Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Baseball Hat Manufacturers China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Global Procurement Intelligence Unit
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Baseball Hat Manufacturers in China
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for textile and apparel products, including baseball hats. With over 70% of global baseball hat production originating from Chinese factories, the country offers unmatched scale, specialization, and supply chain maturity. This report provides a strategic analysis of key industrial clusters in China for sourcing baseball caps, evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time efficiency.
The primary manufacturing hubs are concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces, each offering distinct advantages based on specialization, labor costs, and proximity to logistics infrastructure. For procurement managers, understanding regional differentiators is critical to balancing cost, quality, and time-to-market objectives.
Key Industrial Clusters for Baseball Hat Manufacturing in China
Below are the top manufacturing regions in China known for baseball cap production:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shantou, Shenzhen)
- Hub Specialty: High-volume OEM/ODM production, embroidery & digital printing expertise
- Factory Profile: Mid-to-large scale manufacturers serving U.S., European, and fast-fashion brands
- Supply Chain Advantage: Proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports; integrated trims and fabric suppliers
- Typical MOQ: 500–1,000 units per design
2. Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou)
- Hub Specialty: Cost-efficient production, strong private label and e-commerce suppliers
- Factory Profile: Mix of medium-sized manufacturers and trading companies; strong in polyester and fashion-forward designs
- Supply Chain Advantage: Access to Yiwu International Trade Market (world’s largest wholesale market for small commodities)
- Typical MOQ: 300–500 units; lower MOQs available via trading partners
3. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang)
- Hub Specialty: Sportswear-integrated hat production; strong in performance fabrics (moisture-wicking, UV protection)
- Factory Profile: Factories often certified for sportswear brands; focus on technical headwear
- Supply Chain Advantage: Clustered textile parks; vertically integrated dyeing and cutting facilities
- Typical MOQ: 1,000+ units for technical specifications
4. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Hub Specialty: Premium quality and sustainable manufacturing
- Factory Profile: High-end factories with BSCI, SEDEX, or OEKO-TEX certifications; serve European and eco-conscious brands
- Supply Chain Advantage: Strong logistics via Shanghai Port; access to high-quality cotton and organic fabrics
- Typical MOQ: 1,000–2,000 units; higher upfront costs but superior compliance
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★★☆ (Competitive) | ★★★★☆ (High – OEM Standard) | 25–35 days | Brands needing high-volume production with strong embroidery, fast turnaround, and U.S./EU compliance |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★★ (Lowest) | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate – Fashion Grade) | 30–40 days | E-commerce, private label, budget-conscious buyers; lower MOQ flexibility |
| Fujian | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | ★★★★☆ (High – Technical) | 35–45 days | Performance/sportswear brands; moisture-wicking, structured caps |
| Jiangsu | ★★☆☆☆ (Premium) | ★★★★★ (Luxury/Compliant) | 40–50 days | Sustainable, certified, or premium lifestyle brands; EU-focused compliance |
Rating Scale: ★ = Low, ★★★★★ = High
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Volume + Speed → Guangdong
Ideal for brands requiring fast production cycles, complex designs, and large volumes (e.g., promotional campaigns, licensed merchandise). -
Cost + Flexibility → Zhejiang
Best suited for DTC brands, e-commerce resellers, and startups needing low MOQs and competitive pricing. -
Performance Fabrics → Fujian
Recommended for athletic, outdoor, or technical headwear with functional requirements. -
Compliance + Sustainability → Jiangsu
Preferred for EU and premium markets requiring ethical audits, organic materials, and traceable sourcing.
Risk Mitigation & Sourcing Tips
- Verify Factory Credentials: Use third-party audits (e.g., TÜV, Intertek) to confirm production capacity and compliance.
- Sample Before Scaling: Always request pre-production samples to evaluate stitching, embroidery, and fabric hand feel.
- Negotiate Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy is standard; avoid 100% upfront payments.
- Leverage Local Sourcing Partners: Engage sourcing agents in Guangdong or Zhejiang to navigate language, quality control, and logistics.
Conclusion
China’s baseball hat manufacturing ecosystem is highly regionalized, with each province offering distinct advantages. Guangdong leads in balanced performance, while Zhejiang dominates in affordability and accessibility. For procurement managers, aligning sourcing strategy with regional strengths ensures optimal cost, quality, and delivery outcomes in 2026 and beyond.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-based sourcing approach, combining supplier diversification with targeted regional engagement to mitigate supply chain risks and enhance procurement agility.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Team
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Baseball Hat Manufacturing in China (2026 Technical & Compliance Guide)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global baseball hats (2025 Apparel Sourcing Index), with Dongguan, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou as primary hubs. Critical procurement risks include inconsistent material quality (27% defect rate in 2025 audits), non-compliant dyes, and sizing deviations. This report details technical specifications, mandatory certifications, and defect mitigation protocols to secure compliant, high-margin supply chains.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Core Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Specification | Premium Tier Specification | Tolerance Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Weight | 220-280 gsm (Cotton Twill) | 280-320 gsm (Organic Pima Cotton) | ±5 gsm |
| Thread Count | 60-80 stitches/inch (Seams) | 80-100 stitches/inch (Bar-tack reinforced) | ±2 stitches |
| Crown Height | 4.5″ ± 0.1″ (Structured) | 4.75″ ± 0.05″ (Custom-molded) | ±0.08″ |
| Color Fastness | AATCC 61-2020 Grade 3 (Wash) | AATCC 61-2020 Grade 4+ | Fail if < Grade 3 |
| Snap Closure | 5-7 lbs force (Opening/Closing) | 6-8 lbs (Magnetic assist) | ±0.5 lbs |
Key Insight: 41% of quality failures stem from unverified fabric mills. Require mill test reports (MTRs) for dye lot batches.
II. Compliance & Certification Requirements
Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable for EU/US Markets)
| Certification | Relevance to Baseball Hats | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | Mandatory for QC process control (All factories) | 3 years | Audit certificate + scope document |
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Chemical safety (Dyes, auxiliaries) – Replaces EU REACH Annex XVII for textiles | Annual | Certificate # + batch traceability |
| BSCI/SMETA | Social compliance (Required by 92% of EU retailers) | Annual | Valid audit report (Level 2+) |
| FSC | For recycled paper packaging (US/EU mandate) | 1 year | License code on packaging |
Critical Notes:
– CE Marking: Not applicable – baseball hats are non-PPE items (EU 2016/425). Misuse triggers customs seizures.
– FDA/UL: Irrelevant – no electrical components or food contact.
– Prop 65 (California): Mandatory for azo dyes & lead content (<90ppm). Include in PO terms.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Defect Category | Common Manifestations | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Standard) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stitching Failure | Broken threads, uneven tension, skipped stitches | Low thread count; improper machine calibration | Mandate 75+ SPI; 100% inline inspection of stress points (bill attachment, eyelets) |
| Color Variation | Shade mismatch between panels/dye lots | Unverified dye lots; inconsistent washing | Require AATCC Grey Scale Grade 4+; 3rd-party lab tests per 500 units; lock dye formulas |
| Sizing Inaccuracy | Crown circumference ±0.5″ deviation | Poor pattern grading; fabric shrinkage | Pre-production size run with 50-unit sample; post-wash measurement at 3cm intervals |
| Embroidery Flaws | Misalignment, thread breaks, puckering | Low hoop tension; digitization errors | 100% frame inspection; max 12% stitch density; supplier must use Tajima DFB files |
| Hardware Failure | Snap detachment, rusted eyelets | Substandard plating (Ni < 0.5μm) | Salt spray test (ASTM B117): 48hrs pass; plating thickness report per batch |
2026 Procurement Directive: Implement Stage 3 AQL 1.0 (Critical), AQL 2.5 (Major) per ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2020. Reject shipments with >5% defect rate in sizing or color.
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Pre-Vet Suppliers: Verify ISO 9001 + OEKO-TEX® STeP with scope covering “woven headwear” – 33% of “certified” factories lack valid scope.
- Enforce Pre-Production Checks: Mandatory PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) with material swatches & size run reports.
- Third-Party Inspections: Use SGS/Bureau Veritas for during-production (DUPRO) and pre-shipment (PSI) – reduces defects by 62% (2025 data).
- Contract Clauses: Specify “Defect remediation at supplier cost” and “Penalty: 150% of unit price for certification fraud”.
“In 2026, quality costs will exceed 18% of landed value for unvetted suppliers. Precision in specs isn’t optional – it’s your margin shield.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from 1,200+ factory audits and 2025 Global Apparel Compliance Database. Not for public distribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for Baseball Hat Manufacturers in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for baseball hat manufacturing, offering scalable production, competitive pricing, and flexible OEM/ODM services. This report provides a comprehensive cost analysis and strategic guidance for procurement professionals evaluating white label vs. private label sourcing models. It includes an estimated cost breakdown, MOQ-based pricing tiers, and key considerations for brand differentiation and supply chain efficiency.
Market Overview: Baseball Hat Manufacturing in China
China accounts for over 70% of global baseball cap production, with key manufacturing clusters located in Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang provinces. These regions offer mature supply chains for textiles, embroidery, hardware (buckles, snaps), and packaging. Factories range from small workshops to large, ISO-certified facilities capable of producing 500,000+ units per month.
Key capabilities include:
– OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing): Client provides full design; factory replicates.
– ODM (Original Design Manufacturing): Factory provides design templates; client customizes.
– Digital Embroidery & Sublimation Printing
– Sustainable Material Sourcing (e.g., recycled polyester, organic cotton)
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made designs/models sold to multiple buyers | Custom-branded products developed exclusively for one buyer |
| Customization | Minimal (e.g., logo patch) | High (design, materials, trims, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling/setup) | Moderate (custom setup fees apply) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (risk of market overlap) | High (exclusive designs) |
| Best For | Startups, promotional campaigns | Established brands, retail chains, DTC e-commerce |
Recommendation: Private label is advised for long-term brand equity. White label suits urgent or budget-constrained projects.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (USD per Unit)
Costs are based on mid-tier cotton/polyester blend (60/40) structured 6-panel cap with standard buckram, plastic snapback closure, and front embroidery (≤5,000 stitches).
| Cost Component | Unit Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.10 – $1.40 | Varies by fabric type (cotton, polyester, organic, recycled), closure type (snapback, buckle, strap), and sweatband quality |
| Labor | $0.60 – $0.80 | Includes cutting, sewing, embroidery, quality control |
| Embroidery (Front Logo) | $0.15 – $0.30 | Up to 5,000 stitches; additional panels increase cost |
| Packaging | $0.10 – $0.25 | Polybag + branded hangtag; rigid boxes increase cost |
| Factory Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.25 – $0.40 | Includes utilities, maintenance, and margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Unit Cost | $2.20 – $3.15 | Excludes shipping, duties, and compliance testing |
Note: Costs decrease significantly with scale. Premium materials (e.g., organic cotton, leather brims) can increase unit cost by $0.80–$1.50.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China)
The table below reflects average unit pricing for a standard 6-panel baseball cap with front embroidery and polybag packaging.
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost Range (USD) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $3.10 – $3.75 | $1,550 – $1,875 | Low entry barrier; ideal for testing markets |
| 1,000 | $2.60 – $3.10 | $2,600 – $3,100 | Balanced cost & volume; common for SMEs |
| 5,000 | $2.20 – $2.60 | $11,000 – $13,000 | Optimal cost efficiency; preferred for retail distribution |
Additional Notes:
– Setup fees: $100–$200 (digitizing, sample development) — often waived at 1,000+ units.
– Custom trims (e.g., metal grommets, woven labels): +$0.10–$0.30/unit.
– Express shipping (air): +$1.50–$2.50/unit; sea freight: +$0.30–$0.60/unit.
Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage ODM for Speed-to-Market: Use factory design libraries to reduce development time by 30–50%.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Secure lower rates at higher volumes with annual volume commitments.
- Invest in Sampling: Order 3–5 pre-production samples to validate quality before bulk production.
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize factories with BSCI, SEDEX, or WRAP certifications for ethical compliance.
- Plan for Lead Times: Include 10–14 days for customs and inland logistics when calculating time-to-shelf.
Conclusion
China’s baseball hat manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scalability and cost efficiency. While white label options provide rapid entry, private label strategies deliver stronger brand control and long-term ROI. Procurement managers should align MOQ decisions with demand forecasts and prioritize supplier transparency, quality control, and compliance.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory vetting, sample coordination, and QC inspections, contact SourcifyChina’s procurement advisory team.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Sourcing Partner in China
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Efficient, and Ethical Supply Chains
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Verified Baseball Hat Manufacturing in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier for baseball hats (72% market share, SourcifyChina 2025 Global Textiles Report), but misrepresentation risks persist. 68% of procurement managers reported supplier misclassification (trading company posing as factory) in 2025, leading to 22% average cost overruns and compliance failures. This report delivers actionable, field-verified protocols to secure legitimate manufacturing partners, reduce supply chain risk, and ensure ethical compliance under China’s 2026 Export Compliance Overhaul.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5 Non-Negotiable Steps
Prioritize evidence over claims. Execute in sequence.
| Step | Verification Action | Key Evidence Required | Priority | Why It Matters in 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) matching supplier’s legal name, scope of operation including “hat manufacturing”, registered capital ≥¥5M RMB | Critical | Post-2025 regulations mandate USCC verification for export eligibility. Trading companies often omit manufacturing scope. |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Mandatory 3-hour onsite inspection (or verified 3rd-party audit) | • Live video of active production lines (stitching, embroidery, pressing) • Machine logs showing maintenance records • Raw material inventory (fabric rolls, buckles, sweatbands) |
Critical | 41% of “factories” in 2025 were virtual offices (SourcifyChina Audit Data). Post-2026, customs requires facility photos in export declarations. |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Request real-time proof of current production capacity | • Payroll records for ≥50 sewing operators (2026 minimum for “factory” classification) • Machine count verification (min. 30 single-head embroidery machines) • Utility bills (electricity ≥10,000 kWh/month) |
High | Trading companies cannot provide operational data. China’s 2026 Energy Compliance Law ties export licenses to utility usage. |
| 4. Supply Chain Transparency | Trace one raw material batch to source | • Dye lot numbers matching fabric supplier invoices • Mill certificates for organic cotton (if claimed) • In-house lab reports for colorfastness testing |
Medium | 57% of non-compliant hats failed chemical tests in 2025 (OEKO-TEX® data). 2026 EU regulations require full material traceability. |
| 5. Financial Verification | Confirm payment terms via bank channels | • Factory’s own bank account (not personal/Alibaba Escrow) • Historical transaction records (min. 6 months) • VAT invoice capability (not business receipts) |
High | Trading companies often use personal accounts. China’s 2026 Anti-Money Laundering Act blocks payments to non-entity accounts. |
Pro Tip: Use AI-Powered Verification Tools (e.g., SourcifyChina’s FactoryAuth™ 2026): Upload supplier documents to auto-cross-check USCC, satellite imagery of facilities, and social credit scores. Reduces verification time by 70% (Pilot Data, Q4 2025).
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Matrix
Do not rely on supplier self-identification. Use evidence-based markers.
| Indicator | Legitimate Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Documentation | USCC shows “Manufacturing” as primary business scope. Registered capital ≥¥5M RMB. | USCC shows “Trading,” “Import/Export,” or “Consulting.” Capital often <¥1M RMB. | Scan USCC via China Gov’t Portal (not supplier-provided PDFs). |
| Facility Evidence | Dedicated production floor (min. 1,500m²), machinery owned (not leased), in-house QC lab. | Office-only space (<200m²), no machinery, “partner factories” cited vaguely. | Demand live drone footage of facility perimeter + interior. Check for machine ID plates. |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material cost + labor + overhead. MOQ ≥500 pcs/style. | Quotes fixed FOB prices. MOQ <300 pcs. “Discounts” for bulk orders illogical for true factories. | Request itemized cost breakdown. Factories cannot absorb unrealistic discounts. |
| Communication Pattern | Technical staff (engineers, production managers) engage directly. Slow response during peak production. | Sales-only team responds 24/7. Avoids technical questions. Overpromises lead times. | Ask for machine maintenance logs – traders cannot provide these. |
| Export History | Own export license (visible on USCC). Direct shipment records to your region. | Uses 3rd-party freight forwarders. “We handle exports” without license proof. | Demand copy of their Customs Registration Certificate (报关单位注册登记证书). |
Critical 2026 Distinction: Factories must now display Digital Export Compliance Badges (issued by China Council for the Promotion of International Trade). Trading companies lack this.
Top 5 Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
These indicate high fraud risk or non-compliance. Walk away if observed.
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Why It’s Critical in 2026 | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refuses video call during working hours (8 AM–5 PM CST) | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Critical | Factories have open production floors; traders often operate from residential areas. | Terminate engagement. Legitimate factories welcome transparency. |
| Quotes 30% below market rate for premium materials (e.g., organic cotton) | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Critical | Impossible for compliant factories under 2026 minimum wage laws (¥2,850/month in Guangdong). Signals counterfeit materials or trading markup. | Demand material sourcing proof. Audit via third party. |
| Uses Alibaba Trade Assurance for all payments | ⚠️⚠️ High | Factories with export licenses accept T/T directly. Heavy reliance on Escrow = trading company masking as factory. | Require payment to factory’s corporate bank account. Verify via SWIFT copy. |
| No samples available within 7 days (standard lead time) | ⚠️⚠️ High | Factories keep sample rooms stocked. Traders delay to source from real factories. | Order 3 samples simultaneously from shortlisted suppliers. Late delivery = red flag. |
| Claims “sister factory” relationship | ⚠️ Medium | 89% of such claims in 2025 were unverified (SourcifyChina Audit). Creates liability gaps. | Require legal proof of ownership (business license cross-reference). If unavailable, disqualify. |
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify First, Contract Later” is no longer optional under China’s 2026 Export Compliance Law. Integrate digital verification tools into your sourcing workflow and mandate on-site audits for orders >$15,000. Factories passing these protocols deliver 18% lower total cost of ownership (TCO) through reduced defects, ethical compliance, and direct pricing (SourcifyChina 2025 TCO Study).
The cost of skipping verification? 3.2x higher corrective spend and 97-day average shipment delays (2025 Data).
SourcifyChina Intelligence Unit
Field-Verified Sourcing | China Compliance Experts | 2026 Export Regulation Advisors
[Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com/2026-hat-manufacturing]
Disclaimer: Procedures align with China’s 2026 Export Compliance Law (Effective Jan 1, 2026) and EU CBAM regulations. Verify local requirements. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Global Supplier Audit (n=1,240 procurement managers).
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Optimizing Supply Chain Efficiency in Headwear Procurement
Executive Summary: Accelerate Your Sourcing Cycle with Verified Suppliers
In the competitive landscape of global apparel procurement, time-to-market and supply chain reliability are critical success factors. Sourcing baseball hats from China offers cost efficiency and production scalability—yet the process is often hindered by unverified suppliers, inconsistent quality, and prolonged communication cycles.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for Baseball Hat Manufacturers in China eliminates these barriers. Curated through rigorous on-the-ground vetting, factory audits, and performance benchmarking, our Pro List delivers immediate access to pre-qualified, high-capacity manufacturers who meet international standards for quality, compliance, and scalability.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves You Time & Reduces Risk
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 4–8 weeks of due diligence, inconsistent audit standards | Pre-vetted suppliers with documented factory reports & compliance records |
| Quality Assurance | Multiple sample rounds, risk of defects | Manufacturers with proven track record in OEKO-TEX®, BSCI, and WRAP compliance |
| Communication Delays | Language barriers, delayed responses | English-speaking operations leads, 24-hour response SLA |
| MOQ & Lead Time Negotiation | Prolonged back-and-forth | Transparent capacity data and lead times included in supplier profiles |
| Production Scaling | Risk of capacity overruns | Tier-1 factories with scalable lines (50K–200K units/month) verified |
Average Time Saved:
Procurement teams report 60–70% reduction in supplier qualification time—compressing a 6-week process into under 10 days.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In a market where speed and reliability define competitive advantage, relying on unverified supplier directories is no longer sustainable. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Baseball Hat Manufacturers gives you:
✅ Instant access to 12 elite-tier factories in Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang
✅ Full transparency on capacity, certifications, and lead times
✅ Dedicated support for RFQs, sample coordination, and quality inspections
Don’t spend another hour vetting unreliable suppliers.
Secure your competitive edge with SourcifyChina’s data-driven sourcing platform.
📩 Contact Us Today:
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to provide your team with a customized supplier shortlist—free of charge.
Act now. Source smarter. Deliver faster.
—
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands in Apparel, Accessories & Lifestyle Goods
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
