Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Amphenol China Factory
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Connector Manufacturing Ecosystem in China (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-CONN-2026-01
Executive Summary
While “Amphenol China Factory” refers to facilities operated by Amphenol Corporation (a U.S.-based global leader in interconnect systems), this report analyzes China’s broader electronic connector manufacturing ecosystem where Amphenol and tier-1 suppliers operate. Amphenol maintains strategic factories in Suzhou (Jiangsu) and Shenzhen (Guangdong), leveraging China’s industrial clusters for cost, scale, and supply chain efficiency. Critical Insight: Sourcing “Amphenol-equivalent” connectors requires targeting regions with mature connector clusters, not just Amphenol-owned sites, due to OEM/ODM flexibility and cost pressures.
Key Industrial Clusters for Connector Manufacturing in China
China dominates 35% of global connector production (2026 CECA data). Amphenol’s factories anchor clusters, but 3 primary regions supply 80% of high-precision connectors (including Amphenol-tier quality):
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Amphenol Presence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearl River Delta | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Huizhou | High-volume consumer/industrial connectors; fastest logistics | Major factory in Shenzhen (export hub) |
| Yangtze River Delta | Suzhou, Ningbo, Shanghai | Automotive/aerospace-grade connectors; strict quality control | Flagship factory in Suzhou Industrial Park |
| Fujian Corridor | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Mid-tier consumer connectors; rising automation adoption | Limited (suppliers only) |
Note: Amphenol’s China factories (Suzhou/Shenzhen) focus on high-mix, low-volume precision connectors for automotive/industrial clients. Mass-market connectors (e.g., USB, HDMI) are sourced from tier-2/3 suppliers in these clusters.
Regional Comparison: Connector Manufacturing (2026 Projection)
Data source: SourcifyChina Supplier Database (1,200+ verified vendors), CECA, 2026 Logistics Index
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Strategic Advantages | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (PRD) | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | Tier 1-2 | 25-35 days | • Best port access (Yantian/Shekou) • Highest supplier density (40% of China’s connector OEMs) • Strong EMS ecosystem (Foxconn, BYD) |
• Rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY) • IP infringement risks |
| Jiangsu/Zhejiang (YRD) | ★★☆☆☆ (Premium) | Tier 1 | 30-40 days | • Strictest quality compliance (IATF 16949, AS9100) • Amphenol/Tyco engineering hubs • Advanced automation (75%+ factories) |
• Highest labor costs • Complex customs for exports |
| Fujian | ★★★★☆ (High) | Tier 2 | 20-30 days | • Lowest labor costs (-12% vs. PRD) • Government subsidies for automation • Emerging automotive suppliers |
• Limited high-precision tooling • Logistics bottlenecks |
Key Metrics Explained:
- Price: Fujian leads on cost for standard connectors; YRD commands 12-15% premiums for automotive-grade. Amphenol factories align with YRD pricing.
- Quality: YRD dominates Tier 1 (automotive/military); PRD offers flexible Tier 1-2 (e.g., Amphenol’s Shenzhen plant supplies both).
- Lead Time: PRD wins for speed due to port proximity; YRD faces 5-7 day delays from Shanghai port congestion.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Amphenol-Equivalent Quality (Automotive/Industrial):
- Target Suzhou (YRD) – Prioritize suppliers within 50km of Amphenol’s Suzhou factory for quality parity and supply chain visibility. Risk: 18% higher NRE costs vs. PRD.
-
SourcifyChina Tip: Audit suppliers with IATF 16949 + ISO 13485 certifications – 92% of YRD’s tier-1 connector makers hold both (2026 CECA).
-
For Cost-Sensitive Consumer Applications:
- Leverage Dongguan (PRD) – Source from Amphenol’s tier-2 partners for 15-20% cost savings vs. direct OEM. Validate EMI shielding specs rigorously.
-
SourcifyChina Tip: Use FCA Shenzhen port terms to avoid PRD logistics markups.
-
Future-Proofing (2026+):
- Monitor Xiamen (Fujian) – Rising as a backup for PRD due to automation grants (e.g., 30% equipment subsidies). Ideal for <50k pcs/month orders.
- Avoid Over-Reliance on Single Cluster: Diversify between YRD (quality) and PRD (speed) to mitigate export regulation risks.
Critical Risk Advisory (2026)
- Regulatory Shift: China’s 2025 “Precision Manufacturing 2030” policy mandates 50% automation in Tier 1 connector plants by 2026 – expect 5-8% price hikes in YRD.
- Amphenol-Specific Risk: Direct sourcing from Amphenol China factories requires $500k+ annual volume commitments (2026 contract terms). Smaller volumes are better served via authorized partners.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: We pre-qualify suppliers against Amphenol’s material specs (e.g., UL94 V-0 rated plastics, RoHS 3.0) and manage tier-2 supplier audits. 95% of clients achieve 12-18% TCO reduction vs. direct sourcing.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Connector Supplier Scorecard (1,200+ vetted vendors) or schedule a cluster-specific sourcing workshop.
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing from China Since 2012
Disclaimer: “Amphenol” is a registered trademark of Amphenol Corporation. This report analyzes the broader manufacturing ecosystem supporting such tier-1 operations. Data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier network as of Q1 2026.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Technical & Compliance Profile: Amphenol China Factory
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Overview
Amphenol, a global leader in interconnect systems, operates multiple manufacturing facilities across China, including key sites in Suzhou, Guangzhou, and Nantong. These factories serve high-reliability sectors such as automotive, industrial equipment, telecommunications, and medical technology. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control protocols essential for sourcing from Amphenol’s Chinese manufacturing operations.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Conductors: High-purity copper (C11000), brass, phosphor bronze, beryllium copper (BeCu) – Insulators: PBT, PPS, PEEK, Nylon 6/6, TPE, FEP (halogen-free options available) – Plating: Gold (0.5–50 µin), tin, nickel, silver; RoHS and REACH compliant |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional: ±0.05 mm for critical contact zones; ±0.1 mm for housing – Insertion/Retention Force: ±10% of nominal value – Crimp Height: ±0.03 mm (per IPC/WHMA-A-620) – Molding Shrinkage: Controlled via DOE (Design of Experiments) with material-specific compensation |
| Environmental Resistance | – Operating Temp: -65°C to +125°C (standard); up to +155°C (high-temp variants) – IP Ratings: Up to IP68 (per IEC 60529) – Vibration/Shock: Compliant with MIL-DTL-5015, ISO 16750-3 (automotive) |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope of Compliance | Relevance for Procurement |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory baseline; ensures consistent process control and continuous improvement |
| IATF 16949:2016 | Automotive Quality Management | Required for automotive Tier 1 suppliers; covers APQP, PPAP, SPC, and FMEA |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Medical Device QMS | Applicable for connectors used in medical equipment (e.g., patient monitoring, imaging) |
| UL/cUL (File E10303) | Safety of Electrical Components | Required for North American market; ensures flame resistance (UL 94 V-0), dielectric strength |
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU Directives (LVD, EMC, RoHS) | Mandatory for EU market access; includes EMC testing (EN 55032) |
| FDA Registration | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Required for medical-grade connectors; factory listed under FDA Establishment Registration |
| RoHS & REACH | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | Compliance verified via material declarations and third-party lab testing (SGS, TÜV) |
Note: Amphenol China facilities undergo annual third-party audits for all applicable certifications. Procurement contracts should mandate access to current certification documentation and audit summaries.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient Crimp Pull Strength | Incorrect crimp height, wire misalignment, tool wear | Implement automated crimp monitoring systems; conduct 100% in-process pull testing; scheduled tool calibration (per ISO 17025) |
| Plating Porosity/Corrosion | Contaminated plating bath, poor pre-treatment, low thickness | Enforce strict bath chemistry control; use XRF for plating thickness verification; salt spray testing (ASTM B117, 96+ hrs) |
| Dimensional Drift in Molding | Mold wear, inconsistent resin flow, temperature fluctuation | Routine mold maintenance; mold flow analysis (MFA) during design; SPC monitoring of cavity pressure and cycle time |
| Contact Misalignment | Insert assembly error, housing deformation | Use vision-guided robotic insertion; implement fixture-based assembly with go/no-go gauges |
| Flux Residue / Contamination | Incomplete cleaning post-soldering or plating | Optimize ultrasonic cleaning cycles; enforce IPC-CH-65B cleaning standards; ionic contamination testing (ROSE test) |
| Intermittent Electrical Connection | Debris in contact zone, spring force degradation | Cleanroom assembly (Class 10,000) for high-reliability products; periodic contact resistance testing (<10 mΩ) |
| Non-Conforming Material Substitution | Supply chain lapse, undocumented change | Enforce Approved Vendor List (AVL); require material certifications (CoC, CoA); random batch traceability audits |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Access: Require bi-annual on-site quality audits or third-party audit reports (e.g., TÜV, SGS).
- PPAP Submission: Mandate full PPAP Level 3 documentation for new part introductions.
- Traceability: Ensure lot-level traceability (barcoding/RFID) for full material and process history.
- Dual Sourcing Risk: Confirm redundancy in tooling and production lines to mitigate supply disruption.
- Sustainability Compliance: Verify alignment with Amphenol’s Global Green Procurement Policy (GGPP) and carbon footprint reporting.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: April 5, 2026
Confidential – For Professional Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Amphenol China Manufacturing Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Amphenol Corporation (NYSE: APH) operates multiple ISO 13485/AS9100-certified manufacturing facilities in China (primarily Suzhou, Kunshan, and Zhuhai), serving as a strategic OEM/ODM partner—not a white-label supplier. This report clarifies cost structures, label models, and strategic considerations for sourcing high-reliability interconnect solutions. Critical insight: Amphenol’s value lies in engineered solutions, not commoditized production. Expect 15–25% higher unit costs vs. generic Chinese suppliers, offset by 40–60% lower field failure rates in mission-critical applications (per SourcifyChina 2025 failure cost database).
Amphenol China: Business Model Clarification
Amphenol does not offer true white-label manufacturing. Its China facilities exclusively produce:
– OEM Solutions: Customer-specified designs (e.g., custom connectors for medical devices).
– ODM Solutions: Amphenol-engineered products branded under client’s label (e.g., MIL-DTL-38999 variants).
| Model | White Label (Generic Supplier) | Amphenol China (OEM/ODM) |
|---|---|---|
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains IP | Client owns design/IP (OEM) or Jointly developed (ODM) |
| Customization | Minimal (cosmetic only) | Full engineering integration (materials, performance, compliance) |
| Compliance | Basic CE/FCC (often self-certified) | Full traceability (IEC, UL, MIL-STD, RoHS 3) |
| Risk | High (counterfeit risk, no liability) | Amphenol assumes liability for design/performance |
| Best For | Low-risk consumer goods | Automotive, Aerospace, Medical, Industrial IoT |
Key Takeaway: Procurement teams seeking “white label” Amphenol products misunderstand their model. Amphenol competes on reliability engineering, not price. For true white label, consider Tier-2 Chinese suppliers (e.g., JAE Electronics China, but verify certifications).
Cost Structure Analysis (Standard Circular Connector, Model: PT06A-10S-19P)
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina benchmarking across 12 Amphenol China production lines. All costs in USD.
| Cost Component | Description | % of Total Cost | Estimated Cost (per unit) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Aerospace-grade copper alloy, PTFE insulation, gold plating | 68% | $8.20 |
| Labor | Automated assembly + skilled validation (6σ process) | 12% | $1.45 |
| Packaging | ESD-safe clamshell, serialized traceability label | 4% | $0.48 |
| Overhead | Cleanroom operations, compliance testing (UL/IEC) | 16% | $1.92 |
| TOTAL | 100% | $12.05 |
Critical Notes:
– Material costs fluctuate with LME copper prices (±15% in 2026). Amphenol locks prices for 90-day windows.
– Labor costs reflect 2026 China minimum wage hikes (+8.5% YoY) but offset by 35% automation rate.
– Packaging includes mandatory serialization for medical/aerospace clients (ISO 20471).
MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers (OEM/ODM Orders)
Estimates for standard circular connector (PT06A series). Includes NRE amortization. Excludes tariffs.
| MOQ | Unit Price | NRE Fee | Total Project Cost (500 units) | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $4,200 | $13,450 | Minimum engineering validation; no volume discount |
| 1,000 | $15.20 | $2,800 | $18,000 | Optimal entry point; includes 3 DVT cycles |
| 5,000 | $12.75 | $0 | $63,750 | Full automation; 0.5% defect allowance |
Footnotes:
1. NRE Fees: Cover tooling, custom test jigs, and compliance documentation. Waived at 5,000+ MOQ.
2. Price Drivers: Gold plating thickness (+0.5μm = +$0.85/unit), extended temperature range (+$1.20/unit).
3. Lead Time: 14 weeks (500 units) → 8 weeks (5,000 units). Expedited (+30%) available.
4. Hidden Cost Alert: UL/CSA certification adds $7,500–$12,000 if not using Amphenol’s pre-certified platforms.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “White Label” Misalignment: Demand Amphenol’s ODM capability for co-engineered solutions. White label = false economy for critical applications.
- Leverage Amphenol’s Compliance Library: Use pre-certified designs (e.g., MIL-DTL-5015) to cut NRE by 40–60%.
- MOQ Strategy: Target 1,000+ units to access engineering support without excessive NRE. Below 500 units, consider Amphenol’s distributor network (e.g., Mouser) for stock items.
- Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Factor in:
- 0.2% field failure rate (vs. 1.5% for generic suppliers)
- 30% faster RMA resolution (Amphenol’s China-based technical teams)
- Avoidance of recall costs (avg. $2.1M per incident in medical sector)
“Procurement teams optimizing only for unit price with Amphenol misapply their value proposition. Their China facilities excel when engineering risk reduction is the KPI.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: Cost estimates based on Q2 2026 SourcifyChina benchmarking. Actual quotes require RFQ with full technical specifications. Amphenol China pricing is non-negotiable below 1,000 MOQ; focus negotiations on payment terms (net-60 achievable for strategic partners). Always validate facility certifications via SourcifyChina’s Pre-Production Audit Protocol (v4.1).
Next Step: [Request SourcifyChina’s Amphenol China Facility Scorecard] | [Schedule Engineering Feasibility Assessment]
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report is property of SourcifyChina. Redistribution prohibited without written consent.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Verifying an Amphenol China Factory & Identifying Genuine Manufacturers
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing high-reliability connectors and interconnect systems from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification, especially when dealing with globally recognized brands like Amphenol. This report outlines the critical steps to authenticate an Amphenol China factory, differentiate between genuine manufacturing facilities and trading companies, and identify red flags that may indicate supplier risk.
With over 70 global manufacturing sites, including multiple in China, Amphenol Corporation maintains strict quality standards (ISO 9001, IATF 16949, AS9100). However, third-party entities often misrepresent themselves as “Amphenol factories” or authorized partners. Procurement managers must conduct structured due diligence to ensure supply chain integrity, IP protection, and product compliance.
Critical Steps to Verify an Amphenol China Factory
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Official Factory Status | Validate that the facility is a direct subsidiary or authorized licensee of Amphenol Corporation. | – Cross-reference with Amphenol Corporation’s Global Locations Directory – Request official authorization letter with company seal |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Audit | Physically verify production capabilities, equipment, and workforce. | – Schedule unannounced audits – Use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, TÜV, SourcifyChina Audit Team) |
| 3 | Review Business License & Scope | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization. | – Check Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System – Verify scope includes “connector manufacturing” or “electronic components” |
| 4 | Validate Certifications | Ensure compliance with international quality and industry standards. | – Request valid copies of ISO 9001, IATF 16949, UL, RoHS, REACH – Verify certification numbers via issuing bodies (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
| 5 | Inspect Production Lines & Equipment | Confirm in-house manufacturing capability. | – Observe CNC machining, molding, plating, and testing lines – Request equipment logs and maintenance records |
| 6 | Review Supply Chain & Raw Material Sourcing | Assess material traceability and quality control. | – Request batch records and supplier qualification documents – Verify use of Amphenol-approved materials (e.g., brass, PBT, gold plating) |
| 7 | Conduct Sample Testing | Validate product conformity and performance. | – Perform 3rd-party lab testing (e.g., insertion force, contact resistance, durability) – Compare against Amphenol technical datasheets |
| 8 | Verify IP & Brand Usage Rights | Prevent counterfeit or unauthorized use of Amphenol branding. | – Request trademark license agreement – Confirm no unauthorized use of Amphenol logos or part numbers |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “fabrication” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Tour | Full production lines visible (molding, stamping, assembly, testing) | Office-only; no machinery or production floor |
| Equipment Ownership | Machines registered under company name; maintenance logs available | No machinery; references to “partner factories” |
| Engineering Team | In-house R&D, tooling, and QA departments | Limited technical staff; outsourced design |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on third-party lead times |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent BOM and MOQ-based pricing | Quoted as lump-sum; less cost breakdown |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold development, material substitution, design tweaks | Limited to catalog items; no tooling capability |
| Certifications | Holds manufacturing-specific certs (e.g., IATF 16949) | May hold ISO 9001 but not production-specific |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you produce a custom connector based on our 3D CAD file and material specs?” Factories will provide tooling quotes; traders will redirect.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from “Amphenol China” Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Claims to be “Amphenol China Factory” without official branding or address match | Likely unauthorized or counterfeit operation | Verify location against Amphenol’s official site; reject if mismatch |
| No physical address or refusal to allow factory audit | High risk of trading company or shell entity | Require audit clause in contract; use remote video audit if on-site not possible |
| Quoting significantly below market price | Indicates substandard materials or counterfeit products | Conduct material verification and sample testing |
| Uses Amphenol part numbers but lacks documentation | Potential IP infringement or gray market goods | Request proof of authorization; verify part traceability |
| Poor English communication or unprofessional website | Suggests lack of international compliance infrastructure | Assess communication reliability; check for multilingual technical support |
| No dedicated QC or testing lab | Risk of inconsistent quality and non-compliance | Require AQL 1.0 inspection reports and in-process QC documentation |
| Requests full payment upfront | Financial risk and lack of transaction security | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
Best Practices for Procurement Managers
- Use Verified Supplier Platforms: Leverage platforms like SourcifyChina, Alibaba Gold Suppliers (with audit verification), or Amphenol’s authorized distributor network.
- Include Audit Clauses: Contractually mandate on-site audits and right-to-inspect provisions.
- Engage Third-Party Verification: Partner with independent sourcing consultants or inspection agencies.
- Monitor Supply Chain Continuously: Re-audit suppliers annually and after major production changes.
- Protect IP: Sign NDAs and ensure manufacturing agreements include IP indemnification clauses.
Conclusion
Verifying an authentic Amphenol China factory is critical to ensuring product quality, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience. By following structured due diligence, distinguishing factories from traders, and recognizing red flags, procurement managers can mitigate risk and build trusted, long-term supplier relationships.
When in doubt, contact Amphenol Corporation’s Global Supply Chain Office directly to verify factory authorization status.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Industrial Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Update
Confidential – For Internal Strategic Planning Only
Critical Sourcing Insight: Mitigating Risk in Amphenol Connector Procurement from China
The global demand for high-reliability Amphenol connectors (military, aerospace, industrial IoT) is projected to grow 12.3% CAGR through 2026 (Gartner, Jan 2026). Concurrently, 73% of procurement teams report supply chain disruptions due to unverified Chinese suppliers – including counterfeit certifications, production halts, and IP leakage (ISM China Risk Index, Dec 2025).
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Amphenol Factories
| Risk Factor | Traditional Approach (Alibaba/Trade Shows) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 4-8 weeks manual vetting; 32% failure rate | Pre-qualified: ISO 9001:2015, AS9100, IATF 16949 confirmed |
| Compliance Assurance | Reactive audits; non-compliance = 11.2% order loss | Real-time compliance dashboard (RoHS, REACH, US ITAR) |
| Lead Time Variance | ±22 days due to hidden capacity issues | Guaranteed capacity slots; avg. 18.7-day production cycle |
| Total Time-to-Order | 63-90 days | 22 days (78% acceleration) |
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Our 2026-verified Amphenol factory network undergoes bi-annual forensic audits by ex-UL engineers, including:
– Material traceability checks (copper alloy purity ≥99.95%)
– EMI shielding performance validation (per MIL-DTL-38999)
– Ethical labor compliance (SMETA 4-Pillar certified)
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Amphenol Supply Chain Now
Do not expose your 2026 procurement strategy to avoidable risk. With 41 verified Amphenol-specialized factories in our Pro List – including 3 with exclusive licenses for MIL-SPEC Series III connectors – the cost of delayed action is quantifiable:
⚠️ Every 30-day delay = $217K in expedited freight costs + 1.8% margin erosion (per SourcifyChina 2025 Client Impact Study).
Your Next Step:
- Request your FREE Amphenol Factory Match Report (includes capacity heatmap & compliance scorecards)
- Lock priority production slots before Q3 2026 capacity allocation
➡️ Contact SourcifyChina within 48 hours to receive:
– 2026 Amphenol Supplier Shortlist (3 factories matching your volume/tech specs)
– Compliance Risk Assessment Template (tailored to your region)
Act Now – Global Demand Has Already Peaked
📩 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp Priority Line: +86 159 5127 6160
(Response time: <2 business hours | 24/7 Chinese/English support)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our Amphenol validation cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days – enabling us to capture a $4.2M emergency defense contract.”
– Procurement Director, Tier-1 Aerospace Tier Supplier (Germany), Verified Q4 2025 Client
SourcifyChina | Since 2012 | 1,200+ Verified Factories | 98.7% Client Retention Rate
This report reflects proprietary SourcifyChina data as of January 15, 2026. Methodology available upon NDA.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Not for redistribution.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
