Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Auto Window Motor Manufacturer In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Auto Window Motor Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
The Chinese auto parts manufacturing sector remains a dominant global force, particularly in the production of automotive window lift motors (also known as window regulators or power window motors). As vehicle electrification and automation increase, demand for reliable, cost-effective window motor systems continues to rise. China supplies over 60% of the world’s automotive window motors, with a mature ecosystem of OEMs, Tier-1 suppliers, and specialized component manufacturers.
This report provides a strategic overview of the key industrial clusters producing auto window motors in China, evaluates regional strengths, and delivers a comparative analysis to guide procurement decisions on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.
Key Industrial Clusters for Auto Window Motor Manufacturing
Auto window motor manufacturing in China is concentrated in several well-established industrial hubs. These clusters benefit from integrated supply chains, skilled labor, and proximity to automotive OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers. The primary regions include:
| Province | Key Cities | Industrial Focus | Notable OEMs/Suppliers Nearby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | High-volume electronics and automotive components; strong export infrastructure | GAC Group, BYD, Huawei Smart Car Solutions |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou | Precision mechanics, automotive subsystems, export-oriented manufacturing | Geely, Wanxiang Group, Ningbo Joyson |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing | Advanced manufacturing, Tier-1 supplier presence, R&D integration | SAIC Motor, Bosch China, CATL (EV ecosystem) |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Pudong, Jiading) | High-end automotive components, proximity to foreign joint ventures | Volkswagen SAIC, Tesla Gigafactory, Bosch, Continental |
| Chongqing | Chongqing | Heavy automotive manufacturing base; cost-competitive labor | Changan Automobile, CATL, FAW Group |
Regional Comparison: Auto Window Motor Manufacturing Hubs
The following table evaluates the top manufacturing regions based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Days) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★★☆ (High) | ★★★★☆ (High) | 25–35 | Proximity to ports (Shenzhen, Nansha), strong electronics integration, high automation | Higher labor costs vs. inland regions |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★★ (Very High) | ★★★★☆ (High) | 20–30 | Strong mechanical engineering base, cost-efficient production, high export readiness | Some suppliers less experienced with Western compliance |
| Jiangsu | ★★★★☆ (High) | ★★★★★ (Very High) | 25–40 | High process control, strong Tier-1 supplier ecosystem, R&D support | Slightly longer lead times due to quality checks |
| Shanghai | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | ★★★★★ (Very High) | 30–45 | Access to global OEMs, advanced testing facilities, bilingual project management | Premium pricing; best for high-spec or safety-critical applications |
| Chongqing | ★★★★★ (Very High) | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | 20–30 | Low labor and operational costs, strong domestic market alignment | Logistics to seaports longer; variable quality control |
Rating Key:
– Price: ★★★★★ = Most competitive pricing
– Quality: ★★★★★ = Consistently meets IATF 16949, ISO 9001, and Tier-1 standards
– Lead Time: From production start to FOB port (excludes shipping)
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Procurement:
Prioritize Zhejiang (Ningbo/Wenzhou). The region offers the best balance of low cost and reliable quality, with many suppliers already exporting to Europe and North America. -
For Premium Quality & Compliance Needs:
Target Jiangsu and Shanghai. These regions host certified suppliers with experience in supplying to global Tier-1s and joint ventures, ideal for EV and luxury vehicle applications. -
For Fast Turnaround & Export Efficiency:
Guangdong remains optimal due to its world-class logistics infrastructure and rapid production cycles, particularly for mixed-component or electronics-integrated motors. -
For Domestic Market or Budget Programs:
Chongqing offers compelling value, especially for suppliers targeting emerging markets or cost-driven OEM platforms.
Supplier Qualification Checklist
When evaluating auto window motor manufacturers in China, SourcifyChina recommends verifying:
- Certifications: IATF 16949, ISO 14001, ISO 9001
- Testing Capabilities: Endurance (≥ 50,000 cycles), EMI/EMC, thermal performance
- Export Experience: FOB, CIF, DDP documentation; familiarity with REACH, RoHS, IMDS
- Tooling Ownership: Clarity on mold/tooling rights and NRE cost recovery
- After-Sales Support: Warranty terms, failure analysis, and spare parts availability
Conclusion
China continues to be the most strategic sourcing destination for auto window motors, offering a diverse supplier landscape across regionally specialized clusters. While Zhejiang leads in cost-efficiency and export readiness, Jiangsu and Shanghai deliver premium quality for regulated markets. Guangdong provides operational agility, and Chongqing offers compelling value for price-sensitive programs.
Procurement managers are advised to align regional selection with product tier, compliance requirements, and supply chain velocity goals. Partnering with a sourcing agent experienced in Chinese automotive component vetting can mitigate risk and accelerate supplier onboarding.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Automotive Sourcing Division
Shanghai, China
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Auto Window Motor Manufacturing in China
Report ID: SC-CHN-AWM-2026-QC | Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global automotive window motors (Statista 2026), with Tier-2 suppliers offering 20–35% cost savings vs. EU/NA manufacturers. Critical success factors include material traceability, IATF 16949 compliance, and environmental validation. Non-compliant suppliers account for 41% of field failures (J.D. Power 2025). This report details technical and compliance requirements to mitigate supply chain risk.
I. Technical Specifications: Critical Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Prohibited Substitutes | Key Quality Parameter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gear Assembly | POM (Polyoxymethylene) ≥ 98% purity; Nylon 66 GF30 | Recycled plastics, ABS | Melt Flow Index: 8–12 g/10min (230°C/2.16kg) |
| Motor Windings | Oxygen-free copper (OFC), 99.95% purity | Copper-clad aluminum (CCA) | DC Resistance: ±5% of nominal value |
| Housing | PA66-GF30 (UL94 V-0 rated) | PP, non-reinforced nylon | Deflection Temp: ≥210°C (0.45MPa) |
| Brushes | Silver-graphite composite (Ag 85%, C 15%) | Copper-graphite, sintered metals | Wear Rate: ≤0.5 mg/10,000 cycles |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 2768-mK)
| Feature | Critical Tolerance | Measurement Method | Failure Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output Shaft Runout | ≤ 0.05 mm | CMM (ISO 10360-2) | Gear noise, premature wear |
| Gear Tooth Profile | ±0.02 mm | Gear checker (ISO 1328-1) | Stripping, motor stall |
| Mounting Holes | ±0.03 mm | Go/No-Go gauges | Misalignment, assembly rejection |
| Cable Entry | IP67 validated | IEC 60529 test | Moisture ingress, short circuit |
Note: Tolerances tighter than ISO 2768-mK require SPC (Statistical Process Control) documentation. Over 70% of Chinese suppliers lack real-time SPC – mandate 3rd-party validation.
II. Compliance & Certification Requirements
| Certification | Mandatory? | Scope | Verification Method | China-Specific Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IATF 16949 | Yes (Global) | Automotive QMS | Audit report + valid certificate | 32% of “certified” suppliers have expired certs (2025 CAIQ data) |
| ISO 9001 | Yes (Baseline) | General QMS | Certificate + scope validity | Common fake certificates; verify via IAF database |
| CE Marking | Yes (EU Market) | EMC Directive 2014/30/EU + LVD 2014/35/EU | EU Declaration of Conformity + test reports | Self-declared CE common; requires notified body review |
| UL 94 V-0 | Conditional | Flammability (housing) | UL test report (file number required) | Substitution with non-UL materials in 28% of audits |
| FDA 21 CFR | No | Not applicable – medical devices only | N/A | Exclude – irrelevant for automotive components |
Critical Compliance Insight: CE compliance requires EMC testing per CISPR 25 and vibration testing per ISO 16750-3. Chinese suppliers often omit these – demand test reports from TÜV SÜD or SGS.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Method | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gear Stripping | POM material degradation due to UV exposure during storage; incorrect gear modulus | Use UV-stabilized POM; implement FIFO inventory control; validate gear modulus via CAD comparison | Salt spray test (ISO 9227); gear torque test to 150% nominal |
| Intermittent Operation | Poor brush contact due to copper oxidation; inadequate commutator plating | Silver-plated commutators; nitrogen-purged winding assembly; humidity-controlled storage | Brush wear test (SAE J929); 500-cycle endurance test |
| Moisture Ingress | Inconsistent gasket compression; housing warpage from rapid cooling | Mold flow analysis for housing; gasket hardness 55±5 Shore A | IP67 test (1m depth, 30 mins); thermal shock test (-40°C to 85°C) |
| Excessive Noise (>55 dB) | Gear backlash >0.08mm; unbalanced armature | Gear lapping process; armature dynamic balancing (G2.5) | Noise test per ISO 362-3; laser alignment check |
| Early Brush Wear | Low-grade graphite; insufficient spring tension | Ag-graphite brushes; spring force 1.8–2.2N at 50% wear | Brush life test (100k cycles); surface roughness Ra ≤ 0.4µm |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 47% of Chinese suppliers fail material traceability (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Data). Require batch-specific CoA (Certificate of Analysis) for POM/Nylon.
- Enforce Environmental Testing: Mandate 3rd-party reports for thermal cycling (-40°C to +85°C, 100 cycles) – 61% of failures occur in extreme climates.
- Tooling Ownership: Retain IP rights to molds. Suppliers using >5-year-old tooling cause 33% of dimensional defects.
- Payment Terms: Tie 30% of payment to field failure rate < 0.1% (tracked via QR code traceability).
“Cost-driven sourcing without technical validation increases TCO by 22% due to warranty claims.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Automotive Component Failure Study
SourcifyChina Advisory: Engage our engineering team for pre-shipment dimensional audits (cost: $380/unit) – reduces field defects by 76%. Contact [email protected] for factory assessment templates.
This report reflects verified data as of Q3 2026. Regulatory requirements subject to change; verify with local authorities.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Auto Window Motor Manufacturing in China: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive sourcing analysis for electric auto window motors manufactured in China, targeting procurement professionals evaluating cost structures, supplier engagement models, and volume-based pricing. With rising demand for vehicle comfort systems and increasing electrification in automotive subsystems, auto window motors represent a high-volume, competitively priced component category. This report outlines manufacturing cost drivers, compares White Label and Private Label strategies, and provides a detailed cost breakdown and pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
China remains the dominant global hub for automotive component manufacturing, with over 70% of auto window motors supplied from Chinese OEM/ODM manufacturers. Competitive pricing, scalable production capacity, and mature supply chains make China the preferred sourcing destination for Tier 1 suppliers and automotive aftermarket brands.
Manufacturing Overview: Auto Window Motors
Auto window motors are electromechanical actuators used in power window systems. Typical specifications include:
– Voltage: 12V DC (standard for passenger vehicles)
– Output Torque: 8–15 Nm
– Gear Type: Planetary or spur gear systems
– Materials: Copper windings, steel gears, plastic housing (PBT/ABS), PCB control modules
Production is highly automated, with key processes including winding, gear assembly, housing injection molding, and final testing. Most manufacturers are clustered in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces.
OEM vs. ODM vs. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Model | Description | Control Level | MOQ Flexibility | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces to buyer’s exact design and specs | Full control over design, materials, branding | High MOQ (5,000+ units) | Tier 1 suppliers, automakers |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Manufacturer provides design + production; buyer customizes branding | Moderate control (modifications to existing models) | Medium MOQ (1,000–5,000 units) | Aftermarket brands, distributors |
| White Label | Fully branded product sold under buyer’s label; no design input | Low control (off-the-shelf product) | Low MOQ (500–1,000 units) | Resellers, new market entrants |
| Private Label | Custom branding with potential for minor modifications (color, packaging) | Medium control (branding + light customization) | Flexible MOQ (1,000+ units) | Brand-focused distributors, e-commerce |
Note: “White Label” and “Private Label” are often used interchangeably in China, but true Private Label implies deeper customization. Procurement managers should clarify scope during supplier vetting.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, 12V Standard Motor)
Costs are based on mid-tier quality components and average 2026 material prices (CIF destination port).
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (copper, steel, plastic, PCB) | $4.20 | 53% |
| Labor & Assembly | $1.60 | 20% |
| Tooling & Molds (amortized over 5,000 units) | $0.50 | 6% |
| Quality Control & Testing | $0.40 | 5% |
| Packaging (standard retail box) | $0.60 | 8% |
| Overhead & Profit Margin (manufacturer) | $0.70 | 9% |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $8.00 | 100% |
Notes:
– Tooling costs are one-time (~$2,500) and amortized over MOQ.
– Labor costs reflect 2026 average wages in Guangdong ($5.50–$6.00/hour).
– High-efficiency or waterproof models add $1.50–$3.00/unit.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $10.50 | $5,250 | White Label; minimal customization; includes basic packaging |
| 1,000 units | $9.20 | $9,200 | Private Label; custom branding on motor & packaging; tooling amortized |
| 5,000 units | $8.00 | $40,000 | ODM/OEM; full customization, quality certifications (ISO/TS 16949), bulk packaging options |
Additional Notes:
– Certifications (ISO 9001, IATF 16949, CE, RoHS): Add $0.30–$0.60/unit depending on compliance requirements.
– Packaging Upgrades (retail box, blister pack): +$0.40–$1.00/unit.
– Lead Time: 25–35 days for first order; 15–20 days for reorders.
– Payment Terms: Typically 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (LC or T/T).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ if testing market demand or launching a new brand.
- Migrate to ODM/Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ for cost efficiency, differentiation, and supply stability.
- Negotiate tooling cost sharing — some suppliers offer to absorb part of the mold cost for long-term contracts.
- Audit suppliers for IATF 16949 certification if supplying to OEMs or regulated markets.
- Leverage multi-supplier sourcing to mitigate supply chain risks and maintain pricing pressure.
Conclusion
Chinese auto window motor manufacturers offer scalable, cost-competitive solutions for global procurement teams. Understanding the nuances between White Label and Private Label models, along with volume-based pricing dynamics, enables strategic sourcing decisions. At MOQs of 5,000 units, procurement managers can achieve optimal cost efficiency while securing custom branding and quality assurance.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit — February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Auto Window Motor Manufacturers
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Automotive Tier 1/Tier 2 Suppliers)
Confidentiality Level: B2B Client Advisory
Executive Summary
Sourcing automotive window motors from China requires rigorous validation to mitigate risks of defective components, IP theft, and supply chain disruption. 68% of “verified factories” on B2B platforms are trading companies or unlicensed subcontractors (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report provides a field-tested verification framework to identify true manufacturers with ISO/TS 16949 compliance, technical capability, and ethical operations.
Critical Verification Steps: Auto Window Motor Manufacturer in China
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Desk Audit)
Validate legitimacy before site visits or samples.
| Step | Action | Validation Method | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Verification | Cross-check business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Confirm: – Registered capital ≥¥5M RMB – Manufacturing scope includes “automotive window regulators” (汽车门窗升降器) – No administrative penalties |
★★★ (Mandatory) |
| 2. Certifications Audit | Demand original ISO/TS 16949, IATF 16949, and ISO 9001 certificates | Verify via: – IATF Online Directory – Certificate issue date (must be current) – Scope must cover electric window motors |
★★★ (Mandatory) |
| 3. Technical Capability Review | Request: – Motor torque/speed test reports (per SAE J984) – OEM project history (e.g., VW, GM, Toyota) – CAD/3D modeling samples |
Validate test data against: – Automotive standards (ISO 11452, ECE R21) – Material specs (e.g., copper winding grade) |
★★☆ (High) |
| 4. Facility Footprint Analysis | Scrutinize Google Earth/Street View imagery of factory address | Confirm: – Dedicated R&D lab visible – Production lines (not just warehouse) – Consistent employee count vs. claimed capacity |
★★☆ (High) |
Phase 2: On-Ground Validation (Mandatory for >$50k/year contracts)
Conduct in-person audit with SourcifyChina’s QC team or 3rd-party inspector (e.g., SGS).
| Focus Area | Key Checks | Red Flag Triggers |
|---|---|---|
| Production Line Verification | – Observe live motor assembly – Confirm in-house winding/stamping (not subcontracted) – Validate IP67 waterproof testing rig |
• Staff avoid production floor tours • “Prototype” motors sourced externally • No EOL (End-of-Line) testing station |
| Supply Chain Transparency | – Trace raw material invoices (copper, magnets, plastic) – Confirm 100% in-house magnetization process |
• Refusal to show supplier records • Use of unbranded generic components |
| IP Protection Protocol | – Review NDA enforcement process – Check locked engineering data rooms |
• No employee NDAs signed • Design files accessible on shared drives |
Trader vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
70% of “factories” on Alibaba/1688 are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
| Indicator | Trading Company | True Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Assets | Office-only address; no machinery visible | Dedicated workshop ≥2,000m²; visible CNC/stamping lines | Demand live video tour of entire facility during operating hours |
| Pricing Structure | Fixed FOB price; refuses EXW quotes | Offers EXW pricing; itemized BOM costs | Request EXW quote – traders cannot provide this |
| Technical Dialogue | Avoids engineering questions; defers to “engineers” | Discusses: – Magnet grade (N35/N52) – Commutator segment count – Thermal protection specs |
Ask: “What’s your max continuous current at 85°C ambient?” |
| Document Trail | Provides only commercial invoice | Shares: – Factory utility bills – Social insurance records for 50+ staff – Machinery purchase contracts |
Verify utility bills with local provider (via agent) |
Trader Red Flag: Insistence on using their freight forwarder for all shipments (hides true factory location).
Critical Red Flags: Auto Window Motor Suppliers
Immediate disqualification criteria for automotive procurement.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Severity | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| No ISO/TS 16949 Certification | Non-compliance with automotive safety standards; rejects Tier 1 audits | Critical | Terminate engagement |
| Refusal of 3rd-Party Audit | Conceals subcontracting or unsafe practices | Critical | Do not proceed |
| Sample ≠ Mass Production Quality | 43% of defects emerge post-ramp (e.g., brush wear, gear noise) | High | Require production-intent samples from live line |
| “OEM” Claims Without Proof | Fake partnerships damage brand reputation | High | Demand redacted POs from OEMs + contact procurement manager |
| Payment Terms >30% Advance | Financial instability; common in trading scams | Medium | Cap at 30% LC at sight; use Escrow for first order |
Why This Protocol Matters in 2026
Chinese auto parts manufacturing is consolidating under stricter MIIT regulations. Non-compliant suppliers face automatic delisting from Tier 1 vendor databases. SourcifyChina’s 2025 data shows:
– Verified factories had 92% on-time delivery vs. 67% for unverified suppliers
– True manufacturers reduced defect rates by 4.1x vs. traders (PPM: 850 vs. 3,480)
Procurement Advisory: Always require factory-specific audit reports (not generic “China supplier” certificates). For window motors, prioritize suppliers with brushless DC (BLDC) motor experience – the 2027 EU safety directive mandates fail-safe current limits.
Next Steps for Procurement Teams
- Initiate a SourcifyChina Pre-Screen Audit (72-hour turnaround; $495)
- Demand EXW quotes – reveals true factory location
- Embed IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.3 in contracts for supply chain monitoring
Prepared by SourcifyChina’s Automotive Sourcing Desk – Operational in Shenzhen, Ningbo & Changsha since 2018. All verification protocols align with AIAG VDA 2023 Risk Management Guidelines.
[End of Report] © 2026 SourcifyChina. For licensed client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary verification methodologies. Implementation requires engagement with SourcifyChina’s on-ground audit team for legal compliance in China.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage — Verified Auto Window Motor Manufacturers in China
Executive Summary
In 2026, global supply chains continue to face volatility due to geopolitical shifts, rising compliance demands, and compressed lead times. For procurement managers sourcing automotive components—particularly precision parts like auto window motors—partnering with reliable, pre-vetted suppliers is no longer a competitive advantage; it is a necessity.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers immediate access to rigorously screened auto window motor manufacturers in China, eliminating months of supplier qualification, reducing risk, and accelerating time-to-market.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Each manufacturer has passed our 7-point verification: business license, factory audit, export history, quality certifications (IATF 16949, ISO 9001), production capacity, financial stability, and English-speaking teams. |
| Reduced Qualification Time | Cuts supplier onboarding from 3–6 months to under 2 weeks. |
| Direct Factory Access | Eliminates middlemen and trading companies, ensuring transparent pricing and direct communication. |
| Compliance-Ready Partners | All listed suppliers meet international automotive quality and traceability standards. |
| Localized Support | SourcifyChina’s team in Dongguan provides real-time updates, sample coordination, and QC inspections. |
Time Saved: Procurement teams report up to 70% reduction in sourcing cycle time when using the Verified Pro List versus traditional sourcing methods.
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge Today
In a high-stakes industry where delays cost millions and quality failures damage reputations, time is your most valuable resource. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List is not just a supplier directory—it’s a proven procurement acceleration tool trusted by Tier 1 automotive suppliers and global OEMs.
Don’t spend another week on unqualified leads or unreliable RFQs.
👉 Contact our sourcing team today to receive your free, customized shortlist of verified auto window motor manufacturers in China—complete with factory profiles, MOQs, lead times, and compliance documentation.
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
One conversation can shorten your sourcing timeline by months.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing.
Verified. Transparent. Efficient.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
