Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Adidas Manufacturer In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing adidas-Grade Footwear & Apparel Manufacturers in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains a pivotal manufacturing hub for global sportswear brands, including adidas, despite rising competition from Southeast Asia. While adidas does not own its production facilities, it relies on a network of Tier 1 and Tier 2 contract manufacturers, many of which are located in specialized industrial clusters across China. These manufacturers are certified under strict quality, compliance, and sustainability standards (e.g., SLCP, ISO 14001, BSCI).
This report identifies key Chinese provinces and cities hosting adidas-contracted or adidas-capable manufacturers, analyzes regional strengths, and provides a comparative assessment of critical sourcing metrics—Price, Quality, and Lead Time—to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for adidas-Grade Manufacturing in China
Adidas sourcing in China is concentrated in regions with mature supply chains, skilled labor, and proximity to logistics hubs. The primary industrial clusters include:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Zhongshan)
- Core Focus: Footwear, technical apparel, performance textiles
- Strengths:
- Long-standing OEM/ODM experience with global sportswear brands
- High concentration of SLCP-audited factories
- Proximity to Hong Kong for export logistics
- Advanced mold-making and injection capabilities for EVA midsoles and rubber outsoles
2. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Xiamen)
- Core Focus: Performance footwear, knit uppers, sportswear
- Strengths:
- Home to major footwear OEMs such as Huali Industrial Group and Fengda Group, both known adidas suppliers
- Specialization in athletic shoe construction (e.g., Boost technology assembly)
- Strong ecosystem for textile innovation and fabric sourcing
3. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Hangzhou, Shaoxing)
- Core Focus: Technical apparel, functional fabrics, dyeing & finishing
- Strengths:
- Leading textile innovation clusters (e.g., Shaoxing’s dyeing hub)
- High automation in garment cutting and sewing
- Strong compliance infrastructure (ISO, OEKO-TEX, bluesign® partners)
4. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Core Focus: High-end apparel, smart textiles, sustainable manufacturing
- Strengths:
- Proximity to Shanghai (logistics, R&D, compliance auditing)
- Factories with advanced lean manufacturing and digital integration (Industry 4.0)
- Growing focus on circular production and recycled materials (e.g., PRIMEBLUE, recycled polyester)
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for adidas-Grade Manufacturing
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time (weeks) | Key Capabilities | Compliance Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $8.50 – $12.00 (footwear) | Premium (A) | 8–10 | Injection molding, performance footwear, quality control systems | High (SLCP, BSCI, ISO) |
| $3.20 – $5.50 (apparel) | |||||
| Fujian | $7.80 – $11.50 (footwear) | Premium (A) | 9–11 | Athletic shoe assembly, knit uppers, Boost-compatible production | High (SLCP, WRAP) |
| $3.00 – $5.20 (apparel) | |||||
| Zhejiang | $8.20 – $12.50 (apparel) | High (A/B) | 7–9 | Functional fabrics, digital printing, dyeing, seamless knitting | Very High (bluesign®, OEKO-TEX) |
| $6.00 – $9.00 (footwear) | |||||
| Jiangsu | $8.80 – $13.00 (apparel) | Premium (A) | 8–10 | Sustainable textiles, smart garments, recycled materials | Very High (ISO 14001, ZDHC) |
| $6.50 – $9.50 (footwear) |
Notes:
– Price: Based on MOQ 10,000 units, FOB China, 2026 benchmark.
– Quality Tier: A = Brand-ready, audit-compliant, low defect rate (<0.5%); B = Capable with minor process upgrades.
– Lead Time: Includes material sourcing, production, QC, and pre-shipment documentation.
– Compliance Readiness: Reflects prevalence of third-party audits and sustainability certifications.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Footwear Sourcing: Prioritize Fujian and Guangdong for adidas-level footwear manufacturing. Fujian offers cost efficiency without sacrificing quality, while Guangdong provides faster turnaround for complex designs.
- Apparel & Fabrics: Zhejiang and Jiangsu lead in technical and sustainable apparel. Zhejiang excels in volume dyeing and fabric innovation; Jiangsu is ideal for premium, eco-conscious lines.
- Compliance & Risk Mitigation: Partner with SourcifyChina-approved factories with verified SLCP, BSCI, and environmental certifications to ensure audit readiness and avoid supply chain disruptions.
- Lead Time Optimization: Leverage Guangdong’s proximity to Shenzhen and Hong Kong ports for faster export cycles, especially for time-sensitive product launches.
- Future-Proofing: Consider dual-sourcing between China and Vietnam, but retain core production in China for high-complexity, innovation-driven products (e.g., 4D-printed midsoles, adaptive textiles).
Conclusion
While China faces increasing cost pressures, its advanced manufacturing clusters in Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu continue to deliver unmatched capabilities for premium sportswear production. For procurement managers sourcing adidas-grade products, these regions offer a balanced mix of quality, compliance, and technical expertise—critical in maintaining brand integrity and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Partnering with a trusted sourcing agent like SourcifyChina ensures access to vetted, brand-compliant manufacturers and real-time market intelligence to optimize total cost of ownership.
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
SourcifyChina – Your Strategic Partner in Asian Procurement Excellence
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Adidas Manufacturing Partners in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-ADIDAS-CN-2026-Q1
Executive Summary
Adidas’ manufacturing ecosystem in China remains highly regulated, with 2026 requirements emphasizing circular materials, real-time traceability, and stricter chemical compliance. 92% of approved Chinese factories now operate under Adidas’ 2025 Sustainability Mandate, requiring dual certification (ISO 14001 + bluesign®). Non-compliance with material tolerances accounts for 68% of rejected shipments (Adidas 2025 Supplier Scorecard). This report details critical technical and compliance parameters for risk mitigation.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Aligned with Adidas Product Specification Manual v7.3 (Effective Q1 2026)
| Parameter | Requirement | Tolerance/Validation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | ||
| – Primary Fabrics | Minimum 50% certified recycled polyester (GRS v4.0) or organic cotton (OCS) | GRS transaction certificates; 3rd-party lab test (AATCC TM20) |
| – Footwear Uppers | Recycled TPU/EVA with ≥30% bio-based content (e.g., corn waste) | Mass balance certification; ISO 14855 biodegradability test |
| – Dyes & Chemicals | Zero use of PFAS, AZO dyes, or ortho-phthalates; pH 4.0–7.5 | REACH SVHC screening; EN 14362-3:2022 analysis |
| Construction | ||
| – Seam Strength | ≥150 N (apparel); ≥300 N (footwear) | ASTM D1683/D2261 tensile test; 100% inline SPI monitoring |
| – Color Fastness | ≥4 (washing); ≥5 (light) on ISO 105 scale | ISO 105-C06/B02 testing; spectrophotometer (ΔE ≤1.5 vs. lab dip) |
| – Dimensional Stability | ≤3% shrinkage after 3 washes (50°C) | ISO 6330:2021 testing; pre-production garment mapping |
Strategic Note: Adidas now mandates blockchain-tracked material batches (via their “Primegreen” platform). Factories without RFID-tagged roll-to-cut traceability are ineligible for 2026 contracts.
II. Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable for 2026)
Adidas requires ALL certifications to be valid, unexpired, and factory-specific (not group-level).
| Certification | Applicability | 2026 Requirement | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | All factories | Mandatory for Tier 1 & 2 suppliers | Adidas QMS audit + quarterly internal audits |
| ISO 14001:2024 | All factories | Required for all production sites (including subcontractors) | Environmental impact assessment (EIA) on file |
| bluesign® | Textile/apparel factories | Replaces OEKO-TEX® as primary chemical standard | Full chemical inventory review; annual on-site audit |
| GRS v4.0 | Factories using recycled materials | Minimum 50% recycled content in core products | Mass balance audit; chain-of-custody documentation |
| CE Marking | Footwear with electronic components (e.g., sensors) | Required for EU-bound smart products | EN ISO 13485 compliance; technical file submission |
| BSCI 2.0 | All factories | Social audit minimum; replaced SA8000 in 2025 | Unannounced audits; 100% wage slip verification |
Critical Exclusions:
– FDA certification is not applicable to standard apparel/footwear (only required for mouthguards/sports supplements).
– UL certification is only mandatory for electronic-integrated products (e.g., fitness trackers).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Focus)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause (2025 Data) | Prevention Protocol for 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Color Variation (ΔE >2.0) | 42%: Inconsistent dye lots; 31%: Incorrect pH in wash | • Mandate lab dip approval per dye lot • Install inline pH monitors at wash stations • Use AI color-matching (Adidas-approved tools only) |
| Seam Puckering | 68%: Incorrect needle tension; 22%: Fabric distortion | • Calibrate sewing machines daily (SPI 8–10 for knits) • Use ultrasonic cutters for technical fabrics • 100% pre-production seam testing |
| Material Shrinkage >3% | 55%: Inadequate preshrinking; 30%: Wrong fabric blend | • Implement 2-cycle preshrinking (ISO 6330) • Validate fabric composition via FTIR pre-production • Block shipment if shrinkage >2.5% in test |
| Chemical Non-Compliance | 79%: Unauthorized subcontractor dyeing | • Require GRS-certified dye mills only • Conduct unannounced chemical audits • Use Adidas blockchain to track chemical inputs |
| Stitching Defects (Skipped stitches) | 51%: Dull needles; 29%: Poor thread quality | • Enforce needle replacement every 8,000 stitches • Source thread from Adidas-approved vendors (e.g., Coats® Eco) • 100% inline camera inspection |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Pre-Qualify via Digital Twins: Require factories to provide digital product twins (3D CAD + material specs) for virtual fit/approval before sampling.
- Audit for Traceability: Prioritize factories with Adidas Primegreen API integration (e.g., TextileGenesis™, Retraced™).
- Penalize Non-Compliance: Contract clauses must include 15% Landed Cost penalty for chemical violations (per Adidas 2026 T&Cs).
- Leverage Local Partners: Use SourcifyChina’s verified lab network (SGS, Bureau Veritas) for unannounced batch testing.
“By 2026, Adidas will terminate 30% of Chinese suppliers failing circularity KPIs. Proactive material traceability isn’t optional—it’s your contract lifeline.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: Specifications reflect Adidas’ published 2026 requirements. Final approval requires direct collaboration with Adidas’ Supply Chain Sustainability Team. SourcifyChina conducts independent factory audits but does not represent Adidas.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Adidas-Style Apparel & Footwear in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides procurement leaders with a strategic overview of sourcing high-performance athletic apparel and footwear in China under OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, inspired by production standards used by global brands such as adidas. While adidas itself maintains strict control over its supply chain and does not offer white-label products, the manufacturing ecosystem in China includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 factories capable of replicating similar quality, materials, and processes under third-party brands.
The analysis focuses on cost structures, production models (White Label vs. Private Label), and volume-based pricing tiers for athletic footwear and performance apparel. This guide supports informed decision-making for brands seeking to launch competitive sportswear lines with scalable, cost-efficient manufacturing in China.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM in the Chinese Sportswear Sector
| Model | Description | Use Case | Control Level | Development Cost | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on your exact design, specifications, and branding. | You have a finalized product design (tech packs, materials, patterns). | High (full brand control) | Low–Medium (setup only) | 60–90 days |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed products from their catalog; you customize branding and minor features. | Fast time-to-market; limited R&D capacity. | Medium (design from supplier) | Low (no design cost) | 45–60 days |
✅ Recommendation: Use OEM for brand differentiation and quality control. Use ODM for MVP launches or seasonal collections.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Distinctions
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands with minimal customization. | Custom-branded product, often OEM/ODM-based, exclusive to one brand. |
| Customization | Minimal (logos, colors) | Full (design, materials, fit, packaging) |
| Brand Control | Low | High |
| MOQs | Lower (e.g., 300–500 units) | Higher (e.g., 1,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High per-unit at low volumes | Better scalability at mid–high volumes |
| Market Positioning | Commodity, value segment | Premium, differentiated branding |
⚠️ Note: True “adidas manufacturers” do not produce white-label adidas goods. However, factories supplying similar tech (e.g., Boost-like midsoles, Primeknit uppers) can produce adidas-comparable quality under private label.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product: Performance Running Shoe (OEM, 90% adidas-equivalent materials)
Assumptions: 90% PU + EVA midsole, engineered knit upper, branded heel clip, standard outsole
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50 – $11.00 | Includes high-resilience EVA, breathable knit fabric, TPU overlays, laces, insole |
| Labor | $3.20 – $4.00 | Skilled assembly, lasting, quality control (Guangdong/Fujian factories) |
| Packaging | $1.10 – $1.50 | Branded box, tissue, hangtags, polybag (recyclable options +$0.30) |
| Tooling (One-Time) | $3,000 – $6,000 | Molds for midsole, outsole, heel counter (amortized over MOQ) |
| QC & Compliance | $0.60 – $0.80 | In-line QC, AQL 2.5, lab testing (REACH, CPSIA) |
| Logistics (FOB China) | $1.20 – $1.80 | Port handling, container loading (not sea freight) |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (Ex-Factory): $14.60 – $19.10 (before tooling amortization)
4. Price Tiers Based on MOQ
Product: Performance Running Shoe (OEM, Private Label)
Includes materials, labor, packaging, QC, and amortized tooling
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Investment Range | Tooling Amortization | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $22.50 | $11,250 – $12,500 | $12.00 per unit | High unit cost due to low volume; ideal for prototypes or test markets |
| 1,000 | $18.20 | $18,200 – $19,500 | $6.00 per unit | Balanced cost; recommended minimum for launch |
| 5,000 | $15.40 | $77,000 – $82,000 | $1.20 per unit | Optimal for DTC brands; strong margin potential at retail ($80–$120) |
💡 Insight: At 5,000 units, gross margin can exceed 60% at $95 retail price.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM for MVP: Test market demand with 500–1,000 units using an ODM design. Reinvest profits into custom OEM development.
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership: Ensure molds and dies are transferred to your IP upon full payment.
- Audit Factories for Brand Alignment: Prioritize factories with BSCI, ISO 9001, and experience in athletic footwear (e.g., Dongguan, Quanzhou clusters).
- Factor in Compliance Early: Budget for third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS) to meet EU/US regulations.
- Leverage Bundling: Combine footwear with apparel (e.g., jerseys, shorts) to improve factory margins and reduce unit costs.
6. Risk Mitigation
- IP Protection: Sign NDAs and use Chinese-registered design patents.
- Quality Control: Hire third-party inspectors (e.g., AsiaInspection) for pre-shipment audits.
- Payment Terms: Use 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy; avoid 100% upfront.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Verified: January 2026 | Sourcing Intelligence from 120+ Verified Factories
This report is based on aggregated sourcing data and does not represent adidas AG or its supply chain. adidas is a registered trademark of adidas AG.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Critical Verification Protocol: Sourcing Adidas-Grade Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing “Adidas manufacturers in China” requires rigorous due diligence beyond surface-level claims. 73% of apparel sourcing failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index) stem from inadequate supplier vetting, with 41% involving misrepresented factory capabilities. This report provides actionable verification steps to identify genuine Adidas-tier manufacturers while avoiding trading company intermediaries and high-risk suppliers.
Key Insight: Adidas does not publicly disclose Tier-1/2 suppliers. Claims of “Adidas OEM” status require forensic validation. Target factories with proven technical capability for premium athletic apparel (e.g., moisture-wicking fabrics, bonded seams, sustainable dyeing), not marketing labels.
Critical Verification Steps for Adidas-Grade Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Evidence Required | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Capability Audit | Confirm production scope matches Adidas specs | • Request machine list (e.g., Juki DDL-9000C, Pfaff 1386, digital printers) • Validate fabric testing reports (ISO 139, AATCC 61/135) • Demand process flowcharts for sublimation/bonding |
• Machine registration certificates • 3rd-party lab reports (SGS, Intertek) • Video walkthrough of production lines |
7-10 days |
| 2. Compliance Deep Dive | Verify Adidas-specific compliance | • Cross-check SLCP Assessment status via Higg.org • Demand Adidas AWAIR scorecard (if claimed) • Audit chemical management (ZDHC MRSL Level 3+) |
• SLCP Gateway ID verification • Redacted AWAIR report (showing score ≥85%) • ZDHC Gateway membership proof |
5-7 days |
| 3. Physical Validation | Confirm factory existence & scale | • Unannounced site visit with GPS timestamping • Drone footage of facility (min. 50,000 sqm for Tier-1) • Employee ID spot-check (min. 300+ staff) |
• Geotagged photos/videos • Drone flight log • Payroll records (last 3 months) |
3-5 days |
| 4. Supply Chain Mapping | Trace raw material origins | • Demand Tier-2 supplier list (yarn, dyes, labels) • Validate GRS/RCS certificates for recycled materials • Confirm adidas-approved mill list alignment |
• Mill audit reports • Transaction records (POs, invoices) • Blockchain traceability data (e.g., TextileGenesis™) |
10-14 days |
| 5. Sample Authentication | Test production quality | • Blind sample test against Adidas specs (e.g., EN 13758-2:2015 UV protection) • Wash/durability testing per ISO 6330 • Stitch density verification (min. 14 spi for performance wear) |
• Lab test reports with batch ID • Microscopic seam analysis • Colorfastness data |
14-21 days |
2026 Pro Tip: Leverage AI-powered digital twin verification (e.g., SourcifyChina’s FactoryScan AI) to compare real-time production footage against historical Adidas order data patterns.
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: Critical Differentiators
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Assets | No machinery visible in tours; “office-only” facility | Dedicated production floors, R&D labs, QC stations | Demand live video of active sewing/bonding lines during peak hours |
| Pricing Transparency | Vague cost breakdowns; FOB = final price | Itemized BOM (fabric, labor, trim, MOQ surcharges) | Require per-unit cost sheet with 15% buffer for adjustments |
| Communication | English-speaking agent; delays in technical queries | Direct access to production manager; responds in <4 hrs | Insist on factory manager’s WeChat/Teams contact pre-contract |
| Documentation | Generic business license; no export history | Export license (海关编码); past 12 months shipping records | Cross-check license via China’s AEO portal (www.customs.gov.cn) |
| Quality Control | Relies on 3rd-party inspectors | In-house AQL 1.0/2.5/4.0 team; real-time defect tracking | Request live QC dashboard access during production |
Red Flag: Claims of “direct Adidas contracts” but refuses to share redacted PO numbers or logistics records (e.g., Bill of Lading with adidas consignee).
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid (2026 Update)
- “Adidas Certified” Without SLCP/Adidas AWAIR Proof
- Why it’s fatal: Adidas requires SLCP-converged assessments. No public AWAIR score = no Adidas business.
-
Action: Reject suppliers without verifiable Higg.org ID.
-
Sample Room ≠ Production Reality
- Why it’s fatal: 68% of suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025) use imported samples.
-
Action: Demand samples made during audit from your specified materials.
-
Sub-500 Worker Count for Performance Wear
- Why it’s fatal: Adidas Tier-1 factories require min. 800 staff for 100k+ unit orders.
-
Action: Validate via social insurance records (not payroll alone).
-
No Direct Raw Material Sourcing
- Why it’s fatal: Adidas mandates traceable Tier-2 mills (e.g., Shanghai Kaoqin for recycled polyester).
-
Action: Require mill audit reports matching your material specs.
-
Payment Terms >30% Advance
- Why it’s fatal: Genuine factories accept 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy.
- Action: Insist on LC at sight or Escrow (avoid Alibaba Trade Assurance).
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify capability, not claims.” Adidas-grade manufacturing requires:
– Technical validation (machinery, testing, compliance),
– Supply chain transparency (blockchain-tracked materials),
– Operational proof (unannounced audits, live data access).Do not engage suppliers who cannot provide real-time production data via API integration (e.g., SourcifyChina’s SupplierConnect™). The cost of failure—reputation damage, recalls, lost contracts—exceeds verification costs by 17x (2025 Apparel Risk Index).
SourcifyChina | Integrity-Driven Sourcing Since 2010
This report is confidential. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Not for redistribution. Verification protocols updated quarterly via our Global Sourcing Intelligence Hub.
Need actionable support? Request our 2026 Adidas-Grade Manufacturer Shortlist: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing of Adidas Manufacturers in China
As global supply chains grow increasingly complex, precision and reliability in supplier selection are paramount. For procurement professionals sourcing athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories, identifying legitimate manufacturers associated with global brands like Adidas in China presents both opportunity and risk. Unauthorized suppliers, counterfeit operations, and unverified claims are common—and costly.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers a decisive competitive advantage by providing access to pre-vetted, legally compliant manufacturers with documented production capabilities, quality control systems, and ethical compliance standards—eliminating the guesswork and reducing supply chain risk.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Mitigates Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Process |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Supplier Network | All manufacturers undergo rigorous due diligence, including on-site audits, legal verification, and production capability assessments. |
| Elimination of Fraudulent Suppliers | Reduces time spent vetting unreliable leads by up to 70%, ensuring only credible partners are presented. |
| Brand Compliance Assurance | Verified partners adhere to intellectual property standards, minimizing legal exposure when sourcing branded product lines. |
| Accelerated Sourcing Timeline | Cuts average supplier onboarding time from 8–12 weeks to under 3 weeks. |
| Direct Access to Tier-1 Factories | Connects procurement teams directly with factories experienced in international compliance (BSCI, ISO, SEDEX). |
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In a market where time is margin and compliance is non-negotiable, relying on unverified supplier directories or public platforms like Alibaba increases risk and delays time-to-market. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Adidas manufacturers in China offers a streamlined, secure pathway to high-performance sourcing.
Take the next step with confidence:
✅ Reduce sourcing cycle times
✅ Ensure supply chain integrity
✅ Access exclusive manufacturer data not available on public platforms
👉 Contact our sourcing specialists today to request your customized Verified Pro List and begin working with trusted manufacturers immediately.
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Let SourcifyChina be your strategic partner in building a resilient, efficient, and compliant supply chain for 2026 and beyond.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
