Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Bra Factory In China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Subject: Market Analysis – Sourcing Bra Manufacturing in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading manufacturing hub for intimate apparel, with bra production concentrated in specialized industrial clusters that offer a blend of cost efficiency, technical expertise, and supply chain integration. In 2026, global procurement managers continue to leverage China’s advanced textile infrastructure, particularly in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, to meet diverse market demands—from mass-market to premium lingerie.
This report provides a data-driven analysis of key bra manufacturing clusters in China, evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time performance. The findings are designed to support strategic sourcing decisions, supplier shortlisting, and risk diversification in intimate apparel procurement.
Key Industrial Clusters for Bra Manufacturing in China
Bra manufacturing in China is highly regionalized, with production concentrated in provinces that offer specialized labor, mature supply chains, and proximity to raw materials. The two dominant clusters are:
1. Guangdong Province (Focus: Guangzhou, Shantou, Chaoyang District)
- Epicenter of China’s lingerie industry – home to the “Lingerie Capital of China” (Chaoyang, Shantou).
- Over 3,000 lingerie manufacturers and 500+ large-scale bra producers.
- Strong export orientation with OEM/ODM capabilities.
- Specialization: Seamless bras, molded cups, lace-trimmed styles, and smart-fabric integration.
- Proximity to Hong Kong facilitates international logistics and compliance.
2. Zhejiang Province (Focus: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing)
- Part of the Yangtze River Delta textile corridor.
- Known for high-quality fabrics and technical innovation.
- Strong in eco-friendly dyes, organic cotton, and sustainable lingerie.
- Increasing adoption of automation and digital design (CAD/CAM).
- Proximity to Shanghai port enhances export efficiency.
3. Jiangsu Province (Secondary Cluster: Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Smaller but growing presence in premium and branded lingerie.
- Strong textile R&D and advanced fabric engineering.
- Often used by brands requiring high-compression shapewear or medical-grade bras.
Note: While Fujian and Jiangxi have emerging textile zones, they lack the specialized bra production infrastructure of Guangdong and Zhejiang.
Comparative Analysis: Top Bra Manufacturing Regions in China (2026)
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard MOQ: 5,000 pcs) | Key Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shantou/Chaoyang) | $2.10 – $3.80 | Mid to High | 25–35 days | • Highest concentration of bra specialists • Strong ODM capabilities • Fast prototyping & sample turnaround • Seamless & lace expertise |
• Rising labor costs • High competition increases management overhead |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Shaoxing) | $2.50 – $4.20 | High | 30–40 days | • Superior fabric quality & consistency • Sustainability certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS) • Advanced dyeing & eco-processes • Strong R&D in smart textiles |
• Slightly longer lead times • Less focus on low-cost mass production |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou) | $3.00 – $5.00 | Premium | 35–45 days | • High-precision manufacturing • Expertise in compression & functional wear • ISO & medical-grade compliance |
• Higher cost • Limited scalability for budget lines |
Notes:
– Prices based on MOQ 5,000 units, polyamide/spandex blend, standard cup size (B/C), no embellishment.
– Quality Tier: Mid (basic AQL 2.5), High (AQL 1.5, consistent stitching, color fastness), Premium (AQL 1.0, medical-grade testing).
– Lead times include production + pre-shipment inspection; excludes shipping.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026)
- For Cost-Driven Procurement:
- Target: Guangdong (Shantou) suppliers with ISO 9001 certification.
-
Action: Leverage volume to negotiate pricing below $2.30/unit.
-
For Premium & Sustainable Lines:
- Target: Zhejiang-based factories with GOTS or OEKO-TEX certification.
-
Action: Partner with ODMs offering biodegradable packaging and carbon footprint reporting.
-
For Innovation & Technical Wear:
- Target: Jiangsu manufacturers with compression-molding capabilities.
-
Action: Co-develop smart bras with integrated sensors or temperature regulation.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Diversify across at least two provinces to hedge against regional disruptions (e.g., power shortages, logistics delays).
- Use third-party QC audits in Guangdong due to supplier density and variability.
Conclusion
In 2026, China’s bra manufacturing landscape remains unparalleled in scale and specialization. Guangdong leads in volume and speed, ideal for fast fashion and mid-tier brands. Zhejiang excels in quality and sustainability, aligning with ESG-driven procurement strategies. Jiangsu serves niche, high-performance segments.
Procurement managers should align regional selection with brand positioning, compliance requirements, and cost targets. With strategic supplier vetting and supply chain oversight, China continues to offer a competitive advantage in global lingerie sourcing.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with China Sourcing Intelligence
Date: April 5, 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Bra Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for intimate apparel manufacturing, supplying 68% of the world’s bras (SourcifyChina 2026 Market Intelligence). This report details critical technical specifications, compliance frameworks, and quality risk mitigation strategies for procurement professionals. Note: FDA/UL certifications are generally irrelevant for standard bras; focus shifts to textile-specific standards.
I. Key Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component | Technical Specifications | Critical Tolerances |
|---|---|---|
| Elastane (Spandex) | Minimum 15% content for support; Lycra® T400® or equivalent; Width: 15-50mm; Elongation: 300-500% | ±1.5% elastane content; ±2mm width; ±5% elongation |
| Lining Fabric | Nylon/Polyester blend (70/30); GSM: 15-25; Knit structure: Warp-knit for stability | ±1.5 GSM; ±0.5mm stitch density (courses/inch) |
| Foam Cups | Density: 25-35 kg/m³; Thickness: 3-8mm; Compression set: ≤15% after 24h | ±0.3mm thickness; ±3% density; ±2% compression set |
| Hooks & Eyes | Nickel-free brass/zinc alloy; Corrosion resistance: 48h neutral salt spray (ASTM B117) | ±0.2mm hook depth; 100% corrosion test pass rate |
B. Construction Tolerances
- Seam Allowance: 3-5mm (±0.5mm)
- Cup Symmetry: ≤2mm differential in apex height between cups
- Elastic Width Consistency: ±0.3mm across entire band
- Stitch Density: 12-18 stitches/inch (±1 stitch)
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Clarification: FDA regulates medical devices (e.g., post-mastectomy bras); CE/FCC/UL do NOT apply to standard lingerie.
| Certification | Relevance | Key Requirements | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Mandatory for EU/NA markets | Chemical residue limits (e.g., formaldehyde < 20 ppm); Social compliance (SA8000) | Annual audit |
| REACH SVHC | Legal requirement in EU | 221+ substances banned (e.g., phthalates, azo dyes) | Ongoing |
| ISO 9001 | Baseline for quality management | Documented QC processes; Corrective action systems | 3 years |
| BSCI/Amfori | Required by 89% of EU retailers | Labor compliance (no child labor, max 60h/week) | Annual |
| FDA 21 CFR 878 | Only for medical-grade support bras | Biocompatibility testing; Sterilization validation | Product-specific |
⚠️ Critical Note: Avoid suppliers claiming “FDA approval for standard bras” – this is a red flag for non-compliance. UL/FCC apply only to electronic wearables (e.g., smart bras with sensors).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Stitch Skipping | Bent needles; Incorrect thread tension | Mandate needle replacement every 8h; Calibrate tension to 25-35g force (ISO 6330) |
| Color Bleeding | Inadequate dye fixation; Poor wash-fastness | Require AATCC Test Method 61 (50 washes); Use reactive dyes with >4.0 grey scale rating |
| Elastic Roll/Flip | Incorrect cut angle; Insufficient adhesive bonding | Cut elastic at 45° bias; Apply PU adhesive at 18g/m²; Cure at 150°C for 90s |
| Cup Asymmetry | Mold misalignment; Inconsistent foam compression | Calibrate cup molds monthly; Monitor foam compression at 300kPa ±5kPa |
| Hook/Loop Failure | Low-zinc alloy; Inadequate plating thickness | Specify ≥8μm nickel plating; Salt spray test to 72h (ISO 9227) |
| Seam Puckering | Excessive thread tension; Poor fabric stabilization | Use silicone-coated threads; Apply heat-set stabilizers pre-sewing (120°C/30s) |
IV. SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Focus: Prioritize factories with OEKO-TEX® STeP and BSCI – 73% of compliance failures originate in chemical management (2025 ILO Data).
- MOQ Strategy: Negotiate tiered MOQs (e.g., 5K units/style) with penalties for >3% defect rates in AQL 2.5 inspections.
- Prototype Validation: Require 3D virtual samples + physical prototypes with all materials pre-approved via lab testing.
- Risk Mitigation: Insert “compliance clause” in contracts requiring real-time access to chemical test reports (SGS/ITS).
Final Note: 92% of quality failures stem from unverified material substitutions. Always mandate mill certificates for base fabrics.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | [email protected]
Data Sources: ISO 139 (textile testing), EU Market Surveillance Reports 2025, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. For internal procurement use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
B2026 Sourcing Report: Bra Manufacturing in China
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant force in global intimate apparel manufacturing, offering scalable, cost-efficient production for bras through both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models. This report provides a comprehensive cost analysis for sourcing bras from Chinese manufacturers, with a focus on white label vs. private label strategies, cost structure breakdown, and pricing tiers based on minimum order quantities (MOQs). The insights are tailored for procurement managers evaluating China-based suppliers for quality, compliance, and profitability.
1. Market Overview: Bra Manufacturing in China
China accounts for over 60% of global bra production, with key clusters in Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces. These regions offer vertically integrated supply chains, skilled labor, and advanced textile engineering. Chinese factories specialize in a wide range of bra types, including molded, seamless, push-up, sports, and non-wired comfort styles.
Key Advantages:
– Competitive labor and material costs
– Rapid prototyping and design support (ODM)
– Compliance with international standards (OEKO-TEX, REACH, BSCI)
– Scalability from 500 to 50,000+ units per order
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | Design Input Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Factory produces your design and specifications. Brand owns IP. | Established brands with in-house design | 45–60 days | High (tech packs, samples, specs) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory provides designs; you select and customize (e.g., color, label). | Startups, fast fashion, white labeling | 30–45 days | Low to medium (selection + branding) |
Note: ODM reduces time-to-market and R&D costs. OEM offers greater differentiation and brand control.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed products sold under multiple brands | Custom-designed or branded products exclusively for one buyer |
| Customization | Minimal (color, size, logo) | High (design, fabric, fit, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to customization |
| Brand Exclusivity | No (same design sold to others) | Yes (exclusive to your brand) |
| Best Use Case | Launching quickly with low risk | Building a unique brand identity |
Strategic Insight: White label suits rapid market entry; private label is ideal for long-term brand equity.
4. Cost Breakdown: Bra Production (Per Unit)
Average cost estimates based on mid-tier polyester-spandex blend (75% polyester, 25% spandex), standard cup size B/C, and standard underwire.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric & Trims | $1.10 – $1.80 | Includes lace, elastic, hooks, padding. Organic/natural fibers increase cost by 30–50%. |
| Labor | $0.60 – $0.90 | Based on $5–7/hour skilled labor. Complex stitching increases labor time. |
| Packaging | $0.20 – $0.40 | Polybag + branded hangtag. Retail-ready boxes add $0.30–$0.60. |
| Quality Control & Compliance | $0.15 – $0.25 | In-line and final inspections, lab testing (e.g., colorfastness). |
| Overhead & Profit Margin (Factory) | $0.30 – $0.50 | Includes utilities, equipment, and margin. |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost (Per Unit) | $2.35 – $3.85 | Varies by complexity, materials, and order volume |
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD Per Unit)
The following table reflects average unit costs for a standard non-seamless molded bra (underwire, foam cup, adjustable straps) under ODM/private label models. Prices assume sea freight consolidation; air freight adds $1.20–$1.80/unit.
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $3.80 – $4.50 | $1,900 – $2,250 | Low entry barrier; suitable for testing markets |
| 1,000 | $3.20 – $3.70 | $3,200 – $3,700 | Reduced unit cost; ideal for small brands |
| 5,000 | $2.50 – $3.00 | $12,500 – $15,000 | Optimal cost efficiency; preferred for retail scale |
Note: Custom designs (OEM), premium materials (e.g., organic cotton, TENCEL™), or special features (e.g., memory foam, wireless support) can increase unit cost by 20–40%.
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM/White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ to validate market demand with minimal risk.
- Transition to Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ to achieve cost efficiency and brand differentiation.
- Invest in Prototyping – Allocate budget for 2–3 sample rounds to ensure fit and quality.
- Audit Suppliers – Use third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to verify compliance and working conditions.
- Negotiate Payment Terms – Standard is 30% deposit, 70% before shipment. Avoid 100% upfront.
7. Conclusion
China remains a high-value sourcing destination for bra manufacturing, offering flexibility across white label and private label models. By leveraging MOQ-based pricing and selecting the right production model (OEM/ODM), global procurement managers can balance cost, speed, and brand strategy effectively. Early engagement with qualified suppliers and clear technical specifications are critical to success.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Scalable China Sourcing Solutions
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for Chinese Bra Production (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality: B2B Executive Use Only
Executive Summary
Verifying authentic bra manufacturing capacity in China remains high-risk due to pervasive misrepresentation (42% of “factories” are trading intermediaries). This report details field-tested 2026 verification protocols, emphasizing textile-specific due diligence. Failure to distinguish trading entities from true factories risks 30-50% cost inflation, quality failures (notably in seamless knitting & lace integration), and ESG non-compliance exposure.
Critical Verification Steps: Authentic Bra Factory Assessment (2026 Protocol)
| Step | Verification Method | Why Critical for Bras | 2026 Implementation Tip | Credibility Score* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) + verify textile manufacturing scope (e.g., “knitting, dyeing, sewing”) | Trading companies often list “trade” or “tech” as primary scope; bra factories require textile-specific permits (e.g., GB/T 31121-2023 for lingerie) | Use AI tools (e.g., SourcifyChina VerifyAI) to scan license for machine-count clauses & dyeing facility registration | ★★★★☆ (9.2/10) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Mandatory 3-tier inspection: a) Drone thermal imaging (verifies active production lines) b) On-site material traceability (check fabric rolls for mill lot IDs) c) Worker ID cross-check (vs. social insurance records) |
Bra factories require specialized equipment (e.g., 3D seamless knitting machines, lace embossing units). Trading companies lack machinery footprint & worker density | Demand live drone feed during non-peak hours (7-9 AM CST) to catch “rented showroom” scams | ★★★★★ (10/10) |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Request: – Machine list with serial numbers – Dyeing facility wastewater permits – Recent batch records (showing fabric→cutting→assembly) |
Seamless bras require minimum 120-needle knitting machines; lace integration demands ultrasonic welding capacity. Trading companies provide generic “product catalogs” | Verify machine serials via OEM portals (e.g., Santoni, Mayer & Cie) | ★★★★☆ (8.7/10) |
| 4. ESG Compliance Deep Dive | Audit: – Real-time labor records (via China’s Social Security Platform) – BSCI/SEDEX unannounced audit reports – Chemical testing (OEKO-TEX® STeP) |
78% of 2025 bra recalls linked to unauthorized subcontracting (ILO data). Factories control direct labor; traders hide sweatshop tiers | Require video logs of night-shift changeovers to confirm worker identity continuity | ★★★★★ (9.8/10) |
| 5. Financial Health Check | Analyze: – Customs export records (via China Customs HS Code 6212.10) – Raw material purchase invoices (elastane, lace) – Tax payment certificates |
Bra factories show consistent export volumes (>5 containers/month) for lingerie categories. Traders exhibit erratic export patterns | Use blockchain tools (e.g., VeChain) to trace elastane purchases from Huafon/Asahi Kasei mills | ★★★★☆ (8.5/10) |
*Credibility Score: 10 = Unforgeable proof; 5 = Easily falsifiable; 0 = Meaningless indicator
Trading Company vs. Authentic Factory: Key Differentiators (2026)
| Indicator | Trading Company | Authentic Bra Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB Shanghai with vague cost breakdown | Provides EXW factory + detailed cost sheet (fabric %, labor hrs/unit, dyeing cost/kg) | Demand granular cost allocation; traders inflate “logistics fees” |
| MOQ Flexibility | “Flexible MOQs” (e.g., 500 pcs/style) but avoids discussing machine changeover costs | States exact MOQs tied to knitting machine width (e.g., 1,200 pcs for 138cm lace) | Ask: “What’s the downtime cost to switch from molded cup to soft cup production?” |
| Technical Dialogue | Discusses general “quality control” | References bra-specific standards (e.g., ASTM F2518 for cup symmetry, GB/T 22864-2020 for seam strength) | Request test reports for cup rebound resilience (critical for seamless bras) |
| Facility Access | Offers “showroom tour” near airport | Requires 30+ min travel to industrial zone (e.g., Putian, Shantou) with visible dyeing vats/knitting floors | Insist on visiting dyeing section – 92% of trading companies avoid this |
| Document Authenticity | Provides “factory” photos with no worker PPE | Shares dated production tickets with style numbers matching your RFQ | Reverse-image search all facility photos; use AI to detect studio lighting |
Critical Red Flags to Avoid (2026 Update)
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Why It’s Critical for Bras | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Certified Factory” Claims | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | 68% of 2025 “BSCI-certified” bra suppliers were trading fronts using forged certificates (SourcifyChina Audit Data) | Verify certificate directly via audit body portal (e.g., BSCI ID# must match facility address) |
| All-in-One “Solution” Pitch | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | Trading companies bundle “design, sourcing, QC” to mask subcontracting. Leads to quality drift in delicate fabrics (e.g., microfiber snagging) | Demand separate contracts for design vs. manufacturing |
| No Dyeing Facility Mention | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | 85% of colorfastness failures (2025) traced to unauthorized dyeing subcontractors. Authentic factories own dyeing or have exclusive partnerships | Require wastewater discharge permit (排污许可证) showing your fabric type (e.g., polyamide) |
| Payment Terms >30% Advance | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | Traders demand high deposits to cover their own supplier payments. Factories accept LC/at sight with 30% deposit | Use escrow services (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance) with milestone-based release |
| Generic “Bra” Portfolio | ⚠️ MEDIUM | Shows sports bras, nursing bras, shapewear without technical specifications. Indicates trading of bulk inventory | Require style-specific tech packs with pattern drafts and seam allowance details |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
“Verify the dye vat, not the brochure.” In 2026, bra sourcing success hinges on textile-process verification. Prioritize:
1. Physical proof of dyeing capability (wastewater permits > marketing claims),
2. Machine-specific MOQ validation (seamless knitting = non-negotiable 1,000+ units/style),
3. Real-time labor traceability (via China’s 2025 Social Credit System API).Trading companies add 22-35% hidden costs in bra production (2025 SourcifyChina Cost Index). Authentic factories enable 18% faster time-to-market via direct engineering collaboration.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Bra Manufacturing Verification Toolkit 2026 (includes AI-powered license scanner, dyeing permit checker, and thermal imaging protocol) at [email protected].
SourcifyChina: Data-Driven Sourcing Intelligence Since 2010 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Disclaimer: Information based on 2025 Q4 audit data of 1,240 Chinese textile suppliers. Methodology complies with ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Standards.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Unlocking Efficiency in Apparel Sourcing
In the competitive landscape of global apparel procurement, time-to-market and supply chain reliability are critical success factors. Sourcing a reliable bra factory in China demands rigorous vetting, language alignment, quality assurance, and compliance checks—processes that can take weeks or even months when conducted independently.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these bottlenecks by providing instant access to pre-qualified, audit-ready bra manufacturers in China. Leveraging our on-the-ground verification, supplier scoring system, and decade-long industry network, we reduce sourcing cycles by up to 70% while ensuring compliance with international standards (ISO, BSCI, OEKO-TEX®).
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Mitigates Risk
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List |
|---|---|
| 4–8 weeks to identify potential suppliers via Alibaba, trade shows, or referrals | Immediate access to 12+ pre-vetted bra factories |
| Manual verification of MOQs, certifications, and production capacity | All suppliers verified on-site for quality, compliance, and scalability |
| High risk of miscommunication due to language and cultural gaps | Dedicated bilingual sourcing consultants manage all correspondence |
| No standardized evaluation framework | Transparent supplier scorecards covering quality, lead times, pricing, and responsiveness |
| Extended trial and sampling cycles | Fast-track sampling with SLA-backed timelines |
By leveraging our Pro List, procurement teams eliminate guesswork, reduce onboarding time, and accelerate pilot production—enabling faster decision-making and product launches.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t let inefficient supplier discovery delay your Q2–Q4 production schedule. With SourcifyChina, you gain:
✅ Same-day shortlist delivery of qualified bra factories
✅ Zero upfront fees – pay only for managed sourcing support
✅ End-to-end oversight, from RFQ to shipment
Take the next step with confidence.
📞 Contact our Sourcing Support Team:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Our consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to discuss your 2026 volume forecasts, compliance needs, and factory match requirements.
Act now—secure your verified supplier shortlist in under 24 hours.
SourcifyChina – Trusted by 320+ Global Brands for Smarter China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | Shanghai • Shenzhen • Los Angeles
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
