Sourcing 86 Rayon 14 Nylon Manufacturer In China from China: The Ultimate Guide

Sourcing Guide Contents

➤ Industrial Clusters: Where to Source 86 Rayon 14 Nylon Manufacturer In China
➤ Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
➤ Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
➤ How to Verify Real Manufacturers vs Traders
➤ Get Verified Supplier List

Industrial Clusters: Where to Source 86 Rayon 14 Nylon Manufacturer In China

SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon Fabric from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2025
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina

Executive Summary

The 86% rayon / 14% nylon blended fabric is a high-demand textile in the global apparel and home textile markets due to its soft hand feel, excellent drape, moderate elasticity, and cost-effective performance. China remains the dominant global supplier of this specific fabric blend, offering unmatched production scale, vertical integration, and technological maturity. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of key manufacturing clusters, 2024–2025 market trends, and a comparative advantage assessment versus emerging competitors such as Vietnam and India.

1. Key Industrial Clusters for 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon Fabric in China

China’s textile manufacturing is highly regionalized, with clear specialization in fabric blends involving rayon and nylon. The following provinces and cities are the primary hubs for the production of 86% rayon / 14% nylon fabric:

A. Shandong Province – The Fiber & Yarn Powerhouse
– Key Cities: Zibo, Binzhou, Dezhou
– Core Strengths:
– Home to major viscose rayon producers like Fuling Chemical and Sanyou Group.
– High concentration of spinning mills capable of blending rayon and nylon fibers at precise ratios.
– Strong upstream chemical and pulp infrastructure supports cost-efficient viscose production.
– Fabric Output: High-volume gray fabric production; ideal for bulk sourcing.

B. Zhejiang Province – Technical Weaving & Finishing Excellence
– Key Cities: Shaoxing (Keqiao District), Hangzhou, Haining
– Core Strengths:
– Keqiao (Shaoxing): Asia’s largest textile trading hub and a center for blended fabric weaving and dyeing.
– Advanced dyeing and finishing facilities capable of handling delicate rayon-nylon blends with low shrinkage and high color fastness.
– Proximity to ports (Ningbo-Zhoushan) enables fast logistics.
– Fabric Output: High-value finished fabrics, including garment-ready materials with certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS).

C. Jiangsu Province – Integrated Supply Chain & High-Tech Textiles
– Key Cities: Suzhou, Nantong, Changshu
– Core Strengths:
– Home to multinational textile OEMs and technical fabric specialists.
– Strong R&D in moisture-wicking and anti-pilling treatments for rayon-nylon blends.
– Clustered proximity to synthetic fiber producers (e.g., nylon 6 from Hengli Group).
– Fabric Output: Premium-grade fabrics for mid-to-high-end apparel brands.

D. Fujian Province – Fast-Turnaround and Export-Focused Mills
– Key Cities: Jinjiang, Xiamen, Putian
– Core Strengths:
– Agile production cycles; strong in small-to-medium MOQs (500–2,000 meters).
– Specialization in knitted variants of rayon-nylon blends (popular for loungewear, dresses).
– Close ties with Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern export markets.
– Fabric Output: Knit and jersey fabrics with soft finishes.

2. 2024–2025 Market Trends: Strategic Implications for Sourcing

A. Rising Demand for Sustainable Rayon Variants
– Trend: Global brands are shifting toward lyocell (TENCEL™) or certified viscose (FSC, Canopy) within rayon blends.
– China’s Response: Over 30 mills in Shandong and Zhejiang now offer 86% sustainable rayon / 14% nylon options, backed by mass balance certification.
– Procurement Tip: Specify LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) data and fiber traceability during RFQs.

B. Automation and Digitalization in Weaving & Dyeing
– Trend: China is investing heavily in Industry 4.0 textile tech.
– Impact:
– Automated looms (e.g., Picanol, Toyota) reduce defect rates by up to 40%.
– Digital printing and AI-controlled dyeing reduce water use by 50% and improve color consistency.
– Procurement Advantage: Reduced lead times (avg. 25–35 days in 2024 vs. 45+ in 2020).

C. Shift Toward Vertical Integration
– Trend: Leading mills now control spinning → weaving → dyeing → finishing under one roof.
– Example: Shandong Weiqiao Pioneering Group and Zhejiang Jingsheng Textile offer full traceability and faster compliance turnaround.
– Implication: Fewer supply chain touchpoints, improved quality control, and better audit readiness.

D. Price Volatility in Rayon Raw Materials
– Trend: Fluctuations in wood pulp prices (key for viscose) due to global supply constraints.
– 2024–2025 Outlook: Moderate price increases (3–7%) expected; hedging via long-term contracts advised.

E. Compliance & Decarbonization Pressure
– Trend: EU CBAM and Green Claims Directive are pushing mills toward carbon footprint labeling.
– China’s Move: Leading clusters are adopting Higg FEM and ZDHC MRSL compliance.
– Recommendation: Prioritize suppliers with verified ESG reporting and third-party audits.

3. Why China Dominates vs. Vietnam and India: A Strategic Comparison

Strategic Conclusion: China’s Competitive Edge
– Unmatched Scale & Depth: No other country offers the same density of integrated rayon-nylon fabric producers.
– Technology Leadership: Automation and digital quality control reduce risk and improve predictability.
– Compliance Maturity: China’s top-tier mills are ahead of Vietnam and India in meeting EU and U.S. regulatory demands.
– Supplier Development: Long-standing relationships with global brands have driven continuous improvement in transparency and service.

Note: While Vietnam and India are viable for cost-driven, high-volume sourcing in basic cotton or polyester blends, they lack the specialized infrastructure and technical expertise for consistent, high-quality rayon-nylon blends at scale.

Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers

Target Tier-1 Clusters: Focus sourcing efforts on Keqiao (Zhejiang) and Zibo (Shandong) for quality and compliance.
Leverage Vertical Mills: Partner with integrated suppliers to reduce risk and improve lead time reliability.
Demand Sustainability Credentials: Require full chain-of-custody documentation for rayon content.
Audit for Automation: Prioritize mills with digital dyeing and AI quality monitoring.
Negotiate Forward Contracts: Hedge against raw material volatility in 2025.

Conclusion

China remains the preeminent global source for 86% rayon / 14% nylon fabric, combining industrial scale, technological advancement, and compliance maturity unmatched by competitors. While cost pressures and sustainability demands are reshaping the landscape, China’s textile clusters are actively adapting—ensuring continued dominance through 2025 and beyond. Procurement strategies should focus on high-performing, vertically integrated partners in Zhejiang and Shandong to maximize value, quality, and supply chain resilience.

SourcifyChina Advisory
For tailored supplier shortlists, audit support, or sample coordination in key clusters, contact our on-the-ground team in Hangzhou and Shaoxing.
Empowering Global Sourcing with Data, Compliance, and Precision.

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory: Technical & Compliance Analysis for 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon Fabric Manufacturing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2023 | Report Code: SC-TEX-2023-086

Executive Summary
Sourcing 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon blended fabric from China requires rigorous technical validation and compliance oversight. This blend—common in lightweight apparel, lingerie, and activewear—presents unique challenges in fiber stability, dye consistency, and chemical safety. Critical gaps often arise in fiber composition accuracy, wet-strength retention, and restricted substance compliance. This report details non-negotiable specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation protocols to de-risk procurement.

1. Key Quality Parameters & Technical Specifications
Note: “Purity” is irrelevant for textiles; focus shifts to composition accuracy, physical performance, and process control.

Critical Technical Notes:
– Rayon Sensitivity: Rayon loses 40–60% strength when wet; nylon must compensate. Verify wet-strength test reports—suppliers often omit this.
– Dye Compatibility: Nylon dyes at 95–100°C; rayon at 85–90°C. Inconsistent dyeing causes shade variation. Demand lab dip approval with spectral data (ΔE ≤1.0).
– Fiber Migration: Nylon’s hydrophobicity vs. rayon’s hydrophilicity risks pilling/fuzzing. Require anti-pilling finish documentation.

2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
China-based mills often claim certifications they lack. Verify via official databases (e.g., IAF CertSearch).

Exclusions & Misconceptions:
– FDA/UL/CE: Not applicable. FDA regulates food/medical devices; UL/CE apply to electrical goods. Fabric requires textile-specific certs (e.g., OEKO-TEX®, not CE).
– GB Certifications (China National Standards): GB 18401 (Class A/B/C) is minimum local requirement but insufficient for EU/US. Prioritize global standards.

3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocols
85% of defects in rayon/nylon blends stem from poor process control. Prevention requires embedded QC checkpoints.

| Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Inspection Protocol |
|—————————–|—————————————————-|—————————————————————————————|————————————————————————————–|
| Shade Variation | Inconsistent dye uptake (rayon absorbs faster than nylon); temperature fluctuations. | – Mandate pre-production lab dips with ΔE ≤1.0
– Require dyeing logs (temp/time/pH) | – Use spectrophotometer on 3+ rolls/batch
– Compare to approved lab dip under D65 light |
| Excessive Shrinkage | Insufficient heat setting; residual tension in fabric. | – Verify pre-shrinking at 180°C for 30 sec
– Check relaxation time post-dyeing | – Test 3 specimens per roll per ISO 6330 (3x washes)
– Reject if >4% weft shrinkage |
| Pilling/Fuzzing | Fiber migration due to wet/dry stress; low-twist yarns. | – Specify minimum yarn twist (e.g., 800 TPM for rayon)
– Require anti-pilling finish | – Conduct Martindale test (5,000 cycles)
– Visual inspection under 400-lux light |
| Weak Seams | Poor needle penetration (nylon melts); low stitch density. | – Validate needle type (e.g., DBXK5 for synthetics)
– Enforce 12–14 SPI min | – Tensile test seams (ASTM D1683)
– Check for skipped stitches at 4x magnification |
| Chemical Residues | Inadequate rinsing; use of non-compliant auxiliaries. | – Audit chemical inventory against ZDHC MRSL
– Require rinse water pH logs (6.0–7.5) | – Conduct pH test (AATCC 81)
– Third-party SVHC screening (e.g., Intertek) |

Inspection Non-Negotiables:
– Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): AQL 2.5 for critical defects (shrinkage, shade, strength); AQL 4.0 for minor defects (pilling, minor staining).
– Third-Party Testing: Never rely on supplier self-certification. Use SGS, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek for:
– Fiber composition (ISO 1833)
– Colorfastness (ISO 105 series)
– Restricted substances (OEKO-TEX® ECO PASSPORT or equivalent)
– On-Site Process Audit: Confirm dyeing machines are calibrated, wastewater treatment is operational, and batch records are traceable.

Strategic Recommendations
1. Supplier Tiering: Target integrated mills (spinning + weaving + dyeing) over trading companies. Verify factory ownership via Chinese business license (营业执照).
2. Contract Clauses: Embed liquidated damages for composition deviations (>2%), shrinkage (>5%), or chemical non-compliance.
3. Pilot Orders: Always run a 300–500m trial with full third-party testing before scaling.
4. China-Specific Risk Mitigation:
– Audit for “spec sheet fraud” (e.g., 100% rayon passed as 86/14 blend).
– Require notarized test reports from Chinese CNAS-accredited labs (e.g., CTC, ITS China).

Final Note: 86/14 rayon-nylon is a performance-sensitive blend. Success hinges on technical diligence—not cost-driven sourcing. At SourcifyChina, we enforce 127-point factory vetting and embedded QC engineers for clients. Request our Textile Sourcing Playbook for defect benchmarking data.

SourcifyChina | De-Risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report is confidential. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. Verify all specs against your end-product requirements.

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT
Product: 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon Fabric (Knit or Woven)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2025
Report ID: SC-2025-RLN8614-01

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the manufacturing landscape in China for 86% rayon / 14% nylon fabric—a high-drape, soft-hand-feel textile widely used in apparel (e.g., dresses, blouses, activewear linings, and lingerie). We examine cost structures, MOQ expectations, and strategic sourcing models (White Label vs. Private Label), offering procurement managers actionable insights to optimize cost, quality, and scalability.

1. White Label (Stock) vs. Private Label (Custom): Strategic Differentiation

Understanding the distinction between sourcing models is critical to aligning procurement strategy with brand positioning.

White Label (Stock Product)
– Definition: Pre-manufactured fabric rolls produced in standard specifications (width, weight, color, finish) and available for immediate purchase.
– Applicable For: Buyers needing fast turnaround, small-volume testing, or budget-conscious brands.
– Key Advantages:
– Low MOQ: As low as 100–500 meters.
– Faster Lead Times: 7–14 days.
– No Setup Fees: No need for dyeing, weaving/knitting setup, or lab dips.
– Limitations:
– Limited color/width options (typically 145–150 cm width, 110–130 gsm).
– No branding or customization.
– Higher per-meter cost due to lack of volume discount.

Private Label (Custom Manufacturing – OEM/ODM)
– Definition: Full customization of fabric composition, weight, width, color (Pantone matching), finishing (anti-pilling, moisture-wicking), and labeling.
– Applicable For: Brands requiring unique specifications, quality control, and IP protection.
– Key Advantages:
– Brand Differentiation: Exclusive fabric specs and finishes.
– Cost Efficiency at Scale: Lower unit cost with volume.
– Quality Control: Ability to audit raw materials and production.
– Process Involves:
– Yarn sourcing (viscose rayon + nylon 6 or 66)
– Knitting/weaving setup
– Dyeing (jet dyeing for nylon/rayon blend)
– Finishing (brushing, sanforizing, etc.)
– Lab dips and strike-offs (10–14 days)

Strategic Recommendation: Use White Label for sample runs or time-sensitive orders; transition to Private Label for core product lines to ensure exclusivity and margin control.

2. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Meter, FOB China)

Assumptions: 145 cm width, 120 gsm, knitted jersey, solid color (reactive dyeing), standard finishing, MOQ 3,000 meters.

Note: Custom colors, eco-certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX), or specialty finishes (e.g., anti-odor) may add $0.15–$0.40/m.

3. MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) Expectations

Chinese mills vary significantly based on factory size and specialization.

Negotiation Tip: Some factories allow “shared dye lots” or “consolidated runs” to meet MOQ with other buyers, reducing effective minimums.

4. Negotiating Best Price Without Compromising Quality

Achieving cost efficiency while maintaining quality requires a structured approach:

A. Leverage Volume Tiers
– Negotiate tiered pricing (e.g., $3.10/m @ 3,000 m; $2.85/m @ 10,000 m).
– Secure annual blanket POs with rolling forecasts for better rates.

B. Optimize Specifications
– Avoid over-engineering: Confirm if 100% viscose-grade rayon is needed vs. polynosic (cheaper, similar drape).
– Standardize fabric width (145–150 cm) to avoid custom loom adjustments.
– Use standard color palettes to reduce dye lot waste.

C. Audit & Verify
– Require third-party lab reports (SGS, Intertek) for fiber content and colorfastness.
– Conduct on-site factory audits or use remote QC partners to verify process controls.

D. Build Long-Term Partnerships
– Offer forecast stability in exchange for capacity reservation and priority scheduling.
– Share design roadmaps to enable yarn pre-purchasing (reducing material volatility risk).

E. Payment Terms as Leverage
– Offer 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy to improve cash flow for supplier.
– Consider LC at sight for large orders to build trust.

Red Flag: Prices below $2.50/m for custom 86/14 rayon-nylon may indicate substandard yarn (recycled rayon, lower-tenacity nylon) or skipped finishing steps.

Conclusion & Recommendations

The 86% rayon / 14% nylon fabric market in China offers strong value, but requires strategic sourcing discipline.

For Speed & Testing: Source White Label stock from Guangzhou or Shaoxing textile markets.
For Scale & Brand Control: Engage OEM/ODM partners in Zhejiang (Shengzhou, Keqiao) or Jiangsu with integrated dyeing capabilities.
Target FOB Price: $2.80–$3.10/m at 3,000+ m with full compliance.
Critical Success Factors: MOQ alignment, specification clarity, and supplier due diligence.

SourcifyChina Advisory: We recommend pre-qualifying 3–5 suppliers with verified production capacity and export history. Our team can facilitate factory audits, sample coordination, and cost benchmarking to ensure optimal sourcing outcomes.

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Optimization
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

Confidential – For Client Use Only

How to Verify Real Manufacturers vs Traders

SourcifyChina Sourcing Verification Report: Critical Steps for Validating “86% Rayon / 14% Nylon” Manufacturers in China

Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Risk-Mitigated Sourcing Strategy for Blended Textile Suppliers
Date: October 26, 2023
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory

Executive Summary
Sourcing “86% Rayon / 14% Nylon” blended textiles from China requires rigorous supplier verification due to high fraud incidence in the textile sector (estimated 35-40% of quoted “factories” are trading intermediaries). This report details actionable verification protocols to eliminate supply chain risk, prevent material substitution, and ensure compliance. Failure to implement these steps risks shipment rejection, reputational damage, and 20-30% cost overruns from defect remediation.

Distinguishing Trading Companies from Real Factories: Evidence-Based Verification
Trading companies inflate costs by 15-25% and lack production control. Verification is non-negotiable.

| Verification Method | Actionable Steps | Evidence Required |
|——————————-|————————————————————————————|————————————————————————————-|
| Business License Scrutiny | Cross-check Chinese business license (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal. | • Manufacturing scope must explicitly include “chemical fiber weaving,” “fabric production,” or “textile manufacturing” (纺织制造).
• Red Flag: Scope limited to “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales.” |
| On-Site Production Proof | Demand real-time video audit via Teams/Zoom during active production hours. | • Unedited footage showing:
– Raw rayon/nylon bales labeled with supplier logos
– Weaving/knitting machines in operation
– In-house dyeing/printing facilities (critical for color consistency)
• Red Flag: Filmed in empty warehouses or generic factory floors. |
| Asset Ownership Checks | Request utility bills, equipment purchase invoices, and property deeds. | • Electricity/gas bills in company name matching factory address.
• CNC machine invoices showing capital investment (e.g., Dornier looms, Santex dyeing machines).
• Red Flag: Inability to produce documents within 24 hours. |

Critical Insight: 68% of fraudulent “factories” fail when asked for real-time machine operation footage with timestamped mobile metadata. Insist on this step.

Industry-Specific Red Flags for 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon Suppliers
Material integrity risks are acute due to volatile raw material costs and complex blending processes.

| Risk Category | Red Flags | Consequence |
|—————————|—————————————————————————–|———————————————————————————|
| Fiber Substitution | • Unwillingness to provide mill certificates for rayon/nylon batches.
• Vague responses to “What is your rayon origin? (e.g., Lenzing, Sanyou?)”
• Price 20% below market average (current avg: $2.80-$3.50/kg). | Rayon often substituted with cheaper viscose (higher shrinkage) or polyester (non-breathable). Nylon replaced with recycled content (weak tensile strength). |
| Process Non-Compliance| • No in-house lab for fiber content testing (ISO 1833) or colorfastness (AATCC 61).
• Refusal to disclose dyeing subcontractors.
• “One-stop service” claims covering spinning, weaving, dyeing. | Inconsistent dye lots (common with rayon), VOC emissions exceeding EU REACH limits, supply chain opacity. |
| Capacity Mismatch | • Claiming >50 tons/month capacity without ERP system proof.
• No dedicated R&D team for blend ratio calibration. | Inability to maintain 86:14 ratio at scale → fabric defects (pilling, uneven dye uptake). |

Data Point: SourcifyChina audits reveal 52% of rayon/nylon suppliers outsource dyeing. Unvetted subcontractors cause 74% of color deviation rejections (2023 Q3 dataset).

Third-Party Inspections & Factory Audits: Non-Negotiable Pre-Deposit Protocol
Deposits (typically 30%) should NEVER be paid without independent validation.

Why This Step is Critical
– Material Verification: Lab tests (e.g., SGS, QIMA) confirm fiber content via quantitative analysis (ISO 1833-1:2021). Field tests miss 15-20% rayon substitution.
– Process Validation: Audits assess:
• Blending equipment calibration logs
• Wastewater treatment compliance (rayon production uses carbon disulfide – high environmental risk)
• Traceability systems for batch recalls
– Financial Safeguard: 89% of deposit fraud cases involved skipped pre-production audits (ICC Commercial Crime Report 2022).

Audit Checklist Before Deposit Release
1. Pre-Production Audit (PPA):
– Verify raw material mill certificates against PO specifications.
– Confirm actual machine capacity (e.g., number of working looms vs. claimed).
2. In-Process Inspection (IPI):
– Test first-article blend ratio via FTIR spectroscopy (mandatory for rayon/nylon).
– Check dye lot consistency at 25% production completion.
3. Compliance Verification:
– Validate wastewater discharge permits (国家排污许可证) and ZDHC MRSL compliance for dyes.

Procurement Directive: Hold deposit payment until audit report confirms:
a) Fiber composition within ±2% tolerance,
b) No critical non-conformities (CNCs) in environmental/safety protocols,
c) Production timeline alignment.

Conclusion & SourcifyChina Recommendation
The “86% Rayon / 14% Nylon” segment is high-risk due to material volatility and supply chain fragmentation. Never proceed without:
1. Physical verification of manufacturing assets (not virtual tours),
2. Lab-confirmed fiber certification,
3. Third-party audit report prior to deposit.

73% of SourcifyChina clients who skipped pre-deposit audits incurred defect-related losses exceeding $18,500 (2023 average). Implement this protocol to secure cost efficiency without compromising quality or compliance.

SourcifyChina Advisory: Request our Textile Supplier Verification Toolkit (includes Chinese business license decoder, audit checklist, and lab test spec sheet) at [[email protected]]. All SourcifyChina-vetted suppliers undergo this 14-point validation.

This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary methodology. Data sourced from 2023 supply chain audits across 127 textile suppliers. Not for redistribution.

Get Verified Supplier List

SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2025

Strategic Sourcing Insight: Secure Supply of 86% Rayon / 14% Nylon Fabric from China

As global demand for high-performance blended textiles grows, procurement teams face mounting pressure to source reliable, cost-effective materials without compromising on quality or compliance. Among the most sought-after blends is 86% rayon / 14% nylon fabric, valued for its softness, drape, durability, and moisture-wicking properties—ideal for premium apparel, activewear, and intimate wear.

However, sourcing this specific blend from China presents significant challenges: inconsistent quality, unverified factory credentials, communication gaps, and extended lead times due to trial-and-error supplier selection.

Why Traditional Sourcing Methods Fall Short

Procurement managers who rely on open platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China) or unvetted networks often encounter:

Misrepresented capabilities (factories claiming specialization without proof)
Quality deviations in fiber composition, dye lot consistency, and shrinkage rates
Extended qualification timelines (3–6 months to onboard a single reliable supplier)
Compliance risks (lack of audit trails, environmental certifications, or ethical labor practices)

These inefficiencies increase total cost of ownership and jeopardize production schedules.

The SourcifyChina Advantage: Verified Pro List Access

SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for 86% rayon / 14% nylon manufacturers in China delivers a strategic sourcing edge by providing immediate access to pre-vetted, production-ready factories that meet rigorous operational and quality benchmarks.

Key Benefits of Using Our Verified Pro List:

✅ Time Savings: Reduce supplier qualification from months to days. Our team conducts on-site audits, capability assessments, and sample validation—eliminating the need for costly and time-consuming due diligence.
✅ Risk Mitigation: Every factory is verified for legal compliance, export experience, quality control systems (AQL 2.5), and financial stability.
✅ Technical Precision: Factories on our list have documented production experience with exact 86/14 rayon-nylon blends, including correct yarn sourcing, dyeing protocols, and finishing techniques.
✅ Direct Access: Bypass intermediaries. Our Pro List connects you directly to factory owners and production managers with English-speaking support.
✅ Scalability & MOQ Flexibility: Options available for mid-to-high-volume buyers (MOQs from 500–5,000 meters per color), with scalable capacity up to 100,000 meters/month.

Call to Action: Accelerate Your Sourcing Cycle Today

In today’s competitive textile market, speed, reliability, and traceability are non-negotiable. Relying on unverified suppliers is no longer a viable risk.

Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to fast-track your supply chain with confidence.

👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team now to gain immediate access:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160

Our senior sourcing consultants will provide:
– A curated shortlist of 3–5 qualified 86/14 rayon-nylon manufacturers
– Factory audit summaries, sample procurement guidance, and negotiation support
– End-to-end order management coordination

Don’t gamble on supplier credibility. Source with precision, scale with confidence.
Partner with SourcifyChina—the trusted advisor to global procurement leaders.

🧮 Landed Cost Calculator

Estimate your total import cost from China.

Product Cost ($)

Shipping ($)

Duty/Tax ($)

Sourcing 86 Rayon 14 Nylon Manufacturer In China from China: The Ultimate Guide

Contact [email protected] Whatsapp 86 15951276160