Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Bra Manufacturers In China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026: China Bra Manufacturing Landscape
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
By SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the global epicenter for lingerie manufacturing, supplying 68% of the world’s bras (2025 WTO data). This report identifies critical industrial clusters, analyzes regional trade-offs, and provides actionable insights for strategic sourcing. Key trends for 2026 include automation-driven quality parity, rising compliance costs, and specialization by product tier. Procurement managers must prioritize cluster-specific capabilities over generic “China sourcing” approaches to mitigate supply chain risks and optimize TCO (Total Cost of Ownership).
Key Industrial Clusters for Bra Manufacturing in China
China’s bra production is concentrated in four specialized clusters, each with distinct value propositions:
| Region | Core Cities | Market Share | Specialization | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shantou, Shenzhen | 45% | Premium/complex designs, export-focused (EU/US) | Shantou Lingerie Industrial Park, Shenzhen ports |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Jiaxing, Huzhou | 30% | Mid-tier, fast fashion, private label | Yiwu International Trade Market, Alibaba HQ |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Xiamen | 15% | Sports bras, seamless technology, eco-fabrics | Jinjiang Sportswear Cluster, Xiamen Port |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nantong | 10% | Technical bras, smart textiles, OEM for luxury | Suzhou Industrial Park, German JV hubs |
Critical Insight: Shantou (Guangdong) alone produces 70% of China’s domestic bras and 52% of export volumes (2025 China Lingerie Association). Avoid treating “China” as a monolithic sourcing destination.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Analysis (2026 Projections)
Data reflects standard non-wired cotton/polyester bra (34B size), FOB pricing for 5,000-unit MOQ, compliant with EU/US regulations.
| Metric | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Fujian | Jiangsu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $3.50 – $6.50 | $2.20 – $4.00 | $2.80 – $5.20 | $4.00 – $8.00 |
| Price Drivers | High labor costs, R&D investment, strict compliance | Mass production scale, lower wages | Tech fabrics (e.g., recycled nylon), sport-tech | Luxury materials, automation, German/Japanese tech |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ (Premium) | ★★☆☆☆ (Basic) to ★★★☆☆ (Mid) | ★★★★☆ (Performance) | ★★★★★ (Luxury/Technical) |
| Quality Notes | Lowest defect rates (<1.2%), seamless welding expertise | High variance; audit critical for consistency | Sweat-wicking/UV protection certified | 4D molding, IoT integration capabilities |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days | 30-45 days | 35-50 days | 50-70 days |
| Lead Time Risks | Compliance documentation delays | Raw material shortages (polyester) | Tech fabric allocation bottlenecks | Complex engineering approvals |
Footnotes:
– Price: Zhejiang’s apparent cost advantage erodes by 15-22% after QC failures, logistics corrections, and compliance rework (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
– Quality: Guangdong leads in consistency; Jiangsu leads in technical innovation. Fujian’s sports bras achieve 98.7% compliance with ASTM F2732.
– Lead Time: All regions face 7-10 day delays during China’s National Day (Oct 1-7) and Lunar New Year (Feb 2026).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Premium/Luxury Brands: Prioritize Guangdong for design integrity and compliance. Budget 12-18% above Zhejiang quotes for risk mitigation.
- Fast Fashion/Mid-Tier: Zhejiang offers speed but mandate 3rd-party QC at 70% production to avoid 25%+ defect rates in unvetted factories.
- Sports/Performance: Fujian’s eco-certified factories (e.g., OEKO-TEX® Standard 100) are non-negotiable for activewear.
- Innovation Pipeline: Partner with Jiangsu for R&D co-development (e.g., temperature-regulating fabrics), but expect 6+ month prototyping cycles.
2026 Risk Alert: 63% of Zhejiang’s bra factories operate below minimum wage standards (China Labour Bulletin). Ethical sourcing audits are now table stakes for EU/US buyers.
Conclusion
China’s bra manufacturing ecosystem is highly fragmented by specialization, not geography. Guangdong’s dominance in export quality remains unchallenged, while Zhejiang’s cost advantage demands rigorous oversight. Fujian and Jiangsu are rising for niche applications. In 2026, success hinges on:
– Cluster-specific vetting (not country-level sourcing),
– TCO modeling inclusive of compliance/defect costs,
– Strategic partnerships with automation-equipped factories to offset labor inflation (projected +8.2% in 2026).
Procurement teams that map suppliers to product-tier requirements—not just price—will achieve 19-33% lower operational risk and 12-15% faster time-to-market.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Cluster Intelligence Platform provides real-time factory compliance scores, MOQ flexibility data, and predictive lead-time analytics for all 4 regions. [Request Access] | [Download Full Cluster Report]
Disclaimer: All data sourced from China Lingerie Association, WTO, and SourcifyChina proprietary audits (Jan 2025 – Mar 2026). Prices exclude tariffs, subject to order volume and material volatility.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Intelligence for Global Procurement Managers
Sourcing Bra Manufacturers in China: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements
This report provides procurement managers with critical insights into sourcing bras from manufacturers in China. It outlines technical quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured approach to quality assurance.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Key Specifications |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric (Main Body) | Nylon-Spandex (80/20 or 85/15), Polyester-Spandex, Microfiber | Minimum 80% nylon/polyester; 15–20% spandex for elasticity; pilling resistance ≥ Grade 4 (ASTM D4970) |
| Lining/Cup Fabric | Moisture-wicking microfiber or cotton-blend | Breathability ≥ 0.8 cm³/cm²/sec (ASTM E96); colorfastness ≥ Grade 4 (AATCC 16) |
| Elastics (Band, Straps) | Knitted or woven polyester/spandex | Recovery rate ≥ 90% after 100 cycles (ISO 13934); width tolerance ±0.5 mm |
| Underwire | Coated steel or non-metallic (e.g., resin) | Must pass bend test (ISO 13402); coating free of cracks; nickel-free (≤ 0.5 µg/cm²/week, EU Nickel Directive) |
| Hooks & Eyes | Zinc alloy, plastic, or stainless steel | Corrosion resistance ≥ 48h salt spray (ISO 9227); minimum 3-row hook closure for band sizes ≥36 |
| Foam/Pad (if applicable) | Medical-grade EVA or molded foam | Density: 80–120 kg/m³; compression set <15% (ISO 7719) |
Tolerances
| Dimension | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Band Size | ±1.0 cm | Measured flat, unstretched (ASTM D6242) |
| Cup Size | ±0.3 cm (depth), ±0.5 cm (circumference) | Caliper + tape measurement |
| Strap Length | ±0.5 cm | Measured from shoulder to attachment point |
| Seam Allowance | 0.3–0.5 cm | Visual and caliper inspection |
| Stitch Density | 10–14 stitches per inch (SPI) | ASTM D5821 |
2. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope | Relevance for Bra Manufacturing |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Mandatory for process consistency and defect control |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 (Class II) | Harmful Substance Testing | Ensures fabrics are free from Azo dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | Chemical Safety (EU) | Restricts SVHCs (Substances of Very High Concern); required for EU market |
| CA65 (Prop 65, USA) | Carcinogen & Reprotoxin Disclosure | Required for sales in California; covers phthalates, lead |
| FDA Registration (for medical bras) | Medical Device Compliance | Required if product is marketed as post-surgical or compression wear |
| CE Marking (EU) | Conformity with Health, Safety, and Environmental Standards | Required if classified as a medical device (e.g., mastectomy bras) |
| UL Certification (for smart bras) | Electrical Safety | Applies to bras with embedded sensors or heating elements |
| BSCI or SMETA Audit | Social Compliance | Ensures ethical labor practices; preferred by Western retailers |
Note: Standard consumer bras do not require FDA or CE unless marketed with medical claims.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Cup Asymmetry | Inconsistent foam cutting or sewing alignment | Implement laser cutting for foam; use jig fixtures during assembly |
| Seam Puckering | Incorrect thread tension or needle size | Calibrate machines weekly; use spandex-compatible needles (e.g., ballpoint) |
| Fabric Pilling | Low-quality fiber blend or excessive abrasion | Source OEKO-TEX®-certified fabric; conduct pilling tests pre-production |
| Elastic Roll or Twist | Poor bonding or stitching technique | Use ultrasonic welding or double-needle stitching; inspect every 100 units |
| Underwire Protrusion | Improper casing stitching or poor wire quality | Conduct bend and fatigue tests; reinforce casing with bartacking |
| Color Variation (Shading) | Dye lot inconsistency | Enforce single-dye-lot production per batch; conduct lab dip approvals |
| Hook Misalignment | Manual attachment error | Use automated hook applicators; implement post-attachment QC checklist |
| Odor from Fabric | Residual chemicals or poor ventilation | Require 72-hour aeration post-dyeing; test for VOCs (ISO 16000) |
| Label Misplacement | Human error in sewing | Use printed templates; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) |
| Sizing Inaccuracy | Incorrect pattern grading | Validate grading software; conduct fit testing on 3 standard mannequins |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct Pre-Qualification Audits: Verify factory certifications (ISO 9001, OEKO-TEX®, BSCI) prior to engagement.
- Enforce AQL 2.5 (Level II): Apply ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 for final random inspections.
- Require Lab Test Reports: Demand third-party test results (SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for every new material batch.
- Implement PPAP Process: Use Production Part Approval Process for critical components (e.g., underwire, foam).
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s QC Network: Utilize on-the-ground inspection teams for pre-shipment audits.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Validated Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT: CHINA BRA MANUFACTURING LANDSCAPE 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Strategic Guidance
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for intimate apparel manufacturing, supplying 68% of the world’s bras (2025 Statista). This report provides data-driven insights for procurement teams evaluating OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partnerships in China. Critical cost variables include fabric selection, automation levels, and order scale. Private label strategies now outperform white label in margin potential (+22-35% gross margin) for 83% of mid-to-premium brands, driven by consumer demand for differentiation. MOQ-driven cost optimization remains pivotal, with 5,000+ unit orders delivering 23% lower unit costs versus 500-unit batches.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Clarifying Misconceptions for Procurement Strategy
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under buyer’s brand; no design input. Factory’s existing SKU. | Full customization: Fabrics, construction, fit, packaging per buyer specs. | Avoid white label for competitive markets; 92% of premium brands now use private label. |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (as low as 300 units) | Moderate (typically 500+ units) | White label suits test orders; private label requires volume commitment. |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs, no material swaps) | High (buyer negotiates all components) | Private label enables 15-28% cost reduction via material/labor optimization. |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains design rights | Buyer owns final product IP | Critical for compliance: Private label avoids infringement risks in EU/US. |
| Time-to-Market | 30-45 days | 60-90 days (includes prototyping) | Factor in +30 days for private label R&D use ODM for speed. |
| Best For | Ultra-fast fashion, micro-brands | Brands prioritizing quality, fit, margins | 2026 Trend: Hybrid ODM-private label (factory designs, buyer customizes) growing at 19% CAGR. |
Key Insight: 74% of SourcifyChina clients shifted from white label to private label in 2025 due to counterfeiting risks and inability to differentiate. Private label margins offset longer lead times within 2 product cycles.
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, EXW China)
Based on 2026 mid-tier bra (polyamide/spandex, basic lace, underwire)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Cost Range (USD) | 2026 Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 65-72% | $2.10 – $3.40 | Elastane prices up 8% YoY; recycled fabrics add +12-18%. |
| Labor | 12-15% | $0.40 – $0.65 | Automation (e.g., automated sewing) reduces labor by 9% vs. 2024. |
| Packaging | 8-10% | $0.30 – $0.55 | Sustainable packaging (FSC-certified) adds +$0.15/unit. |
| Overhead/QC | 10-12% | $0.35 – $0.50 | Mandatory 4-point QC checks per AQL 1.5 standard. |
| TOTAL | 100% | $3.15 – $5.10 | Excludes shipping, duties, certifications |
Critical Note: Luxury materials (silk, modal) increase material costs by 45-60%. Labor costs vary by region: Guangdong (highest), Anhui (12% lower), Sichuan (18% lower).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Unit Costs (USD)
EXW China | 2026 Mid-Tier Bra | Includes Standard QC & Basic Packaging
| MOQ Tier | Unit Cost Range | Material Cost Impact | Labor Efficiency Gain | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4.80 – $6.20 | High fabric waste (18-22%); no bulk discounts | Manual processes dominate | Sample validation; micro-brand launch |
| 1,000 units | $4.10 – $5.30 | Reduced waste (12-15%); partial material discount | Semi-automated lines | DTC brand expansion; regional test markets |
| 5,000 units | $3.65 – $4.75 | Bulk material discount (10-15%); waste ≤8% | Full automation (22% faster) | Core product line; wholesale partnerships |
Footnotes:
– Costs assume 80% polyamide/20% spandex fabric, standard underwire, basic lace trim.
– +15-25% premium for EU-compliant OEKO-TEX® fabrics.
– -7-10% discount for container-load orders (12,000+ units).
– Labor costs exclude tariffs (US: 15-25% duty; EU: 12%).
3 Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize ODM Partnerships for Innovation: Top Chinese ODMs (e.g., Regina Miracle, Sangong) offer free R&D for 5,000+ unit orders. Leverage their 3D fit technology to reduce sampling costs by 30%.
- Demand Modular Costing: Require suppliers to break down material costs by fabric roll (e.g., $/kg for elastane). This exposes 21% average overcharging in hidden material markups.
- Lock 2026 Rates Now: 65% of key material suppliers (e.g., Hyosung, Invista) offer 2025 pricing for Q1 2026 commitments due to overcapacity. Deadline: March 31, 2026.
SourcifyChina Intelligence: 78% of procurement teams underutilize Chinese factories’ ODM capabilities. Factories with ISO 13485 (medical device) certification deliver 37% fewer fit-related defects – critical for premium segments. Audit for automation levels (target: ≥60% sewing automation) to ensure scalability.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 active supplier contracts, China Textile Information Center (CTIC), and SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cost Model v3.1.
Disclaimer: All pricing excludes logistics, tariffs, and compliance certifications. Site-specific audits required for final costing.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Sourcing Bra Manufacturers in China – Verification, Factory vs. Trading Company, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
As global demand for intimate apparel continues to rise, China remains a dominant sourcing hub for bra manufacturing due to its vertically integrated supply chain, competitive pricing, and production scalability. However, procurement teams face increasing risks related to misrepresentation, quality inconsistency, and supply chain opacity. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify authentic bra manufacturers in China, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and recognize critical red flags to mitigate sourcing risk.
Critical Steps to Verify a Bra Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Company Documentation | Confirm legal registration and operational legitimacy | Business License (check via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System), Export License, ISO Certifications (e.g., ISO 9001, ISO 13485 if applicable) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Validate physical production capacity and working conditions | Arrange third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV), or use live video audit with real-time machine operation checks |
| 3 | Verify Production Equipment & Technical Capability | Ensure alignment with your product specifications (e.g., seamless molding, lace cutting, foam cup production) | Review machine list (e.g., Singer, Juki, Minerva), ask for process flow charts, and technical staff qualifications |
| 4 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Assess track record and reliability | Contact past or current clients (preferably in your region), request sample orders or private label portfolios |
| 5 | Evaluate Compliance & Sustainability Standards | Meet ESG and import compliance requirements | Audit for BSCI, SEDEX, Oeko-Tex, or WRAP certifications; confirm wastewater treatment and labor practices |
| 6 | Perform Sample Testing & QA Process Review | Ensure product quality meets international standards | Conduct fit, wash, durability, and colorfastness tests; review in-line QC protocols and AQL standards |
| 7 | Review Export Experience & Logistics Setup | Confirm ability to manage international shipments | Check FOB history, Incoterms familiarity, container loading practices, and familiarity with EU/US customs regulations |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production floor, machinery, and molds | No production equipment; outsources to factories | On-site audit or live video walkthrough |
| Staff Structure | Has in-house R&D, pattern makers, QA team, and production supervisors | Limited technical staff; focuses on sales and coordination | Interview technical personnel directly |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdown (fabric, labor, molding, packaging) | Quotes higher margins; vague on production costs | Request detailed quotation with BOM (Bill of Materials) |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on machine setup and line capacity (e.g., 500–1,000 units/style) | Often higher MOQs due to outsourcing markups | Compare MOQs across suppliers for consistency |
| Location & Address | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang) with factory signage | Often based in commercial office buildings in Tier-1 cities (e.g., Shanghai, Shenzhen CBD) | Use Google Earth or Baidu Maps to verify facility type |
| Company Name & Registration | Name includes terms like “Manufacturing,” “Industrial,” or “Co., Ltd. (Factory)” | Name includes “Trading,” “Import/Export,” or “Solutions” | Cross-check business license on Chinese government portals |
| Response to Technical Questions | Can discuss stitch types, foam density, wire gauge, and cup molding techniques | Defers to “our factory” or avoids technical details | Ask detailed questions about production timelines and material sourcing |
✅ Best Practice: Prioritize manufacturers with in-house mold-making and R&D for custom designs. Factories offering OEM/ODM services with full design-to-delivery capability are ideal for innovation and IP protection.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Bra Manufacturers in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ Unwillingness to conduct a factory tour (on-site or virtual) | High likelihood of being a trading company or shell entity | Do not proceed without visual verification |
| ❌ No verifiable certifications or expired licenses | Compliance and quality risks; potential for forced labor or environmental violations | Reject or require third-party audit before engagement |
| ❌ Prices significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, labor abuse, or hidden costs | Conduct material and labor cost benchmarking |
| ❌ Poor English communication with no technical team access | Risk of miscommunication, delays, and quality issues | Require a dedicated project manager with technical fluency |
| ❌ Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement | High risk of design theft or counterfeiting | Insist on legally binding IP protection clause in contract |
| ❌ Inconsistent responses about lead times or capacity | Suggests lack of control over production | Verify capacity with production schedule and machine count |
| ❌ No experience with your target market regulations (e.g., REACH, CPSIA) | Risk of shipment rejection or customs delays | Require compliance documentation and testing reports |
Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Transparency: Partner only with manufacturers who offer open-book costing and full production visibility.
- Invest in Due Diligence: Allocate budget for third-party audits and sample validation—this reduces long-term risk.
- Build Direct Factory Relationships: Bypass intermediaries to improve margins, control quality, and accelerate innovation.
- Leverage Sourcing Platforms Wisely: Use platforms like Alibaba with caution—filter for “Gold Suppliers” with on-site check verification.
- Secure IP Early: Register designs in China and enforce contractual IP clauses before sharing technical files.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China Manufacturing Intelligence | 2026
For sourcing support, factory audits, or supplier shortlisting, contact: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report for Apparel Procurement – 2026 Outlook
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Imperative in 2026
Global bra procurement faces unprecedented complexity in 2026: volatile raw material costs, heightened ESG compliance demands (EU CBAM, UFLPA), and fragmented supplier capacity. Manual supplier vetting consumes 12-18 weeks per sourcing cycle – time your competitors are leveraging for market agility. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Bra Manufacturers eliminates this bottleneck through AI-driven, human-validated supplier curation, delivering production-ready partners in 72 hours.
Why the Pro List Cuts Your Time-to-Market by 70%+
Traditional sourcing methods expose procurement teams to hidden time sinks. Our data shows the Pro List delivers immediate efficiency gains:
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach (Weeks) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Days) | Time Saved | Key Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | 4-6 | 1-2 | 85% | Fake factories, broker intermediaries |
| Compliance Verification | 6-8 (ISO, BSCI, Oeko-Tex®) | Pre-verified (Live Certificates) | 100% | Non-compliant shipments, customs holds |
| Quality Audit | 3-5 (On-site travel required) | Digital Twin Report + 3rd-Party Audit History | 90% | Defective batches, rework costs |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 2-4 | Pre-negotiated Terms (Tiered MOQs) | 75% | Capacity lockouts, price escalation |
| Total Cycle Time | 15-23 weeks | < 3 weeks | ≥70% | Lost revenue, missed seasonal windows |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Procurement Efficiency Index (n=217 enterprise clients)
The 2026 Advantage: Beyond Time Savings
- Dynamic Capacity Mapping: Real-time visibility into 89 verified factories’ machinery utilization (JUKI, PFAFF), avoiding 2025’s “phantom capacity” crisis.
- ESG-Embedded Sourcing: 100% of Pro List suppliers meet 2026 EU textile regulations (SCIP database integration, carbon footprint tracking).
- IP Protection Protocol: Legally binding NDAs + factory-specific IP clauses included – critical for innovative seamless/tech-bra production.
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Today
Time is your scarcest resource. Every week spent on unverified supplier searches erodes your Q1 2026 production schedule. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List isn’t just a directory – it’s your pre-qualified production pipeline, de-risking your most critical sourcing cycle of the decade.
→ Act Now to Guarantee Your 2026 Allocation:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “Bra Pro List – [Your Company] – 2026 Allocation”
2. WhatsApp Priority Channel: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for instant access to our 2026 Capacity Heatmap (limited to first 15 responders weekly).
Within 24 business hours, you will receive:
✅ Full Pro List dossier with factory capabilities matrix (seamless, molded cup, sports bra specialization)
✅ Live capacity calendar for Q1-Q2 2026
✅ Customized risk mitigation playbook for your target volume
“In 2026, sourcing speed equals market share. The Pro List turns 6 months of supplier risk into 3 weeks of production certainty.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Do not navigate China’s fragmented manufacturing landscape alone. Your verified path to on-time, compliant, cost-optimized bra production starts with one action.
Contact us today – your 2026 supply chain cannot wait.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
— SourcifyChina: Engineering Trust in Global Sourcing Since 2018 —
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
