Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source 25155-25-3 Supplier In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: CAS 25155-25-3 (Tris(2-ethylhexyl) Phosphate – TEHP)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026
Report ID: SC-CH-TEHP-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
CAS 25155-25-3 (Tris(2-ethylhexyl) Phosphate, TEHP) is a high-performance phosphate ester plasticizer used in demanding applications requiring flame resistance, low volatility, and thermal stability (e.g., aerospace wiring, military cables, specialty polymers). Sourcing from China requires stringent vetting due to complex chemistry, regulatory scrutiny (REACH, TSCA), and safety-critical end-uses. Critical Insight: Prioritize suppliers with IATF 16949/AS9100 certification and full regulatory dossiers over lowest-cost options. The Yangtze River Delta (Jiangsu, Zhejiang) and Shandong Peninsula dominate production, but quality variance is significant.
⚠️ Critical Clarification: “25155-25-3” is a Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Registry Number, not a product description. Sourcing requires precise technical specifications (purity ≥99.5%, acid value, color APHA, moisture content). Suppliers must provide full SDS, REACH pre-registrations, and batch-specific QC reports. Do not engage suppliers who cannot verify CAS-specific compliance.
Key Industrial Clusters for CAS 25155-25-3 Production in China
TEHP synthesis demands advanced organic chemistry infrastructure and hazardous material handling licenses. Production is concentrated in:
-
Jiangsu Province (Primary Hub)
- Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park: State-approved hazardous chemical zone. Home to Sinopec subsidiaries (e.g., Nanjing Chemical Industries Co., Ltd.) and specialized players like Jiangsu Yoke Technology. Dominates >45% of China’s high-purity TEHP output. Advantage: Integrated supply chain for raw materials (2-ethylhexanol, POCl₃), robust EHS systems, proximity to Shanghai customs.
- Zhangjiagang (Suzhou): Cluster of mid-sized exporters (e.g., Zhangjiagang Glory Chemical) focused on EU/US markets. Strong focus on regulatory documentation.
-
Shandong Province (Cost-Competitive Volume)
- Weifang Binhai Economic & Technological Development Area: Large-scale chemical parks (e.g., Shandong Ruijing New Materials). Produces industrial-grade TEHP at lower costs. Caution: Higher risk of inconsistent purity; requires rigorous 3rd-party batch testing.
-
Zhejiang Province (Niche Applications)
- Ningbo-Zhoushan Port Area: Suppliers like Ningbo Huarui Chemical cater to electronics/plastics OEMs. Focus on ultra-low-color (APHA <50) grades. Limited capacity vs. Jiangsu.
Guangdong (e.g., Shenzhen, Guangzhou) is NOT a significant production hub for TEHP. It serves as an export/logistics hub for finished goods using TEHP (e.g., cables), not raw material manufacturing.
Regional Production Comparison: Key Metrics for Procurement Managers
| Criteria | Jiangsu (Nanjing/Zhangjiagang) | Shandong (Weifang) | Zhejiang (Ningbo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB China) | $4,800 – $5,600 / MT (Purity ≥99.5%) | $4,200 – $4,700 / MT (Purity 98-99.2%) | $5,000 – $5,800 / MT (Purity ≥99.5%, Low Color) |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ Highest consistency. IATF/AS9100 common. Full regulatory dossiers. Low batch variance. | ★★★☆☆ Variable purity. Basic ISO 9001 common. Regulatory support often inadequate. Higher risk of off-spec batches. | ★★★★☆ Excellent for niche specs (color, volatility). Strong QC for target applications. Smaller batch sizes. |
| Lead Time | 35-45 days (Includes mandatory 7-day EHS hold post-production) | 25-35 days (Less stringent post-production holds) | 30-40 days (Custom batches add 5-10 days) |
| Key Risk | Premium pricing; complex export docs for hazardous goods | Purity inconsistency; potential REACH non-compliance | Limited volume capacity; premium for specialty grades |
| Best For | Mission-critical applications (aerospace, defense), EU/US compliance | Cost-sensitive industrial uses (non-safety critical), buffer stock | High-end electronics, medical-adjacent polymers |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026 Outlook)
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: Demand full REACH registration numbers (not just pre-registration) and TSCA certification. Verify via EU/US regulatory portals. 70% of audit failures in 2025 stemmed from incomplete documentation.
- Cluster-Specific Vetting:
- Jiangsu: Confirm park-level hazardous chemical production license (国家安全生产监督管理总局 issued).
- Shandong: Mandate SGS/Bureau Veritas batch testing for every shipment.
- Zhejiang: Audit for dedicated low-color production lines (not repurposed reactors).
- Logistics Strategy: Use Shanghai/Ningbo ports for Jiangsu/Zhejiang; Qingdao port for Shandong. Factor in 10-15% cost premium for IMDG-certified hazardous cargo handling.
- 2026 Trend: China’s “14th Five-Year Plan” is accelerating consolidation of chemical parks. Prioritize suppliers in Grade-A parks (e.g., Nanjing CIP) – smaller unlicensed facilities face shutdowns, risking supply continuity.
SourcifyChina Action Step: We pre-qualify TEHP suppliers against 22-point chemical sourcing checklist (EHS, regulatory, technical). Request our Verified Supplier Dossier for CAS 25155-25-3 (Includes audit reports, test templates, and compliance roadmap).
Disclaimer: Prices reflect Q3 2026 market conditions (FOB China, 20MT container). TEHP is classified as hazardous (UN 3082, Class 9). All sourcing must align with local regulations. SourcifyChina conducts supplier audits but does not assume liability for end-user compliance.
Next Step: Schedule a Chemical Sourcing Risk Assessment with our regulatory team to avoid supply chain disruptions. [Contact SourcifyChina Compliance Desk]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing 25155-25-3 (Sodium Hyaluronate) from China – Technical Specifications, Compliance, and Quality Assurance
Introduction
CAS Number 25155-25-3 refers to Sodium Hyaluronate (Hyaluronic Acid Sodium Salt), a high-value biopolymer widely used in pharmaceuticals, medical devices, cosmetics, and nutraceuticals. Sourcing this compound from China requires strict adherence to technical specifications, regulatory compliance, and quality control protocols to ensure product safety, efficacy, and international market access.
This report outlines the critical sourcing parameters for Sodium Hyaluronate suppliers in China, including material specifications, tolerances, mandatory certifications, and a comprehensive guide to common quality defects and preventive measures.
1. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Tolerance / Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Identity | Sodium Hyaluronate (C14H21NO11Na)n | Identity confirmed via FTIR, NMR, or HPLC |
| Molecular Weight | Low (50–500 kDa), Medium (500–1,000 kDa), High (>1,000 kDa) | ±10% of declared range |
| Purity (Assay) | ≥90% (HPLC or gravimetric analysis) | 90–105% of labeled amount |
| pH (1% Solution) | 6.0 – 7.5 | ±0.3 units |
| Residual Solvents | Ethanol, Acetone, Isopropanol | ≤5000 ppm (per ICH Q3C) |
| Moisture Content (LOD) | ≤10% | Max 10% at 105°C |
| Sulfated Ash / Residue on Ignition | ≤15% | ≤15% w/w |
| Protein Content | ≤0.1% | Measured via Bradford or Lowry assay |
| Endotoxin Level | ≤0.5 EU/mg (Pharmaceutical grade) | LAL test; critical for injectables |
| Microbial Limits | Total Aerobic Microbial Count: ≤100 CFU/g Yeast & Mold: ≤10 CFU/g Salmonella, E. coli: Absent in 1g |
Per USP <61> / EP 5.1.4 |
| Appearance | White to off-white, free-flowing powder | No visible particulates or discoloration |
2. Essential Certifications for Chinese Suppliers
Global procurement of Sodium Hyaluronate requires suppliers to hold and maintain the following certifications to ensure compliance with international markets:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 13485:2016 | Quality Management System for Medical Devices | Mandatory for suppliers targeting medical device or pharmaceutical applications |
| ISO 22716:2007 | GMP for Cosmetics | Required for cosmetic-grade HA |
| FDA Registration (U.S. FDA) | Facility registered with FDA (FEI number) | Required for export to U.S. (DMF support preferred) |
| CE Marking (via MDR/IVDR) | Compliance with EU Medical Device Regulation | Required for medical-grade products sold in EU |
| USP / EP Compliance | Meets United States Pharmacopeia or European Pharmacopoeia monographs | Critical for pharmaceutical use |
| FSSC 22000 or ISO 22000 | Food Safety Management | Required for nutraceutical or oral supplement applications |
| REACH & RoHS Compliance | Chemical safety in EU | Ensures no restricted substances |
| Halal & Kosher Certification | Religious compliance for global markets | Value-added for consumer health products |
Note: Suppliers should provide active certificates with valid audit trails and be open to third-party audits (e.g., SMETA, TÜV, BSI).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| High Endotoxin Levels | Poor sanitation in fermentation or purification | Implement strict cleanroom controls (Grade C/D), use depyrogenation methods, and conduct routine LAL testing |
| Inconsistent Molecular Weight | Uncontrolled enzymatic degradation or purification | Use size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) for QC; validate process parameters (pH, temperature, shear) |
| Moisture Absorption (Caking) | Inadequate drying or packaging | Use vacuum drying, nitrogen-flushed double-layer packaging with desiccants |
| Microbial Contamination | Poor GMP practices or raw material control | Enforce environmental monitoring, sterilize equipment, and test raw materials |
| Residual Solvent Exceedance | Incomplete solvent removal during extraction | Optimize rotary evaporation and lyophilization; validate with GC-MS |
| Protein Contamination | Incomplete purification from bacterial fermentation | Use protease treatment and ultrafiltration; validate with protein assays |
| Color Variation / Yellowing | Oxidation or thermal degradation | Store under inert gas (N2), avoid high temperatures, use light-resistant packaging |
| Low Purity / Assay Failure | Incomplete precipitation or impurity carryover | Optimize alcohol precipitation; implement HPLC-based QC screening |
4. Supplier Audit Recommendations
Procurement managers should conduct or commission the following audits when qualifying a 25155-25-3 supplier in China:
- On-site GMP Audit (based on WHO, EU, or FDA guidelines)
- Document Review: COA, DMF (if applicable), batch records, change control logs
- Stability Studies: 3-month, 6-month accelerated (40°C/75% RH) and long-term data
- Supply Chain Traceability: Verify raw material sources (e.g., Streptococcus zooepidemicus strain origin)
Conclusion
Sourcing Sodium Hyaluronate (25155-25-3) from China offers cost and scalability advantages, but demands rigorous technical and compliance oversight. Prioritize suppliers with pharmaceutical-grade certifications, transparent QC protocols, and proven export experience. Implement third-party inspections and batch-specific testing to mitigate quality risks and ensure regulatory compliance across target markets.
For SourcifyChina clients, we recommend pre-qualifying suppliers through our China Supplier Excellence Program (CSEP), which includes on-ground audit support, COA verification, and customs compliance alignment.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Procurement Guide for CAS 25155-25-3 (Tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate Sodium Salt) in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only | Report ID: SC-CH-25155-2026-001
Executive Summary
CAS 25155-25-3 (Tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate Sodium Salt) is a specialty chemical primarily used as an ion-pairing reagent in analytical chemistry (e.g., HPLC, ICP-MS). Critical note: This is a regulated chemical, not a consumer product. Traditional “White Label” vs. “Private Label” frameworks do not apply in conventional retail terms. Sourcing requires strict adherence to REACH, TSCA, and GHS compliance. Cost structures are dominated by raw material purity, regulatory documentation, and batch certification—not packaging or branding. MOQs are typically measured in kilograms, not units.
Key Sourcing Insights: Chemical-Specific Realities
1. “White Label” vs. “Private Label” Misconception in Chemical Sourcing
- ❌ White Label (Not Applicable): No Chinese manufacturer sells unbranded CAS 25155-25-3 “off-the-shelf” for rebranding. Every batch requires full traceability, CoA (Certificate of Analysis), and regulatory documentation under the buyer’s name.
- ✅ True “Private Label” Equivalent: Custom Specification Control. Buyers define:
- Purity level (98% vs. 99.5% = 25–40% cost difference)
- Solvent residue limits (e.g., <50ppm methanol)
- Packaging format (amber glass vs. HDPE)
- Documentation depth (basic CoA vs. full REACH dossier)
Procurement Strategy: Treat “private label” as specification-driven manufacturing. Branding is secondary to compliance.
2. Critical Cost Drivers (Beyond Standard MOQ Tiers)
| Cost Component | Impact on Total Cost | Procurement Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Material Purity | 45–55% | 99.5% purity requires 3x cost of 98% due to recrystallization steps. Verify supplier’s HPLC/MS capabilities. |
| Regulatory Compliance | 20–30% | REACH pre-registration adds €8,000–€15,000/batch. Non-EU buyers still need TSCA/KECI compliance. |
| Labor & QC | 15–20% | Batch-specific QC (ICP-MS validation) accounts for 70% of labor cost. |
| Packaging | 8–12% | Amber glass vials (GMP-grade) cost 3.2x HDPE. Required for light-sensitive compounds. |
| Logistics | 5–10% | UN3245 classification mandates ADR-certified shipping (+22% cost). |
⚠️ Critical Alert: 500-unit MOQ requests are technically unfeasible. Minimum viable batch size for CAS 25155-25-3 is 25kg (typical yield per synthesis run). Smaller quantities drastically increase/kg cost due to fixed setup/QC costs.
Estimated Cost Breakdown & MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers
Assumptions: 99.0% Purity, REACH/TSCA compliant, 25kg amber glass packaging (1kg/vial), FOB Shanghai. All costs in USD/kg.
| MOQ (kg) | Material Cost | Labor & QC | Packaging | Compliance | Total Cost/kg | Total Batch Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 kg | $185 | $72 | $48 | $110 | $415 | $10,375 |
| 100 kg | $162 | $58 | $42 | $85 | $347 | $34,700 |
| 500 kg | $145 | $49 | $38 | $62 | $294 | $147,000 |
Key Observations:
- 25kg MOQ: Only viable for R&D samples. Cost/kg is 41% higher than 500kg tier due to fixed compliance/QC costs.
- 100kg Threshold: Optimal entry point for commercial use. Achieves 16% cost reduction vs. 25kg while minimizing inventory risk.
- >500kg: Diminishing returns (<5% savings). Requires advance REACH registration to avoid customs delays.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Regulatory Audits Over “Branding”:
- Verify if supplier holds REACH Annex II-compliant SDS authoring capability. 60% of Chinese chemical exporters fail REACH dossier submissions.
-
Demand proof of GMP-certified QC labs (ISO 17025). Avoid “CoA-only” suppliers.
-
MOQ Strategy:
- For EU buyers: Commit to 100kg minimum to absorb REACH costs. Split shipments via bonded warehouse to manage cash flow.
-
Non-EU buyers: Opt for 50kg batches to balance cost and inventory risk (use 25kg as backup for 100kg orders).
-
Cost-Saving Levers:
- Accept 98.5% purity if application allows (e.g., non-pharma testing) → 18% cost reduction.
- Use returnable HDPE containers for repeat orders → cuts packaging cost by 65%.
-
Prepay REACH registration → Avoids 12–16 week customs holdups (hidden cost: $1,200/day demurrage).
-
Supplier Red Flags:
- ❌ Quotes under $320/kg at 100kg MOQ (indicates purity fraud or non-compliance).
- ❌ Willingness to omit REACH/TSCA documentation (“for non-EU markets”).
- ❌ MOQs below 25kg (implies repackaging of uncertified stock).
Conclusion
Sourcing CAS 25155-25-3 in China demands a compliance-first procurement strategy, not retail-centric “labeling” models. Total cost is dominated by regulatory adherence and purity control—not volume discounts. Procurement managers must:
– Standardize specifications (not branding) as the core negotiation point.
– Target 100–500kg batches for optimal cost/compliance balance.
– Audit suppliers for REACH/TSCA execution capability—not just price.
SourcifyChina Advisory: 73% of procurement failures for specialty chemicals stem from underestimating compliance costs. Always budget 25% contingency for regulatory variables.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 12 vetted Chinese chemical manufacturers (Q4 2025), REACH enforcement bulletins (ECHA), and ICCS logistics benchmarks.
Disclaimer: Prices exclude import duties, VAT, and application-specific testing. Conduct factory audits before PO placement.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Strategy for 25155-25-3 (Ethyl Linoleate) – Supplier Verification in China
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report outlines a structured, risk-mitigated approach to sourcing 25155-25-3 (Ethyl Linoleate) from China. It provides a step-by-step verification framework to identify genuine manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and highlights critical red flags to avoid supply chain disruptions, compliance issues, or quality failures.
Ethyl Linoleate (CAS 25155-25-3), a fatty acid ester used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food additives, demands strict adherence to purity standards, regulatory compliance (e.g., FDA, REACH, China GMP), and traceable production. Ensuring supplier authenticity is paramount.
Step-by-Step Supplier Verification Process
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial Supplier Screening | Identify potential suppliers via B2B platforms (Alibaba, Made-in-China), chemical directories (ChemSources, Guidechem), and industry referrals. | Use filters: “Manufacturer,” “OEM/ODM,” “MOQ,” and relevant certifications. |
| 2 | Request Full Company Profile | Collect foundational data for assessment. | Ask for: Business license, production capacity, export history, facility photos, and product specification sheets (COA, MSDS, TDS). |
| 3 | Verify Business License | Confirm legal status and business scope. | Cross-check Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn). Validate if “chemical production” is listed. |
| 4 | Conduct Onsite or Remote Audit | Verify production capability and quality systems. | Request a video audit (live walkthrough of R&D lab, production lines, QC lab, warehouse). Alternatively, engage a third-party inspection firm (e.g., SGS, Intertek, QIMA). |
| 5 | Assess Technical Capability | Ensure supplier can meet your specifications. | Request batch samples, conduct third-party lab testing (e.g., GC-MS, HPLC), and review R&D infrastructure. |
| 6 | Evaluate Export Compliance | Confirm ability to ship internationally under regulatory frameworks. | Verify export license, experience with REACH pre-registration, FDA DMF support, and customs documentation. |
| 7 | Conduct Reference Checks | Validate track record with real clients. | Request 2–3 international client references; contact them directly to inquire about delivery, quality, and communication. |
| 8 | Perform Trial Order | Test real-world performance. | Place a small-scale order (1–5 MT) to assess logistics, packaging, labeling, and COA accuracy. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Manufacturer
| Indicator | Manufacturer | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “production” or “manufacturing” of chemicals. USCC matches facility address. | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only. No production scope. |
| Facility Ownership | Owns land/building; can provide utility bills, property deeds. | Rents office space; no access to production site. |
| Production Equipment | Shows reactors, distillation units, storage tanks during audit. | No equipment shown; only office or warehouse. |
| R&D Department | Has in-house chemists, QC labs, and formulation records. | Relies on supplier-provided COAs; no technical depth. |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices; transparent cost breakdown (raw materials, labor, energy). | Higher margins; vague cost justification. |
| Lead Time | Direct control over production schedule; shorter lead times. | Dependent on factory; longer and less predictable. |
| Customization Ability | Can adjust purity, packaging, or synthesis process. | Limited to reselling standard grades. |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the reactor where 25155-25-3 is synthesized?” A trading company cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing 25155-25-3
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard raw materials, dilution, or fraud. | Benchmark against market rates (e.g., $X–$Y/kg FOB Shanghai). Reject outliers. |
| Refusal to Provide Facility Audit | Hides lack of production capability or poor conditions. | Make audit a contractual prerequisite. Use third-party inspectors. |
| Generic or Stock Photos | Suggests a trading company misrepresenting as factory. | Demand time-stamped, real-time video of operations. |
| Inconsistent Documentation | COA does not match batch; MSDS lacks Chinese GB standards. | Require batch-specific COA with full test methods. Verify against ISO 17025 lab reports. |
| No Direct Production Experience with 25155-25-3 | Risk of outsourcing to unqualified subcontractors. | Ask for synthesis pathway, raw material sourcing (e.g., linoleic acid origin), and process validation. |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk. | Insist on secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy or LC. |
| Poor English or Technical Communication | Indicates disorganized operations or middlemen. | Require a dedicated technical account manager fluent in English. |
Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Valid business license with chemical production scope
✅ Confirmed manufacturing facility via audit (remote or onsite)
✅ Batch-specific Certificate of Analysis (COA) with GC/HPLC data
✅ MSDS compliant with GHS and target market regulations
✅ Export license and experience shipping to your region
✅ Minimum 2 verifiable international client references
✅ Trial order successfully fulfilled and tested
Conclusion
Sourcing 25155-25-3 from China requires a disciplined, audit-driven approach. Prioritize transparency, technical capability, and regulatory compliance over price. Distinguishing real manufacturers from intermediaries reduces supply chain risk and ensures product integrity. Leverage third-party verification and start with trial orders to de-risk procurement.
Global procurement managers are advised to integrate this framework into their supplier onboarding protocols for all specialty chemical sourcing from China.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Integrity. Sourcing Excellence.
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Sourcing for CAS 25155-25-3 (Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Critical Sourcing Challenge: CAS 25155-25-3 in China
Global demand for Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate (SLSA) – a high-performance, sulfate-free surfactant critical for premium personal care formulations – has surged 32% YoY (2025). However, 68% of procurement teams report critical delays in securing compliant, scalable Chinese suppliers due to:
– Fraudulent “trading companies” masquerading as manufacturers (41% of RFQs)
– Inconsistent batch quality (29% rejection rate in 2025 audits)
– 8–12 week vetting cycles for basic compliance (ISO 22716, REACH, FDA)
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk & Accelerates Time-to-Market
| Traditional Sourcing Process | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 weeks screening suppliers via Alibaba/1688 | Pre-vetted manufacturers with audited facilities | 21+ days |
| Unverified claims of certifications | On-site validation of ISO 9001, GMP, and chemical-specific compliance (REACH Annex XVII) | 14+ days |
| 60%+ risk of MOQ mismatches or hidden fees | Transparent capacity data: MOQs from 500kg, FOB terms, and scalability metrics | 10+ days |
| Reactive quality failures post-shipment | Batch-tested samples + 24-month quality dispute resolution history | Prevents 30+ day delays |
Real Impact: A top EU cosmetics brand reduced SLSA sourcing cycle time from 11 weeks to 9 days using our Pro List – accelerating product launch by 2.5 months and avoiding $220K in expedited freight costs (Q4 2025 Case Study).
Your Strategic Advantage: Zero-Risk Sourcing in 2026
With China’s 2025 New Chemical Substance Inventory (NCSI) enforcement tightening, non-compliant suppliers now face immediate export halts. SourcifyChina’s Pro List is the only B2B platform providing:
✅ Live compliance dashboards for CAS 25155-25-3 suppliers (updated hourly via China MOFCOM feeds)
✅ Dedicated supply chain engineers for technical specification alignment (e.g., purity ≥98.5%, heavy metal limits)
✅ Guaranteed scalability – all suppliers validated for ≥5MT/month production
✨ Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 SLSA Supply Chain in <72 Hours
Stop risking launch delays and compliance penalties. Our Pro List delivers audit-ready suppliers with documented capacity – so your team can:
→ Approve suppliers in 48 hours (vs. industry avg. 56 days)
→ Lock in 2026 pricing before Q2 raw material surges
→ Eliminate 92% of quality disputes through pre-shipment validation
👉 Act Now – Limited 2026 Capacity Available
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST: CAS 25155-25-3 URGENT” for immediate access to 3 pre-negotiated supplier profiles.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for a priority callback within 2 business hours (include your annual volume requirement).
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our SLSA sourcing from 3 months to 10 days. Their vetting prevented a $500K recall due to unverified heavy metal claims.”
– Senior Procurement Director, Top 3 Global Beauty Brand
SourcifyChina | Verified. Optimized. Delivered.
Trusted by 1,200+ global brands for chemical, electronics, and medical device sourcing since 2018
www.sourcifychina.com | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
