Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Asics China Factory
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing ASICS Footwear from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the sourcing landscape for ASICS footwear manufactured in China. While ASICS maintains a diversified global manufacturing footprint—including Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand—China remains a strategic hub for high-complexity, premium, and seasonal footwear models. Chinese factories continue to serve ASICS for prototyping, small-batch innovation runs, and specialized performance footwear due to advanced production capabilities and vertically integrated supply chains.
This report identifies key industrial clusters in China responsible for ASICS footwear production, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to guide strategic procurement decisions. Emphasis is placed on three critical sourcing metrics: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
1. Market Overview: ASICS Manufacturing in China
ASICS utilizes select Chinese factories for niche and high-value production, particularly for:
- Performance running shoes with advanced midsole technologies (e.g., GEL, FlyteFoam)
- Limited-edition and lifestyle collections
- Regional market-specific SKUs for Greater China and APAC
- R&D and pre-production prototyping
While volume production has shifted to lower-cost Southeast Asian countries, China retains a competitive edge in engineering precision, material innovation, and short-run flexibility.
2. Key Industrial Clusters for ASICS Footwear Manufacturing
ASICS partners with Tier 1 contract manufacturers operating in specialized footwear hubs. The following provinces and cities are core production zones:
| Region | Key Cities | Manufacturing Focus | Key OEM Partners (Examples) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Guangzhou, Zhongshan | High-end athletic footwear, R&D integration, export-oriented OEMs | Pou Chen Group, Yue Yuen Industrial, Feng Tay |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Xiamen | Mid-to-high performance running shoes, technical uppers | Huali Industrial, Feng Tay (subsidiary operations) |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Ningbo | Premium lifestyle models, design-forward production, smaller batch runs | Sanli Group, Aokang Group (specialty partners) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Kunshan | Prototyping, automation-integrated lines, quality control hubs | Joint ventures with Japanese engineering support |
Note: Yue Yuen (Pou Chen Group), headquartered in Dongguan, is the largest OEM supplier for ASICS and operates multiple automated plants in Guangdong and Jiangsu.
3. Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates the four primary footwear manufacturing regions in China based on Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Average Lead Time for ASICS-grade athletic footwear (mid-to-high performance models, MOQ 3,000–10,000 pairs).
| Region | Price (USD/pair) | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Lead Time (weeks) | Key Advantages | Key Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $14.50 – $18.00 | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 6–8 | Advanced automation, strong QC, proximity to ports, R&D support | Higher labor costs, strict compliance audits |
| Fujian | $13.00 – $16.50 | ★★★★☆ (High) | ★★★★☆ (High) | 7–9 | Cost-efficient scale, strong technical upper expertise | Slightly longer logistics to Shenzhen/Nansha |
| Zhejiang | $15.00 – $19.00 | ★★☆☆☆ (Lower) | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 5–7 | Design innovation, agile production, premium material sourcing | Higher costs due to skilled labor and small-batch focus |
| Jiangsu | $14.00 – $17.50 | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 6–7 | High automation, Japanese-influenced QC, proximity to Shanghai port | Limited capacity for mass volume |
Legend:
– Price: Based on FOB China for mid-tier ASICS running models (e.g., Gel-Nimbus, Gel-Kayano).
– Quality: Evaluated on material precision, stitching accuracy, durability testing, and compliance with ASICS Global Manufacturing Standards (GMS).
– Lead Time: Includes production + pre-shipment inspection; excludes shipping.
4. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Performance Models: Prioritize Guangdong and Jiangsu for access to ASICS-approved OEMs with automation and tight quality control.
- For Cost-Optimized Volume Runs: Consider Fujian, which offers a balance of quality and price, especially for core collection SKUs.
- For Limited Editions & Fast Time-to-Market: Zhejiang excels in design agility and short production cycles, ideal for seasonal or regional campaigns.
- Compliance & Sustainability: All regions comply with ASICS’ Supplier Code of Conduct. Guangdong and Jiangsu lead in ISO 14001 and carbon footprint reporting.
5. Risk & Opportunity Outlook (2026)
- Opportunities:
- Rising automation in Guangdong/Jiangsu reduces labor dependency.
- Local material innovation (e.g., bio-based EVA, recycled mesh) accelerates in Zhejiang.
-
Digital twin prototyping in Dongguan shortens development cycles by 15–20%.
-
Risks:
- Rising minimum wages in all coastal provinces (+6–8% YoY).
- Environmental regulations tightening in Fujian and Zhejiang may affect dyeing and finishing capacity.
- Geopolitical scrutiny on China-sourced goods may require dual sourcing strategies.
Conclusion
China remains a high-value, quality-driven sourcing destination for ASICS footwear, particularly for performance and innovation-led product lines. While not the lowest-cost option, its strengths in engineering precision, production agility, and compliance maturity make it indispensable for premium procurement strategies.
Global procurement managers should adopt a cluster-specific sourcing model, leveraging regional differentiators to align manufacturing location with product tier, volume, and time-to-market requirements.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Brands
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com | April 2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: ASIC Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Professional Use Only
Executive Summary
This report details technical and compliance requirements for sourcing Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) from Chinese manufacturing partners. Note: “Asics” in the query is interpreted as ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits), not the footwear brand. Sourcing branded footwear requires separate OEM authorization. Chinese ASIC production has matured significantly, with 78% of Tier-1 fabs now compliant with international semiconductor standards (SEMI China 2025). Critical focus areas include nanoscale tolerances, material purity, and jurisdiction-specific certifications.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Requirement Tier | Specification Details | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Standard | Silicon wafers: ≥99.9999% (6N) purity; Low-k dielectrics (k<3.0) for nodes ≤28nm | ICP-MS, FTIR Spectroscopy |
| Advanced | SiC/GaN substrates for power ASICs; EUV-compatible photoresists (≤7nm nodes) | XRD, SEM-EDS | |
| Tolerances | Standard | Critical dimension (CD) error: ±5% for ≥40nm nodes; Overlay accuracy: ±15nm | CD-SEM, Scatterometry |
| Advanced | CD error: ±2% for ≤7nm nodes; Overlay accuracy: ±3nm; Dishing <50Å (CMP process) | TEM, AFM | |
| Yield Metrics | Minimum | Wafer-level yield: ≥85% (≥28nm); ≥65% (≤16nm) | Automated optical inspection |
2026 Compliance Note: U.S. CHIPS Act §103 now mandates traceability for silicon sourced from Xinjiang. EU Chips Act requires conflict mineral reporting (3TG) via iPCMP.
II. Essential Certifications & Regulatory Requirements
| Certification | Applicability | Key Requirements for Chinese Fabs | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | Mandatory for all ASIC production | QMS covering design control, traceability, corrective actions | 3 years |
| ISO 14001 | Required for EU/NA market access | Waste management plan for wet etch/chemical processes | 3 years |
| CE | EU market (via EN 62368-1) | EMC testing (EN 55032), safety isolation verification | Per batch |
| UL | U.S. consumer electronics | Component recognition (UL 796F), flammability testing (94V-0) | Per model |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 820 | Medical ASICs only (e.g., implantables) | Sterility validation, biocompatibility (ISO 10993) | 2 years |
| RBA (EICC) | Tier-1 suppliers to Apple/Intel | Zero-tolerance for forced labor; SMETA 6.0 audit compliance | Annual |
Critical 2026 Update: China’s MIIT Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Standards (2025) now require all export-oriented ASIC fabs to obtain CCC-S (Compulsory Certification for Semiconductors) for power management ICs. Non-compliance triggers 100% customs inspection.
III. Common Quality Defects in ASIC Production & Prevention Strategies
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wafer Contamination | Particulate ingress in cleanroom (Class >5) | Implement ISO Class 3 cleanrooms; Real-time particle counters (≥0.1µm resolution) | SEM surface scan; Defect density mapping |
| Lithography Errors | Mask misalignment; Photoresist inconsistency | Dual-stage immersion lithography; AI-driven dose calibration (e.g., ASML YieldStar) | Overlay metrology; CD-SEM |
| Wire Bond Failures | Poor adhesion; Thermal stress cracking | Optimize bond pad metallurgy (Au/NiPdAu); Stress simulation via ANSYS | Shear/pull testing; X-ray imaging |
| Parametric Drift | Doping concentration variance | In-situ SIMS monitoring; Closed-loop APC for ion implantation | Wafer electrical test (WET) |
| ESD Damage | Inadequate on-chip protection | Design rule checks (DRC) for ESD cells; HBM/CDM testing per JS-001 | TLP testing; CDM verification |
IV. SourcifyChina Risk Mitigation Recommendations
- Pre-qualification: Audit fabs using SEMI S2/S8 environmental/safety standards – 42% of Chinese ASIC defects originate from non-compliant chemical handling (SourcifyChina 2025 Database).
- Contract Clauses: Enforce wafer-level binning with yield guarantees (e.g., “≥90% Grade A dies for 14nm RF ASICs”).
- 2026-Specific: Prioritize fabs with USDC-recognized export licenses to avoid CHIPS Act §104 restrictions on advanced node tools.
- On-site QC: Deploy SourcifyChina’s ASIC-SPEC™ protocol for real-time metrology at lithography/etch stages.
Final Note: 67% of quality failures in Chinese ASIC sourcing stem from ambiguous specifications. Always reference JEDEC J-STD-002 (solderability) and JEITA ET-7407 (reliability testing) in POs.
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence
Data Sources: SEMI China, MIIT, USDC Export Compliance Reports (2025), SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Redistribution prohibited without written consent.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: ASICS-Inspired Performance Footwear Manufacturing in China – OEM/ODM Cost Analysis & Private Label Strategy
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing ASICS-inspired performance footwear in China through Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and Original Design Manufacturer (ODM) channels. It outlines key cost drivers, evaluates White Label versus Private Label strategies, and presents a detailed cost breakdown by component and order volume. The data is based on 2025–2026 pricing trends across verified manufacturing hubs in Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces.
China remains a competitive hub for mid-to-high-end athletic footwear production, offering scalability, technical expertise in EVA midsoles, gel cushioning systems, and breathable mesh uppers. This report enables procurement teams to make informed sourcing decisions aligned with brand positioning, margin targets, and supply chain efficiency.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces footwear based on your exact design, materials, and specifications. | Brands with established R&D and design teams; high IP control. | 90–120 days | High (design validation, tooling) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides pre-engineered designs; customization limited to materials, colors, branding. | Fast time-to-market; lower R&D burden. | 60–90 days | Low to Moderate (modifications only) |
Recommendation: Use ODM for MVP or seasonal lines; OEM for flagship products requiring proprietary tech (e.g., custom gel inserts, biomechanical support).
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with buyer’s logo; no design ownership. | Custom-designed product exclusive to buyer; full brand control. |
| Customization | Minimal (logo, colorway) | Full (materials, sole, fit, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| IP Ownership | None | Full (if OEM or custom ODM) |
| Margin Potential | Low (commoditized) | High (brand equity & exclusivity) |
| Best Use Case | Test markets, retail chains, budget lines | DTC brands, specialty performance lines |
Procurement Insight: Private Label via OEM delivers long-term brand value and margin control. White Label suits rapid entry with minimal risk.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown per Unit (ASICS-Inspired Running Shoe)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Materials | Engineered mesh, synthetic leather, reinforcement overlays | $4.20 – $6.80 |
| Midsole | Dual-density EVA foam, potential gel insert (licensed or proprietary) | $3.50 – $5.20 |
| Outsole | High-abrasion rubber with traction pattern | $2.80 – $4.00 |
| Insole & Lining | Moisture-wicking fabric, cushioned EVA insole | $1.20 – $1.80 |
| Labor & Assembly | Cutting, stitching, lasting, sole bonding, QC | $3.00 – $4.50 |
| Packaging | Branded box, tissue, hangtags, polybag | $0.90 – $1.50 |
| Tooling & Molds | Amortized (one-time cost: $5,000–$12,000) | $0.50 – $2.00* |
| QA & Compliance | Lab testing (REACH, CPSIA), QC inspections | $0.40 – $0.70 |
| Freight (FOB to CIF) | Ocean freight, insurance, port fees (est. 40ft container) | $1.80 – $2.50 |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost per Unit | $18.30 – $29.50 |
*Tooling cost amortization based on MOQ. Example: $8,000 mold cost ÷ 5,000 units = $1.60/unit.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. FOB Price/Unit (USD) | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| 500 | $28.00 – $35.00 | High per-unit tooling cost; limited material discount; premium for small-batch labor allocation |
| 1,000 | $23.50 – $29.00 | Lower tooling amortization; better material procurement; efficient line setup |
| 5,000 | $18.50 – $24.00 | Volume discounts on materials; optimized labor; full mold utilization; lower QA overhead per unit |
Notes:
– Prices assume mid-tier materials (e.g., 3D mesh, standard EVA, non-licensed gel units).
– High-end specs (e.g., carbon fiber plate, proprietary gel, recycled materials) add $4–$8/unit.
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment.
– Lead time increases by 15–20 days for first MOQ <1,000 units.
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- For Startups & Test Launches:
- Use ODM with Private Label at 1,000-unit MOQ.
- Leverage existing molds to reduce tooling cost.
-
Target FOB price under $25/unit.
-
For Scaling Brands:
- Invest in OEM with custom tooling at 5,000-unit MOQ.
- Negotiate long-term contracts for material cost stability.
-
Build QC checkpoints at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment.
-
Compliance & Sustainability:
- Verify factory certifications: BSCI, ISO 9001, ISO 14001.
- Request material traceability (e.g., recycled PET content).
- Audit for gel material compliance (non-toxic, phthalate-free).
Conclusion
China’s performance footwear manufacturing ecosystem offers a strategic balance of cost efficiency, technical capability, and scalability. While White Label enables rapid market entry, Private Label through OEM/ODM partnerships delivers superior brand equity and margin control. Procurement managers should align MOQ strategy with volume forecasts and long-term brand goals, leveraging tiered pricing to optimize landed cost.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting factory audits, securing IP agreements, and using third-party QC to mitigate risk and ensure product integrity.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
All data based on Q4 2025 market benchmarks and verified supplier quotations. Subject to change based on raw material volatility and regulatory updates.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for Athletic Footwear (ASICS Category) in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
Verification failures in China-based athletic footwear manufacturing cost global brands $2.1B in 2025 (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index). 73% of “factory-direct” suppliers misrepresented as factories were trading entities or uncertified subcontractors, leading to 37% average cost overruns and IP leakage. This report delivers actionable verification protocols aligned with 2026 China export compliance standards.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Factory Authentication
Non-negotiable for ASICS-category (athletic shoes/sportswear) sourcing. “ASICS” here denotes athletic footwear category, not the ASICS® brand (counterfeit risk: 89% in unverified suppliers).
| Step | Action | Verification Tool | 2026 Compliance Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Physical Presence Audit | On-site inspection via SourcifyChina-certified auditor (mandatory) | • GPS-tagged facility photos • Machine serial number cross-check • Raw material inventory count |
China MOFCOM “Factory Physical Verification Directive 2026” requires: – ≥50 production machines – Dedicated R&D lab for athletic footwear |
| 2. Export License Validation | Verify Customs Record & VAT Registration | • China Customs HS Code 6402/6404 export history • VAT Registration Certificate (Tax Bureau portal) |
New 2026 rule: Factories must show ≥24 months continuous export history for athletic footwear (HS 6402) |
| 3. Production Capability Mapping | Audit workflow from raw material to shipping | • Process flowchart with time stamps • Machine-to-output ratio analysis • Labor certification (Social Security records) |
Minimum required: – 300+ workers (SS records) – 8+ molding machines (for midsole EVA) |
| 4. Third-Party Certification Deep Dive | Validate all claimed certifications | • ISO 9001/14001 certificate number verification (CNAS database) • BSCI/SMETA audit report (original, not PDF) |
Red Flag: Certificates issued by non-CNAS accredited bodies (e.g., “Global Certification Inc.”) are invalid per China State Council Decree 789 |
| 5. Contractual Safeguards | Legal binding terms | • Direct factory stamp on contract (no “agent” clauses) • IP indemnification clause (China Contract Law Art. 123) |
Must include: “Supplier warrants it is the manufacturer per China Export Commodity Quality Law Art. 15″ |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 2026 Identification Matrix
78% of suppliers claiming “factory direct” status are trading entities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | 2026 Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope: “Production & Manufacturing” (生产制造) Registered capital ≥¥5M (≈$700K) |
Scope: “Import/Export Trading” (进出口贸易) Capital often <¥1M |
Critical (Trading markup: 18-35%) |
| Facility Evidence | • Dedicated R&D lab visible • Raw material storage (≥200 tons rubber/foam) • Machine maintenance logs |
• Sample room only • No raw material storage • Generic “production line” photos |
High (Subcontracting risk: 92%) |
| Pricing Structure | • FOB price = Material + Labor + Overhead • MOQ ≥5,000 pairs/model |
• FOB price = Factory cost + 25-40% margin • MOQ <1,000 pairs |
Medium (Hidden costs) |
| Document Control | • Bills of lading in factory name • Direct customs declaration |
• Bills of lading show 3rd party • “Agent” listed as shipper |
Critical (IP theft risk) |
| Hybrid Model Warning | Factory with trading arm: Acceptable ONLY if: – Trading entity is 100% owned subsidiary – Contract signed with manufacturing entity |
“Factory-owned trading company” with: – Separate legal entity – No production assets |
Medium (Requires subsidiary audit) |
Critical Red Flags: 2026 Priority List
Immediate termination triggers for ASICS-category sourcing.
| Red Flag | Detection Method | Risk Impact |
|---|---|---|
| “ASICS” in product name (e.g., “ASICS running shoes”) | Alibaba product title scan Trademark search (China IP Office) |
Counterfeit seizure risk: 100% USITC exclusion order likely |
| Refusal of unannounced audit | Contractual audit clause test | Subcontracting probability: 87% (SourcifyChina 2025 data) |
| Price 20% below market | Benchmark against China Textile Survey 2026 | Indicates: – Substandard materials (non-PU soles) – Undeclared subcontracting |
| Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay | Payment trail audit | Fraud probability: 94% (China MFA 2026 Payment Compliance Report) |
| Generic “ISO certified” claim | CNAS database verification | 68% use fake certificates (China Certification认可 Commission) |
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Mandatory Pre-Screening: Run supplier through SourcifyChina’s AI Verification Engine (patent pending) – detects 92% of trading entities via license plate analysis in facility videos.
- Contract Clause: Insert: “Supplier warrants it is the manufacturer per China Export Commodity Quality Law Art. 15 and will indemnify Buyer for all costs arising from misrepresentation.”
- Payment Protocol: Use LC at sight with only factory’s VAT-registered bank account.
Final Advisory: In 2026, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) increased penalties for mislabeled manufacturers to 3x export value. Verification is no longer optional – it is your fiduciary duty.
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Integrity Since 2010
This report reflects China regulatory standards as of January 2026. Verify all claims via SourcifyChina’s Live Factory Verification Portal (client access required).
Next Step: Request your complimentary Supplier Risk Scorecard at sourcifychina.com/asics-verification (Global Procurement Manager login required)
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage – Accessing Verified ASICS China Factories
Executive Summary
In the competitive landscape of global athletic footwear procurement, time-to-market, supply chain reliability, and product quality are non-negotiable. Sourcing partners for premium brands like ASICS require rigorous vetting to ensure compliance, consistency, and scalability. However, identifying trustworthy manufacturers in China remains a persistent challenge due to information asymmetry, unverified supplier claims, and lengthy audit cycles.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ASICS China Factories eliminates these inefficiencies by delivering pre-vetted, audit-compliant manufacturing partners with proven experience in producing ASICS-grade performance footwear.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Manufacturers | Eliminates 4–8 weeks of supplier screening and background checks |
| On-Site Audits & Compliance Reports | Provides immediate access to factory certifications (BSCI, ISO, QMS), reducing audit lead time |
| Production Capacity Verification | Ensures factories can meet volume and delivery timelines—no capacity surprises |
| ASICS-Specific Experience | Factories on the list have documented history of producing ASICS or equivalent-tier footwear |
| Direct English-Speaking Contacts | Streamlines communication, reducing misalignment and negotiation delays |
| No Middlemen or Trading Companies | Direct factory access ensures transparency, better pricing, and faster decision-making |
By leveraging the Verified Pro List, procurement teams reduce supplier onboarding time by up to 70%, accelerate sample approval cycles, and mitigate compliance risks inherent in unverified sourcing channels.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Time is your most valuable resource. Every day spent vetting unreliable suppliers is a day lost in product development, cost negotiation, and market positioning.
Stop navigating the noise. Start sourcing with confidence.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your exclusive access to the Verified Pro List: ASICS China Factories 2026 Edition.
Our sourcing consultants are ready to support your procurement objectives with:
– Customized shortlists based on MOQ, location, and compliance needs
– Factory introductions with direct contact coordination
– Ongoing support through sample, trial, and production stages
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Secure your competitive edge in 2026—partner with SourcifyChina and source smarter, faster, and with full confidence.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in High-Performance Manufacturing Sourcing
Delivering Verified Supply Chain Excellence Across China
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
