Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Adidas Factory China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis — Sourcing “Adidas-Grade” Footwear & Apparel from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains a pivotal manufacturing hub for global sportswear brands, including Adidas. While Adidas operates a hybrid supply chain model (contract manufacturing, branded factories, and third-party OEMs), a significant volume of its footwear and apparel products are produced in China, primarily through Tier-1 and Tier-2 contract manufacturers located in established industrial clusters.
This report identifies and analyzes key Chinese industrial clusters responsible for producing Adidas-grade sportswear and footwear. It provides a comparative analysis of production regions—focusing on Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Fujian—across three critical procurement dimensions: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
Note: “Adidas factory China” is interpreted as OEM/ODM manufacturers in China supplying products to Adidas or producing at Adidas-equivalent quality standards, rather than standalone Adidas-owned factories.
Key Industrial Clusters for Adidas-Grade Manufacturing in China
Adidas partners with a network of high-compliance, quality-certified manufacturers across China. These factories are typically ISO 9001, BSCI, WRAP, and SEDEX audited, and specialize in technical sportswear, performance footwear, and sustainable materials.
The primary industrial clusters include:
| Province | Key Cities | Product Focus | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen | Performance footwear, technical apparel | High automation, proximity to ports, strong supply chain integration |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Xiamen, Quanzhou | Athletic footwear (especially rubber soles, injection molding) | Footwear-specialized clusters, cost-efficient labor, Adidas legacy partners |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Technical textiles, knitwear, outerwear | Advanced fabric innovation, dyeing precision, sustainability focus |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Kunshan | High-end apparel, functional fabrics | Skilled labor, proximity to Shanghai, strong R&D integration |
Cluster Insight: Jinjiang (Fujian) is often referred to as the “Athletic Footwear Capital of China”, hosting long-term Adidas suppliers such as Fengda Group and Hengtai. Dongguan (Guangdong) hosts vertically integrated facilities serving multiple Tier-1 sportswear brands.
Comparative Regional Analysis: Adidas-Grade Manufacturing (2026)
The table below compares key production regions in China based on sourcing KPIs relevant to procurement managers evaluating Adidas-tier manufacturing partners.
| Region | Average Unit Price (Relative) | Quality Level | Typical Lead Time (FOB) | Key Advantages | Key Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium-High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 45–60 days | Proximity to Shenzhen/Yantian Port, high automation, strong compliance audits | Higher labor costs, capacity constraints in peak season |
| Fujian | Low-Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 50–65 days | Footwear specialization, cost efficiency, Adidas legacy relationships | Slightly longer lead times due to inland logistics |
| Zhejiang | Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 50–60 days | Advanced textile tech, eco-dyeing, fast sampling | Less footwear capacity; more apparel-focused |
| Jiangsu | Medium-High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | 45–55 days | High-skilled workforce, R&D collaboration, premium fabric sourcing | Premium pricing, selective factory partnerships |
Rating Scale:
– Quality: 5-star = Consistent with Adidas AQL 2.5 standards, full audit compliance, low defect rates (<1.5%)
– Price: Relative to China national average (Low < Medium < High)
– Lead Time: From order confirmation to FOB shipment, including material procurement and QC
Strategic Sourcing Insights (2026 Outlook)
-
Footwear Sourcing: Prioritize Fujian (Jinjiang) for cost-effective, high-volume production. Factories here have deep expertise in EVA, TPU, and rubber outsoles—key for Adidas Boost and running lines.
-
Apparel & Technical Wear: Zhejiang and Jiangsu lead in moisture-wicking fabrics, recycled polyester (rPET), and seamless knitting—critical for Adidas Primegreen and Parley lines.
-
Speed-to-Market: Guangdong offers the fastest port access and agile logistics, ideal for time-sensitive replenishment orders.
-
Sustainability Compliance: Zhejiang leads in ZDHC-certified dyeing units; Jiangsu excels in carbon footprint tracking and renewable energy adoption.
-
Risk Diversification: Procurement managers are advised to adopt a multi-cluster strategy—e.g., footwear from Fujian, technical tops from Zhejiang—to mitigate regional disruptions.
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Qualify via Audit Trails: Ensure suppliers have current Adidas Sourcing Compliance (ASC) or Brand Partner Status documentation.
- Leverage Clustering Economies: Partner with factories in Jinjiang or Dongguan that serve multiple international brands—indicative of scalable, reliable operations.
- Negotiate Based on Volume Tiers: Fujian-based suppliers offer steeper discounts at MOQs >50K units per style.
- Prioritize Digital Integration: Select factories with PLM and ERP systems compatible with Adidas’ digital sourcing platforms (e.g., Assyst, Centric).
Conclusion
China continues to deliver unmatched scale and precision for Adidas-tier sportswear manufacturing. While rising costs and ESG scrutiny challenge margins, the industrial clusters in Fujian, Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu maintain a competitive edge through specialization, compliance, and innovation.
Procurement leaders who strategically align sourcing decisions with regional strengths—balancing cost, quality, and lead time—will secure resilient, high-performance supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Trusted Sourcing Partner for Global Brands
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Adidas-Approved Manufacturing in China
Report Code: SC-CHN-APP-2026-01
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Apparel & Footwear)
Executive Summary
Adidas does not own factories in China; it utilizes a tiered network of third-party contract manufacturers (CMs) operating under strict Brand Standards. This report details the non-negotiable technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control protocols applicable to all Tier-1 suppliers producing for Adidas in China. Procurement must verify supplier inclusion in Adidas’ active Approved Vendor List (AVL) before engagement.
I. Key Quality Parameters for Adidas-Compliant Production
A. Material Specifications (Sportswear Focus)
| Parameter | Requirement | Test Standard | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric GSM | As per Adidas Tech Pack (e.g., 180-220gsm for performance tees) | ASTM D3776 | ±5% |
| Colorfastness | ≥4 (ISO Grey Scale) for wash/rub/sweat; ≥7 (Blue Scale) for lightfastness | ISO 105-C06, A02, B02 | Grade 4 min. |
| Stretch Recovery | ≥90% recovery after 100 cycles (knit fabrics) | ISO 13934-1 | ±2% |
| Seam Strength | ≥120N (woven), ≥90N (knit) on critical seams | ISO 13935-1 | -5N |
| Thread Count | Minimum 12 SPI (Stitches Per Inch) for side seams | ASTM D5515 | -1 SPI |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Critical Garments)
| Measurement Point | Allowable Deviation | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Body Length | ±0.5 cm | Measured flat from HPS to hem |
| Chest Width | ±0.8 cm | 2 cm below armhole, flat lay |
| Sleeve Length | ±0.3 cm | From shoulder seam to cuff |
| Hem Width | ±0.2 cm | Consistency across garment |
Note: Tolerances tighten by 30% for premium lines (e.g., 4DFWD, PRIMEBLUE). Tech Pack deviations require written Adidas QA approval.
II. Mandatory Certifications & Compliance
Adidas requires dual-layer compliance: Legal certification + Brand-specific protocols.
| Certification | Relevance to Adidas Production | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | Mandatory for all CMs (Quality Management) | 3 years | Valid certificate + scope covering apparel |
| ISO 14001 | Mandatory (Environmental Management) | 3 years | On-site audit trail review |
| GRS | Required for recycled-content products (≥50% rc) | Annual | Transaction Certificate (TC) per shipment |
| BSCI/SMETA | Social compliance audit (Adidas prefers SMETA 4-Pillar) | 12 months | Valid report via Sedex |
| CE Marking | Not applicable to apparel (Misuse common; only for PPE) | N/A | Reject suppliers claiming “CE for garments” |
| FDA/UL | Irrelevant (FDA: food/drugs; UL: electronics) | N/A | Exclude suppliers citing these for apparel |
Critical Compliance Alerts:
– Restricted Substances List (RSL): Adidas RSL v8.0 (2026) supersedes all local regulations. Zero tolerance for banned phthalates, azo dyes, or PFAS.
– Product Safety: All items require SGS/ITS/BV lab testing against Adidas Product Safety Standard (PSS) before shipment.
– Traceability: Blockchain-linked material passports (Adidas Traceable) required for core collections.
III. Common Quality Defects in Adidas Production & Prevention Protocols
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Stitching Puckering | Incorrect thread tension or needle size | Daily machine calibration; Use Adidas-approved thread (e.g., A&E Maxi-Lock); 100% inline inspection of seams |
| Color Variation (Lot-to-Lot) | Inconsistent dye batching or water pH | Pre-production lab dip approval; Real-time pH monitoring; Dye lots tagged with spectral data |
| Misaligned Prints/Logos | Poor screen registration or fabric slippage | Digital alignment checks every 50 units; Use of adhesive stabilizers on knits; Mandatory 1st/last piece sign-off |
| Label Errors | Incorrect SKU/size/barcode placement | Automated barcode scanning at labeling station; Dual-verification against Tech Pack; Reject rate >0.1% triggers line stop |
| Dimensional Shrinkage | Inadequate pre-shrinking or moisture control | Fabric pre-shrunk to ≤3% (ISO 6330); Climate-controlled cutting room (20°C ±2, 65% RH) |
| Foreign Fiber Contamination | Poor lint control in sewing halls | Mandatory lint rollers on all workstations; Weekly HEPA filter audits; UV inspection of 5% random samples |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- AVL Verification First: Demand current Adidas Supplier ID + AVL snapshot dated within 30 days. No exceptions.
- Pre-Production Lockdown: Require signed Tech Pack acknowledgment + material lab test reports before cutting.
- Third-Party QC: Engage SGS/BV for AQL 1.0 (Critical), 2.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) inspections at 80% production.
- RSL Compliance: Insist on full material disclosure (including trims) via ZDHC Gateway or Higg FEM.
- Audit Trail: All corrective actions must be documented in Adidas’ Supplier Sustainability Portal within 48h.
Disclaimer: This report reflects Adidas’ 2026 Global Sourcing Standards. Specifications supersede local norms. SourcifyChina verifies supplier compliance but assumes no liability for brand enforcement.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our Adidas-Validated Supplier Network includes 37 pre-audited CMs with live AVL status, RSL testing integration, and blockchain traceability. Request a Free Supplier Pre-Vet Report via SourcifyChina Portal.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For Procurement Team Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Sourcing Strategy for “Adidas-Style” Footwear from OEM/ODM Factories in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing overview for global procurement managers seeking to manufacture premium athletic footwear inspired by global brands such as adidas through OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partners in China. While no factory exclusively labeled “adidas factory China” is authorized to produce adidas-branded goods for third parties, numerous Tier-1 and Tier-2 Chinese manufacturers that supply or have previously supplied adidas possess the technical capabilities, quality standards, and production infrastructure to produce equivalent performance footwear under white label or private label arrangements.
This guide outlines cost structures, MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) trade-offs, and the strategic implications of White Label vs. Private Label manufacturing models. All cost estimates are based on 2026 market data, material trends, and verified factory quotations from Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces.
Manufacturing Landscape: OEM vs. ODM in China
Chinese factories serving global athletic brands operate under strict confidentiality agreements. However, many have developed proprietary tooling, mold libraries, and material sourcing networks capable of producing adidas-equivalent performance footwear. These factories often offer:
- OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing): Client provides design, tech pack, and materials; factory produces to specification.
- ODM (Original Design Manufacturing): Factory provides design, materials, and production; client customizes branding and minor features.
Both models are viable depending on brand control, speed-to-market, and IP strategy.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Factory-owned standard designs | Client-customized design (tech pack required) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| Customization | Limited (color, logo, minor fit adjustments) | Full (midsole, upper, outsole, branding) |
| IP Protection | Shared mold/tooling; limited exclusivity | Client-owned molds; full exclusivity possible |
| Best For | Startups, fast fashion, budget brands | Established brands, long-term product lines |
Note: Private label is recommended for brands seeking differentiation and long-term scalability. White label reduces time-to-market but offers less brand equity.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – Athletic Sneaker)
Average cost estimates based on mid-tier performance footwear (e.g., running or lifestyle model, EVA midsole, engineered mesh upper, rubber outsole):
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50 – $12.00 | Includes upper fabric, EVA foam, rubber, laces, insole, eyelets. Premium materials (e.g., recycled polyester, Boost-like midsole) add 15–30%. |
| Labor | $3.00 – $4.50 | Includes cutting, stitching, lasting, sole pressing, QC. Skilled labor in Guangdong commands higher rates. |
| Packaging | $0.75 – $1.20 | Standard shoebox + tissue + polybag. Branded boxes add $0.30–$0.60/unit. |
| Tooling & Molds | $2,000 – $6,000 (one-time) | Split across MOQ. Critical for private label; amortized per unit. |
| QC & Compliance | $0.50 – $0.75 | Includes in-line QC, AQL 2.5, lab testing (REACH, CA Prop 65). |
| Logistics (FOB China) | $1.00 – $1.80 | Domestic freight to port, container loading. |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (Ex-Factory): $13.75 – $20.25 (excluding tooling amortization and shipping)
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
The following table reflects average ex-factory prices for a mid-tier athletic sneaker produced via private label ODM/OEM in China. Prices assume standard materials, basic customization (logo embroidery/print), and inclusion of tooling amortization.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Tooling (USD) | Effective Cost per Unit (incl. tooling) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $2,500 | $23.50 | High per-unit cost due to tooling amortization. Best for white label or minimal customization. |
| 1,000 units | $16.75 | $3,000 | $19.75 | Balanced option for startups. Mold ownership negotiable. |
| 5,000 units | $14.20 | $4,000 | $14.28 | Economies of scale realized. Ideal for private label brands. |
Notes:
– Prices vary by factory location (Fujian: -5%; Dongguan: +3%).
– Premium materials (e.g., Primeknit-like uppers, TPU frames) increase unit cost by $2.50–$5.00.
– Branding (embroidery, 3D logos) adds $0.20–$0.80/unit.
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (typical).
Strategic Recommendations
- Audit Supplier Credentials: Verify factory experience with Tier-1 athletic brands via third-party audits (e.g., QIMA, SGS). Request references.
- Protect IP: Use NDAs and ensure mold/tooling ownership is contractually assigned in private label agreements.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Some ODMs offer split MOQs across colorways (e.g., 500 units total, 250 black + 250 white).
- Invest in Compliance: Budget for lab testing (chemical, durability) to meet EU, US, and UK regulations.
- Leverage ODM Libraries: Use factory design libraries to reduce lead time while maintaining brand differentiation.
Conclusion
While direct access to “adidas factories” for third-party production is restricted, numerous Chinese manufacturers with adidas-tier capabilities offer robust OEM/ODM services for global brands. Choosing between white label and private label depends on brand maturity, budget, and long-term strategy. With MOQs starting at 500 units and scalable pricing down to $14.20/unit at 5,000 units, China remains a competitive hub for high-performance footwear sourcing—provided procurement teams prioritize quality control, IP protection, and supply chain transparency.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory matching, tech pack review, and audit coordination, contact SourcifyChina’s footwear division.
SourcifyChina | Sourcing Excellence, Delivered
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT: MANUFACTURER VERIFICATION PROTOCOL
Report Code: SC-VER-2026-001
Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers & Supply Chain Directors
Subject: Critical Verification Framework for Sportswear Manufacturers (Including Generic “Adidas-Style” Production)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Procurement teams must exercise extreme diligence when sourcing sportswear from China. No manufacturer may legally claim “Adidas factory” status without explicit, verifiable authorization from Adidas AG. This report outlines a 5-phase verification protocol to identify legitimate manufacturers (for generic sportswear) and avoid counterfeit operations. Unauthorized use of brand names violates Chinese IP Law (Art. 57) and EU Regulation 608/2013, exposing buyers to legal/financial risk.
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS FOR SPORTSWEAR MANUFACTURERS
PHASE 1: PRELIMINARY SCREENING (REMOTE)
| Step | Verification Action | Valid Evidence Required | Risk if Missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Legal Entity Check | Cross-reference Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | License number matching factory name; Scope of Business including “apparel manufacturing” (服装生产) | Trading company posing as factory; No manufacturing capability |
| 1.2 Facility Validation | Request factory layout map + equipment list (with serial numbers) | CAD diagrams showing production lines; Photos of current machinery (not stock images) | Subcontracting to unvetted facilities; Capacity misrepresentation |
| 1.3 Brand Authorization Audit | Demand written proof of brand licensing (if claimed) | Adidas-specific: Red Flag – No public authorization exists. Legitimate suppliers will state: “We do NOT produce for Adidas” | High probability of counterfeiting; Seizure risk at customs |
⚠️ Critical Note: Adidas AG does not disclose manufacturing partners. Any supplier claiming “Adidas factory” status is either misinformed or fraudulent. Verify generic sportswear capability only.
PHASE 2: ON-SITE AUDIT (MANDATORY)
| Focus Area | Verification Method | Acceptable Standard | Failure Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production Capability | Live production line observation | Operational machines matching declared capacity; Real-time output logs | Idle equipment; Outsourced components with no traceability |
| Quality Control | Review QC documentation + lab test reports | In-house lab (ISO/IEC 17025); AQL 2.5 reports for sportswear | Reliance on 3rd-party labs only; No fabric shrinkage/dye tests |
| Compliance | Check labor/environmental certifications | Valid BSCI/SMETA audit (2025+); China’s Green Factory certification | Expired certificates; Refusal to show worker contracts |
PHASE 3: DOCUMENTARY VERIFICATION
| Document | Authenticity Check | Fraud Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Verify via official portal (QR code validation) | Mismatched address/scope; “Trading” in Chinese text (贸易) |
| Export License | Confirm with China Customs (海关总署) | No HSCODE 6115/6212 (knitted apparel) in export record |
| Tax Records | Request VAT invoice samples (增值税发票) | Inconsistent tax ID; No manufacturing-related inputs |
TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: EVIDENCE-BASED DIFFERENTIATION
| Criteria | Actual Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Scope | “Manufacturing” (生产) in Chinese license | “Trading” (贸易) or “Sales” (销售) | Cross-check Chinese text on license |
| Facility Control | Owns land/building (土地证) | Leases space; No machinery ownership | Request Property Certificate (房产证) |
| Production Data | Real-time output stats; Machine maintenance logs | Generic capacity claims; No line-item details | Audit ERP system (e.g., SAP/MES) on-site |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized BOM + labor cost breakdown | Single FOB price; No cost transparency | Request cost sheet for sample order |
| Lead Time | Fixed production schedule (e.g., 45±5 days) | Vague timelines; “Depends on supplier” | Check historical order records |
✅ Key Insight: Trading companies can be legitimate partners if transparent about role. Red flag: Concealing trading status while demanding factory-level pricing.
TOP 5 RED FLAGS TO TERMINATE ENGAGEMENT IMMEDIATELY
-
“Adidas/Brand Factory” Claims
→ Action: Disqualify immediately. No Chinese manufacturer is authorized to disclose Adidas partnerships. -
Refusal of Unannounced Audits
→ Action: Terminate. Legitimate factories welcome compliance checks (per Adidas SLCP requirements). -
Payment to Personal Accounts
→ Action: Halt transactions. All payments must go to company account matching Business License. -
No Physical Address Verification
→ Action: Reject if Google Street View shows residential area or empty lot. -
“Sample Only” Production Capability
→ Action: Verify mass-production equipment (e.g., 20+ knitting machines for sportswear).
RECOMMENDED VERIFICATION ROADMAP
CONCLUSION
Verification of Chinese sportswear manufacturers requires IP-compliant due diligence, not brand-name fishing. Procurement teams must:
1. Abandon searches for “Adidas factories” – focus on generic technical capability (moisture-wicking fabrics, sublimation printing, etc.)
2. Prioritize auditable evidence over verbal claims (e.g., machine ownership > “we make for brands”)
3. Implement blockchain traceability (e.g., VeChain) for 2026+ orders to verify production provenance
Adidas AG and other brands actively pursue legal action against unauthorized suppliers. SourcifyChina recommends using only manufacturers with clean IP records and third-party compliance certifications.
SOURCIFYCHINA ADVISORY
This report supersedes all prior guidance. For live factory verification support (including Adidas-compliant sportswear sourcing), contact our Shenzhen Compliance Hub: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Not for public distribution.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Sourcing adidas-Quality Factories in China
Executive Summary
In a global supply chain landscape defined by volatility, compliance risks, and rising lead times, precision in supplier selection is no longer optional—it’s imperative. For procurement professionals seeking manufacturers capable of producing adidas-grade quality in China, time-to-solution directly impacts time-to-market, cost control, and brand integrity.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘adidas factory China’ offers a strategic shortcut to sourcing excellence. No more sifting through unreliable Alibaba leads, unverified claims, or months of due diligence. Our Pro List delivers immediate access to pre-vetted, audit-compliant factories with proven experience in high-standard sportswear manufacturing—exactly the tier of supplier that supports global athletic brands like adidas.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Mitigates Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Workflow |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Supplier Base | Factories audited for quality systems, export experience, and social compliance—eliminates 60–80 hours of initial screening. |
| Proven adidas-Grade Capabilities | Suppliers with documented experience in OEM sportswear production for Tier-1 brands—ensures technical competence and quality alignment. |
| Ready for Audit & Sampling | All listed factories are prepared for BSCI, SEDEX, or QMS audits and can initiate sample development within 72 hours. |
| Dedicated SourcifyChina Liaison | Each inquiry receives a single point of contact to coordinate factory communication, NDA management, and documentation. |
| Reduced Time-to-PO | Average onboarding time reduced from 14 weeks to under 4 weeks. |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
The cost of sourcing delays is measured in missed seasons, inflated logistics, and compromised margins. In 2026, procurement leaders can’t afford to gamble on unverified supply chains.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to:
✅ Secure factory partners with adidas-level quality standards
✅ Cut supplier qualification time by up to 70%
✅ De-risk compliance, IP protection, and production scalability
Now is the time to act with confidence.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team today to request your customized Pro List and factory match report.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
One inquiry. Zero guesswork. Verified results.
—
SourcifyChina | Precision Sourcing. Proven Factories. Global Results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
