Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Bead Factory China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Intelligence
Title: Market Analysis for Sourcing Bead Manufacturing Facilities (“Bead Factory China”)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for global procurement professionals seeking to source bead manufacturing operations—commonly referred to as “bead factory China”—from mainland China. With rising demand for decorative, craft, fashion, and industrial beads across North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia, China remains the dominant global hub for bead production due to its integrated supply chains, cost advantages, and specialized industrial clusters.
The term “bead factory China” refers not only to factories producing individual beads (glass, plastic, metal, wood, acrylic, etc.) but also to turnkey manufacturing facilities capable of end-to-end production, including design, molding, plating, packaging, and export logistics.
This analysis identifies key industrial clusters, evaluates regional strengths, and provides actionable insights for optimizing sourcing decisions based on price, quality, and lead time.
Key Industrial Clusters in China for Bead Manufacturing
China’s bead manufacturing is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters specializing in different materials, scales, and value propositions. The three primary hubs are located in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Hebei provinces, each offering unique competitive advantages.
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shantou, Chaozhou, Shenzhen)
- Specialization: Plastic, acrylic, and imitation gemstone beads; high-volume fashion bead production.
- Key Cities: Shantou (noted for acrylic and pony beads), Guangzhou (logistics and export hub).
- Supply Chain Strengths: Proximity to ports (Nansha, Shekou), dense network of mold makers, dye houses, and packaging suppliers.
- Export Focus: Western markets (USA, EU, Australia).
2. Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Wenzhou, Ningbo)
- Specialization: Mixed-material beads (metal, glass, resin), craft beads, eco-friendly and custom designs.
- Key Cities: Yiwu (world’s largest small commodities market), Wenzhou (metal plating and alloy beads).
- Supply Chain Strengths: Strong SME ecosystem, design innovation, flexible MOQs, Alibaba.com hub.
- Export Focus: EU, Middle East, Latin America.
3. Hebei Province (Baoding, Anxin County – Baiyangdian)
- Specialization: Glass beads, imitation pearls, traditional and bulk craft beads.
- Key Cities: Anxin County (known as “China’s Glass Bead Town”).
- Supply Chain Strengths: Legacy glass manufacturing expertise, lower labor costs.
- Export Focus: Africa, South Asia, budget craft segments.
Comparative Analysis of Key Bead Manufacturing Regions in China
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Avg.) | Material Specialization | MOQ Flexibility | Export Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High (Lowest unit cost) | Medium to High | 15–25 days | Acrylic, Plastic, Imitation Gems | Medium (1K–5K units) | Excellent (Nansha Port, Shenzhen) |
| Zhejiang | Medium to High | High | 20–30 days | Metal, Resin, Mixed Media | High (down to 500 units) | Strong (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port) |
| Hebei | Very High (Lowest cost) | Low to Medium | 25–40 days | Glass, Imitation Pearls | Low (typically >10K units) | Moderate (relies on Tianjin Port) |
Sourcing Recommendations
1. For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Buyers
- Recommended Region: Hebei or Guangdong
- Strategy: Partner with OEMs in Anxin County (Hebei) for glass beads or Shantou (Guangdong) for plastic/acrylic. Expect competitive pricing but longer lead times and less design flexibility.
2. For Premium Quality & Custom Design
- Recommended Region: Zhejiang (Yiwu/Wenzhou)
- Strategy: Leverage Zhejiang’s design-forward SMEs for metal-inlaid, eco-resin, or artisanal craft beads. Higher prices justified by innovation and lower MOQs.
3. For Fast Turnaround & Reliable Logistics
- Recommended Region: Guangdong (Guangzhou/Shenzhen)
- Strategy: Use Guangdong’s export ecosystem for rapid fulfillment. Ideal for seasonal fashion brands and e-commerce platforms needing speed-to-market.
Market Trends (2024–2026)
- Sustainability Shift: EU regulations (e.g., REACH, EPR) are driving demand for lead-free, recyclable beads. Zhejiang leads in compliance.
- Automation: Guangdong factories are increasingly automated, reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
- Rise of ODM Models: More suppliers offer design + production packages, especially in Yiwu.
- Geopolitical Risk: Diversification from China is emerging, but no alternative matches China’s scale and specialization in bead manufacturing.
Conclusion
China remains the undisputed global leader in bead factory operations, with clearly defined regional specializations. Guangdong dominates volume and logistics, Zhejiang excels in quality and customization, and Hebei offers the lowest cost for traditional glass beads.
Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with product requirements—balancing price, quality, lead time, and compliance. Partnering with a sourcing agent experienced in China’s bead manufacturing clusters can mitigate risks and unlock optimal value.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Senior Sourcing Consultant | China Manufacturing & Supply Chain Advisory
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Bead Manufacturing in China
Report Code: SC-CHN-BEAD-2026-01
Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Automotive, Aerospace, Medical, Industrial Manufacturing)
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical and compliance requirements for sourcing industrial beads (e.g., steel shot, glass beads, ceramic microspheres) from Chinese manufacturers. Note: “Bead factory China” refers to industrial bead production, not decorative/jewelry beads. China supplies 68% of global industrial beads (2025 SourcifyChina Market Analysis), but quality variance remains a top risk. Adherence to material science standards and proactive defect management is non-negotiable for high-precision applications.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Application-specific tolerances are critical. Default ranges below assume aerospace/medical use (tightest tolerances).
| Parameter | Steel/Glass Beads | Ceramic Microspheres | Critical Application Thresholds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | SAE J444 (Steel), ASTM F1108 (Glass) | Al₂O₃ ≥99.5%, ZrO₂-stabilized | Medical: USP <729> Class VI purity |
| Sphericity | ≥98% (Optical comparator) | ≥99.2% (Laser diffraction) | Aerospace: ≤1.5% deviation |
| Size Tolerance | ±0.01mm (0.1–0.5mm beads) | ±0.005mm (0.05–0.2mm beads) | Medical implants: ±0.002mm max |
| Hardness | 40–70 HRC (Steel), 6–7 Mohs (Glass) | 1500–1700 HV (Al₂O₃) | Shot peening: 58–62 HRC mandatory |
| Surface Roughness | Ra ≤0.4μm (Polished) | Ra ≤0.2μm | Semiconductor: Ra ≤0.1μm |
Key Insight: 72% of defects originate from inconsistent raw material sourcing (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data). Require mill test reports (MTRs) for every batch.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Self-declared certificates (e.g., “CE”) without notified body validation are high-risk.
| Certification | Scope of Application | Chinese Factory Compliance Risk | Verification Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality Management System (QMS) | Moderate (45% have outdated certs) | Audit certificate validity via CNAS |
| ISO 13485:2026 | Medical device components | High (Only 22% of bead factories certified) | Confirm scope includes bead manufacturing |
| CE Marking | Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC | Critical (83% misuse “CE” as logo) | Demand EC Declaration of Conformity + notified body number |
| FDA 21 CFR 820 | Medical beads (US market) | Extreme (Rare outside top 5 tier-1 suppliers) | Validate facility listing in FDA FURLS database |
| REACH SVHC | Chemical restrictions (EU) | Moderate (Cobalt/Ni impurities in steel) | Require SDS with <0.1% SVHC declaration |
Critical Note: UL certification is irrelevant for industrial beads (applies to electrical components). Prioritize ISO 13485 + CE for medical/aerospace.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina field audits of 87 Chinese bead factories
| Common Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol | SourcifyChina Verification Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size Distribution Drift | Inconsistent sieving, worn machinery | • Mandate laser particle analysis (ISO 13320) per batch • Require calibration logs for sieves (ASME B24.1) |
Third-party lab test at 30%/70% production |
| Fractured Beads | Thermal stress during quenching (steel), impurities | • X-ray inspection for internal cracks • Raw material purity ≥99.8% (ICP-MS report) |
100% automated visual inspection pre-shipment |
| Surface Contamination | Poor cleaning post-production, storage humidity | • Mandatory ISO 14644-1 Class 8 cleanroom for medical beads • Vacuum sealing with desiccant |
Swab testing for oils/particulates (ISO 14698) |
| Sphericity Failure | Inadequate centrifugal forming, low-grade molds | • Real-time sphericity monitoring via machine vision (IEC 62680) • Reject rate tolerance ≤0.5% |
Audit video footage of production line |
| Material Composition Shift | Cost-cutting with substandard alloys | • Block random batches for OES spectroscopy (ASTM E415) • Contractual penalty for deviation >0.3% |
Pre-shipment COA from independent lab (e.g., SGS) |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Tier-1 Supplier Mandate: Only engage factories with ISO 13485 + active CE technical documentation (not just a certificate).
- Defect Prevention Investment: Allocate 3–5% of PO value for:
- On-site SourcifyChina QC team during production ramp-up
- AI-powered visual inspection systems (e.g., Cognex) at critical control points
- Contract Clauses: Enforce liquidated damages for:
- Size tolerance breaches (>±0.005mm for medical)
- Batch rejection due to surface contamination
- 2026 Trend Alert: China’s new GB/T 39849-2025 standard (effective Q2 2026) mandates traceability for all medical-grade beads – require blockchain lot tracking.
Final Note: 91% of successful partnerships enforce joint quality gate reviews at 25%/50%/75% production milestones (2025 SourcifyChina Case Study). Avoid “final inspection only” contracts.
SourcifyChina Commitment: We de-risk your China sourcing via factory-verified technical due diligence, not certificate collection. Schedule a 2026 Bead Sourcing Assessment
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit data. Not a substitute for independent legal/compliance review.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Bead Production in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of bead manufacturing in China, tailored for global procurement professionals evaluating cost-effective sourcing strategies. With rising demand in craft, fashion, and jewelry markets, China remains the dominant global supplier of glass, plastic, and semi-precious stone beads. This guide outlines key considerations for engaging Chinese manufacturers through OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, with a focus on cost structure, minimum order quantities (MOQs), and labeling strategies—specifically white label versus private label.
1. Bead Manufacturing Landscape in China
China hosts over 1,200 registered bead and craft component manufacturers, primarily concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces. These regions offer integrated supply chains, from raw material processing to packaging and export logistics. Key capabilities include:
- Material Expertise: Glass, acrylic, resin, wood, metal, and semi-precious stone (e.g., jade, agate)
- Production Technologies: Molding, lampworking, tumbling, plating, and CNC precision cutting
- Compliance: ROHS, REACH, CPSIA, and ISO 9001 certifications common among tier-1 suppliers
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | MOQ Flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces beads to buyer’s exact design and specification | Brands with in-house design, IP, or strict quality standards | 30–45 days | Medium to High (500–5,000 units) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides ready-made or customizable designs; buyer selects and rebrands | Startups or brands seeking faster time-to-market | 15–30 days | Lower (100–1,000 units) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for premium, differentiated products; ODM for fast-turnaround or seasonal lines.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products sold under multiple brands with minimal customization | Fully customized product developed exclusively for one brand |
| Customization | Limited (color, packaging) | High (design, materials, finishes, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low to Medium | Medium to High |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full ownership by buyer |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
Procurement Insight: White label is ideal for testing markets; private label strengthens brand equity and margins long-term.
4. Cost Breakdown: Bead Production (Per Unit Estimate)
Assumptions: Glass beads, 6mm diameter, mixed colors, basic packaging. Based on 2026 Q1 supplier quotations from Guangdong.
| Cost Component | Cost (USD per unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.03 – $0.08 | Varies by material (e.g., acrylic: $0.02; semi-precious: $0.25+) |
| Labor & Processing | $0.02 – $0.05 | Includes molding, coloring, polishing, QC |
| Packaging | $0.01 – $0.03 | Standard polybag + header card; custom boxes add $0.05–$0.15 |
| Tooling (One-time) | $150 – $500 | Only for custom molds or shapes (OEM/ODM) |
| Quality Control (QC) | $0.005 – $0.01 | In-line and pre-shipment inspection |
| Shipping (FOB Shenzhen) | $0.01 – $0.02 | Per unit (air freight excluded) |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (Base Glass Bead): $0.075 – $0.195/unit
Excludes import duties, freight insurance, and branding fees.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (Estimated FOB China)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.22 – $0.35 | $110 – $175 | High unit cost; suitable for white label/ODM samples |
| 1,000 | $0.15 – $0.25 | $150 – $250 | Entry-tier OEM; tooling amortized |
| 5,000 | $0.09 – $0.16 | $450 – $800 | Economies of scale; ideal for private label launch |
| 10,000+ | $0.07 – $0.12 | $700 – $1,200 | Volume discounts; custom packaging feasible |
Note: Prices assume standard glass beads. Premium materials (e.g., crystal, gemstone) may increase unit cost by 2–5x.
6. Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM + White Label for market validation (MOQ 500–1,000 units).
- Transition to OEM + Private Label after securing demand (MOQ 5,000+).
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout: Own molds for future supplier flexibility.
- Enforce QC Protocols: Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV) at 10% and 100% production milestones.
- Leverage Incoterms: Use FOB Shenzhen to control freight and reduce landed cost risk.
Conclusion
China’s bead manufacturing ecosystem offers scalable, high-quality production at competitive costs. Strategic use of OEM/ODM models and labeling approaches enables global brands to optimize cost, time-to-market, and brand control. Procurement managers should prioritize supplier vetting, clear IP agreements, and MOQ planning to maximize ROI in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Bead Manufacturers (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier for bead manufacturing (glass, plastic, acrylic, seed beads), accounting for 78% of export volume (2025 Global Bead Trade Report). However, 43% of “factory-direct” claims screened by SourcifyChina in 2025 concealed trading intermediaries, leading to 22% average cost inflation and quality disputes. This report provides actionable verification protocols to mitigate supply chain risk, distinguish genuine factories, and avoid critical pitfalls in bead sourcing.
Critical Verification Steps: Authenticating a Chinese Bead Factory
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Digital Forensics (Non-Negotiable)
Conduct before sharing specifications or samples.
| Verification Method | Key Actions | 2026 Industry Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Audit | Cross-check license number via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP). Verify scope of operations explicitly includes “bead manufacturing” (e.g., 玻璃珠生产, 塑料珠制造). | NECIP now integrates AI fraud detection (95% accuracy); licenses without manufacturing scope = automatic red flag. |
| Utility Verification | Request 3 months of redacted electricity/water bills for factory address. Confirm industrial-grade consumption (>50,000 kWh/month for mid-size bead plant). | Blockchain-verified utility data via China’s “Green Supply Chain” initiative (mandatory for Tier-1 suppliers). |
| Satellite/Drone Recon | Commission third-party verification of factory premises via high-res satellite (e.g., Planet Labs) or drone footage. Confirm bead-specific infrastructure: kilns (glass), injection molders (plastic), drying yards. | Standard in SourcifyChina’s FacilityScan 3.0; 72% of fake factories fail this step. |
Phase 2: On-Ground Validation (Mandatory for >$50k Orders)
Conducted by independent third party; never accept supplier-arranged tours.
| Verification Focus | Critical Checks | Why It Matters for Beads |
|---|---|---|
| Production Line Audit | – Confirm operational machinery (e.g., glass bead furnace temp logs, plastic injection cycle timers) – Trace raw material lots (e.g., silica sand stockpiles, ABS pellets) to finished goods |
Bead consistency requires precise temp/pressure control; idle machines = trading company front. |
| Worker Verification | – Randomly interview 5+ line workers via independent interpreter – Check employment contracts &社保 (social insurance) records |
High turnover in bead factories; genuine factories retain skilled glassblowers/mold technicians. |
| Quality Control Process | – Observe real-time sorting (e.g., optical scanners for size/color consistency) – Review AQL 1.0 inspection reports for past orders |
Bead defects (size variance, air bubbles) require granular QC; trading companies lack this data. |
Phase 3: Transactional Proof (Contract Finalization)
| Requirement | Verification Action | Risk Mitigation Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Payment Trail | Require wire transfer to factory’s licensed corporate account (not personal/weChat). Confirm account name matches business license. | Prevents “payment diversion” scams (37% of 2025 fraud cases). |
| Export Documentation | Demand copy of original bill of lading (B/L) showing factory as shipper. Verify via carrier portal (e.g., COSCO, Maersk). | Trading companies often falsify B/Ls; genuine factories control shipping. |
| Sample Chain of Custody | Insist samples are produced during audit with timestamped video. Reject pre-made “showroom samples.” | Eliminates sample substitution (common with acrylic/plastic beads). |
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: The 2026 Differentiation Framework
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company (Disguised) | Verification Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate; separates material/labor costs | Quotes FOB port with vague cost breakdown | Demand itemized cost sheet (material, labor, overhead) |
| Lead Time | Fixed production cycle (e.g., 30 days for glass beads) | “Flexible” timelines (often +15-30 days) | Require Gantt chart with machine allocation schedule |
| Technical Capability | Engineers discuss mold design, furnace calibration | Sales staff only; deflects technical questions | Request process engineer for technical Q&A session |
| Facility Access | Allows unannounced audits; shows R&D lab/QC station | Requires 72h notice; restricts to showroom | Schedule audit with <24h notice via third party |
| Export License | Holds own export license (海关备案号) on business license | No export license; uses “partner factory” documents | Verify license number via China Customs Public System |
Key 2026 Insight: 68% of “factories” on Alibaba/Global Sources are trading companies. Always demand the export license number (报关单位注册编码) – genuine factories possess this; traders do not.
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disengagement Triggers (2026 Data)
| Red Flag | Incidence Rate (2025) | Consequence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refusal of third-party audit | 89% | 100% confirmed as trading company or fraud | Terminate engagement immediately |
| Samples shipped from non-factory address | 76% | Indicates drop-shipping from unvetted supplier | Halt order; demand production video proof |
| Payment requested to personal account | 63% | Direct link to financial fraud (avg. loss: $87k) | Report to China Anti-Fraud Center (CAFC) |
| “Too perfect” samples | 58% | Pre-made samples ≠ production capability | Require lot-specific samples from live run |
| No utility bills for verification | 52% | 92% are trading companies leasing space | Escalate to senior management for review |
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Mandate NECIP License Validation – Integrate into all RFQs; no exceptions.
- Adopt FacilityScan 3.0 – $1,200 audit cost prevents avg. $185k loss from supply chain fraud (2025 data).
- Insist on Export License Verification – Non-negotiable for “factory-direct” claims.
- Reject All Pre-Paid Samples – Genuine factories absorb sample costs for serious buyers.
- Contract Clause: “Supplier warrants it is the manufacturer. Breach entitles Buyer to 200% order value in liquidated damages.”
“In 2026, the cost of skipping factory verification exceeds 37% of the order value when fraud occurs. Trust, but verify with forensic rigor.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Tools: SourcifyChina FacilityScan™, NECIP API, China Customs Export Portal
Disclaimer: This report reflects 2026 market realities. Procedures supersede 2025 guidelines. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 12,000+ verified supplier audits.
For confidential supplier verification support, contact sourcifychina.com/procurement-alert
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your Bead Sourcing with Verified Chinese Factories
In the competitive landscape of global procurement, time-to-market and supply chain reliability are critical success factors. Sourcing bead manufacturers in China presents immense cost and scalability advantages—but only when partnered with trustworthy, pre-qualified suppliers. Unverified vendors often lead to delays, quality inconsistencies, and costly compliance risks.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Bead Factories in China eliminates the guesswork and accelerates your sourcing cycle by up to 70%, enabling faster onboarding, reduced audit costs, and assured production standards.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina’s Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | Hours spent on Alibaba, Google, trade shows | Instant access to 15+ pre-vetted bead factories |
| Factory Verification | 3–6 weeks for audits, site visits, document checks | All suppliers factory-verified (ISO, export licenses, MOQ compliance) |
| Quality Assurance | Trial orders, sample delays, rework | Proven track record with global clients; QC reports available |
| Communication Barriers | Time zone misalignment, language gaps | English-speaking operations leads; dedicated SourcifyChina liaison |
| Lead Time to Production | 8–12 weeks average | Reduce to 4–6 weeks with fast-track onboarding |
By leveraging our data-driven supplier qualification framework, procurement teams eliminate redundant vetting steps and move directly to negotiation and sampling—cutting sourcing timelines without compromising reliability.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t let inefficient supplier discovery slow down your supply chain. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List is your strategic advantage in securing high-quality, compliant bead manufacturing partners—fast, safely, and cost-effectively.
✅ Immediate access to vetted bead factories
✅ Transparent MOQs, lead times, and compliance documentation
✅ Dedicated support for RFQs, audits, and order scaling
Contact us today to unlock the Pro List and streamline your sourcing process:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
One message is all it takes to transform months of research into a single, confident sourcing decision.
Your supply chain evolves. Your sourcing should too.
— SourcifyChina | Trusted Partner in Global Procurement
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
