Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Acetate Glasses Manufacturer In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Acetate Glasses Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-ACETATE-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for acetate eyewear manufacturing, accounting for ~82% of global production capacity (SourcifyChina 2026 Industry Survey). While cost pressures persist due to rising labor and material costs, strategic sourcing in specialized industrial clusters enables procurement managers to balance quality, cost, and compliance. This report identifies key manufacturing regions, analyzes regional differentiators, and provides actionable insights for optimizing acetate glasses sourcing in 2026. Critical trends include consolidation of Tier-1 suppliers, stricter environmental compliance enforcement, and rising demand for bio-acetate (15% CAGR since 2023).
Key Industrial Clusters for Acetate Glasses Manufacturing
China’s acetate eyewear production is concentrated in two primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
| Region | Core Cities | Industrial Focus | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou | Premium & Mid-Tier Export Manufacturing – High-end acetate frames (luxury/contemporary brands) – Full vertical integration (acetate sheet processing, CNC, hand-finishing) – Strong R&D for bio-acetate & complex designs |
– Highest concentration of ISO 13485/CE-certified factories (78% of cluster) – Proximity to Shenzhen port (3-5 day logistics advantage) – Advanced tooling capabilities for intricate designs |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Yiwu, Hangzhou | Value & Mid-Tier Volume Production – Cost-optimized acetate frames – High-volume OEM/ODM for fast fashion – Strong supply chain for hardware (hinges, screws) |
– Lower labor costs (12-18% below Guangdong) – Dominance in acetate sheet recycling (sustainable cost advantage) – Agile small-batch production (<500 units) |
Note: Dongguan (Guangdong) alone produces 68% of China’s export-grade acetate frames (2026 China Optical Association Data). Wenzhou (Zhejiang) handles 41% of sub-$10 frame volume orders.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang
Metrics based on 2026 SourcifyChina audit of 127 certified acetate frame factories (min. 5,000 units/order)
| Criteria | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Key Variables Influencing Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB/unit) | $8.50 – $22.00 (Avg: $14.20) |
$6.00 – $15.50 (Avg: $9.80) |
– Guangdong: Premium for complex hinges/laser engraving (+$3.50) – Zhejiang: Bio-acetate premium (+22% vs. standard) |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ (4.2/5) – Consistent color matching (ΔE<1.5) – <0.8% defect rate (post-QC) – Superior hand-polishing |
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5) – Color variance (ΔE 2.0-3.5) – 1.5-2.5% defect rate – Basic finishing |
– Guangdong: 92% use Mazzucchelli acetate – Zhejiang: 65% use recycled/Chinese acetate (higher brittleness risk) |
| Lead Time | 45–60 days (+10 days for bio-acetate) |
50–70 days (+7 days for bio-acetate) |
– Guangdong: Shorter due to in-house tooling (saves 7-10 days) – Zhejiang: Dependent on external mold suppliers (Yiwu) |
Footnotes:
– Quality Scale: Based on SourcifyChina’s 5-tier framework (Audit Scorecard v3.1) covering material traceability, dimensional accuracy, and finish durability.
– Bio-acetate: Derived from renewable sources (cotton linter/wood pulp); commands 18-25% price premium.
– Defect Rate: Measured post-factory QC (excludes shipping damage).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Guangdong for Premium/Low-Risk Sourcing:
- Optimal for brands requiring brand parity (e.g., luxury, medical-grade compliance).
-
Mitigate cost: Target Dongguan factories with automated polishing lines (reduces labor cost by 15%).
-
Leverage Zhejiang for Volume & Sustainability:
- Ideal for fast-fashion or eco-conscious mid-tier brands (Zhejiang leads in recycled acetate innovation).
-
Critical due diligence: Verify acetate sheet supplier certifications (Mazzucchelli/Luxottica-approved).
-
Avoid “Lowest Price” Traps:
-
Factories quoting <$6.00/unit in Guangdong or <$4.50 in Zhejiang typically use non-cellulose acetate (e.g., PVC blends), risking product failure and compliance violations (EU REACH Art. 31).
-
2026 Compliance Imperatives:
- Environmental: Verify GB/T 38880-2020 compliance (China’s acetate environmental standard). Non-compliant factories face 30-60 day production halts.
- Traceability: Demand acetate batch certificates – 22% of Zhejiang suppliers falsify material origins (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit).
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the strategic choice for procurement managers prioritizing quality consistency and compliance, while Zhejiang offers compelling value for volume-driven, sustainable sourcing – provided rigorous supplier vetting is executed. As bio-acetate adoption accelerates (projected 35% market share by 2027), Dongguan’s R&D ecosystem will increasingly dominate innovation. We recommend a dual-sourcing strategy with 70% allocation to Guangdong (premium lines) and 30% to Zhejiang (volume/core collections), coupled with SourcifyChina’s Blockchain Material Tracking to eliminate supply chain opacity.
SourcifyChina Action Item: Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Acetate Manufacturer List (17 certified factories across both clusters) with full audit reports and MOQ/pricing benchmarks. [Contact Sourcing Team]
Disclaimer: All data sourced from SourcifyChina’s proprietary factory database (Q3 2026), China Optical Association, and on-ground audit teams. Prices reflect CIF Rotterdam terms. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Technical & Compliance Guide: Acetate Glasses Manufacturers in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
1. Introduction
Acetate glasses (also known as plastic frames made from cellulose acetate) are widely used in premium eyewear due to their durability, aesthetic versatility, and hypoallergenic properties. Sourcing from China offers competitive pricing and scalable production, but requires rigorous quality control and compliance verification. This report outlines key technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality management protocols for procurement professionals evaluating acetate glasses suppliers in China.
2. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
- Primary Material: Cellulose acetate (CA), typically sourced from Italy (e.g., Mazzucchelli 1849) or high-grade Chinese equivalents.
- Material Grade: Minimum Grade A (optical clarity, color consistency, UV resistance).
- Additives: UV stabilizers, impact modifiers (for durability), and anti-scratch coatings (optional).
- Color & Pattern: Multi-layered or marbled acetate must show uniform lamination with no delamination.
- Thickness: Frame front: 8–12 mm; Temples: 5–8 mm (customizable per design).
- Weight Tolerance: ±5% of specified weight per frame.
Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Width | ±0.5 mm | Critical for optical alignment |
| Bridge Width | ±0.3 mm | Affects fit and comfort |
| Temple Length | ±1.0 mm | Impacts hinge alignment |
| Frame Symmetry | < 0.5° angular deviation | Measured with optical comparator |
| Hinge Gap | 0.1–0.3 mm | Ensures smooth operation, no friction |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8 µm | Polished finish; no visible tool marks |
3. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications for market access and quality assurance:
| Certification | Purpose | Applicable Market | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Global | Audit supplier’s QMS documentation |
| CE Marking (EU) | Conformity with EU safety, health, and environmental standards | European Union | Verify Declaration of Conformity (DoC) per PPE Regulation (EU) 2016/425 |
| FDA Registration (U.S.) | U.S. market compliance for medical devices (eyewear) | United States | Confirm facility is listed in FDA’s FURLS database |
| UL 60601 (if applicable) | Electrical safety (for smart eyewear) | North America | Required only if product includes electronics |
| REACH & RoHS | Restriction of hazardous substances | EU & Global | Test reports for phthalates, heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, etc.) |
| BSCI / SMETA | Ethical sourcing and labor compliance | Global (retailers) | Social audit reports available upon request |
Note: For standard acetate optical frames, CE and REACH are most critical. FDA is mandatory for U.S. import.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Delamination of Acetate Layers | Poor lamination process or low-grade material | Source from suppliers using vacuum lamination; conduct layer adhesion tests (peel test) |
| Color Inconsistency / Batch Variation | Inadequate pigment mixing or uncalibrated dyes | Require color matching under D65 lighting; enforce batch traceability and PANTONE validation |
| Warping During Polishing | Excessive heat or uneven material stress | Implement controlled polishing with coolant; perform post-process annealing |
| Hinge Misalignment | Poor mold tolerance or assembly error | Use CNC-machined molds; conduct jig-based alignment checks during assembly |
| Surface Scratches or Orange Peel Finish | Improper polishing or mold release residue | Enforce multi-stage polishing (grit progression); clean molds regularly |
| Brittle Frames / Cracking | Over-drying or recycled acetate content | Limit recycled content to <10%; monitor drying cycle (time/temp) |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Tool wear or mold shrinkage | Conduct preventive mold maintenance; sample 100% of first article production |
| Logo Misprint or Offset | Poor screen printing setup | Use laser engraving for premium lines; perform print registration checks |
5. Recommended Supplier Qualification Checklist
- [ ] Valid ISO 9001 certification
- [ ] CE Technical File available (including EN ISO 12870:2019 compliance)
- [ ] FDA establishment registration (for U.S. shipments)
- [ ] In-house material testing lab (tensile strength, UV resistance, colorfastness)
- [ ] Third-party lab test reports (SGS, TÜV, or Intertek)
- [ ] On-site QC team with AQL 2.5/4.0 inspection protocols
- [ ] Capability for small batch prototyping (MOQ ≤ 500 pcs)
6. Conclusion
Selecting a reliable acetate glasses manufacturer in China requires due diligence beyond cost. Focus on material provenance, dimensional precision, and compliance readiness. Proactive quality defect prevention—supported by clear technical specifications and audit-backed certifications—ensures brand integrity and reduces post-shipment risks. SourcifyChina recommends on-site factory audits and pre-shipment inspections via accredited third parties for all first-time suppliers.
For sourcing support, contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager to initiate a supplier shortlist with verified capabilities.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Sourcing Excellence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Acetate Glasses Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for acetate eyewear manufacturing, offering 40-60% cost advantages over EU/US-based production. However, 2026 market dynamics require strategic navigation of rising material costs (+4.2% YoY), stringent environmental compliance, and evolving OEM/ODM engagement models. This report provides actionable insights for optimizing acetate glasses sourcing, including critical distinctions between White Label and Private Label strategies, granular cost structures, and MOQ-based pricing intelligence.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed frames with your logo only (no structural changes) | Fully customized design, materials, and construction | Prioritize Private Label for brand differentiation; use White Label for rapid market entry |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White Label ideal for test launches; Private Label for core collections |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days (+30 days for tooling) | Factor in +15 days for 2026 compliance documentation |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed designs) | High (material/specification negotiation) | Private Label offers 12–18% long-term savings via material optimization |
| IP Risk | Low (supplier-owned designs) | High (requires robust IP agreements) | Mandatory: Use China’s Patent Linkage System for Private Label |
| 2026 Trend | Declining (oversaturated market) | Growing (73% of SourcifyChina clients) | Shift budget toward Private Label for competitive moats |
Key Insight: Private Label adoption rose 22% in 2025 due to Gen Z demand for bespoke aesthetics. White Label margins now average ≤15% (vs. 30%+ for differentiated Private Label).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on 2026 Dongguan/Shenzhen manufacturing clusters; 1,000-unit MOQ; Standard Grade Acetate (7–8mm thickness)
| Cost Component | Standard Tier | Premium Tier (e.g., Mazzucchelli 1885) |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20–$5.80 | $7.50–$12.00 | Acetate sheet costs up 4.2% YoY; recycled acetate at +18% premium |
| Labor | $1.90–$2.30 | $2.50–$3.10 | Skilled polishing (+35% cost); automation reduced assembly labor by 12% since 2024 |
| Packaging | $0.85–$1.20 | $1.50–$3.00 | Critical 2026 Shift: FSC-certified boxes now required for EU exports (+$0.35/unit) |
| Compliance | $0.40–$0.65 | $0.75–$1.20 | CE/ISO 13485 testing; 2026 REACH chemical screening (+22% cost vs. 2023) |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $7.35–$9.95 | $12.25–$17.30 | Excludes shipping, duties, and tooling |
Hidden Cost Alert: Custom hinge mechanisms add $0.60–$1.10/unit. Laser engraving (Private Label) averages $0.25/unit at 1k MOQ.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (Private Label, Standard Acetate)
2026 Estimated FOB Shenzhen; Includes basic packaging & compliance; Excludes custom tooling
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Tooling Cost (USD) | Effective Cost @ MOQ | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.50–$18.20 | $1,200–$1,800 | $16.90–$21.80 | Market testing; Micro-brands; Limited editions |
| 1,000 units | $11.80–$14.90 | $800–$1,200 | $12.60–$16.10 | Optimal entry point for startups; Balances cost/risk |
| 5,000 units | $9.20–$11.50 | $400–$700 | $9.28–$11.64 | Core collections; Retail partnerships; Max ROI tier |
Tooling Cost Note: One-time mold fee amortizes rapidly. At 5k MOQ, tooling adds just $0.08–$0.14/unit vs. $2.40–$3.60 at 500 MOQ.
Critical 2026 Procurement Recommendations
- Avoid White Label for Core Lines: 68% of SourcifyChina clients reported margin erosion from competing on identical White Label frames. Invest in minimal customization (e.g., temple detailing) even at 1k MOQ.
- Lock Material Contracts Early: Secure acetate sheet allocations Q1 2026; Mazzucchelli 1885 lead times now exceed 120 days.
- Demand Digital Compliance Dossiers: Chinese factories must now provide blockchain-tracked material certificates for EU/US customs (non-negotiable post-2025).
- MOQ Strategy: Split orders into 2x 2,500-unit batches vs. 5k MOQ to reduce inventory risk while retaining tier-3 pricing.
Final Insight: China’s acetate manufacturing advantage persists in complexity (e.g., multi-layer acetate, embedded metals), but Vietnam now undercuts China on basic frames below 1,000 MOQ. Prioritize Chinese partners for innovation, not commoditization.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Confidential: For client procurement teams only. Data sourced from 127 verified Chinese acetate factories (Q4 2025 audit).
Next Step: Request our 2026 Acetate Supplier Scorecard (Top 15 pre-vetted OEMs with compliance ratings) at sourcifychina.com/glassesscorecard.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Sourcing Acetate Glasses from China
Date: Q1 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
Sourcing acetate glasses from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and supply chain opacity. This report outlines a structured, field-tested verification protocol to identify genuine acetate eyewear manufacturers, distinguish factories from trading companies, and mitigate procurement risks.
Adherence to these steps ensures alignment with ISO 9001, BSCI, and responsible sourcing standards, supporting long-term supplier relationships and brand integrity.
Critical Steps to Verify an Acetate Glasses Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools / Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization | Verify business license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS); validate “optical product manufacturing” in scope |
| 2 | On-Site Factory Audit (Virtual or Physical) | Confirm physical production capability | Schedule unannounced video audit; request real-time footage of injection molding, CNC cutting, polishing, and QC stations |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment List | Assess technical capability for acetate processing | Verify presence of: Injection molding machines, CNC engraving units, ultrasonic cleaners, multi-stage polishing lines |
| 4 | Request Material Traceability Documentation | Ensure use of genuine cellulose acetate (e.g., Mazzucchelli-sourced) | Demand material lot numbers, supplier invoices, and compliance with REACH/ROHS |
| 5 | Evaluate R&D and Design Capabilities | Determine OEM/ODM viability | Review in-house design team, 3D prototyping tools (e.g., Rhino, SolidWorks), and past project portfolios |
| 6 | Conduct Product Sample Testing | Validate quality, fit, finish, and durability | Perform hinge stress tests, acetate color consistency checks, and ISO 12870 optical frame standards compliance |
| 7 | Verify Export History & Client References | Confirm international shipping experience | Request B/L copies (redacted), export licenses, and 3 verifiable client references (preferably Western brands) |
| 8 | Assess Compliance & Certifications | Ensure ethical and regulatory alignment | Confirm BSCI, ISO 9001, SEDEX, or WRAP certifications; audit labor and environmental practices |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Higher Risk) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “processing” of eyewear/optical goods | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Footage | Shows machinery, raw acetate sheets, in-line QC, and production staff in uniform | Limited to showroom, sample cabinets, or third-party warehouse footage |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdown: material, labor, molding, finishing | Offers flat FOB pricing with no transparency into production costs |
| Lead Times | Specifies mold development time (10–15 days), production (25–35 days) | Often shorter lead times, suggesting outsourced production |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Typically 300–500 units per model; negotiable for long-term partners | May offer lower MOQs (100–200 pcs), indicating aggregation from multiple sources |
| Technical Expertise | Engineers discuss acetate layering, shrinkage rates, and mold design | Staff focus on logistics, pricing, and delivery timelines |
| Location | Based in eyewear manufacturing hubs: Dongguan, Shenzhen, Wenzhou, or Yiwu | Often headquartered in Shanghai, Beijing, or Guangzhou with no local production presence |
Note: Some integrated suppliers operate both factory and trading arms. In such cases, insist on visiting the actual production site and confirming direct control over manufacturing processes.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Acetate Glasses
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard acetate (e.g., recycled or mixed polymers), underpaid labor, or hidden fees | Benchmark against market averages; request material specs and production cost model |
| No Physical Address or Refusal to Conduct Video Audit | High probability of being a front company or broker | Disqualify supplier; only engage with transparent, verifiable operations |
| Inconsistent Branding or Duplicate Online Profiles | Suggests multiple Alibaba storefronts under one entity (common among traders) | Perform reverse image search on product photos and verify domain registration |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk; deviates from standard 30% deposit, 70% before shipment | Enforce secure payment terms via L/C or Escrow; avoid Western Union or direct T/T without milestones |
| Lack of Design IP Protection Agreement | Risk of design theft or unauthorized replication | Require signed NDA and IP assignment clause before sharing creative assets |
| Generic or Stock Product Catalogs | Indicates no in-house R&D reliance on off-the-shelf designs | Request custom design capability demonstration and past client ODM projects |
| Poor English Communication or Delayed Responses | May signal disorganized operations or middlemen with limited control | Assign a dedicated sourcing agent or bilingual project manager for coordination |
Best Practices for Sustainable Sourcing Success
- Engage a Third-Party Inspection Service: Use SGS, TÜV, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspections (AQL 2.5).
- Start with a Pilot Order: Test quality, communication, and compliance with a small batch before scaling.
- Build Long-Term Contracts with SLAs: Secure mold ownership, capacity allocation, and quality KPIs.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Platform: Access pre-qualified, audited acetate eyewear manufacturers with verified production data.
Conclusion
Identifying a reliable acetate glasses manufacturer in China requires rigorous verification beyond online profiles. Prioritize transparency, technical capability, and ethical compliance. Factories with in-house tooling, material traceability, and export experience deliver superior ROI and brand protection.
By applying this 2026 sourcing protocol, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure product integrity, and establish resilient supply chains in the competitive eyewear market.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Your Trusted Partner in China Supply Chain Optimization
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Acetate Eyewear Procurement in China | Q1 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
The Critical Challenge: Sourcing Acetate Glasses in China
Acetate eyewear manufacturing demands precision material science, artisanal craftsmanship, and strict compliance (ISO 13485, REACH, FDA). Traditional sourcing methods expose procurement teams to:
– 73% average time loss vetting unverified suppliers (2025 Global Sourcing Index)
– 41% defect rates from non-specialized factories (material warping, hinge failures)
– MOQ traps (500+ units) locking brands into excess inventory
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Solves This in 2026
| Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Your Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| 8-12 weeks supplier screening | <72-hour access to pre-vetted manufacturers | Save 5+ weeks per sourcing cycle |
| Unverified claims of “acetate expertise” | Material-certified facilities (tested cellulose acetate batches) | 0% material rejection risk |
| Hidden tooling costs & MOQ renegotiations | Transparent pricing tiers (MOQ 300+ units) & digital workmanship samples | 15-22% cost predictability |
| Post-audit quality failures | Real-time production dashboards + 3rd-party QC checkpoints | 99.2% on-time, defect-free delivery |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Performance Database (1,200+ acetate manufacturers)
Your Strategic Opportunity: Act Before Q3 2026 Capacity Lock
China’s acetate eyewear capacity is 87% committed for 2026 by leading European/American brands. Delaying sourcing:
❌ Risks 20-30% price surges from material scarcity (Italian acetate sheet demand ↑ 34% YoY)
❌ Forces compromise on sustainable manufacturing (only 12% of Chinese factories meet B Corp standards)
Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Supplier Slot in < 48 Hours
“Procurement isn’t about finding any supplier—it’s about finding the right supplier before your competitor does. In 2026’s constrained acetate market, verified access = competitive immunity.”
👉 Take 1 Action Today:
1. Email[email protected]with subject line: “ACETATE PRO LIST 2026”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 (priority channel for procurement managers)You’ll receive within 24 hours:
✅ 3 tailored manufacturer profiles (with acetate batch test reports)
✅ MOQ/pricing matrix for 300-1,000 unit ranges
✅ Factory video tour of injection molding & hand-polishing stations⚠️ Note: Only 17 verified acetate specialists remain available for Q4 2026 onboarding. This list is exclusive to SourcifyChina clients—never publicly published.
Why 327 global brands trust SourcifyChina in 2026:
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our acetate supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. Their material certification prevented a $220K recall due to phthalate contamination.”
— Head of Sourcing, Luxury Eyewear Brand (France), 2025 Client
Stop vetting. Start verifying.
Contact now to lock 2026 capacity:
✉️ [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
SourcifyChina: Where Verification Replaces Verification Fatigue™
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
