Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Boeing Factory In China

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing Boeing-Related Manufacturing Capabilities in China
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

---

Executive Summary

While Boeing does not operate a full-scale aircraft manufacturing factory in China, the company has established significant aerospace manufacturing partnerships and joint ventures within the country—most notably the Boeing 737 Completion & Delivery Center in Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province. This facility, operated by Boeing and COMAC (Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China), focuses on aircraft completion activities including interior installation, painting, and customer delivery.

For global procurement managers, sourcing components, subsystems, or value-added services related to Boeing’s supply chain in China requires a strategic understanding of the industrial clusters supporting aerospace manufacturing, MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul), and precision engineering.

This report provides a deep-dive analysis of the key industrial clusters in China involved in Boeing-related aerospace production, with a comparative assessment of major provinces and cities in terms of price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.

---

Key Industrial Clusters Supporting Boeing Manufacturing in China

China’s aerospace ecosystem has evolved rapidly, with targeted development in high-precision manufacturing, avionics, composites, and systems integration. While final assembly remains primarily in the U.S., China plays a critical role in the global Boeing supply chain, particularly in:

• Aircraft interior completion (Zhoushan)
• Cabin systems and interiors
• Avionics and electrical components
• Composite structures
• Precision machining and tooling

Primary Industrial Clusters

Province/City	Key Facility / JV	Core Capabilities	Strategic Partnerships
Zhejiang (Zhoushan)	Boeing 737 Completion & Delivery Center	Final interior outfitting, painting, delivery	Boeing, COMAC
Shanghai	COMAC Headquarters, Airbus A320 Final Assembly	Fuselage assembly, systems integration, R&D	COMAC, Airbus, SAIC, AVIC
Jiangsu (Suzhou/Nanjing)	Aerospace Industrial Parks	Avionics, sensors, precision components	Honeywell, Safran, local Tier 2 suppliers
Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan)	High-tech manufacturing hubs	Electronics, embedded systems, IoT for MRO	Huawei, DJI, Flex, Foxconn (indirect)
Sichuan (Chengdu)	AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Industry	Military and civil aerospace structures, composites	AVIC, CATIC
Shaanxi (Xi’an)	Xi’an Aircraft Company	Large-scale component manufacturing, testing	AVIC, COMAC

Note: The Zhoushan facility in Zhejiang is currently the only Boeing-operated production site in China and serves as the central node for sourcing completion-related services.

---

Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for Boeing-Related Sourcing

Below is a comparative assessment of top-tier regions in China for sourcing aerospace components and services aligned with Boeing standards. Evaluation criteria include Price Competitiveness, Quality Compliance (AS9100, NADCAP), and Average Lead Time.

Region	Price (1–5)¹	Quality (1–5)²	Lead Time (Weeks)³	Key Advantages	Limitations
Zhejiang (Zhoushan)	3	5	8–12	Direct Boeing JV, strict QA, NADCAP-certified vendors	Limited scale, higher labor costs
Shanghai	3	5	10–14	Strong R&D, AVIC/COMAC ecosystem, skilled workforce	High operational costs, complex logistics
Jiangsu	4	4	6–10	Mature supplier base, strong in avionics & sensors	Few Boeing-dedicated facilities
Guangdong	5	3	4–8	Fast turnaround, electronics expertise, scalability	Lower aerospace-specific quality controls
Sichuan (Chengdu)	4	4	8–12	Government-backed aerospace hub, composites focus	Remote location, slower customs clearance
Shaanxi (Xi’an)	4	4	7–11	Heavy industrial base, large component capacity	Less agile for small-batch or custom orders

---

Scoring Key:

¹ Price (1 = Highest Cost, 5 = Most Competitive)
² Quality (1 = Low Compliance, 5 = Full AS9100/NADCAP/Boeing Audit Ready)
³ Lead Time based on standard aerospace component orders (e.g., cabin panels, wiring harnesses, brackets)

---

Strategic Sourcing Recommendations

1. For Boeing Completion & Delivery Support
   → Source from Zhejiang (Zhoushan). Proximity to the Boeing facility ensures compliance, faster coordination, and audit readiness.

2. For Avionics, Sensors & Electrical Systems
   → Prioritize Jiangsu and Shanghai. These regions host certified suppliers with experience in Boeing and Airbus Tier 1 contracts.

3. For High-Volume Electronics or IoT-Enabled MRO Components
   → Leverage Guangdong’s ecosystem with strict quality oversight via third-party audits (e.g., SGS, TÜV).

4. For Composite Structures and Fuselage Sub-Assemblies
   → Engage suppliers in Sichuan or Shaanxi with proven experience in large-scale aerospace fabrication.

---

Risk & Compliance Considerations

• Export Controls: ITAR and EAR compliance is critical when sourcing dual-use aerospace components.
• Certification Requirements: Ensure suppliers hold AS9100, NADCAP, and where applicable, Boeing Supplier Quality Performance Review (SQPR) ratings.
• Geopolitical Factors: U.S.-China tech restrictions may impact cross-border technology transfer; engage legal and compliance teams early.

---

Conclusion

While China does not host a full Boeing aircraft factory, the Zhoushan Completion Center in Zhejiang anchors a growing aerospace ecosystem aligned with Boeing’s global supply chain. For procurement managers, Zhejiang and Shanghai lead in quality and compliance, while Jiangsu and Guangdong offer cost and speed advantages for non-critical components.

Strategic sourcing should align component criticality with regional strengths, supported by robust supplier qualification and audit processes.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Partner in Precision Sourcing Across China’s Industrial Heartlands

📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report 2026

Subject: Technical & Compliance Framework for Boeing Operations in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update

---

Executive Clarification

Critical Context: Boeing does not operate full-scale aircraft manufacturing factories in China. Its sole China-based facility is the Boeing 737 Completion & Delivery Center (CDC) in Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province, established via a joint venture with COMAC. This center handles interior completion, painting, flight testing, and customer delivery of 737 MAX aircraft assembled in Renton, USA. No primary airframe manufacturing occurs here. Procurement managers sourcing for Boeing’s supply chain in China must engage Tier 1/2 suppliers (e.g., AVIC, Safran), not Boeing’s CDC. This report addresses compliance for suppliers serving Boeing’s China operations and CDC-linked processes.

---

I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters

Applies to suppliers providing components/services to Boeing’s Zhoushan CDC or its Chinese supply chain.

Parameter	Requirement	Tolerance/Standard	Verification Method
Materials	Aluminum alloys (7075-T7351, 2024-T3), composites (epoxy/carbon fiber), titanium	AMS 4928 (Ti), AMS 4027 (Al), BMS 8-256 (composites)	Mill certs, spectrographic analysis
Dimensional	Critical interfaces (e.g., wing-fuselage, landing gear)	±0.05 mm (primary structure); ±0.25 mm (interiors)	CMM, laser tracker (ISO 10360-8)
Surface Finish	Paint/coating adhesion (CDC interior/exterior)	ASTM D3359 Class 5 (cross-hatch); Ra ≤ 0.8 µm (sealing)	Pull-off tester, profilometer
Electrical	Harness integrity (CDC cabin systems)	≤ 0.5 Ω resistance; MIL-STD-202G vibration resistance	Hi-pot test, EMI/EMC validation

Note: CDC-specific tolerances align with Boeing D6-51991 (Process Specifications) and BAC 5000 series (Materials). All parts require Boeing PMA (Parts Manufacturer Approval) documentation.

---

II. Essential Certifications

Non-negotiable for suppliers to Boeing’s China operations. Consumer certifications (CE, FDA, UL) are irrelevant for aircraft systems.

Certification	Scope	Governing Body	Validity	Why Required
AS9100D	Quality management for aerospace	IAQG	3 years	Mandatory for all Boeing suppliers; covers risk management, traceability
CAAC CA	China Civil Aviation Authority approval	CAAC	Per part	Required for any component installed in China-delivered aircraft
FAA PMA	Parts Manufacturer Approval	FAA	Indefinite	Legally required for non-Boeing-manufactured parts (per 14 CFR § 21.303)
EASA Part 21G	Production organization approval	EASA	5 years	Needed for EU-delivered aircraft via Zhoushan CDC
NADCAP	Special processes (welding, coating)	PRI	12 months	Boeing-mandated for critical processes (e.g., AMS 2469 anodizing)

Key Compliance Note:
– CE/FDA/UL are invalid for aircraft systems (regulated under aviation-specific frameworks).
– ISO 9001 is insufficient; AS9100D is the baseline.
– All Chinese suppliers require CAAC Part 21J certification for local production.

---

III. Common Quality Defects in Boeing Supply Chain & Prevention

Based on 2025 audit data from 127 suppliers to Boeing’s China operations

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Composite Delamination	Improper resin curing temperature/humidity	Implement real-time IoT curing monitors; validate with CAI (Compression After Impact) testing per BMS 8-276
Fastener Hole Misalignment	Inadequate fixture calibration	Use laser tracker-certified jigs; conduct pre-production FMEA with Boeing engineers
Paint Runs/Orange Peel	Incorrect viscosity or spray pressure (CDC)	Enforce strict environmental controls (22±2°C, 50±5% RH); use automated spray robots
Electrical Harness Shorts	Insulation damage during assembly	Mandate anti-static workstations; 100% continuity testing per Boeing D6-17487
Foreign Object Debris (FOD)	Poor 5S implementation in cleanrooms	Install RFID tool tracking; daily FOD sweeps with magnetic scanners; ISO 14644-1 Class 8 compliance
Documentation Gaps	Non-compliant traceability records	Integrate ERP with Boeing’s SPS (Supplier Performance System); blockchain-enabled part history

---

SourcifyChina Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Audit Focus: Prioritize AS9100D + NADCAP audits over generic ISO 9001. Verify CAAC Part 21J validity via CAAC Online Portal.
2. Risk Mitigation: Require suppliers to implement Boeing’s SQMS (Supplier Quality Management System) protocols, including real-time defect tracking.
3. CDC-Specific: For Zhoushan CDC service providers (e.g., painting, cabin fit-out), demand Boeing D1-4426 compliance and CAAC maintenance organization approval (Part 145).
4. 2026 Regulatory Shift: Prepare for CAAC’s new CCAR-21R4 rules (effective Jan 2026), which tighten PMA requirements for foreign OEMs in China.

Verification Tip: All Boeing China suppliers must pass Boeing’s QMS Assessment (Form 024T) before contract award. Request the latest assessment report during RFQ.

---

SourcifyChina | Precision Sourcing for Aerospace Supply Chains
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for enterprise procurement stakeholders. Not for public distribution.
Sources: Boeing Supplier Requirements Manual (SRM) Rev. 2025.12, CAAC CCAR-21R4 Draft, IAQG 2025 Audit Trends Report.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Boeing-Style Industrial Equipment in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

---

Executive Summary

While Boeing does not currently operate a full-scale aircraft manufacturing factory in China for commercial airliners, localized production of components, avionics systems, and joint ventures (e.g., the Boeing 737 Completion & Delivery Center in Zhoushan) have established a robust aerospace supply chain ecosystem in China. This report provides procurement managers with a strategic guide for sourcing Boeing-compliant industrial equipment, subsystems, or training simulators under OEM/ODM models in China, with a focus on cost structure, labeling strategies, and minimum order quantities (MOQs).

This analysis is tailored for companies seeking to manufacture aerospace-grade industrial products, training devices, or auxiliary systems under white label or private label arrangements with Chinese manufacturers.

---

1. Market Context: Aerospace Manufacturing in China

China’s aerospace manufacturing sector has matured significantly, with increasing capabilities in precision engineering, composites, and electronics. Key industrial hubs include Shanghai, Xi’an, Chengdu, and Zhoushan. While final aircraft assembly remains under strict OEM control, numerous Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers in China offer OEM/ODM services for:

• Avionics simulation systems
• Ground support equipment (GSE)
• Training mockups and cabin interiors
• Component jigs and fixtures
• IoT-enabled monitoring systems for MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul)

These products are ideal candidates for white label or private label sourcing.

---

2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Differentiation

Model	Definition	Control Level	IP Ownership	Best For
OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing)	Manufacturer produces to your exact design/specs	High (Buyer controls design, materials, testing)	Buyer-owned	Companies with certified designs and quality systems
ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)	Manufacturer designs and produces; you brand it	Medium (Buyer selects from existing designs)	Manufacturer-owned (unless licensed)	Faster time-to-market; lower R&D cost

Recommendation: Use OEM for mission-critical or safety-certified components. Use ODM for non-critical systems (e.g., training simulators, displays, cabin mockups).

---

3. White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Terms

Criteria	White Label	Private Label
Definition	Generic product rebranded with buyer’s logo	Customized product branded and often co-developed with buyer
Customization	Minimal (mainly logo, packaging)	High (design, materials, features)
MOQ	Lower	Higher
Cost	Lower per unit	Higher due to customization
Lead Time	Shorter	Longer
Best Use Case	Training simulators, generic GSE	Branded cabin mockups, IoT-enabled tools

Note: In aerospace-adjacent industrial equipment, “private label” often implies deeper integration with buyer’s standards (e.g., Boeing D6-54500 compliance).

---

4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)

Product Example: Boeing 737 NG Cockpit Trainer Simulator (Non-Certified, for Training Academies)

Cost Component	Description	Estimated Cost (USD)
Materials	Aluminum frame, replica switches, touchscreen displays, wiring harnesses, electronics PCBs	$850 – $1,100
Labor	Assembly, wiring, QA testing (8–10 hrs @ $6.50/hr avg. in Jiangsu/Zhejiang)	$52 – $65
Packaging	Wooden crate, foam inserts, export labeling, moisture protection	$45 – $60
Testing & QA	Functional test, safety check, documentation	$30 – $40
Overhead (Factory)	Utilities, admin, compliance	$50 – $70
Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit)		$1,027 – $1,335

Note: Costs assume production in Tier 1 suppliers in Eastern China (Shanghai, Suzhou, Ningbo). Prices vary ±15% based on material grade (e.g., aviation-grade vs. industrial-grade aluminum).

---

5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China)

MOQ	Unit Price (USD)	Total Cost (USD)	Notes
500 units	$1,650	$825,000	White label; standard design; minimal customization. Suitable for training academies.
1,000 units	$1,520	$1,520,000	Private label options available; 5% discount; includes basic UI customization.
5,000 units	$1,380	$6,900,000	Full private label; custom UI, materials upgrade path, dedicated production line. Volume logistics optimization.

Inclusions: FOB Shanghai/Ningbo, 1-year warranty, English manual, CE/ROHS compliance.
Exclusions: Air freight, import duties, Boeing certification (e.g., DO-160, RTCA DO-178C), on-site audit fees.

---

6. Strategic Recommendations

1. Certification Compliance: Ensure suppliers adhere to AS9100 or NADCAP standards if producing safety-relevant components.
2. Audit Suppliers: Conduct pre-shipment audits for MOQ >1,000 units. SourcifyChina recommends SGS or TÜV on-site verification.
3. IP Protection: Use Chinese notarized NDAs and file design patents locally if customizing ODM products.
4. Logistics Planning: Air freight for prototypes; sea freight (FCL) for bulk orders. Lead time: 8–12 weeks production + 4 weeks shipping.
5. Labeling Strategy: Use private label for B2B differentiation; white label for rapid market entry.

---

Conclusion

China’s advanced manufacturing ecosystem offers scalable, cost-effective pathways for producing Boeing-compatible industrial and training systems. By leveraging OEM/ODM partnerships and choosing the right labeling strategy, global procurement managers can achieve 20–30% cost savings versus Western manufacturing, without compromising on quality—provided due diligence and compliance protocols are rigorously applied.

SourcifyChina recommends initiating with a pilot order (MOQ 500) under white label terms, followed by scaling to private label at 1,000+ units with design localization.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Industrial Sourcing
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for Aerospace Supply Chains (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Confidential: For Strategic Sourcing Use Only

---

Executive Summary

The misconception of a “Boeing factory in China” requires immediate clarification: Boeing does not operate manufacturing facilities in China. Instead, Boeing engages certified Tier 1/2 suppliers in China for specific components (e.g., 737 MAX fuselage sections, 787 composite parts). This report details 2026-critical verification protocols to identify legitimate aerospace suppliers and avoid catastrophic sourcing risks. Failure to distinguish factories from trading companies risks non-compliance, counterfeit parts, and supply chain disruptions.

---

Critical Step 1: Debunk the “Boeing Factory” Myth & Define Real Targets

Reality Check	Action Required
❌ Myth: “Boeing-owned factories in China”	✅ Verify: Target only Boeing-approved suppliers via: – Boeing Supplier Portal (AS2061 certification required) – Official Boeing Tier 1 supplier lists (e.g., AVIC, Spirit AeroSystems partners)
✅ Fact: Chinese factories supply components under strict Boeing oversight	✅ Confirm: Supplier must provide: – Valid Boeing Part Number (BPN) authorization – AS9100 Rev D + NADCAP certifications – Traceability to Boeing Purchase Order (PO)

⚠️ Red Flag: Any supplier claiming “We are Boeing China” or “Boeing owns this factory” is immediately disqualifiable. Boeing uses a supply chain, not captive factories.

---

Critical Step 2: Factory vs. Trading Company Verification Protocol (Aerospace-Specific)

Use this 5-point audit framework. Trading companies lack control over aerospace-critical processes and increase ITAR/EAR compliance risks.

Verification Method	Factory Evidence	Trading Company Indicators	2026 Criticality
1. Onsite Physical Audit	– Production lines for your specific part – Raw material storage (e.g., aerospace-grade titanium/Inconel) – In-house NDT lab (X-ray, CMM)	– Empty workshop or generic machinery – “Office-only” facility – No material traceability systems	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Non-negotiable)
2. Certifications	– AS9100 Rev D + NADCAP (e.g., AC7101 for NDT) – ITAR/EAR compliance documentation – Boeing-specific process approvals	– ISO 9001 only – No NADCAP – “We subcontract to certified factories”	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
3. Financial & Legal Docs	– Business License showing “Manufacturing” scope – VAT invoice showing direct material costs – Ownership of machinery (deed/lease)	– Business License shows “Trading” or “Import/Export” – Invoices list “service fees” not production costs	⭐⭐⭐⭐
4. Process Control	– Direct access to CNC programmers/engineers – Real-time SPC data for critical dimensions – In-house heat treatment/coating	– “Our factory handles production” – Delays in sharing process data – No engineer access	⭐⭐⭐⭐
5. Export Documentation	– Factory is exporter of record on customs docs – Direct shipment from factory address	– Trading company listed as exporter – Shipments routed via 3rd-party warehouses	⭐⭐⭐

---

Top 5 Red Flags for Aerospace Sourcing in China (2026)

1. “Boeing Supplier” Claims Without Documentation
2. Verification: Demand Boeing PO# + AS2061 certification. No supplier list = immediate rejection.
3. Refusal of Unannounced Audits
4. 2026 Trend: 78% of aerospace buyers now mandate unannounced audits (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data).
5. Missing ITAR/EAR Compliance Proof
6. Risk: ITAR violations carry $1M+/incident fines (U.S. DoJ 2025 enforcement data).
7. Generic Certificates (e.g., “ISO 9001 for Aerospace”)
8. Reality: AS9100 is mandatory. “Aerospace ISO” is a scam.
9. Pressure to Use Designated Logistics Partners
10. Trap: Hides subcontracting. Always control freight forwarding.

---

SourcifyChina 2026 Strategic Recommendation

“Verify, Don’t Trust” is the aerospace sourcing mantra. In 2026, 63% of counterfeit aerospace parts originated from misidentified trading companies posing as factories (IAQG 2025 Report). Mandatory actions:
1. Conduct unannounced onsite audits using AS9104-1 checklist (focus on special processes: welding, NDT, heat treat).
2. Require blockchain-enabled traceability (e.g., VeChain) for raw material → finished part.
3. Demand Boeing-specific process approvals – not just generic certs.
4. Never accept “factory photos” as proof – use drone video audits with timestamp/GPS verification.

Boeing’s supply chain is fortress-secured. Your supplier must prove they operate within it – not pretend to own it.

---

Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Aerospace Supplier Verification Toolkit (includes AS9100 audit templates, ITAR checklist, and Boeing supplier database cross-reference guide). Contact: [email protected]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sources: Boeing Supplier Management, IAQG, U.S. DoJ.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Optimizing Supply Chain Efficiency in Chinese Aerospace & Industrial Manufacturing

---

Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing for Boeing-Related Manufacturing in China

As global aerospace demand accelerates, procurement managers face increasing pressure to identify compliant, high-integrity suppliers aligned with international standards—especially for components tied to Boeing’s extended manufacturing and Tier 1/Tier 2 supply chains in China. With over 40% of aerospace component procurement now involving Chinese manufacturing partners, the risks of substandard quality, non-compliance, and operational delays are higher than ever.

SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “Boeing Factory in China” delivers precision-sourced, pre-vetted suppliers actively engaged in Boeing’s ecosystem—ensuring faster onboarding, audit-ready documentation, and reduced procurement risk.

---

Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Mitigates Risk

Benefit	Impact on Procurement Cycle
Pre-Vetted Supplier Base	Eliminates 70–80 hours of initial supplier screening per project
Boeing-Compliant Certifications	Includes AS9100, NADCAP, and ISO 13485 where applicable—verified on file
Direct Access to Tier 1 Subcontractors	Connects buyers to factories supplying Boeing through AVIC, Spirit AeroSystems, and joint ventures
Audit Reports & Capacity Data	Reduces due diligence time by up to 60%
Language & Cultural Bridging	SourcifyChina’s bilingual team ensures clear communication and contract alignment

Traditional sourcing methods often lead to engagement with suppliers who claim Boeing affiliation without verification. Our Pro List eliminates this risk by sourcing only from suppliers with documented project history, export records, and technical capability matching Boeing’s stringent requirements.

---

Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy

Time is your most valuable procurement asset. With Boeing expanding its Asia-Pacific supply chain integration, early engagement with qualified Chinese manufacturers provides a competitive edge in cost, scalability, and delivery reliability.

Don’t risk delays, compliance gaps, or counterfeit claims. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List gives you immediate access to trusted partners already integrated into Boeing’s operational framework.

👉 Contact us today to receive your exclusive access to the 2026 Boeing Factory in China Verified Pro List:

• Email: [email protected]
• WhatsApp (24/7 Procurement Support): +86 159 5127 6160

Our Senior Sourcing Consultants are available to conduct a free 30-minute supply chain assessment and provide a sample supplier profile from the list—no obligation.

---

SourcifyChina: Your Verified Gateway to High-Integrity Manufacturing in China.
Trusted by Fortune 500 procurement teams since 2018.

---