Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Apple Factory In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Apple Production Ecosystem Analysis
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality Level: SourcifyChina Client-Exclusive
Executive Summary
China dominates global apple production (accounting for 48.3% of world output in 2025 per FAO data), but the term “apple factory” requires critical clarification for strategic sourcing. This report confirms “apple factory” refers to fresh apple cultivation and processing facilities (not Apple Inc. electronics). Sourcing electronics requires separate analysis of Shenzhen/Dongguan clusters. For agricultural apples, China’s production is concentrated in temperate northern provinces – not coastal manufacturing hubs like Guangdong or Zhejiang. Misinterpreting this risks supply chain failure. This analysis identifies verified clusters, debunks regional myths, and provides actionable sourcing criteria.
Critical Terminology Clarification
| Term | Common Misconception | SourcifyChina Verified Reality |
|---|---|---|
| “Apple Factory” | Apple Inc. device assembly | Fresh apple orchards + packing/processing facilities (e.g., sorting lines, cold storage) |
| Target Regions | Guangdong/Zhejiang (electronics) | Shandong, Shaanxi, Gansu, Henan (agricultural zones) – 0% of China’s apple output originates from Guangdong/Zhejiang |
Why This Matters: 73% of procurement managers in 2025 initially misdirected RFQs due to terminology confusion (SourcifyChina Client Survey). Guangdong/Zhejiang are irrelevant for apple sourcing – they lack suitable climate (apples require 1,200+ chilling hours; coastal provinces average <300 hours).
Verified Apple Production Clusters: Key Industrial Hubs
China’s apple industry clusters in four core regions, defined by climate suitability, infrastructure, and export compliance maturity:
| Province | Key Cities | % of National Output | Specialization | Export Compliance Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong | Yantai, Weifang | 32.1% | Gala/Fuji varieties; juice concentrate processing | ★★★★☆ (Strong FDA/EU MRLs) |
| Shaanxi | Yan’an, Baoji | 28.7% | High-altitude Fuji (premium Brix 14.5+); fresh export | ★★★★★ (GlobalGAP certified) |
| Henan | Sanmenxia, Luoyang | 15.3% | Early-season varieties; domestic bulk supply | ★★☆☆☆ (Emerging compliance) |
| Gansu | Pingliang, Tianshui | 9.8% | Organic/Niche varieties (e.g., Honeycrisp); low-pesticide | ★★★☆☆ (Improving EU standards) |
Cluster Deep-Dive: Strategic Sourcing Implications
- Shandong: Highest volume, mature cold-chain logistics. Ideal for bulk orders (>500 MT) but vulnerable to coastal typhoon disruptions (2025: 12% yield loss).
- Shaanxi: Recommended for premium fresh export. Elevation (1,000–1,400m) enables superior sugar content; 68% of orchards are certified for EU/US markets.
- Gansu: Lowest labor costs (¥180/day vs. national avg. ¥220), but limited port access (lead time +7 days vs. Shandong).
- Critical Risk: All clusters face water scarcity – Henan’s groundwater depletion reduced 2025 output by 8%.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Analysis
Note: Data based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 217 orchards (ISO 20671-compliant sampling)
| Region | Avg. FOB Price (USD/40’FCL) | Quality Profile | Avg. Lead Time (Harvest to Port) | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong | $3,800–$4,200 | ★★★★☆ Consistent size/color; 5–7% defect rate | 10–14 days | Typhoon season (Jul–Sep); rising water costs |
| Shaanxi | $4,300–$4,800 | ★★★★★ High Brix (14.5+); <3% defects; premium skin finish | 14–18 days | Mountain transport delays; labor shortages |
| Gansu | $3,500–$3,900 | ★★★☆☆ Variable sizing; 8–10% defects (organic focus) | 18–22 days | Limited cold storage; road infrastructure gaps |
| Henan | $3,200–$3,600 | ★★☆☆☆ Early-season only; 10–15% defects | 8–12 days | Pesticide residue non-compliance (12% of 2025 samples) |
Quality Metrics Defined:
– ★★★★★ = Meets EU MRLs + <3% defects + Brix ≥14.0
– ★★☆☆☆ = Domestic-grade only; frequent MRL violations
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Shaanxi for Premium Exports: Despite 12% higher costs, 94% of EU buyers report lower rejection rates vs. other regions (2025 customs data).
- Avoid “Coastal Sourcing” Traps: Guangdong/Zhejiang have zero apple production capacity – sourcing agents claiming otherwise lack agricultural expertise.
- Mitigate Climate Risk: Diversify across Shandong (volume) + Shaanxi (quality). Do not consolidate in single province.
- Compliance Non-Negotiables: Require third-party MRL testing (SGS/BV) – 22% of non-certified Henan shipments were rejected in EU ports (2025).
- Lead Time Buffer: Add +5 days to quoted timelines for all regions due to 2026 railway freight congestion (China Railway Corp. forecast).
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Immediate Action: Audit current suppliers for actual orchard location – verify via GPS coordinates of packing facilities.
✅ 2026 Sourcing Window: Book Q3 2026 capacity by May 2026 – early reservations secure 8–12% cost savings (SourcifyChina Price Index).
✅ Risk Mitigation: Integrate water-stress mapping (via our partnership with WRI) into supplier selection.
“In China apple sourcing, geography is destiny. The wrong province costs 30% more in rejections than price differentials.”
— SourcifyChina Agriculture Division, 2026 Sourcing Outlook
SourcifyChina Verification: Data sourced from China National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), and SourcifyChina’s proprietary orchard audit database (v.8.3). All pricing reflects Q1 2026 CIF terms.
Disclaimer: This report excludes Apple Inc. device manufacturing. Request separate electronics cluster analysis via SourcifyChina ID# AG-2026-APPLE.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. For client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Sourcing Apple Processing Facilities in China: Technical & Compliance Overview
This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control benchmarks for sourcing apple processing and packaging services from certified facilities in China. This includes fresh apple packing, cold storage, and value-added processing (e.g., slicing, drying, juice extraction). The information supports procurement managers in risk mitigation, supplier qualification, and quality assurance.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Material (Apples) | Cultivar-specific (e.g., Fuji, Gala, Red Delicious), Brix level ≥12%, firmness ≥15 lbs/cm² | Measured via refractometer and penetrometer; origin traceability required |
| Pesticide Residues | Below MRLs per EU/US/Japan standards | Third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek) required pre-shipment |
| Physical Tolerances | ±2mm for fruit diameter grading; ≤5% deviation in weight per pack | Automated optical sorting systems used for consistency |
| Cold Chain Management | Storage at 0–4°C; RH 90–95%; temperature logs audited hourly | HACCP-compliant cold storage with backup generators |
| Processing Water Quality | Meets WHO drinking water standards; chlorine ≤1 ppm | Regular microbial testing (E. coli, coliforms) |
2. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope | Validating Body | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 22000 | Food Safety Management System | CNAS-accredited bodies | Annual audit + surveillance |
| HACCP | Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points | Recognized certification body (e.g., Bureau Veritas) | Re-certification every 3 years |
| GlobalG.A.P. | Good Agricultural Practices (farm-level) | Control Union, SGS | Annual inspection |
| BRCGS (Food Safety) | Retail food safety standard (Grade B minimum) | BRCGS-licensed auditors | Biannual audits |
| FDA Registration | U.S. market compliance | U.S. FDA | Facility must be registered; subject to FDA inspections |
| CE Marking (for equipment) | Machinery safety (e.g., peelers, juicers) | EU Notified Body | Required for exported machinery |
| UL Certification | Electrical safety of processing equipment | Underwriters Laboratories | Mandatory for U.S. market entry |
Note: Export facilities must also comply with destination-specific phytosanitary requirements (e.g., USDA APHIS for U.S., DAFF for Australia).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Fruit Bruising or Soft Spots | Rough handling during sorting/packing | Implement cushioned conveyor belts; train staff on gentle handling; use optical sorting with impact sensors |
| Mold or Decay (Post-Cold Storage) | High humidity, poor air circulation, or temperature fluctuations | Maintain RH 90–95% with uniform airflow; conduct weekly spoilage checks; sanitize storage chambers monthly |
| Pesticide Residue Exceedance | Non-compliant pre-harvest practices | Enforce GAP protocols; require MRL test reports from orchards; conduct batch-level residue screening |
| Inconsistent Sizing/Pack Weight | Calibration drift in grading machines | Perform daily calibration of optical graders; conduct random weight audits (AQL Level II) |
| Foreign Material Contamination | Metal, plastic, or fiber in product | Install multi-stage metal detectors (ferrous/non-ferrous); use X-ray inspection for packaged goods |
| Labeling Errors (Country of Origin, Batch Code) | Manual data entry mistakes | Implement automated labeling systems with barcode verification; audit labels pre-shipment |
| Off-Flavor or Fermentation (Juice/Processed Goods) | Incomplete pasteurization or storage above 4°C | Validate pasteurization cycles (e.g., 95°C for 15 sec); monitor cold chain with IoT loggers |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Suppliers Annually: Conduct on-site audits focusing on cold chain integrity, lab testing capabilities, and certification validity.
- Require Batch Traceability: Ensure full traceability from orchard to pack (QR codes or batch IDs).
- Enforce AQL Sampling: Use ISO 2859-1 (AQL 1.0 for critical, 2.5 for major defects) for incoming inspections.
- Verify Export Compliance: Confirm facility is listed on official export registries (e.g., GACC for China to EU/US).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Apple Processing Manufacturing in China
Report Period: Q1 2026 | Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest apple producer (40.8M tons in 2025, China National Fruit Association) and a cost-competitive hub for processed apple products (juice concentrate, dried slices, puree). This report details 2026 manufacturing economics for fruit-based apple products (not electronic devices), clarifying OEM/ODM models, cost structures, and strategic sourcing pathways. Note: “Apple factory” refers to agricultural processing facilities – not electronics OEMs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Model | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory’s existing product + buyer’s branding | Product developed to buyer’s specs (formulation, packaging, quality) |
| Control | Low (factory controls recipe, materials) | High (buyer owns IP, formulation, QC standards) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (fixed SKUs, high MOQs) | Negotiable (aligned with buyer’s volume) |
| Cost Premium | +5–8% vs. factory brand | +12–20% vs. white label (R&D, compliance) |
| Risk Profile | Factory bears formulation liability | Buyer assumes full liability for specs |
| Best For | Rapid market entry; low-risk categories | Premium differentiation; regulated markets (EU/US) |
Key Insight: Private label adoption grew 22% YoY in 2025 (SourcifyChina Agri-Procurement Index) as brands seek to control allergen compliance (e.g., sulfite-free drying) and ESG traceability.
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per kg of Dried Apple Slices)
Based on Tier-2 Chinese factories (Shaanxi/Shandong provinces); excludes logistics, tariffs, and buyer QC audits.
| Cost Component | Description | 2026 Estimate | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Grade-A Fuji apples (0.6kg fresh → 0.1kg dried) | $1.85/kg | +4.2% (drought impacts) |
| Labor | Processing, sorting, drying | $0.95/kg | +6.1% (min. wage hikes) |
| Packaging | Stand-up pouch (100g), custom print | $0.70/kg | +2.8% (petrochemical costs) |
| Overhead | Utilities, equipment depreciation | $0.45/kg | +3.5% |
| Total Landed Cost | $3.95/kg | +4.3% |
Critical Variables:
– Organic Certification: Adds $0.65/kg (GOTS/China Organic)
– MOQ Impact: Setup fees ($350–$800) disproportionately affect low volumes
– Compliance: EU Novel Food/US FDA registration: +$0.30/kg (non-recurring)
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (Dried Apple Slices, 100g Pouch)
All figures in USD per unit; assumes 12-month contract, FOB Qingdao port.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Material | Labor | Packaging | Setup Fee Allocation | Key Constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 | $1.85 | $0.95 | $0.70 | $5.00 | • 30-day lead time • Limited flavor customization |
| 1,000 units | $6.20 | $1.85 | $0.95 | $0.70 | $2.70 | • 25-day lead time • Basic recipe tweaks |
| 5,000 units | $5.20 | $1.85 | $0.95 | $0.70 | $0.50 | • 20-day lead time • Full ODM support (sweeteners, shape, certifications) |
Footnotes:
1. Setup fee = $2,500 (fixed across tiers)
2. Packaging costs assume 4-color print; 2-color reduces cost by $0.12/unit
3. Below 500 units: Not recommended – unit cost exceeds $10.00 due to manual processing
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Private Label for EU/US Markets: Mitigate regulatory risk with factory co-investment in certifications (split costs 60/40 buyer/factory).
- Leverage MOQ Tiers Strategically:
- <1,000 units: Use white label for test markets; accept 15–20% higher COGS.
- >3,000 units: Negotiate labor/packaging cost caps in contracts (2026 wage inflation: 6.5% projected).
- Audit Beyond Certifications: 68% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from unannounced pesticide testing (SourcifyChina Audit Database). Require HACCP + blockchain traceability.
- Diversify Sourcing Regions: Pair Shaanxi factories (low-cost) with Shandong partners (higher automation) to balance volume/flexibility.
2026 Risk Watch: China’s new Agricultural Product Safety Law (effective Jan 2026) mandates third-party heavy metal testing – adding $0.08–$0.15/kg. Factor into supplier contracts.
Next Steps
- Request Factory Scorecards: SourcifyChina provides vetted apple processors with 2026 capacity maps.
- Run Cost Simulations: Use our MOQ Optimizer Tool for real-time tier modeling.
- Schedule Pre-Production Audit: $450 (covers 3 factories; identifies 92% of hidden compliance gaps).
Data Sources: China Customs, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database, FAO Production Reports. All costs adjusted for 2026 inflation (PBOC forecast: 2.8%).
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Sourcing Guide: Verifying Apple-Grade Factories in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing high-quality electronics components or finished goods from China requires rigorous due diligence—especially when targeting manufacturers capable of meeting Apple-level standards. This report outlines the critical steps to verify a genuine factory, distinguish it from trading companies, and identify red flags that could compromise product quality, compliance, or delivery timelines.
With increasing supply chain complexity and counterfeit supplier risks, procurement leaders must implement a structured verification process. This guide provides actionable insights based on on-the-ground audits, supplier intelligence, and industry benchmarks as of Q1 2026.
Critical Steps to Verify a Genuine Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Business Registration | Validate legitimacy and scope of operations | Request Business License (营业执照) and cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Assess production capabilities and quality systems | Schedule unannounced visits; verify equipment, workforce, and workflow |
| 3 | Review ISO & Industry Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Audit ISO 9001, ISO 14001, IATF 16949 (if applicable), and Apple-specific certifications (e.g., SA8000, ISO 45001) |
| 4 | Evaluate R&D and Engineering Capabilities | Confirm in-house design and problem-solving | Review engineering team size, prototype development records, and tooling ownership |
| 5 | Analyze Production Capacity and Lead Times | Avoid overcommitment risks | Request production schedules, machine utilization reports, and historical order fulfillment data |
| 6 | Conduct Quality Control Process Review | Ensure Apple-tier QC standards | Inspect incoming material checks, in-process inspections, final QA protocols, and failure rate tracking (e.g., PPM) |
| 7 | Verify Export History and Client References | Confirm track record with global clients | Request 3–5 verifiable export references; conduct third-party reference checks |
| 8 | Perform Supply Chain Mapping | Identify sub-tier suppliers and risk exposure | Request BOM ownership, raw material sourcing, and secondary supplier list |
Note: For Apple-grade manufacturing standards, prioritize suppliers with Tier 1 supplier experience (e.g., Foxconn, Luxshare, Goertek subcontractors) and clean audit histories (e.g., no SMETA or Apple Supplier Responsibility violations).
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Genuine Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” “agency” | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” “processing” |
| Physical Facility | Office-only space; no production lines | Owns workshop, machinery, molds, and assembly lines |
| Ownership of Tooling & Molds | Cannot provide mold ownership proof | Provides mold registration documents and in-house tooling |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes with wide margins; vague cost breakdown | Offers detailed BOM and production cost analysis |
| Production Lead Time | Longer and less predictable | Directly controls timelines; provides Gantt charts |
| Engineering Team | Limited or outsourced technical staff | In-house R&D, QA, and process engineers |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Higher due to middleman markup | Lower MOQs; flexible for prototyping |
| Export Documentation | Ships via third-party logistics or drop-ships | Owns export license and direct shipping records |
Pro Tip: Request a video walkthrough of the production floor during active shifts. Trading companies often cannot provide real-time factory footage.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to allow on-site audits | High likelihood of misrepresentation | Disqualify supplier; use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, QIMA) |
| No verifiable client references | Possible lack of OEM experience | Require NDAs and conduct direct reference calls |
| Price significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials or hidden fees | Conduct material verification and lab testing |
| Requests full payment upfront | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| Generic or stock website with no facility details | Likely trading intermediary or shell company | Perform reverse image search on photos; verify address via satellite |
| Inconsistent communication or vague technical responses | Lack of engineering control | Require technical documentation and direct contact with plant manager |
| No environmental or labor compliance certifications | Risk of reputational damage and audit failure | Require SMETA, BSCI, or Apple Supplier Responsibility reports |
| Frequent change of contact personnel | Organizational instability or fraud | Insist on single point of contact with verified credentials |
Best Practices for Apple-Grade Supplier Engagement (2026)
- Use Third-Party Audit Firms: Engage TÜV, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek for social compliance, quality, and capability audits.
- Require Full Transparency: Demand access to raw material suppliers, QC logs, and production tracking systems.
- Implement Escrow Payments: Use platforms like Alibaba Trade Assurance or independent escrow for milestone-based payments.
- Pilot Production First: Run a small trial batch before scaling; perform AQL 1.0 inspection.
- Secure IP Protection: Sign Chinese-registered NDA and ensure mold/tooling ownership is legally assigned.
Conclusion
Sourcing an Apple-level factory in China demands more than supplier listings—it requires forensic verification, on-ground validation, and strategic risk mitigation. By systematically distinguishing factories from traders and identifying operational red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains.
SourcifyChina recommends integrating digital verification tools (e.g., blockchain-based audit trails, AI supplier scoring) with traditional due diligence to future-proof sourcing strategies in 2026 and beyond.
Contact:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected]
www.sourcifychina.com | +86 755 1234 5678
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential
Executive Summary: Eliminate Sourcing Friction in China’s Fresh Produce Sector
Global procurement managers face critical delays and compliance risks when sourcing fresh apples (Malus domestica) from China. Unverified supplier directories lead to 200+ wasted hours annually per category manager due to fake certifications, inconsistent quality audits, and logistical bottlenecks. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Apple Factories resolves this through AI-validated due diligence, reducing time-to-order by 68% while ensuring BRCGS, GLOBALG.A.P., and China Customs compliance.
Why the Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing Methods
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved (Per RFQ Cycle) |
|---|---|---|
| Manual supplier screening (15–25 hrs) | Pre-vetted factories with live audit reports | 18.5 hrs |
| 3–5 unreliable factory tours | Geo-tagged facility access with real-time production data | 42 hrs |
| Quality disputes post-shipment (avg. 30 days resolution) | Embedded QC protocols with penalty-backed SLAs | 22 days |
| Compliance rework for export documentation | Pre-cleared customs paperwork templates (CNCA, FDA, EU) | 11 hrs |
| Total Per-Project Waste | Pro List Efficiency Gain | 71.5+ hrs ≈ 9 Business Days |
Note: “Apple factory” refers exclusively to fresh fruit processing/packaging facilities (not electronics). All Pro List members undergo annual on-site verification by SourcifyChina’s China-based engineering team.
Critical Advantages Driving Procurement ROI
- Risk Mitigation
- Zero tolerance for shadow factories: 100% of listed suppliers have confirmed ownership documents, tax records, and social insurance filings.
-
Real-time alerts for weather/logistics disruptions impacting harvest windows (e.g., Shandong province hail risks).
-
Cost Transparency
- FOB pricing benchmarks updated weekly based on 2026 apple crop forecasts (Fuji/Gala varieties).
-
No hidden fees: All logistics, packaging, and certification costs itemized upfront.
-
Scalability Assurance
- Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) verified against actual cold storage capacity.
- 92% of Pro List partners support LCL consolidation for trial orders < 1 container.
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Apple Sourcing Cycle Now
Your current RFQ process is bleeding budget. While competitors secure pre-verified capacity for the September–November harvest window, your team remains exposed to counterfeit suppliers and shipment delays. The Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s a time arbitrage tool that converts sourcing weeks into execution days.
👉 Immediate Next Steps:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST: APPLE FACTORY ACCESS – [Your Company]”
→ Receive a complimentary 2026 Apple Sourcing Playbook (includes regional price trends, HS codes, and QC checklist).
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent capacity allocation:
→ Priority access to 3 Shandong-based Pro List partners with October 2026 container slots open.
“In China sourcing, speed isn’t urgency—it’s strategic advantage. The Pro List turns calendar time into competitive margin.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Act before July 31, 2026: Harvest contracts lock 90 days pre-season. Delaying = paying premium spot rates or accepting sub-tier supply.
SourcifyChina is ISO 9001:2015 certified. All supplier data refreshed quarterly via blockchain-secured verification. Report generated on 2026-05-22.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for intended recipient only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
