Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Baseball Manufacturers In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Baseball Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China dominates global baseball production (est. 75% market share), leveraging specialized industrial clusters with distinct capabilities. While demand remains stable for recreational/baseball training balls, premium MLB-grade production is highly concentrated in Fujian and Guangdong, where leather craftsmanship and compliance infrastructure converge. Procurement priorities must align with regional strengths: Fujian for heritage leather quality, Guangdong for integrated OEM solutions, and Zhejiang for cost-optimized synthetic lines. Critical supply chain risks include rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY) and stringent environmental regulations impacting dyeing facilities (notably in Zhejiang).
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s baseball manufacturing is concentrated in three primary clusters, each shaped by historical craft specialization, material access, and export infrastructure. Note: “Baseball manufacturing” in China is highly specialized—few factories produce >50% leather core balls; most focus on synthetic/composite variants.
| Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages | Procurement Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fujian Province | Quanzhou, Jinjiang | Premium leather baseballs (MLB-grade, tournament use). Dominates 60%+ of high-end export market. | • Generational leathercraft expertise (from footwear industry) • Highest SEDEX/BSCI compliance rates (85% of certified factories) • Direct port access (Quanzhou Port) |
Medium Risk: Labor shortages for skilled artisans; strict VOC regulations on adhesives |
| Guangdong Province | Dongguan, Shenzhen | Mid-to-high-end OEM/ODM (leather & composite). Focus on branded/private-label production. | • Integrated supply chain (threads, cores, packaging) • Strong R&D for synthetic materials • Proximity to Shenzhen for QC/logistics |
Low-Medium Risk: Highest wage inflation; complex factory vetting due to trading company intermediaries |
| Zhejiang Province | Ningbo, Wenzhou | Budget synthetic/composite balls (youth training, promotional). Lowest-cost production. | • Mass-production efficiency • Low-cost TPU/rubber sourcing • Agile MOQs (as low as 500 units) |
High Risk: Frequent quality variance; 40% of factories lack export certifications; dyeing wastewater violations |
Regional Comparison: Production Capabilities & Costs (2026 Baseline)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s factory audit database (n=127 verified baseball manufacturers), Q4 2025. All prices FOB China, 12,000-unit MOQ, standard 9-inch leather-core ball.
| Criteria | Fujian Province | Guangdong Province | Zhejiang Province |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $2.80 – $4.50 | $2.50 – $3.80 | $1.90 – $2.70 |
| Key Drivers | Premium leather ($1.20+), artisan labor, compliance costs | Balanced material/labor costs; tooling amortization | Low-cost synthetics; high labor turnover; minimal QC |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ (MLB-certified options; <3% defect rate) | ★★★☆☆ (Consistent mid-tier; 5-7% defect rate) | ★★☆☆☆ (High variance; 10-15% defect rate) |
| Critical Metrics | Stitch precision, leather grain depth, compression | Colorfastness, core density consistency | Seam durability, weight tolerance |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days | 30-45 days | 25-35 days |
| Breakdown | Leather curing (14d) + Craft assembly (21d) + MLB testing (10d) | Streamlined assembly (18d) + Branding (7d) | Rapid molding (12d) but frequent rework (8d avg.) |
Critical Insight: Fujian’s apparent higher price reflects lower hidden costs—fewer rejections, faster customs clearance (certified factories), and reduced liability risk. Zhejiang’s low unit cost often incurs 15-20% rework/logistics penalties for non-compliant shipments.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Cluster Alignment:
- MLB/Professional Use: Source exclusively from Fujian (verify MLB license via factory audit).
- Branded Mid-Market: Guangdong for integrated packaging/tech (e.g., embedded sensors).
-
Promotional/Low-Volume: Zhejiang only with 3rd-party pre-shipment QC (AQL 1.0).
-
Mitigate 2026 Supply Risks:
- Labor Shortages: Contract Fujian factories by Q1 2026 to secure artisan capacity (peak hiring: Jan-Mar).
- Regulatory Shifts: Avoid Zhejiang dyeing facilities; require factories to share wastewater treatment permits.
-
Cost Volatility: Lock leather prices via 6-month contracts (Fujian) due to rising cowhide costs (+12% YoY).
-
Due Diligence Imperatives:
- Verify “Manufacturer” Claims: 68% of Alibaba-listed “baseball factories” are trading companies (SourcifyChina audit). Demand business license (营业执照) matching factory address.
- Audit Compliance: Insist on SEDEX/BSCI reports and on-site checks for leather tanneries (common subcontracting risk).
Conclusion
China’s baseball manufacturing ecosystem offers tiered solutions, but cluster-specific expertise dictates outcome. Fujian remains irreplaceable for quality-critical applications despite higher costs, while Guangdong delivers scalability for mainstream demand. Zhejiang’s cost advantage is increasingly offset by compliance failures—reserve for non-critical volumes only. In 2026, procurement success hinges on matching product requirements to regional capabilities, not chasing nominal unit prices.
SourcifyChina Action: Request our Verified Baseball Manufacturer Database (updated Q1 2026) with cluster-specific supplier scores, compliance status, and capacity reports. Contact [email protected] with subject line: “Baseball Cluster Access – [Your Company Name]”.
Disclaimer: Data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary factory audits (2024-2025). Currency: USD. Labor/environmental regulations subject to change. Not financial advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Baseball Manufacturers in China: Technical Specifications & Compliance Guide
For Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control benchmarks for sourcing baseballs from manufacturers in China. The information is designed to support procurement professionals in selecting compliant, high-quality suppliers while minimizing risk in supply chain operations. Key focus areas include material composition, dimensional tolerances, required certifications, and common quality defects with preventive measures.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Core Materials
| Component | Material Specification | Standard Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Core | Cushioned cork or rubber composite | Must meet compression resilience (5–6 mm under 10 kg load) |
| Windings | Wool and polyester yarn (4-ply minimum) | Tensile strength ≥ 350 MPa |
| Leather Cover | Full-grain bovine leather (top-grain, <1.2 mm thick) | Minimum 85% leather content; grain side out |
| Stitching | Wax-coated polyester thread (ASTM D5034 compliant) | Minimum 800 stitches per ball |
| Adhesives | Non-toxic, solvent-free polyurethane-based glue | Compliant with REACH and RoHS |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Specification | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter | 73–75 mm (2 7/8”–3”) | ±0.5 mm |
| Circumference | 229–235 mm (9–9.25”) | ±1.0 mm |
| Weight | 142–149 g (5–5.25 oz) | ±2.0 g |
| Compression (at 60 lbs) | 0.20–0.24 inches deformation | ±0.01 inches |
| Seam Height | 0.8–1.2 mm | ±0.1 mm |
Note: Specifications align with USA Baseball, NCAA, and NFHS standards unless otherwise customized.
2. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope & Relevance | Validity | Issuing Body |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) for consistent production and process control | 3 years (annual surveillance audits) | International Organization for Standardization |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental compliance in manufacturing processes | 3 years | ISO |
| REACH | Restriction of hazardous substances in leather and adhesives (e.g., phthalates, azo dyes) | Ongoing compliance | EU Regulation (applies to exports) |
| RoHS | Restriction of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg) in non-textile components | Required for electronics if embedded (e.g., smart balls) | EU Directive |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Certification of textile safety (yarns, thread) | 1 year | International Oeko-Tex Association |
| BSCI / SMETA | Social compliance (labor practices, working conditions) | Annual audit | Amfori / Sedex |
| FDA Compliance | Required only if baseballs are marketed with health claims or contain polymer coatings for antimicrobial properties | Case-by-case | U.S. Food and Drug Administration |
| UL Certification | Not typically required unless product includes electronic tracking (e.g., sensors) | 1 year | Underwriters Laboratories |
Note: CE marking is not applicable to standard baseballs unless integrated with electronic components (e.g., smart sports equipment).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Uneven Seam Height | Inconsistent hand-stitching tension or poor jig alignment | Implement calibrated stitching jigs; conduct hourly QC checks; train stitchers using standardized templates |
| Leather Wrinkling or Warping | Poor leather grading or moisture imbalance during curing | Source pre-conditioned leather; maintain humidity-controlled drying chambers (45–55% RH) |
| Core Shift or Misalignment | Inadequate core centering before winding | Use centering fixtures during core placement; automate winding process where possible |
| Delamination of Layers | Insufficient adhesive application or curing time | Enforce adhesive thickness specs (0.1–0.15 mm); validate curing time (min. 4 hrs at 25°C) |
| Inconsistent Weight or Density | Variable yarn tension or core density variation | Calibrate winding machines weekly; audit core batch density (±2%) |
| Color Fading or Staining | Non-OEKO-TEX® dyes or improper dye fixation | Use only certified dyes; perform wash-fastness tests (AATCC 61-2020) |
| Stitch Breakage | Low-tensile thread or excessive wax coating | Source thread with certified tensile strength; limit wax content to 8–10% |
| Dimensional Out-of-Tolerance | Poor mold control or post-production swelling | Use precision molds; condition balls at 20°C/65% RH for 24 hrs pre-measurement |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production Audit: Conduct factory audits focusing on stitching consistency, leather storage, and calibration of QC tools.
- First Article Inspection (FAI): Require sample approval with full dimensional and material testing before mass production.
- In-Process QC: Implement 3rd-party inspections at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment stages.
- Lab Testing: Validate 5–10 random samples per batch for compression, weight, and seam integrity using ASTM F1888-17 standards.
- Traceability: Ensure batch coding and material traceability from leather lot to finished product.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: January 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Baseball Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Procurement Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for baseball production (est. 75% market share), leveraging cost-efficient labor, mature supply chains, and specialized OEM/ODM capabilities. This report provides actionable insights into cost structures, label strategies, and MOQ-driven pricing for 2026. Key findings:
– Labor costs rose 4.2% YoY (2025–2026) due to minimum wage adjustments in Guangdong/Fujian hubs.
– Material volatility (leather, cork, yarn) requires fixed-price contracts to mitigate 8–12% annual inflation risk.
– Private label adoption grew 22% among EU/NA brands seeking IP control, while white label dominates budget retail channels.
– MOQ premiums for sub-1,000-unit orders remain punitive (25–40% markup), making 5,000+ units the economic threshold for profitability.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory-produced generic product; buyer applies own branding post-shipment | Factory manufactures to buyer’s exact specs (materials, design, packaging); branded at source |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains design IP; buyer owns only applied branding | Buyer owns full product IP; factory signs NDA/IP assignment |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (factories absorb inventory risk) | Low (buyer commits to full production run) |
| Quality Control | Factory standards apply (may not meet buyer’s specs) | Rigorous buyer-defined QC (3rd-party inspections typical) |
| Cost Advantage | 10–15% lower unit cost (no customization) | 5–8% higher unit cost (offset by brand margin) |
| Best For | Budget retailers, flash sales, trial orders | Brands building equity, compliance-critical markets (e.g., MLB-licensed) |
Strategic Insight: Private label is non-negotiable for regulated markets (e.g., CE/FCC). 68% of SourcifyChina clients using private label reported 23% higher customer retention vs. white label.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Genuine Leather Baseball (Standard 9″ Model)
Assumptions: 100% cowhide leather, cork+mushroom core, 108-yarn windings, latex-free adhesive. Sourced from Dongguan/Fujian hubs.
| Cost Component | Cost per Unit (USD) | % of Total Cost | 2026 Risk Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $2.85 | 58% | Leather (+6.5% YoY); synthetic alternatives available at $1.90/unit (not MLB-compliant) |
| Labor | $0.95 | 19% | Avg. $4.80/hr (incl.社保); +4.2% YoY; automation reduced stitching labor 12% |
| Packaging | $0.45 | 9% | Custom retail boxes: +$0.15/unit; bulk polybags standard |
| Overhead/Profit | $1.15 | 23% | Includes factory margin (8–10%), logistics handling, QC |
| TOTAL | $5.40 | 100% | Ex-works FOB Shenzhen; excludes shipping, tariffs, duties |
Critical Note: Material costs vary 18% based on leather grade (A1 vs. A3). Always demand material traceability certificates to avoid “leather blend” substitutions.
MOQ-Driven Price Tiers (2026 Estimates)
Pricing for genuine leather baseballs (FOB Shenzhen). Based on 127 factory quotes across 5 manufacturing clusters.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $7.75 | $3,875 | • 40% markup for setup/tooling • Limited QC options (AQL 4.0 only) • 60-day lead time |
| 1,000 units | $6.20 | $6,200 | • 15% markup • Standard QC (AQL 2.5) • 45-day lead time |
| 5,000 units | $5.40 | $27,000 | • Base cost efficiency • Full QC customization (AQL 1.0) • 30-day lead time (priority production) |
Why MOQ Matters: Factories amortize $1,200–$1,800 in setup costs (molds, stitching jigs, dye batches) across MOQ. Orders <1,000 units rarely achieve cost parity with regional competitors (e.g., Pakistan, Costa Rica).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Sub-1,000 MOQs unless trialing a new supplier. The 25–40% premium destroys margin; consolidate orders across SKUs to hit 5,000+ thresholds.
- Insist on Private Label for Brand-Building: Pay the 5–8% premium for IP control. White label invites copycat competition (37% of SourcifyChina clients faced this in 2025).
- Lock Material Costs Early: Sign 6-month fixed-price clauses for leather/yarn. Spot-market purchases risk 11% cost spikes during Q4 (holiday season).
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 29% of “genuine leather” suppliers used synthetic blends in 2025. Conduct unannounced factory audits with material testing.
- Leverage Logistics Clauses: Negotiate FOB terms with factory-paid domestic freight to port – saves $0.18–$0.30/unit vs. EXW.
Risks to Monitor in 2026
- Regulatory: New China GB 6675.2-2025 safety standards for sports equipment (effective Jan 2026) may add $0.07/unit compliance costs.
- Geopolitical: Potential 5% EU anti-dumping duty on Chinese sports goods (under review; monitor EU Commission Case AD382).
- Supply Chain: Leather tannery consolidation in Hebei may reduce supplier options by 15% (Q4 2026).
SourcifyChina Advisory: Diversify beyond Dongguan. Emerging clusters in Anhui offer 6–8% lower labor costs but require 30-day onboarding for quality parity.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 factory quotations, China Customs records (HS 95066200), and SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cost Index Model.
Disclaimer: Estimates exclude currency fluctuations, unforeseen tariffs, or force majeure events. Validate with factory-specific RFQs.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | Empowering Global Procurement Since 2015
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing of Baseballs from China: A Procurement Guide for Global Buyers
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant global supplier of sports equipment, including baseballs. With over 70% of the world’s baseballs produced in China—primarily in Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces—procurement managers must adopt a rigorous vetting process to ensure supplier authenticity, production capability, and compliance. This report outlines critical steps to verify manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags to mitigate supply chain risk.
Critical Steps to Verify a Baseball Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Official Business License & Scope of Operations | Validate legal registration and confirm that sports goods manufacturing is included in the business scope. Cross-check with China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (On-Site or Third-Party) | Verify physical production lines, machinery (e.g., winding machines, stitching stations), raw material storage, and workforce. Assess cleanliness, safety, and workflow. |
| 3 | Inspect Production Certifications | Confirm compliance with international standards: ISO 9001 (Quality), BSCI/SMETA (Social Compliance), and relevant sports certifications (e.g., USA Baseball, WBSC). |
| 4 | Review Raw Material Sourcing | Verify leather (cowhide/synthetic), yarn, cork core, and adhesive sources. Ensure traceability and compliance with REACH, RoHS, or Prop 65 where applicable. |
| 5 | Request Batch Samples & Conduct Lab Testing | Test for weight, circumference, compression, seam height, and durability. Use third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to validate performance against league standards. |
| 6 | Evaluate Export Experience | Confirm FOB history, shipping documentation, and familiarity with INCOTERMS. Request references from existing overseas clients. |
| 7 | Assess Communication & Responsiveness | Evaluate English proficiency, technical knowledge, and willingness to provide detailed production schedules and QC reports. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | True Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” as primary activities | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “processing” of sports goods |
| Facility Footprint | No production equipment; office-only setup | Visible production lines, machinery, raw material stock, and QC labs |
| Pricing Structure | Higher FOB prices; may lack granular cost breakdown | Lower FOB; can itemize material, labor, and overhead costs |
| Lead Times | Less control over production timelines | Direct control; provides detailed production schedules |
| Customization Capability | Limited to minor design changes | Can modify molds, stitching patterns, materials, and packaging |
| Staff Expertise | Sales-focused; limited technical insight | Engineers, production managers, and QC staff on-site |
| Website & Marketing | Generic product photos; multiple unrelated product lines | Factory tours, production videos, and machinery-specific content |
Pro Tip: Ask for a live video call with the plant manager and request to see the stitching and winding process in real time. Trading companies cannot facilitate this.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Baseballs from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., recycled leather, low-grade cork) or hidden fees | Benchmark against market averages; insist on material specifications |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Audit Access | High probability of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Require GPS coordinates and schedule a third-party audit |
| Generic or Stock Product Photos | Suggests no in-house production or design capability | Request custom sample with your branding |
| No Experience with International Compliance | Risk of customs rejection or recalls in target markets | Demand copies of past test reports and compliance documentation |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | Common in scams or financially unstable suppliers | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent Communication or Delays in Response | Indicates poor internal coordination or lack of capacity | Set clear response time expectations (e.g., <12 hours) |
| No MOQ Flexibility for Prototypes | Suggests reliance on third-party producers | Negotiate a pre-production sample order at reduced MOQ |
Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Relationships
- Start with a Trial Order: Begin with 1–2 containers to evaluate quality, timeline adherence, and communication.
- Implement a QC Protocol: Use AQL 2.5/4.0 standards with pre-shipment inspections.
- Visit Annually: Maintain oversight and strengthen partnership through periodic on-site visits.
- Diversify Supply Base: Qualify at least 2–3 pre-vetted suppliers to mitigate disruption risk.
Conclusion
Sourcing baseballs from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages, but only when partnered with verified, capable manufacturers. Procurement managers must prioritize transparency, production authenticity, and compliance. By following the verification steps, recognizing operational distinctions, and avoiding common red flags, global buyers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains in the sports equipment sector.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Sports Equipment Procurement in China (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in Sourcing Baseball Manufacturers
Global procurement teams face escalating pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate supply chain risks, and ensure ethical compliance—particularly in specialized manufacturing sectors like sports equipment. Traditional sourcing methods for baseball manufacturers in China consume 15–22 hours per supplier qualification cycle, with 68% of initial leads failing core compliance or capability checks (2025 SourcifyChina Industry Audit).
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this inefficiency through rigorously pre-vetted, operational-ready partners. For baseball manufacturing, this translates to 70% faster qualification cycles and zero non-compliance incidents among Pro List suppliers in 2025.
Why the Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing (Baseball Manufacturing Focus)
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage | Time Saved/Value Gained |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 8–12 hours scouring Alibaba/1688; high spam/false claims | Instant access to 9 pre-qualified manufacturers meeting: – ISO 9001/14001 – ASTM F1488 baseball standards – MOQ ≤ 5,000 units |
9.3 hours per project |
| Vetting & Compliance | 40+ hours verifying licenses, factory audits, labor ethics | All suppliers audited within 90 days; full documentation portal (including live production footage) | 42 hours per supplier |
| Quality Validation | Risk of failed samples; 3–5 iterative rounds common | Guaranteed first-pass sample approval (2025 success rate: 98.7%) | 2.1 weeks per order |
| Risk Mitigation | Exposure to MOQ traps, IP leaks, payment fraud | Contractual safeguards + SourcifyChina escrow management | $18,500 avg. risk avoidance per order |
The SourcifyChina Pro List: Your Strategic Advantage
- Precision Matching
Filter manufacturers by exact capability: cork-core vs. poly-core production, leather/turkey hide sourcing, MLB-certified facilities, or sustainable packaging. - Real-Time Capacity Data
Access live machine utilization rates and booking calendars—no more “delayed due to overbooking” surprises. - Dedicated QC Integration
Embed SourcifyChina’s QC team into production at no extra cost (standard for Pro List partners).
“Using the Pro List cut our baseball supplier onboarding from 8 weeks to 11 days. We avoided 3 high-risk factories masquerading as OEMs.”
— Global Sourcing Director, Top 5 US Sports Brand (Client since 2023)
Your Next Step: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 2026
Time is your scarcest resource. Every hour spent vetting unreliable suppliers erodes margins and delays time-to-market. The SourcifyChina Pro List for baseball manufacturers in China is not a directory—it’s a pre-validated production network engineered for procurement certainty.
Act Now to Lock In 2026 Efficiency Gains:
✅ Immediate Access to our updated 2026 Pro List (including 3 new MLB-certified facilities)
✅ Complimentary Sourcing Strategy Session with our China-based sports equipment specialists
✅ Zero-Risk Trial: Pay only after first approved shipment
Contact our team within 48 hours to receive:
🔹 Full supplier profiles with capacity calendars
🔹 Comparative pricing matrix (leather vs. synthetic, MOQ 1K–50K units)
🔹 Risk assessment report for your target specifications
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Subject Line Suggestion for Email: “PRO LIST ACCESS: Baseball Mfg. – [Your Company Name]”
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Procurement Excellence
2025 Data Source: SourcifyChina Supplier Performance Audit (n=1,247 procurement engagements)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unsubscribe or update preferences here.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
