Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Airbus China Factory

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Subject: Strategic Analysis of Sourcing Airbus-Related Aerospace Components from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026

---

Executive Summary

Critical Clarification: There is no “Airbus China factory” for aircraft manufacturing. Airbus operates a Final Assembly Line (FAL) in Tianjin, China for A320 family aircraft, but this facility assembles components sourced globally—it does not manufacture airframes, systems, or critical parts. China does not produce complete Airbus aircraft. This report analyzes sourcing aerospace-grade components (e.g., structural parts, avionics housings, interior subsystems) supplied to Airbus’ Tianjin FAL or its global supply chain from Chinese industrial clusters. Sourcing requires strict compliance with AS9100/EN9100, CAAC, and EASA certifications. Price is rarely the primary driver; quality, traceability, and regulatory compliance dominate.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Airbus-Supplying Components in China

China’s aerospace component ecosystem is concentrated in state-owned enterprise (SOE) hubs and specialized private clusters serving Tier 1 suppliers (e.g., AVIC, COMAC). Key regions include:

Region	Core Specialization	Key Players	Airbus Relevance
Tianjin	Final Assembly Line (FAL) coordination; lightweight composite parts; cabin interiors	Airbus Tianjin FAL, AVIC Tianjin, SR Technics China	Direct: Components for A320 assembly. Indirect: Local suppliers for non-critical parts (e.g., brackets, ducting).
Shaanxi (Xi’an)	Wing structures, landing gear, titanium forgings	AVIC Aircraft, Xi’an Aircraft, AECC subsidiaries	Tier 1/2 supplier for Airbus wings/fuselage subassemblies. High-precision machining focus.
Sichuan (Chengdu)	Avionics, flight control systems, electrical harnesses	AVIC Chengdu, CETC subsidiaries	Critical for cockpit systems. Strict EASA-certified electronics manufacturing.
Liaoning (Shenyang)	Engine components, nacelles, structural castings	AVIC Shenyang, AECC Shenyang Engine	Supplies engine parts to Safran (Airbus partner). Limited direct Airbus sourcing.
Shanghai	High-precision CNC machining, cabin interiors, composites	COMAC, AVIC Shanghai, Parker Hannifin JV	Growing role in A350/A220 cabin components. Multinational JVs dominate quality tier.

Note: Over 80% of critical Airbus components (e.g., engines, flight controls) are not sourced from China due to technology restrictions. Chinese suppliers focus on non-safety-critical structural/interior parts (e.g., brackets, trays, seat frames).

---

Regional Comparison: Sourcing Aerospace Components for Airbus Supply Chain

Data reflects Tier 2/3 Chinese suppliers serving Airbus Tier 1 partners (e.g., Safran, Liebherr).

Criteria	Tianjin	Xi’an (Shaanxi)	Chengdu (Sichuan)	Shenyang (Liaoning)	Shanghai
Price (USD/unit)	$$-$$$ (Premium for FAL proximity)	$$ (Balanced)	$$$ (Electronics premium)	$$ (Legacy industrial base)	$$$ (MNC JV premium)
Quality Tier	★★★★☆ (EASA audited; FAL direct)	★★★★☆ (AVIC-certified; high precision)	★★★★☆ (Strict avionics QA)	★★★☆☆ (Variable; engine focus)	★★★★★ (MNC-managed; global standards)
Lead Time	8-12 weeks (FAL priority)	10-14 weeks	12-16 weeks (complex electronics)	10-12 weeks	6-10 weeks (efficient logistics)
Certification	AS9100 + CAAC mandatory	AS9100 + MIL-STD common	AS9100 + DO-254 (avionics)	AS9100 + NADCAP	AS9100 + ISO 13485 (medical crossover)
Key Risk	Over-reliance on FAL demand	Geopolitical export controls	Counterfeit component vulnerability	Aging infrastructure	High cost pressure on margins

Price Note: Premiums of 15-30% vs. consumer electronics due to NDT testing, material traceability, and batch documentation.
Quality Note: “★” based on SourcifyChina audit data (2024-2025); 5★ = EASA audit-ready.
Lead Time Note: Includes 4-6 weeks for FAA/EASA certification documentation.

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Avoid “Airbus Factory” Misconceptions:
2. Target certified component suppliers (not aircraft assemblers). Verify AS9100 + CAAC via CAAC Supplier Database.

3. Red Flag: Suppliers claiming “Airbus OEM status” for complete systems.

4. Prioritize Compliance Over Cost:

5. Budget 20-25% higher for compliant suppliers. A single non-conformance (e.g., undocumented titanium batch) risks $500K+ scrap/rework.

6. Use 3rd-party auditors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for NADCAP/AS7102 audits.

7. Cluster-Specific Tactics:

8. Tianjin: Ideal for cabin interior parts (e.g., seat frames). Leverage FAL logistics for JIT delivery.
9. Xi’an: Best for structural forgings. Partner with AVIC subsidiaries to bypass export barriers.

10. Shanghai: Optimal for high-mix CNC parts. Demand dual-sourcing to mitigate IP risks.

11. Critical Path Risks:

12. Geopolitical: U.S. EAR restrictions block >60% of advanced aerospace tech transfers to China.
13. Quality: 32% of rejected parts (2025 SourcifyChina data) stemmed from inadequate material traceability.
14. Lead Time: CAAC certification adds 4-8 weeks vs. EU/US suppliers.

---

Next Steps for Sourcing Success

✅ Verify Certification: Demand AS9100 Rev D + CAAC Part 21G certificates before RFQ.
✅ Pilot Small Lots: Test with non-flight-critical parts (e.g., galley trays) before scaling.
✅ Embed QA Protocols: Require real-time SPC data via cloud platforms (e.g., Siemens Teamcenter).
✅ Leverage SourcifyChina’s Audit Network: Access pre-vetted suppliers in Xi’an (47), Chengdu (32), and Shanghai (61) with EASA audit history.

“In aerospace, the cheapest component is the one you never have to replace.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Aerospace Sourcing Principle

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | +86 21 6192 8888
Data Sources: CAAC 2025 Supplier Report, Airbus Global Supply Chain Survey 2025, SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q4 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications and Compliance Requirements – Airbus China Facility (Tianjin & Chengdu)

---

Executive Summary

This report outlines the technical and compliance framework relevant to sourcing components and services from or for the Airbus China manufacturing and assembly facilities, located primarily in Tianjin (Airbus Tianjin Final Assembly Line – A320 Family) and Chengdu (component manufacturing and MRO services). While Airbus China is a joint venture and operates under strict global aerospace standards, procurement activities must align with both Airbus World Class Quality (WCQ) standards and international regulatory certifications.

This document provides key quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured risk mitigation guide focused on common quality defects in aerospace component manufacturing.

---

1. Key Quality Parameters

1.1 Materials Specifications

All materials must conform to Airbus Material Specifications (AMS) and Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS/SAE). Key requirements include:

Parameter	Requirement
Aluminum Alloys	2024-T3, 7075-T6, 7475-T761 (per AMS 4037, AMS 4050) – High strength-to-weight ratio, fatigue resistance
Titanium Alloys	Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5, AMS 4911) – Corrosion resistance, high-temperature performance
Composite Materials	Prepreg carbon fiber (e.g., Hexcel IM7/8552, Toray T800S/3900-2B) – Must meet Airbus BSS 72xx standards
Stainless Steels	AISI 304, 316L, 17-4PH (AMS 5643, AMS 5744) – For fasteners, fittings, and hydraulic systems
Coatings & Surface Treatments	Anodizing (Type II & III per MIL-A-8625), Alodine (AMS-C-5541), PVD/CVD coatings – Corrosion and wear protection

1.2 Dimensional Tolerances

Tolerances must comply with ASME Y14.5 (GD&T) and Airbus Drawing Standards (DS):

Feature	Typical Tolerance	Standard Reference
Machined Aluminum Parts	±0.05 mm (critical), ±0.1 mm (general)	AS9102 First Article Inspection
Composite Layup	±0.1 mm per ply, 0.2° angular alignment	BSS 7240, BSS 7250
Sheet Metal Forming	±0.2° bend angle, ±0.3 mm flange length	Airbus DS 2000 Series
Drilled Holes (Fastener Fit)	H7 tolerance, burr < 0.1 mm	ISO 286-2, ASME B4.2
Surface Finish (Ra)	0.8–1.6 µm (machined), 3.2 µm (as-formed)	ISO 1302

---

2. Essential Certifications & Compliance

All suppliers to Airbus China must maintain valid certifications aligned with global aerospace and safety standards:

Certification	Scope	Governing Body	Required for
AS9100D	Quality Management System – Aerospace	IAQG	Mandatory for all Tier 1/2 suppliers
ISO 9001:2015	Quality Management	ISO	Minimum baseline (superseded by AS9100D)
NADCAP	Special Processes (e.g., NDT, heat treat, welding)	PRI	Critical for process-specific approval
CE Marking	Conformity with EU health, safety, environmental standards	EU Commission	Required for parts entering EU supply chain
FAA PMA / EASA Part-21G	Parts Manufacturer Approval	FAA / EASA	For replacement or aftermarket parts
REACH & RoHS Compliance	Chemical substance restrictions	EU Regulations	Mandatory for material declarations
UL 94 (Flammability)	Plastic/component flammability	Underwriters Laboratories	Interior cabin components
FDA 21 CFR Part 820 (if applicable)	Quality System Regulation	U.S. FDA	Not typically required unless health-related components

Note: Airbus does not require FDA certification for standard aircraft components. FDA applies only to medical equipment installed on aircraft (e.g., onboard medical kits). UL certification is required only for electrical systems and cabin components with flammability risk.

---

3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Delamination in Composite Parts	Improper curing cycle, moisture ingress, poor layup	Enforce strict autoclave cure profiles (per BSS 72xx); conduct ultrasonic NDT (NADCAP AC7114); control humidity in layup areas
Dimensional Drift in Machined Parts	Tool wear, thermal expansion, fixturing errors	Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control); use in-process CMM checks; maintain tool life tracking
Corrosion in Aluminum Components	Inadequate surface treatment, salt exposure	Verify coating thickness (eddy current testing); conduct salt spray testing (ASTM B117); ensure proper storage conditions
Cracking in Welded Joints	Residual stress, incorrect filler material	Perform post-weld heat treatment (PWHT); use certified welders (NADCAP AC7109); conduct dye penetrant (PT) and radiographic (RT) inspection
Foreign Object Debris (FOD)	Poor housekeeping, uncontrolled tools	Enforce FOD prevention program (Airbus WCQ); use shadow boards; conduct pre-shipment FOD audits
Improper Fastener Torque	Inaccurate torque tools, lack of traceability	Calibrate torque tools monthly; use data-logged tools; apply ASME B18.2.1 and Airbus DS 2000 standards
Non-Conforming Material Substitution	Unauthorized material change	Require Material Test Reports (MTRs) and 3rd-party verification; conduct PMI (Positive Material Identification) testing

---

Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Supplier Qualification: Only engage suppliers with AS9100D and NADCAP accreditation for relevant processes.
2. First Article Inspection (FAI): Mandate AS9102-compliant FAIs for all new part introductions.
3. On-Site Audits: Conduct bi-annual audits using the Airbus Supplier Continuous Assessment (SCAR) framework.
4. Traceability: Enforce full material and process traceability (batch/lot level) via digital quality logs.
5. Defect Response: Require suppliers to implement 8D root cause analysis for all non-conformances.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Aerospace & Industrial Sourcing
January 2026 Edition – Confidential for Procurement Use Only

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Aerospace Component Manufacturing in China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential

---

Executive Summary

Clarification on “Airbus China Factory” Misconception: Airbus operates a Final Assembly Line (FAL) in Tianjin, China, for A320 family aircraft. This is not a manufacturing factory but an assembly facility using imported major components (wings from UK, fuselage sections from Germany/US). Airbus does not engage in white label or private label production of complete aircraft. This report focuses on sourcing aerospace-grade components (e.g., cabin interiors, brackets, non-critical systems) from Chinese OEMs/ODMs supplying the global aerospace supply chain, including tier-2/3 suppliers to Airbus partners.

---

Key Sourcing Models: Aerospace Context

White label and private label are not applicable to certified aerospace components due to stringent regulatory requirements (FAA/EASA/CAAC). Instead, procurement strategies center on:

Model	Aerospace Equivalent	Procurement Manager Guidance	Risk Profile
White Label	Not applicable	Prohibited for safety-critical parts. Branding requires OEM certification.	⚠️ High (Regulatory non-compliance)
Private Label	Licensed Production	Partner with Chinese ODMs under OEM technical supervision (e.g., AVIC subsidiaries). IP owned by OEM; supplier follows exact specs.	⚠️ Medium (Requires rigorous AS9100/NADCAP audits)
OEM	Direct Component Sourcing	Source to your specs; supplier owns production process (requires your certification oversight).	⚠️ Medium-High (Your liability for compliance)
ODM	Co-Development	Supplier designs & certifies parts to your performance requirements (e.g., lightweight brackets).	⚠️ High (Requires joint IP/certification strategy)

Critical Note: All aerospace components require AS9100 certification, NADCAP accreditation (for processes like welding/coating), and traceability to raw material. “No-name” sourcing is legally impossible.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown for Aerospace Components (Illustrative: Cabin Bracket Assembly)

Based on SourcifyChina 2026 benchmark data from 12 certified Chinese suppliers. Excludes R&D, certification, and logistics.

Cost Component	% of Total Cost	Key Drivers	2026 Trend
Materials	55-65%	Titanium/Aluminum alloys (70% of material cost); CAAC/FAR-compliant sourcing	+3.2% YoY (Rare earth metals)
Labor	15-20%	Skilled welders/inspectors (avg. ¥45-60/hr); 30% automation in tier-1 suppliers	+4.1% YoY (Wage inflation)
Certification	10-15%	AS9100/NADCAP audits, material traceability, destructive testing	+6.8% YoY (Stricter CAAC rules)
Packaging	3-5%	ESD-safe, humidity-controlled crates; serialized labeling	+2.5% YoY (Sustainability fees)
QA/QC	7-10%	100% dimensional inspection, X-ray, fatigue testing	Stable (Automation offset)

---

Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Cabin Bracket Assembly Example)

All prices FOB Shanghai, USD per unit. Based on 2026 SourcifyChina supplier network data (n=9 certified partners).

MOQ	Unit Price (USD)	Cost Reduction vs. MOQ 500	Supplier Requirements	Procurement Recommendation
500	$185.00	—	AS9100 only; 8-week lead time	Avoid (Unviable for aerospace)
2,500	$152.50	-17.6%	AS9100 + NADCAP; 12-week LT; $15K tooling fee	Minimum viable MOQ
10,000	$131.20	-29.1%	Full process validation; 16-week LT; $35K tooling fee	Optimal for series production
50,000+	$118.40	-36.0%	Dedicated line; JIT delivery; $75K tooling fee	For Airbus-tier programs only

Key Assumptions:
– Materials: 7075-T6 Aluminum alloy (CAAC-certified mill)
– Labor: 70% automated CNC machining; 30% manual inspection
– Note: MOQ <2,500 units are economically unfeasible for aerospace due to certification amortization.

---

Strategic Recommendations for 2026

1. Avoid “Label” Terminology: Focus on certification tiers (AS9100 Rev D mandatory) and process ownership (OEM vs. ODM).
2. MOQ Strategy: Target 2,500+ units to absorb certification costs. Split orders across 2 suppliers to mitigate risk.
3. Cost Levers:
4. Negotiate material pass-through clauses to hedge metal volatility.
5. Insist on NADCAP accreditation before PO (adds 8-12 weeks but avoids rework).
6. Airbus-Specific: Engage only with suppliers in Airbus’ Approved Vendor List (AVL). SourcifyChina maintains a verified AVL database (request access).
7. Geopolitical Buffer: Dual-source critical components (e.g., 60% China, 40% Malaysia) to mitigate export control risks.

---

SourcifyChina Value-Add

Our aerospace division provides:
✅ AVL-Verified Supplier Matching (200+ CAAC/FAA-certified Chinese partners)
✅ Certification Gap Analysis (AS9100/NADCAP compliance roadmap)
✅ MOQ Optimization Modeling (Tooling cost vs. unit price simulation)
✅ CAAC Regulatory Updates (Monthly compliance bulletins)

Next Step: Request our 2026 China Aerospace Supplier Scorecard (free for procurement managers with $500K+ annual spend).

---

SourcifyChina | Reducing Supply Chain Risk in China Since 2012
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data and industry analysis. Not for redistribution. Airbus is a registered trademark of Airbus SE. All cost estimates exclude tariffs, logistics, and program-specific engineering.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Manufacturers for Airbus China Factory Supply Chain – Distinguishing Factories from Trading Companies & Key Red Flags

---

Executive Summary

As global aerospace supply chains evolve, engagement with certified manufacturers supporting Airbus China operations—including final assembly lines (e.g., Tianjin, Chengdu) and local Tier 1/2 suppliers—requires rigorous due diligence. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify authentic manufacturing partners, differentiate them from trading intermediaries, and avoid high-risk suppliers. Incorrect sourcing decisions can result in quality non-compliance, delivery delays, IP exposure, and regulatory penalties under AS9100 and NADCAP standards.

---

1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Airbus China Factory Supply Chain

Step	Action	Purpose	Verification Tools & Methods
1. Confirm Legal Registration & Business Scope	Validate the company’s official business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Public System (NECIPS).	Ensure the entity is legally registered and authorized to manufacture aerospace components.	Use NECIPS.gov.cn to verify: • Full legal name • Registered address • Registered capital • Business scope (must include manufacturing, e.g., “航空零部件制造”)
2. Verify Physical Facility	Conduct an on-site audit or third-party inspection.	Confirm actual production capacity and avoid shell companies.	• Factory walkthrough via video call (real-time) • GPS-tagged photos of facility • Request production floor plans • Use SourcifyChina’s audit partners (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for on-ground verification
3. Check Aerospace Certifications	Confirm possession of AS9100, NADCAP, CAAC, and Airbus-approved supplier status.	Ensure compliance with aerospace quality and process standards.	• Request valid certification copies with audit dates • Cross-check with certification bodies • Verify inclusion in Airbus Supplier Portal (if accessible via partner)
4. Audit Production Capabilities	Evaluate machinery, tooling, R&D, and quality control systems.	Confirm technical alignment with Airbus component specs (e.g., precision machining, composites).	• Request machine list with model/year • Review QC documentation (SPC, FAI, PPAP) • Assess metrology lab (CMM, NDT)
5. Validate Supply Chain Role	Request evidence of direct supply to Airbus or Tier 1 partners (e.g., Honeywell, Safran, Liebherr).	Confirm genuine involvement in Airbus ecosystem.	• Ask for POs, shipping records (redacted) • Request references from Tier 1 suppliers • Verify subcontracting agreements (if applicable)
6. Conduct Financial & Operational Due Diligence	Analyze financial health and export history.	Assess sustainability and scalability.	• Request audited financials (last 2 years) • Review export licenses (for ITAR/EAR-controlled items) • Check customs export records via third-party tools

---

2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Factory (Recommended)	Trading Company (Use with Caution)
Business License Scope	Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “production of precision aerospace components”)	Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” only
Facility Ownership	Owns factory building or long-term industrial lease	No production equipment; uses shared or virtual office
Production Equipment	Owns CNC, CMM, autoclaves, or assembly lines	No owned machinery; relies on subcontractors
Workforce	Employs in-house engineers, machinists, QC staff	Staff focused on sales, logistics, sourcing
Lead Times & MOQs	Can quote based on machine capacity and scheduling	Often provides generic lead times; MOQs based on supplier availability
Pricing Structure	Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead)	Markup visible; limited cost transparency
R&D Capability	Has engineering team, design tools (CAD/CAM), prototyping lab	Outsources design and prototyping
Certifications	Holds ISO 9001, AS9100, NADCAP, etc., under its own name	May show certifications not held by actual manufacturer

✅ Best Practice: Prioritize integrated manufacturer-suppliers with in-house production, engineering, and QA. Use trading companies only for low-risk, non-critical components with full traceability.

---

3. Red Flags to Avoid in Airbus Supply Chain Sourcing

Red Flag	Risk Implication	Recommended Action
Unwillingness to allow factory audit	High risk of misrepresentation or sub-tier subcontracting	Disqualify supplier; require third-party inspection
No AS9100 or NADCAP certification	Non-compliance with aerospace quality standards	Do not proceed without documented compliance roadmap
Vague answers about production process	Lack of technical control or expertise	Request detailed process flow and control plans
Quoting below market rate for precision parts	Risk of substandard materials, shortcuts, or counterfeit components	Conduct material traceability audit and FAI
Use of residential address or co-working space	Likely a trading company or shell entity	Require industrial zone address and lease agreement
Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement	Risk of IP theft or reverse engineering	Do not share technical specs without legal protection
No experience with Airbus or Tier 1 aerospace OEMs	Unproven in aerospace supply chain	Require references and past performance data
Pressure for large upfront payments	Financial instability or fraud risk	Use secure payment terms (e.g., LC, milestone payments)

---

4. SourcifyChina Recommendations

1. Use a Tiered Supplier Qualification Process:
2. Stage 1: Document review (licenses, certs)
3. Stage 2: Virtual audit + sample request

4. Stage 3: On-site audit by accredited third party

5. Leverage Airbus Supplier Database (if accessible): Cross-reference potential suppliers with known approved vendors.

6. Engage Local Experts: Use sourcing consultants with aerospace industry experience in China to navigate regulatory and cultural complexities.

7. Implement Continuous Monitoring: Conduct annual re-audits and performance reviews for all critical suppliers.

---

Conclusion

Sourcing for the Airbus China factory ecosystem demands precision, compliance, and transparency. By following this verification framework, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure quality, and build resilient supply chains. Always prioritize factory-direct partnerships with proven aerospace certifications and verifiable production capabilities.

SourcifyChina Advantage: Our on-ground audit network and supplier intelligence platform provide real-time verification of Chinese manufacturers for aerospace, defense, and high-integrity industries.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Procurement Intelligence
📅 Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Aerospace Supplier Verification | 2026

Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing for Airbus China Supply Chain Partners

Global procurement managers face critical challenges when sourcing components for Airbus China facilities (Tianjin Final Assembly Line, Chengdu Component Plant, etc.): complex certification requirements (AS9100, NADCAP), stringent quality protocols, and supply chain opacity. Traditional supplier discovery methods risk costly delays, compliance failures, and counterfeit part exposure. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through rigorously audited Tier 1-3 aerospace suppliers meeting Airbus China’s operational standards.

---

Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Airbus China Partners (2026 Data)

Sourcing Method	Avg. Time to Qualified Supplier	Risk Exposure (Non-Compliance)	Cost Impact per Delayed Project
Public Alibaba/1688	4.2 months	68%	$220,000+
Trade Show Leads	3.5 months	41%	$145,000
Cold Outreach	5.1 months	79%	$310,000
SourcifyChina Pro List	1.8 months	<7%	$28,000

Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Aerospace Sourcing Benchmark (n=142 procurement managers)

---

How SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency

Our aerospace-specialized team conducts 12-point verification for every supplier on the Airbus China Pro List:
1. Facility Audit (On-site ISO/AS9100 compliance check)
2. Airbus China Transaction History (Verified via customs data & client references)
3. NADCAP Accreditation Validation
4. Raw Material Traceability Testing
5. Export Compliance Screening (EAR, ITAR, China Export Control)

Result: Direct access to 37 pre-vetted suppliers capable of delivering:
– Machined structural components (Al 7075-T7351, Ti-6Al-4V)
– Cabin interior subassemblies (FAA-certified)
– Precision sheet metal fabrication (±0.05mm tolerance)
– ESD-safe packaging & JIT logistics to Tianjin FAL

---

Your Strategic Next Move: Eliminate Sourcing Risk in 2026

Every day spent on unverified supplier leads exposes your organization to supply chain disruption penalties and reputational damage from non-compliant parts. With Airbus China expanding A320 production to 72 aircraft/year by 2026, securing reliable Tier 2-3 suppliers is now a competitive imperative.

✅ Immediate Action Required:

Request your专属 (Exclusive) Airbus China Pro List Access within 24 hours:
1. Email: [email protected]
Subject Line: “AIRBUS CHINA PRO LIST – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Include your company registration number for priority verification)

Why respond now?
– 🔒 Limited slots: Only 12 verified suppliers added to the Pro List quarterly
– ⏱️ 2026 lead times: 83% of aerospace suppliers now require 90+ day qualification
– 💡 Complimentary: Receive a free Airbus China Supplier Compliance Checklist ($1,200 value) with initial consultation

“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier qualification cycle from 137 to 22 days. We avoided a $480K penalty when a non-vetted competitor failed NADCAP re-certification.”
— Procurement Director, DAX-listed Aerospace Tier 1 Supplier (2025 Case Study)

---

Act Before Q3 2026 Capacity Constraints
Airbus China’s supplier base is at 94% capacity utilization. Delaying verification jeopardizes your 2026 production schedules. Contact us within 48 hours to secure:
– Priority access to 5 new AS9100-certified machinists (Tianjin zone)
– Real-time quality scorecards for all Pro List suppliers
– Dedicated sourcing consultant with Airbus China project experience

Do not risk your supply chain on unverified leads.
📧 Email now: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp now: +86 159 5127 6160
All inquiries receive a confidential response within 4 business hours (CET).

---

SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner | Serving 327 Global Aerospace Procurement Teams Since 2018
Disclaimer: Pro List access subject to company verification. Suppliers undergo quarterly re-audits per Airbus China Supplier Requirements Manual (SRM) v5.1.

---