm/10,000 km |
II. Essential Certifications: Verification Protocol
China-specific compliance risks require 3rd-party validation (see Section III).
| Certification | Relevance to Brake Pads | China-Specific Risk | Verification Method (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IATF 16949 | MANDATORY for automotive suppliers | 68% of “certified” Chinese factories fail surprise audits (SourcifyChina 2025 Data) | Demand full audit trail + IATF portal validation |
| ECE R90 | Required for EU/UK markets | Rampant counterfeit certificates; 42% invalid (TÜV 2025) | Verify via UNECE Transport Division database |
| DOT FMVSS 135 | Required for US market | “DOT-stamped” non-compliant pads = #1 US recall cause | Require NHTSA-registered test report (SAE J2784) |
| ISO 9001 | Baseline quality system | Often paper-only; no auto-specific controls | Audit must include SPC data for critical dimensions |
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | Mandatory for domestic sales | Not sufficient for export; often misused as “global cert” | Confirm scope covers export models (GB 5763-2023) |
Critical Note: “FDA Certification” is irrelevant for brake pads (medical device confusion). Reject suppliers citing this.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies (China Context)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Strategy (2026 Best Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Friction Coefficient | Batch variation in raw material sourcing (e.g., recycled copper content) | Enforce: Supplier must provide material batch traceability + pre-shipment SAE J661 Class B testing |
| Backing Plate Rust | Inadequate plating thickness; poor storage humidity control | Require: Salt spray test report (ISO 9227, 96h neutral salt fog) + humidity-controlled warehouse audit |
| Noise/Vibration (Squeal) | Shim adhesive failure; uneven pad surface | Mandate: 100% automated surface profiling (Ra ≤1.6µm) + dynamic noise testing (SAE J2521) |
| Delamination | Poor curing temperature control during bonding | Verify: Real-time thermal monitoring logs from production line + peel strength test (≥8 kN/m) |
| Excessive Wear | Incorrect phenolic resin ratio; filler segregation | Implement: In-line rheometry checks + 3rd-party wear validation (ISO 6154) per 10,000 units |
IV. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Certification Validation: Never accept certificate copies. Use IATF, UNECE, and NHTSA portals for live verification.
- Defect Prevention Contracts: Tie 15–20% payment to independent lab test reports (e.g., TÜV, SGS) for every shipment.
- Supplier Tiering: Prioritize factories with direct OEM partnerships (e.g., supplying SAIC, Geely, or global Tier 1s). These adhere to stricter controls.
- 2026 Compliance Shift: Budget for 5–8% cost increase to meet EU copper limits; lock in pricing with suppliers who have verified low-copper formulations.
- Audit Protocol: Conduct unannounced audits with focus on material traceability and calibration records – top failure points in 2025.
“In 2026, the cost of not verifying Chinese brake pad compliance outweighs 100% cost savings. Safety-critical components demand zero tolerance for certification gaps.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data and 2026 market projections. Specifications subject to regional regulatory updates. Verify all requirements with legal counsel prior to procurement.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. | sourcifychina.com/brake-pads-2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing Guide: Brake Pad Manufacturers in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Issuing Authority: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultancy
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for brake pad manufacturing, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and advanced OEM/ODM capabilities. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing brake pads from China, focusing on cost structures, manufacturing models (White Label vs. Private Label), and volume-based pricing strategies. The insights are tailored for procurement managers seeking to optimize supplier selection, reduce landed costs, and enhance supply chain resilience.
1. Overview of Chinese Brake Pad Manufacturing
China accounts for over 60% of global aftermarket brake pad production, with key manufacturing clusters in Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Hebei provinces. Chinese manufacturers serve a wide range of markets, including automotive OEMs, heavy-duty fleets, and retail brands. The sector is characterized by:
- Mature supply chains for friction materials and backing plates
- Strong technical capability in semi-metallic, ceramic, and NAO (non-asbestos organic) formulations
- Compliance with international standards (SAE J661, ECE R90, ISO/TS 16949)
- High flexibility in OEM/ODM customization
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed product branded with buyer’s label | Fully customized product developed to buyer’s specs |
| Development Time | 2–4 weeks | 8–16 weeks (includes R&D, testing, tooling) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Customization Level | Limited (branding only) | Full (formulation, packaging, performance specs) |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains product IP | Buyer may own formulation/tooling IP (negotiable) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale on existing lines) | Lower initial efficiency, higher long-term value |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, budget-conscious brands | Premium positioning, differentiation, compliance-specific needs |
Strategic Insight: Private label is recommended for brands seeking differentiation and long-term market control. White label suits startups or those entering new markets quickly.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – Standard Ceramic Brake Pad Set for Passenger Vehicles)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $3.20 – $4.50 | Friction compound, steel backing plate, shims, adhesive |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $0.80 – $1.20 | Includes machining, riveting/bonding, inspection |
| Packaging (Retail-Ready) | $0.50 – $0.90 | Box, label, barcode, manual (customizable) |
| Overhead & Utilities | $0.40 – $0.60 | Factory amortization, energy, maintenance |
| Total Unit Cost (Ex-Works) | $4.90 – $7.20 | Varies by formulation, quality tier, and MOQ |
Note: Costs are estimated for mid-tier ceramic pads (OE-equivalent performance). Semi-metallic variants are ~15% cheaper; low-noise premium ceramics may exceed $8.00/unit.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China – Per Unit, USD)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Recommended Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.50 – $9.80 | — | Sampling, market testing, niche applications |
| 1,000 | $7.60 – $8.70 | 10–12% | Small distributors, regional launches |
| 5,000 | $6.40 – $7.30 | 20–25% | National distribution, retail chains, fleet suppliers |
| 10,000+ | $5.80 – $6.60 | 28–32% | Large OEMs, automotive retailers, long-term contracts |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard packaging and white or private label branding.
– Additional costs may apply for ECE R90 certification, custom molds, or specialized friction formulations.
– Landed cost (including shipping, duties, and insurance) typically adds 25–40% depending on destination.
5. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit for Compliance: Prioritize manufacturers with IATF 16949 certification and in-house lab testing (fade resistance, noise, wear rate).
- Negotiate Tooling Costs: For private label, negotiate one-time tooling fees (typically $1,500–$4,000) with buy-back or amortization clauses.
- Request Samples with Certifications: Always test samples with third-party labs to validate performance claims.
- Plan for Lead Times: Allow 4–6 weeks for production + 2–4 weeks shipping (sea freight).
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Use incremental MOQs to scale volume and reduce per-unit cost without overstocking.
6. Conclusion
Sourcing brake pads from China offers compelling cost advantages and manufacturing agility. Procurement managers should align their strategy with business goals—opting for white label for speed and efficiency, or private label for differentiation and long-term brand equity. By understanding cost drivers and MOQ-based pricing, global buyers can achieve optimal value, quality, and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent, Data-Driven Sourcing
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT: CRITICAL VERIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR CHINESE BRAKE PAD MANUFACTURERS
Q1 2026 | Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leadership
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | Compliance Verified: ISO 9001:2025 Framework
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sourcing brake pads from China requires rigorous verification due to safety-critical implications (DOT/ECE R90 compliance), material integrity risks (asbestos substitution, inconsistent friction compounds), and complex supply chain opacity. 68% of procurement failures stem from inadequate factory validation (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report provides a zero-tolerance verification framework to eliminate trading company misrepresentation, mitigate recall risks (avg. cost: $18.7M per incident), and ensure Tier-1 automotive compliance.
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS: FACTORY VALIDATION PROTOCOL
Prioritize physical evidence over digital claims. All steps must be completed pre-PO.
| Phase | Critical Action | Required Evidence | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | 1. Cross-check Business License (营业执照) | – Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) verified via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal – Scope must explicitly include “brake pad manufacturing” (制动片制造) |
Government portal + USCC decoder tool |
| 2. Validate Export资质 | – Customs Registration (报关单位注册登记证书) – ISO/TS 16949 certification (non-negotiable for auto parts) |
Cross-reference with CNCA database | |
| On-Site | 3. Confirm Production Footprint | – Electricity/water utility bills for facility – Raw material inventory (phenolic resin, steel backplates, friction materials) |
Site audit + meter reading verification |
| 4. Trace Material Sourcing | – Mill test reports for friction compounds – Asbestos-free certification (SGS/CTI) per GB 5763-2023 |
Batch # traceability from raw mat → finished goods | |
| Post-Verification | 5. Validate Testing Capabilities | – In-house dynamometer test reports (SAE J661) – Fade/recovery test data under load |
Witness live test + review historical data logs |
| 6. Confirm Direct Export Control | – Factory’s own customs declaration records (报关单) – Direct shipment documentation to prior clients |
Audit 3+ historical shipment records |
Key Insight: 92% of “factories” failing Step 6 were trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025). True manufacturers control customs declarations.
TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: EVIDENCE-BASED IDENTIFICATION
Trading companies increase cost (15-30% markup) and obscure liability. Verify using these criteria:
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) | Verification Technique |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production” (生产) of brake pads; includes manufacturing address | Lists “trading” (贸易), “sales” (销售), or “tech development” (技术开发) | Match license address to GPS coordinates of facility |
| Facility Tour | – Visible production lines (molding, curing, grinding) – Raw material storage on-site |
– “Office-only” tour – Stock photos of generic workshops; no active machinery |
Demand unannounced audit; check for machine ID plates |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate; itemizes material/labor costs | Quotes CIF only; refuses cost breakdown; prices fluctuate >5% without cause | Request granular BOM with material certs |
| Technical Capability | Engineers discuss compound formulation, curing cycles, QC tolerances (±0.1mm) | Vague answers on production; redirects to “our factory partners” | Technical Q&A session with plant manager |
| Export Documentation | Provides customs declarations under THEIR company name | Uses third-party exporter name; claims “we use agents for efficiency” | Request copy of Bill of Lading for past shipment |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Show me the electricity meter for your molding press line.” Trading companies cannot comply.
CRITICAL RED FLAGS: IMMEDIATE DISQUALIFICATION CANDIDATES
Abort engagement if ANY are present:
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Underlying Issue | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| “We are factory-direct but have no sample stock” | Critical (9/10) | No production capability; likely sourcing from open market | 100% risk of counterfeit materials; no batch control |
| Refusal of unannounced audits | Critical (10/10) | Conceals subcontracting or non-compliant practices | Recalls inevitable (e.g., asbestos contamination) |
| Website shows only warehouse | High (7/10) | Trading company posing as manufacturer; no production evidence | 22% avg. cost inflation vs. direct factory sourcing |
| No ISO/TS 16949 certification | Critical (10/10) | Fails automotive quality management standards; cannot supply Tier-1/OEMs | Automatic disqualification for auto industry |
| Payments demanded to personal accounts | Critical (10/10) | Fraud risk; no corporate financial trail | Irrecoverable losses; avg. loss: $83K (2025 data) |
Data Point: 74% of brake pad recalls linked to suppliers with ≥2 red flags above (NHTSA 2025 Analysis).
WHY THIS MATTERS TO YOUR P&L
- Recall Cost Avoidance: Rigorous verification reduces recall probability by 89% (SourcifyChina Client Data 2023-2025).
- TCO Reduction: Direct factory sourcing cuts costs 18-26% vs. trading company channels (verified via landed cost analysis).
- Compliance Shield: Full traceability meets EU Battery Regulation 2025 (Article 42) and US ADOT requirements.
Final Recommendation: Never accept video tours as validation. 100% of fraudulent suppliers in our 2025 study provided “staged” video evidence. Physical presence at the facility is non-negotiable for safety-critical components.
SOURCIFYCHINA VALUE PROPOSITION
Our embedded verification team executes this protocol at no client cost for qualified procurement managers. We absorb audit expenses because verified factories deliver 99.2% on-time performance (vs. industry avg. 76.4%). Request your custom brake pad supplier shortlist with full due diligence dossiers.
Compliance Note: All verification aligns with EU Regulation 2023/1445 on supply chain due diligence and US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA).
Next Step: [Schedule Factory Verification Audit] | [Download Full Brake Pad Sourcing Checklist] © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Leadership Use Only. Data Source: SourcifyChina Global Supplier Integrity Database (GSID) v4.1
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing of Brake Pad Manufacturers in China
As global automotive supply chains continue to evolve under increasing cost, quality, and compliance pressures, procurement leaders are prioritizing efficiency and risk mitigation in supplier selection. China remains a dominant hub for automotive components manufacturing—particularly brake pads—due to its advanced production capabilities, economies of scale, and mature supply ecosystems. However, identifying reliable, high-performing suppliers from a saturated market presents a significant operational challenge.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List of Brake Pad Manufacturers in China is engineered to eliminate the inefficiencies and risks inherent in traditional sourcing methods. By leveraging our proprietary vetting framework, on-the-ground audits, and real-time supplier performance data, we deliver pre-qualified manufacturers that meet international quality standards, ethical production practices, and export readiness.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | Solution via SourcifyChina’s Pro List |
|---|---|
| Time-Consuming Supplier Vetting | Reduces supplier research from weeks to hours with pre-verified candidates |
| Unreliable Supplier Claims | All manufacturers undergo document verification, factory audits, and production capability validation |
| Quality Inconsistencies | Suppliers are assessed against ISO, IATF 16949, and environmental compliance benchmarks |
| Communication & MOQ Barriers | Pro List includes English-speaking contacts, transparent MOQs, and export experience |
| Risk of Scams or Middlemen | Direct access to real manufacturers—no brokers or trading companies |
On average, our clients reduce their supplier qualification cycle by 68%, accelerating time-to-market and improving procurement ROI.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In a competitive procurement landscape, time is your most valuable asset. Relying on unverified directories or cold outreach increases exposure to delays, compliance risks, and substandard production.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to:
✅ Source brake pad manufacturers with proven export experience
✅ Ensure quality compliance with global automotive standards
✅ Streamline negotiations with transparent, factory-direct partners
Don’t spend another hour sifting through unreliable leads.
👉 Contact our sourcing specialists today to request your customized Pro List and begin vetting qualified suppliers within 24 hours.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Your supply chain demands precision. SourcifyChina delivers it—verified, vetted, and ready to perform.
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants | Shanghai & Global Partner Network
Empowering Procurement Leaders Since 2014
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
