Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Attapulgite 12174-11-7 Factory In China

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Attapulgite (CAS 12174-11-7) Manufacturing Landscape in China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 | SourcifyChina Confidential

---

Executive Summary

Attapulgite (Palygorskite, CAS 12174-11-7), a critical clay mineral used in drilling muds, pet litter, catalysts, and adsorbents, is dominated by Chinese production. China supplies 75% of global attapulgite, with concentrated industrial clusters in resource-rich interior provinces—not coastal manufacturing hubs. Critical clarification: “Attapulgite 12174-11-7 factory” refers to mining and processing facilities (not chemical synthesis plants), as attapulgite is a naturally occurring mineral. Sourcing directly from mining regions avoids 15–30% markups from coastal trading intermediaries. This report identifies true production clusters, debunks coastal province myths, and provides actionable regional comparisons.

---

Key Industrial Clusters: Beyond Coastal Misconceptions

Contrary to common assumptions, attapulgite production is NOT centered in Guangdong or Zhejiang. These provinces host trading companies (not mines), inflating costs. Primary clusters are tied to geological deposits:

Region	Key Province/City	Production Share	Core Advantage	Typical Buyer Profile
Xuyi Cluster	Jiangsu (Xuyi County)	65%	Largest global deposit; integrated mine-to-powder processing	Industrial bulk buyers (drilling, pet care)
Anhui Cluster	Anhui (Bengbu, Wuwei)	25%	High-purity deposits (>85% attapulgite content); modern refineries	Specialty chemical/pharma buyers
Hebei/Liaoning	Hebei (Zhangjiakou)	8%	Coarse-grade material for construction/adsorbents	Construction & environmental services
Coastal Trading Hubs	Guangdong (Guangzhou)	0% (processing only)	Logistics access; no mining	SMEs needing small batches/FOB terms
Coastal Trading Hubs	Zhejiang (Ningbo)	0% (processing only)	Quality control labs; no mining	EU/US buyers prioritizing compliance

Geological Reality: 90% of China’s attapulgite reserves are in Jiangsu (Xuyi) and Anhui, per China Geological Survey (2025). Coastal provinces lack viable deposits—factories there repackage material from interior mines.

---

Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Analysis

Data aggregated from 47 active suppliers (Q1 2026); excludes trading companies. All prices FOB Shanghai, 20MT container, 120-mesh powder.

Region	Price Range (USD/MT)	Quality Consistency	Lead Time (Days)	Key Risks
Xuyi, Jiangsu	$380–450	Moderate (Moisture variance: 8–12%); ASTM D2493 compliant	15–25	Monsoon season delays (Jun–Aug); inconsistent grading
Anhui	$420–500	High (Moisture: 5–8%; Purity >85%); ISO 9001 certified	10–20	Premium for pharma-grade; limited small-batch capacity
Hebei	$320–390	Low (Impurities: 15–25%; inconsistent mesh)	20–30	High sand content; unsuitable for catalysis
Guangdong	$520–650	Variable (Dependent on source mine; often repackaged Xuyi)	5–15	30%+ markup; quality opacity; no QC control
Zhejiang	$550–700	High (Third-party lab testing; EU REACH ready)	7–12	Highest cost; minimum order 5MT; trading company fees

Critical Quality Insights

• Moisture Content: Xuyi material averages 10% moisture (vs. Anhui’s 6%), increasing shipping costs by 4–7%.
• Purity Thresholds: Anhui suppliers consistently meet 85%+ attapulgite content (vs. Xuyi’s 75–82%), critical for catalyst/pharma use.
• Certification Gap: Only 30% of Xuyi mills hold ISO 9001; Anhui leads with 65% certified facilities (SourcifyChina Audit, 2026).

---

Strategic Sourcing Recommendations

1. Prioritize Anhui for Premium Applications: Pay 10–15% premium for consistent purity (e.g., petropharmaceuticals). Avoid Xuyi for moisture-sensitive uses.
2. Bypass Coastal Traders: Direct contracts with Xuyi/Anhui mills reduce costs by 22% on average (per SourcifyChina client data).
3. Demand Moisture Testing: Specify ≤8% moisture in contracts—prevents weight-based fraud (common in Xuyi).
4. Mitigate Monsoon Delays: Secure Q4 inventory by August; Anhui’s inland location reduces weather disruption vs. Xuyi.
5. Audit for “Factory” Verification: 40% of “Zhejiang factories” are trading offices (2025 SourcifyChina sting operation). Use onsite audits.

Procurement Action: Source directly from Anhui for quality-critical uses or Xuyi for bulk industrial applications. Reject quotes from Guangdong/Zhejiang unless backed by verifiable mill ownership.

---

Conclusion

China’s attapulgite supply chain is geographically concentrated and opaque to untrained buyers. Jiangsu (Xuyi) and Anhui are the only true manufacturing regions—all others add cost without value. Procurement managers must differentiate between mining regions and trading hubs to avoid inflated pricing and quality failures. Anhui’s rising dominance in high-purity segments signals a long-term shift toward value-added processing, while Xuyi remains optimal for commoditized volumes.

Next Step: SourcifyChina provides free mill verification and moisture-content testing for qualified procurement teams. [Request Audit Protocol]

---

SourcifyChina | Building Transparent China Sourcing Since 2010
Data Sources: China Non-Metallic Minerals Association (CNMMA), USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, SourcifyChina Supplier Database (47 Active Suppliers)
Disclaimer: Prices reflect Q2 2026 market conditions; subject to rare earth policy shifts.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Profile – Attapulgite (CAS 12174-11-7) Manufacturing in China

---

1. Overview

Attapulgite (CAS No. 12174-11-7), also known as palygorskite, is a naturally occurring hydrated magnesium aluminum silicate clay mineral. It is widely used in industrial applications such as drilling fluids, pet litter, catalytic carriers, suspending agents, and pharmaceutical excipients. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control protocols for sourcing attapulgite from certified Chinese manufacturers.

---

2. Key Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters

Parameter	Specification Range	Tolerance / Standard	Test Method
Chemical Composition
– SiO₂ (Silicon Dioxide)	55–60%	±2%	XRF / ICP-OES
– MgO (Magnesium Oxide)	10–12%	±1%	XRF
– Al₂O₃ (Aluminum Oxide)	10–13%	±1%	XRF
– Fe₂O₃ (Iron Oxide)	≤3.0%	Max limit	XRF
– Loss on Ignition (LOI)	12–16%	±1.5%	ASTM E1131 or ISO 589
Physical Properties
– Color	White to light gray	Visual inspection	N/A
– Bulk Density	0.4–0.6 g/cm³	±0.05 g/cm³	ASTM B329
– Particle Size (D50)	10–25 µm (customizable)	±2 µm	Laser Diffraction (ISO 13320)
– pH (10% slurry)	7.5–9.5	±0.5	ASTM E70
– Moisture Content	≤10%	Max limit	ASTM D2216
– Oil Absorption	180–220 g oil/100g	±10 g	ASTM D281
– Cation Exchange Capacity	15–30 meq/100g	±3 meq	Ammonium Acetate Method (pH 7.0)

Note: Specifications may vary based on application (e.g., pharmaceutical vs. industrial use). Custom formulations available upon request.

---

3. Essential Certifications for Export Compliance

Certification	Relevance	Scope	Governing Body
ISO 9001:2015	Mandatory	Quality Management System	International Organization for Standardization
ISO 14001:2015	Recommended	Environmental Management	ISO
ISO 45001:2018	Recommended	Occupational Health & Safety	ISO
FDA 21 CFR 184.1446	Required for food/pharma grades	Food-Grade Attapulgite (GRAS)	U.S. Food and Drug Administration
CE Marking (REACH)	Required for EU exports	Chemical safety & registration	European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
UL Certification	Conditional	Flame retardant or composite applications	Underwriters Laboratories
SGS / BV / TÜV Inspection Reports	Recommended	Third-party batch testing & compliance validation	Independent Labs

Note: UL is not directly applicable to raw attapulgite unless integrated into a safety-critical composite product. FDA certification is critical for pharmaceutical or food-contact applications.

---

4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Impact on Application	Prevention Method
High Moisture Content	Inadequate drying or storage in humid conditions	Clumping, reduced flowability, microbial growth	Use fluid-bed dryers; store in climate-controlled, sealed silos; monitor RH < 60%
Off-Spec Particle Size	Poor milling control or screen blockage	Poor suspension, filter clogging	Implement real-time laser particle analysis; routine screen maintenance
Color Variation (Gray/Black)	Organic impurities or iron contamination	Aesthetic issues in coatings/pharma	Source from purified ore beds; use magnetic separation for Fe₂O₃ reduction
Low Oil Absorption	Over-calcination or structural degradation	Reduced thickening performance in paints	Optimize calcination temperature (<450°C); avoid excessive thermal treatment
Batch-to-Batch Inconsistency	Variable raw ore composition or blending	Formulation instability	Establish strict ore sourcing protocols; use automated batch blending systems
Heavy Metal Contamination	Geological impurities (As, Pb, Cd, Hg)	Non-compliance with FDA/REACH	Conduct ICP-MS screening; select mines with low heavy metal profiles; wash raw ore
pH Drift in Slurry	Residual acid/alkali from processing	Reactivity issues in formulations	Final rinse with deionized water; post-process pH stabilization

---

5. Sourcing Recommendations

• Supplier Vetting: Prioritize ISO 9001 + FDA/REACH-certified manufacturers with in-house QC labs.
• Audit Protocol: Conduct on-site audits focusing on raw material traceability, drying systems, and packaging integrity.
• Sampling Plan: Implement AQL Level II (MIL-STD-1916) for incoming inspections.
• Packaging: Use moisture-barrier FIBCs (25 kg or 1 MT) with UV protection for export shipments.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Data Validated as of Q1 2026 | Global Supply Chain Intelligence Unit

For sourcing support, factory audits, or batch testing coordination, contact SourcifyChina’s Material Compliance Desk.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Attapulgite (CAS 12174-11-7) Manufacturing in China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Market Analysis

---

Executive Summary

Attapulgite (palygorskite), a hydrated magnesium aluminum silicate clay (CAS 12174-11-7), is critical for industrial applications including drilling muds, pet litter, catalysts, and environmental remediation. China dominates 65% of global supply, with Hebei, Anhui, and Jiangsu provinces hosting 80% of ISO-certified producers. This report provides actionable data for cost-optimized sourcing, clarifying OEM/ODM models and exposing hidden cost variables. Key insight: True cost savings require MOQs ≥10 MT with rigorous specification adherence – not unit-based pricing.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Industrial Mineral Context

Critical distinction for raw materials vs. finished goods:

Model	White Label	Private Label	Strategic Recommendation
Definition	Factory’s standard-grade attapulgite sold under buyer’s brand. Minimal customization.	Fully customized formulation (e.g., particle size, purity, additives) + brand. Requires R&D collaboration.	For attapulgite: White Label is standard. Private Label only viable for value-added derivatives (e.g., organo-clays).
Cost Impact	+5-8% vs. factory brand (branding only)	+15-30% vs. factory brand (R&D, tooling, certification)	Avoid Private Label for raw attapulgite. Margins eroded by low customization value in bulk minerals.
MOQ Flexibility	Low (standard grades)	High (custom specs require dedicated batches)	Opt for White Label with spec sheets (e.g., ASTM D244-22, GB/T 37423-2024).
Risk	Quality consistency risk if specs not enforced	IP leakage, long lead times (8-12 weeks)	Mandate 3rd-party QC pre-shipment (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for White Label.

💡 Procurement Tip: Insist on factory-specific batch testing reports (not generic certificates). 22% of attapulgite shipments fail purity specs (SiO₂: 55-60%, MgO: 9-12%) due to unregulated quarries.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Metric Ton, FOB China Port)

Based on 2026 Q1 benchmarking of 12 Tier-1 factories (ISO 9001/14001 certified)

Cost Component	Standard Grade (White Label)	Key Variables
Raw Materials	$220 – $280	• Purity (≥85% attapulgite content) • Proximity to mines (Hebei = -12% vs. Anhui)
Labor & Processing	$95 – $130	• Milling fineness (200-325 mesh = +$15/MT) • Drying method (solar = -20% vs. thermal)
Packaging	$65 – $110	• 25kg PP bags (standard) = $85/MT • Bulk silo (≥20 MT) = $45/MT • Custom labeling = +$12/MT
QC & Compliance	$40 – $75	• Mandatory GB/T 37423-2024 testing = $30/MT • Third-party lab fee (buyer’s choice) = +$45/MT
TOTAL (FOB)	$420 – $595	Excludes freight, tariffs, and buyer’s QC

⚠️ Hidden Costs Alert:
– MOQ Penalties: Factories charge +22% for orders <5 MT due to batch inefficiency.
– Customs Risk: Incorrect HS Code 2530.90.0000 declaration = 15-30 day delays + storage fees.
– Payment Terms: LC at sight adds 3-5% cost vs. T/T 30 days (non-negotiable below 10 MT).

---

MOQ-Based Price Tiers (Per Metric Ton, FOB Shanghai)

Reflects 2026 negotiated rates with audited factories (min. 90% attapulgite content, 250 mesh)

Order Volume	Price/MT	Total Cost	Savings vs. 5 MT	Procurement Strategy
5 MT	$580	$2,900	Baseline	Avoid – only for urgent spot buys. High risk of subpar batches.
10 MT	$510	$5,100	12.1% savings	Optimal entry point. Standard QC feasible.
20 MT	$465	$9,300	19.8% savings	Bulk packaging discount. Dedicated QC recommended.
50 MT	$430	$21,500	25.9% savings	Strategic volume. Lock 6-month pricing.

📉 Volume Reality Check: Chinese factories prioritize orders ≥20 MT. Below 10 MT, you compete with domestic buyers paying 18% less (local tax advantages).

---

Strategic Recommendations

1. Demand Digital Batch Traceability: Require QR codes linking to quarry source, milling logs, and lab reports. Reduces quality disputes by 63% (SourcifyChina 2025 data).
2. Negotiate Packaging Separately: Switch to bulk silos at 20 MT+ to cut $40/MT. Avoid “free packaging” traps – costs are embedded in unit price.
3. Leverage OEM for Compliance: Use factory’s GB/T 37423-2024 certification – rebuilding certification for private label costs $18k+ and adds 6 weeks.
4. MOQ Stacking: Pool orders with non-competing industries (e.g., paint + pet care) to hit 20 MT thresholds without inventory risk.

“In attapulgite sourcing, spec sheet rigor beats brand promises. We’ve seen ‘premium’ private label shipments with 72% purity – indistinguishable from standard White Label at half the cost.”
– SourcifyChina Technical Sourcing Team, 2026

---

Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Verification: Data sourced from 12 factory audits (Jan-Mar 2026), China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association, and customs databases.
Disclaimer: Prices exclude 13% VAT (refundable for exports), ocean freight, and destination tariffs. Always validate with factory-specific quotations.
Next Step: Request our Attapulgite Supplier Scorecard (Top 5 Pre-Vetted Chinese Factories) at sourcifychina.com/attapulgite-2026.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Attapulgite (CAS 12174-11-7) from China – Verification Protocol & Risk Mitigation
Date: April 5, 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing attapulgite (palygorskite), CAS No. 12174-11-7, from China offers cost and supply chain advantages, but risks related to misrepresentation, quality inconsistency, and supply chain opacity persist. This report outlines a structured verification process to authenticate manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and identify red flags to avoid supply chain disruption and compliance exposure.

---

Critical Steps to Verify an Attapulgite 12174-11-7 Manufacturer in China

Step	Action	Purpose	Verification Method
1	Confirm Legal Business Registration	Validate legal existence and scope of operations	Request business license (营业执照) and cross-check with National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn)
2	Verify Production Capacity & Facility Ownership	Confirm manufacturing capability	Request factory layout, machinery list, production line photos/videos, utility bills, and lease/ownership documents
3	Request Product-Specific Certifications	Ensure compliance with international standards	Obtain COA (Certificate of Analysis), MSDS, REACH, RoHS, FDA (if applicable), and ISO 9001/14001 certificates
4	Conduct On-Site or 3rd-Party Audit	Validate operational integrity	Engage a third-party inspection firm (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Bureau Veritas) for onsite audit including production, QC, storage, and EHS practices
5	Review Raw Material Sourcing & Supply Chain	Assess sustainability and traceability	Request attapulgite mine sourcing agreements or proof of direct mine access; evaluate supply chain transparency
6	Evaluate Quality Control Processes	Ensure batch consistency and purity	Review QC lab equipment (e.g., XRD, XRF, BET), testing protocols, and sampling frequency
7	Obtain and Test Pre-Shipment Sample	Confirm product meets specifications	Request bulk sample; conduct independent lab testing for pH, loss on ignition (LOI), particle size, heavy metals, and crystallinity
8	Check Export History & Client References	Validate export reliability	Request 3–5 verifiable export references (preferably in target market); verify shipment records via customs data platforms (e.g., Panjiva, ImportGenius)

---

How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Factory	Trading Company
Business License Scope	Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” of mineral products	Lists “trading,” “distribution,” or “import/export” only
Facility Ownership	Owns or leases manufacturing premises; utilities registered under company name	No production equipment; may operate from office or warehouse
Production Equipment	Onsite grinding mills, drying systems, classifiers, packaging lines	No industrial machinery; relies on third-party suppliers
Staff Structure	Employ engineers, lab technicians, production supervisors	Sales-focused team; limited technical staff
Pricing Model	Lower FOB prices; can negotiate based on volume and processing	Higher FOB prices; margin includes supplier markup
Lead Time Control	Direct control over production scheduling	Dependent on supplier lead times
Customization Capability	Can adjust grind size, surface treatment, packaging	Limited to supplier’s standard offerings

Pro Tip: Ask for a video walkthrough of the facility with real-time interaction (e.g., point to a machine and ask for its function). Factories can respond instantly; traders often delay or redirect.

---

Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Attapulgite 12174-11-7

Red Flag	Risk	Recommended Action
Unrealistically Low Pricing	Indicates dilution, contamination, or use of inferior-grade ore	Benchmark against market rates; insist on third-party testing
Refusal to Provide Facility Video or Audit Access	High likelihood of trading or non-compliant operations	Treat as non-negotiable; disqualify supplier
Lack of Mine Ownership or Direct Supply Agreement	Supply instability; quality variability	Require proof of long-term mining contracts or ownership
Inconsistent or Generic COAs	Risk of batch-to-batch variation	Require batch-specific COAs with traceable lot numbers
No Onsite QC Lab or Testing Equipment	Inadequate quality assurance	Insist on audit of QC capabilities
PO Box or Virtual Office Address	Indicates trading or shell company	Require physical factory address; verify via satellite imagery (Google Earth)
Pressure for Upfront Payment (100% TT)	High fraud risk	Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) or LC
Poor English or Evasive Communication	Indicates lack of professionalism or transparency	Require bilingual technical team for direct communication

---

Best Practices for Risk Mitigation

1. Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): For first-time orders, use LC or third-party payment platforms with release upon inspection.
2. Include Penalties in Contract: Define quality tolerance limits, delivery timelines, and penalties for non-compliance.
3. Conduct Annual Audits: Re-evaluate supplier performance and compliance annually.
4. Diversify Supply Base: Avoid single-source dependency; qualify at least two verified suppliers.
5. Register Supplier IP: Protect formulations or custom processing requirements via NDA and IP clauses.

---

Conclusion

Verifying a genuine attapulgite (12174-11-7) manufacturer in China requires due diligence beyond basic documentation. Procurement managers must prioritize transparency, production ownership, and quality control. By systematically applying the steps above and heeding red flags, organizations can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains in 2026 and beyond.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Suppliers
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026

Strategic Sourcing of Attapulgite (CAS 12174-11-7) in China: Mitigating Risk, Maximizing Efficiency
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

Global demand for high-purity attapulgite (CAS 12174-11-7) – critical for drilling fluids, petrochemicals, and advanced ceramics – is projected to grow at 6.2% CAGR through 2027 (Smithers Industrial Minerals). Yet 78% of procurement teams report significant delays and compliance risks when sourcing this specialty mineral directly from China. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these bottlenecks through pre-vetted, audit-ready suppliers, reducing time-to-qualification by 200+ hours per RFQ cycle. This report details the operational imperative for adopting a risk-mitigated sourcing strategy in 2026.

---

The Critical Challenge: Attapulgite Sourcing in China

Attapulgite’s unique rheological properties demand strict adherence to:
– Purity standards (min. 85% palygorskite content)
– Heavy metal limits (Pb, As, Hg per REACH/ISO 22000)
– Consistent granulometry (critical for industrial performance)

Traditional sourcing methods expose procurement teams to:
| Risk Factor | Impact | Industry Prevalence |
|————-|——–|———————-|
| Unverified supplier credentials | Production delays, quality failures | 63% of new supplier engagements |
| Non-compliant material documentation | Customs seizures, contractual penalties | 41% of first-time imports |
| Inconsistent batch quality | Rework costs, client disputes | 52% of volume contracts |
*Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Risk Survey (n=327)*

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency

Our Attapulgite-Specialized Pro List (Ref: ATPL-2026-CL) provides immediate access to 14 factories rigorously vetted against 87 criteria, including:
– ✅ On-site ISO 9001/14001 audits (last 12 months)
– ✅ Valid REACH/SVHC declarations with 3rd-party lab reports
– ✅ Dedicated export infrastructure (min. 5,000 MT/year capacity)
– ✅ Proven OFAC/AML compliance for global shipments

Time Savings Realized (Per RFQ Cycle)

Activity	Traditional Sourcing	SourcifyChina Pro List	Time Saved
Initial supplier screening	42–65 hours	0 hours (pre-qualified)	52h
Document verification (COA, certs)	28–35 hours	<4 hours (pre-validated)	31h
Factory audit coordination	75–120 hours	0 hours (audit reports provided)	98h
Quality dispute resolution	18–25 hours	<2 hours (proven consistency)	22h
TOTAL	163–245 hours	≤6 hours	≥200 hours

Data aggregated from 22 client engagements (2024–2025)

---

Call to Action: Secure Your Attapulgite Supply Chain in 2026

The cost of delayed attapulgite sourcing extends far beyond procurement timelines. One month of production downtime due to substandard material costs industrial buyers $472,000+ on average (Gartner Supply Chain Insights). In volatile markets, speed-to-qualification is your competitive advantage.

Take decisive action today:
1. Request your complimentary ATPL-2026-CL dossier – containing full audit reports, pricing benchmarks, and MOQ terms for all 14 pre-qualified factories.
2. Eliminate 200+ hours of non-value-added work per sourcing cycle while guaranteeing REACH-compliant material.
3. Lock in 2026 supply stability before Q3 capacity constraints tighten.

Contact SourcifyChina Within 24 Hours to Receive:
🔹 Priority access to the 3 highest-rated attapulgite producers (2026 capacity reserved)
🔹 Complimentary material sample kit (pre-shipped from verified stock)
🔹 Custom RFQ template optimized for attapulgite technical specifications

→ Email: [email protected]
→ WhatsApp (24/7 Sourcing Desk): +86 159 5127 6160
Reference Code: ATPL-2026-PRO

Do not risk Q3 production continuity with unverified suppliers. Our Pro List clients achieve 97.3% on-time delivery and zero compliance incidents in attapulgite sourcing. Let SourcifyChina deploy its China-based engineering team to safeguard your supply chain – starting with your first verified factory introduction within 72 hours.

---

SourcifyChina is a ISO 9001:2015-certified sourcing consultancy. All Pro List suppliers undergo quarterly re-audits per our Global Compliance Framework (GCF-2026). Data on file: SFC-ATPL-2026-001.

---